Pediatric ulcerative colitis: three- versus two-stage colectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis

The Role of Diversion During Ileal Pouch Anal Anastomosis (IPAA) Creation in Pediatric Ulcerative Colitis

INTRODUCTION

In pediatric ulcerative colitis (UC), surgery is often postponed until disease is life-threatening or refractory to immune suppression. In these settings, diverting ileostomy (DI) is theorized to have a protective effect on the new anastomosis. However, analyses have been performed only in single-institution series and the true impact of performing DI at the time of IPAA on postoperative outcomes is unclear.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study using claims data from the International Business Machines (IBM) MarketScan® database. Patients were sorted to the DI group if they carried a CPT code for ostomy closure within 6 months of index procedure. We examined demographics, preoperative risk factors, and performed regression analysis to compare 30-day postoperative outcomes between groups.

RESULTS

We identified 317 patients ≤18yo that underwent IPAA procedure and met inclusion criteria from 2000 to 2019. Of these, 238 patients were assigned to the IPAA + DI cohort and 79 patients were assigned to the IPAA cohort. Adverse outcomes were comparable between cohorts. Surgical site infection (SSI) rates between IPAA and IPAA + DI were 10.1 vs. 11.3% (p = 0.67). Rates of intra-abdominal drainage procedures were 3.8 vs. 2.1% (p = 0.39). The rates of 30-day readmissions were 16.5 vs. 19.3% (p = 0.39). Creation of a DI was not associated with higher odds of 30-day readmission (OR = 1.4, p = 0.31).

CONCLUSION

Creating a DI necessitates an additional surgery for closure and is not associated with decreased adverse outcomes. There is still a role for multicenter studies to define which patient populations may benefit from diversion.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Retrospective comparative study.

TYPE OF STUDY

Level III.

Does the timing of pouch creation in 2-stage operations for pediatric patients with ulcerative colitis matter?

INTRODUCTION

Children with fulminant ulcerative colitis(UC) traditionally undergo 2-stage operations: restorative-proctocolectomy(RP/IPAA) and ileostomy followed by ostomy closure. In the biologic era, surgeons have modified their strategy: initial subtotal-colectomy/diversion, followed by RP/IPAA without diversion. Yet, evidence on efficacy and functional outcomes with the "modified 2-stage" approach is limited in children. We sought to compare the timing of pouch creation in 2-stage operations to determine outcomes.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study of children with UC undergoing either a traditional 2-stage RP/IPAA or modified 2-stage RP/IPAA between 2010 and 2019. Complications (leak, stricture, wound-infection) were recorded at 90-days and 1 year from 2nd operation.

RESULTS

N = 57 (Traditional n = 40, Modified n = 17). Median time to surgery from consultation was shorter in the modified-group (7 vs.25 days, p = 0.01). Preoperatively, the modified-group had lower albumin(p = 0.01), higher CRP(p = 0.01), and more frequently took biologics within 90-daysp=0.001). After re-establishing intestinal continuity, stricture requiring dilation was higher in the traditional-group (59% vs.18%, p = 0.008). No difference in pouch leak (p = 0.38), bowel obstruction(p = 0.35), loperamide dose(p = 0.21), or incontinence(p = 0.38) was observed.

CONCLUSION

Delaying pouch creation to the second operation without a protective ileostomy as a modified 2-stage is safe in a sicker and more acute pediatric population.