Risk factors influencing ascending testis after laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure for pediatric inguinal hernia and hydrocele

Single-port laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal internal ring closure for paediatric inguinal hernia using a needle grasper

BACKGROUND

Single-site laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure has been widely used for the repair of paediatric inguinal hernia. In this study, we aimed to introduce the usage of a needle grasper in single-port laparoscopic herniorrhaphy in children.

METHODS

In our study, 447 children with inguinal hernia underwent single-port laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure between October 2018 and October 2021 in Shenzhen Children' hospital were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

Among 447 patients, there were 396 males and 51 females with a mean age of 2.24 ± 0.36 years. A contralateral patent processus vaginalis was present in 165 unilateral hernia patients. All patients underwent laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure successfully without converting to open operation. The mean operating time in unilateral and bilateral hernia patients were 10.23 ± 2.25 mine and 14.54 ± 2.81 mine respectively. One patient had subcutaneous emphysema, two male patients had inguinal hernia recurrence and none had complications such as hydrocele and testicular atrophy. Additional 0.3 cm port was done in 4 cases. The mean follow-up time was 22.36 ± 4.56 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Single-port laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure of paediatric inguinal hernia using a needle grasper is a feasible and safe procedure. It has the advantages of fewer skin surgical incisions, short operating time, low complication and low recurrence rate.

Comparison of surgical outcomes between laparoscopic percutaneous extracorporeal closure (LPEC) and open repair for pediatric inguinal hernia by propensity score methods and log-rank test analysis

BACKGROUND

Despite a number of studies comparing laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (LH) and open herniorrhaphy (OH), the putative advantage of LH remains controversial due to a paucity of firm evidence. We hypothesized that LH has both advantages and disadvantages compared to OH and sought to clarify them by comprehensively analyzing the retrospective data using the combination of multiple statistical methods.

METHODS

Operative data for inguinal hernia during the period from February 1999 to December 2019 were examined. The patients were assigned into two groups according to the surgical procedure: laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure (LPEC, n = 2410) and OH (n = 2038). Operative and anesthesia times and incidence of postoperative complications were evaluated using the propensity score methods and log-rank test.

RESULTS

In comparison with OH, operative time of LPEC was longer for unilateral repair (21.59 ± 8.1 min vs 18.01 ± 8.0 min; p < 0.001) and shorter for bilateral repairs (28.55 ± 10.1 min vs 33.23 ± 11.7 min; p < 0.001), while anesthesia times were longer for both unilateral repair (57.67 ± 10.1 min vs 40.62 ± 11.9 min; p < 0.001) and bilateral repairs (65.95 ± 12.5 min vs 56.35 ± 15.1 min; p < 0.001). LPEC significantly reduced the risk of metachronous contralateral hernia (MCLH) (0.52% vs 9.29%; p < 0.001), but the recurrence rate was higher (0.21% vs 0.04%; p = 0.002) than OH. Orchiectomy due to testicular atrophy or torsion was required in 3 cases of OH (0.19%), whereas it was not seen in LPEC.

CONCLUSIONS

LPEC had a less risk of MCLH and testicular complications but was associated with a higher recurrence rate and longer anesthesia time. Propensity scoring techniques can enhance the robustness of retrospective comparisons between groups over several years of data collection, which is frequently required in pediatric surgery studies.