Gynecological and psycho-sexual aspects of women with history of anorectal malformations

Adult urological outcomes for patients with anorectal malformation

Anorectal malformations (ARM) are rare congenital anomalies characterized by a spectrum of defects resulting in the absence of a normal anal opening with or without fistula. Urogenital involvement is common, and the fistulous tract may terminate in the genitourinary system in males or within gynecological structures in females. Surgical reconstruction occurs early in life and survival of these patients to adulthood is the norm. There has, therefore, been increased focus on their long-term outcomes to better anticipate and treat the sequelae that may impact their health and well-being as this population ages. For urologists, urinary health, sexual function, and fertility outcomes are of particular interest among this population. This article aims to provide a review of urological, sexual, and fertility outcomes for individuals born with ARM with a focus on key issues that may occur later in life to ensure adequate counseling, screening, and treatment.

Anatomical Gynecological Anomalies in Girls Born with Anorectal Malformations: A Retrospective Cohort Study of 128 Patients

STUDY OBJECTIVE

In girls born with an anorectal malformation (ARM), anatomical gynecological anomalies (GA) may be present and might need treatment. Therefore, the aim of this study was to provide an overview of GA in girls born with ARM in our cohort. Additionally, diagnostic timing and methods for GA were assessed.

METHODS

A retrospective mono-center study was performed from January 2000 to December 2022. All patients assigned female at birth were eligible for inclusion. GA were classified according to ESHRE/ESGE classification. Outcomes were the number of girls with GA with subsequent screening methods, factors associated with GA, and GA requiring treatment. Uni- and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify the association between baseline characteristics and the presence of GA.

RESULTS

In total, 128 girls were included, of whom 30 (24.1%) had additional GA, with vaginal anomalies being present most often (n = 17). Fifty-six patients (43.8%) underwent full screening, and this number improved over time (37.7% before 2018 vs 72.7% after 2018; P = .003). Thirteen of 30 patients (43.3%) required surgical treatment for their GA, without the occurrence of postoperative complications.

CONCLUSION

Additional GA were present in almost a quarter of the girls born with an ARM, with vaginal anomalies most often identified. Despite GA being most often found in patients with cloacal malformations, these anomalies were also identified in patients with other ARM types. Surgical treatment was required in almost half of the girls with GA. Therefore, this study emphasizes the importance of screening for GA in patients with an ARM, regardless of the ARM type.

Reproductive and Family Building Considerations for Female Patients with Anorectal And Urogenital Malformations

BACKGROUND

Little is known about fertility and pregnancy outcomes in patients with anorectal malformations (ARM), particularly those with long common channel cloaca and cloacal exstrophy who may have impaired fertility. The purpose of this study is to describe pregnancy and offspring data from a cohort of patients with ARM.

METHODS

A retrospective review of female patients with ARM from our database, which includes patients operated on since 1980, was performed as well as a review of the literature. Demographic, operative, and self-reported fertility, obstetric, and offspring data were collected.

RESULTS

There were 37 females identified in our database who reported any pregnancy or having children. There were 59 pregnancies, 48 (81.3%) of which resulted in live birth. The most common mode of delivery was cesarean delivery. There were five patients with long channel cloaca (>3 cm) and one with cloacal exstrophy that reported 11 total pregnancies, eight of which resulted in live birth. Four cloaca patients in which the native vagina was pulled through were able to conceive spontaneously. Three patients with cloacal anomalies required in vitro fertilization to conceive; one was unsuccessful. No patients who underwent bowel partial vaginal replacement became pregnant. Women with ARM face many unique challenges in assisted reproduction, pregnancy, and delivery owing to their anatomy and associated anomalies.

CONCLUSIONS

Women with recto-perineal, recto-vestibular, and cloacas in which the native vagina was pulled through are capable of spontaneous pregnancy. Assisted reproduction, however, may be needed those with more complex anomalies and surgical repairs.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Pelvic exams and cervical cancer screening in patients with anorectal malformations

PURPOSE

Congenital or acquired anatomic differences of the genital tract in patients with anorectal malformations (ARM) may make pelvic exams more challenging. The purpose of this study was to describe office-based pelvic exams and cervical cancer screening among female patients with a history of ARM.

METHODS

This was an IRB approved, cross-sectional study of female patients with ARM who completed our Reproductive Health Surveys from November 2021 to March 2022.

RESULTS

Fifty-four patients with ARM were included in the study. Ages ranged from 22 to 80 years (mean age 34.5 years). Thirty-four patients had a cloaca, 16 had an ARM other than cloaca, and four patients had a complex malformation. Most patients (79.6%) reported having had a pelvic exam in the office. On a scale of 0-100, the mean pain score with pelvic exam was 42. Pain scores were higher for patients with complex malformations and neo-vagina. Forty-three participants (79.6%) had cervical cancer screening. Fifteen participants (28%) had a didelphys uterus but only two patients specified that both cervices were screened for cervical cancer.

CONCLUSION

The majority of female patients with ARM had cervical cancer screening in clinic, those with complex malformations reported greater discomfort. Providers should be aware of barriers to performing pelvic exams in patients with ARM as well as the need to screen both cervices in didelphys uterus.