Single-stage restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis in pediatric patients: a safe alternative

Role of ileal diversion in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease

Surgical intervention is often indicated in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) for medically refractory disease or complications of severe disease. Specifically, surgical intervention via ileal diversion allows for fecal flow to be redirected away from diseased distal bowel and through an ileostomy. It is utilized in patients who have medically refractory colitis, severe perianal disease, or irreversible bowel damage. In patients with ulcerative colitis, it is primarily performed during a restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis to protect the high-risk anastomoses. In the setting of Crohn's disease, ileal diversion reduces the exposure of diseased distal intestine to pro-inflammatory stool. During perioperative planning, it is crucial for the gastroenterologist to partner early with a multidisciplinary team including surgeons, nutritionists, wound ostomy care nurses, psychologists, and social workers. Patients should be assessed for malnutrition and should be optimized nutritionally with enteral or parenteral nutrition. As they are associated with increased risk of postoperative complications, corticosteroids should be significantly reduced or completely discontinued preoperatively. Though ileal diversion may reduce the complications associated with anastomosis, serious postoperative complications can include diversion colitis and high-output fistulae. This review aims to provide an overview of the role of ileal diversion in the treatment of pediatric IBD to pediatric gastroenterologists to inform their medical decision-making and discussions with patients and families.

Surgery for ulcerative colitis

Ulcerative colitis (UC) has a more severe presentation and rapid progression in pediatric patients, resulting in a greater need for surgical intervention compared to adults. Though medical management of UC has advanced with new biologic therapies, surgery continues to play an important role when disease progresses in the form of worsened or persistent symptoms, hemodynamic instability, or sepsis. The goals of surgical management are to restore intestinal continuity with a functional pouch when possible. While the literature has been growing regarding studies of pediatric patients with UC, high level of evidence studies are limited and most recommendations are based on adult studies. Similar to adults, pediatric patients who have ileal pouches created require surveillance for recurrent disease and cancer surveillance. Unique issues for pediatric patients include monitoring of growth and appropriate transition to adult care after adolescence. This review includes indications for surgical management, overview of staged surgical approaches, and the technical details of the three-stage approach.

The Role of Diversion During Ileal Pouch Anal Anastomosis (IPAA) Creation in Pediatric Ulcerative Colitis

INTRODUCTION

In pediatric ulcerative colitis (UC), surgery is often postponed until disease is life-threatening or refractory to immune suppression. In these settings, diverting ileostomy (DI) is theorized to have a protective effect on the new anastomosis. However, analyses have been performed only in single-institution series and the true impact of performing DI at the time of IPAA on postoperative outcomes is unclear.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study using claims data from the International Business Machines (IBM) MarketScan® database. Patients were sorted to the DI group if they carried a CPT code for ostomy closure within 6 months of index procedure. We examined demographics, preoperative risk factors, and performed regression analysis to compare 30-day postoperative outcomes between groups.

RESULTS

We identified 317 patients ≤18yo that underwent IPAA procedure and met inclusion criteria from 2000 to 2019. Of these, 238 patients were assigned to the IPAA + DI cohort and 79 patients were assigned to the IPAA cohort. Adverse outcomes were comparable between cohorts. Surgical site infection (SSI) rates between IPAA and IPAA + DI were 10.1 vs. 11.3% (p = 0.67). Rates of intra-abdominal drainage procedures were 3.8 vs. 2.1% (p = 0.39). The rates of 30-day readmissions were 16.5 vs. 19.3% (p = 0.39). Creation of a DI was not associated with higher odds of 30-day readmission (OR = 1.4, p = 0.31).

CONCLUSION

Creating a DI necessitates an additional surgery for closure and is not associated with decreased adverse outcomes. There is still a role for multicenter studies to define which patient populations may benefit from diversion.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Retrospective comparative study.

TYPE OF STUDY

Level III.