Failed preoperative vacuum bell therapy does not affect outcomes following minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum

Non-surgical approaches to the management of chest wall deformities

Chest wall deformities in children encompass a broad spectrum of disorders but pectus excavatum and carinatum are by far the most common. Treatment varies substantially by center, and depends on patient symptoms, severity of disease, and surgeon preference. Historically, surgical approaches were the mainstay of treatment for these disease processes but new advances in non-surgical approaches have demonstrated reasonable results in select patients. These non-surgical approaches include vacuum bell therapy, autologous fat grafting and hyaluronic acid injections for pectus excavatum, and orthotic brace therapy for pectus carinatum. There is debate with regards to optimal patient selection for these non-surgical approaches, as well as other barriers including reimbursement issues. This paper will review the current non-surgical approaches to chest wall deformities available, including optimal patient selection, treatment protocols, indications, contraindications, and outcomes.

Determinants of success associated with vacuum bell treatment of pectus excavatum

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

We explored determinants of success in a large cohort of patients with pectus excavatum submitted to vacuum bell treatment and compared groups with satisfactory versus unsatisfactory outcomes.

METHODS

Retrospective case-control study in a single center between May 2013 and January 2020, including patients with pectus excavatum treated with vacuum bell. We classified patients according to their status at closure of data registry (surveillance; withdrawal; complete correction; failure) and according to Obermeyer's classification of degrees of pectus excavatum correction. Determinants of success were calculated using receiver operating characteristic curves.

RESULTS

Overall, 186 patients were included. Complete correction was achieved by 17% of the cases, while 45% remained under surveillance. Failure rates were low (n = 9; 5%), whereas withdrawal rates were 34%. Based on Obermeyer's classification of degree of excavation correction, 35% had excellent/good, 25% fair, and 40% poor/worse results. When comparing patients with good/excellent results with those with unsatisfactory results, patients with good/excellent results had a longer treatment duration [19.0 (13.0; 28) months vs. 13.0 (6.5; 22.5) months, p<0.0001], and lower initial pectus depth [1.6 (1.2; 2.0) cm, vs. 2.0 (1.5; 2.6) cm, p = 0.001]. Using ROC curves, the best determinants of success were an initial pectus depth ≤ 1.8 cm and a length of treatment > 12 months.

CONCLUSION

One-third of patients in treatment with a vacuum bell achieved excellent or good outcomes in our cohort. Determinants of success included an initial pectus depth of 1.8 cm or less and a minimum length of treatment of 12 months.

TYPE OF STUDY

retrospective comparative study LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.