Local recurrence after curative resection in patients with colon and rectal cancers

Effectiveness and safety of intraoperative intraperitoneal 5-Fu drug implantation in patients with colorectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study

PURPOSE

The purpose of this clinical study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intraoperative chemotherapy (IOC) with intraoperative intraperitoneal implantation of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients.

METHODS

In this study, 165 patients who underwent colorectal radical surgery were selected, of whom 111 in the experimental group received surgical treatment with an intraperitoneal 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) implantation. Fifty-four patients who did not undergo intraperitoneal implantation of 5-FU were matched to compare the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) with the former.

RESULTS

We also studied the differences in the changes of different biochemical indicators between the two groups before and after surgery, and there were significant differences in leukocytes, neutrophils, and lymphocytes before and after (P < 0.05), while for sodium ions, potassium ions, platelets, alanine transaminase, aspartate transaminase, creatinine, urea, and albumin, there were no significant differences. This may be related to the intraperitoneal chemotherapy implant entering the blood circulation. For 5-year OS, there were 85/111 (76.58%) in the 5-FU group (P = 0.013) and 35/54 (64.81%) in the control group; for 5-year PFS, there were 84/111 (75.68%) in the 5-FU group and 29/54 (53.70%) in the control group (P = 0.02). All the experimental groups were better than the control group with a significant difference in the experimental results.

CONCLUSION

For CRC surgery patients, intraperitoneal implantation of slow-release 5-FU drugs, which is a safe and simple procedure, can improve the prognosis of the patients.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

No clinical trials were performed in the study.

Colon Cancer Survivorship in Patients Who Have Received Adjuvant Chemotherapy

The number of colon cancer survivors in the United States is increasing due to improved early detection, better treatments that extend survival, and the growing aging population who are at high risk for cancer. Following initial active treatment, colon cancer survivors experience a wide range of long-term physical, psychological, and socio-economic effects that impact their overall well-being. Healthcare providers caring for survivors need to prioritize not only monitoring for cancer recurrence but also optimizing their overall health through addressing these long-term effects; managing their comorbidities; promoting healthy behaviors (like exercise, nutrition, and weight loss); and screening for a second primary cancer depending on their risk. Personalized survivorship care plans should be formulated clearly outlining the roles of various healthcare providers involved in their care. Our review article focuses on these various aspects of colon cancer survivorship, including surveillance for cancer recurrence specific to those who received adjuvant chemotherapy with curative intent.

Locoregionally Recurrent Colon Cancer: How Far Have We Come? A Population-Based, Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

The reported outcomes of locoregionally recurrent colon cancer (LRCC) are poor, but the literature about LRCC is scarce and aged. Recent population-based studies to provide current insight into LRCC are warranted. This study aimed to provide an overview of the incidence, risk factors, treatment, and overall survival (OS) of patients with LRCC after curative resection of stage I-III primary colon cancer.

METHODS

Data on disease recurrence were collected for all patients with a diagnosis of non-metastasized primary colon cancer in the Netherlands during the first 6 months of 2015. Patients who underwent surgical resection (N = 3544) were included in this study. The 3-year cumulative incidence, risk factors, treatment, and OS for patients with LRCC were determined.

RESULTS

The 3-year cumulative incidence of LRCC was 3.8%. Synchronous distant metastases (LRCC-M1) were diagnosed in 62.7% of the patients. The risk factors for LRCC were age of 70 years or older, pT4, pN1-2, and R1-2. Adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with a decreased risk of LRCC for high-risk stage II and stage III patients [hazard ratio (HR), 0.47; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.31-0.93]. The median OS for the patients with LRCC was 13.1 months (95% CI 9.1-18.3 months). Curative-intent treatment was given to 22.4% of the LRCC patients, and the subsequent 3 years OS was 71% (95% CI 58-87%). The patients treated with palliative treatment and best supportive care showed 3-year OS rates of 15% (95% CI 7.0-31%) and 3.7% (95% CI 1.0-14%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The cumulative incidence of LRCC was low, and adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with a decreased risk for LRCC among targeted patients. Curative-intent treatment was given to nearly 1 in 4 LRCC patients, and the OS for this group was high.

Risk factors for the recurrence of stage II perforated colorectal cancer: A retrospective observational study

BACKGROUND

Patients with perforated colorectal cancer (PCRC) experience higher recurrence rates than those with non-perforated tissue. We identified the promoting factors of stage II PCRC recurrence after R0 surgery.

METHOD

This retrospective observational study included patients treated for colorectal cancer at a single facility between 2007 and 2016, and compared the clinicopathological features of patients with perforating versus non-perforating stage II tumors who underwent R0 resection, while focusing on recurrences.

RESULTS

Thirty-two and 112 patients (predominantly men) with perforating and non-perforating tumors, respectively, were included. The perforated group had significantly higher proportions of T4 tumors than the non-perforated group (44% vs. 15%). The perforated group had significantly lower numbers of resected lymph nodes than the non-perforated group (6 vs. 17). Seven of 17 patients with follow-up data in the perforated group experienced recurrence (41%), versus 19 of 104 in the non-perforated group (18%). In the non-perforated group, male sex (89% vs. 60%, p = 0.030), T4 stage (32% vs. 9%, p = 0.029), and fewer resected lymph nodes (12.5 vs. 18.6, p = 0.003) were significantly associated with recurrence; however, no such influences on recurrence were observed in the perforated group. The recurrence sites in the perforated group were mostly local (6 patients, 86%). Conversely, recurrences in the non-perforated group were mostly distant; 8 of 19 patients (42%) had liver metastasis and 1 (5%) had lung metastasis.

CONCLUSION

Patients with stage II PCRC experienced higher recurrence rates regardless of clinicopathological features and had high local recurrence rates indicating possible local tumor cell dispersal owing to perforation.

Prognostic Factors and Treatment of Recurrence after Local Excision of Rectal Cancer

PURPOSE

Indications for local excision in patients with rectal cancer remain controversial. We reviewed factors affecting survival rate and treatment effectiveness in cancer recurrence after local excision among patients with rectal cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 831 patients was enrolled. Of these, 391 patients were diagnosed with primary rectal cancer and underwent local excision. A retrospective observational study was performed on patients who underwent full-thickness local excision for rectal cancer.

RESULTS

The median duration of follow-up was 61 months. The overall recurrence rate was 11.5%. The rate of local recurrence was 5.1%. Five-year overall survival rate among recurrent patients was 66.8%; the rate among patients who underwent salvage operation due to recurrence was 84.7%, compared with 44.2% among patients treated with non-operative management (p<0.001). Multivariate analysis of disease-free survival identified distance from the anal verge (p=0.038) and histologic grade (p=0.047) as factors predicting poor prognosis. Multivariate analysis of overall survival showed that age (p<0.001), serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels (p=0.001), and histologic grade (p=0.013) also affected poor prognosis. In subgroup analysis of patients with recurrence, 25 patients underwent reoperation, while 20 patients did not. For 5-year overall survival rate, there was a significant difference between 84.7% of the reoperation group and 44.2% of the non-operation group (p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

The risk factors affecting overall survival rate after local excision were age 65 years or older, preoperative CEA level 5 or higher, and high histologic grade. In cases of recurrence after local excision of rectal cancer, salvage operation might improve overall survival.

A novel fluorescent c-met targeted imaging agent for intra-operative colonic tumour mapping: Translation from the laboratory into a clinical trial

BACKGROUND

The c-Met protein is overexpressed in many gastrointestinal cancers. We explored EMI-137, a novel c-Met targeting fluorescent probe, for application in fluorescence-guided colon surgery, in HT-29 colorectal cancer (CRC) cell line and an in vivo murine model.

METHODS

HT-29 SiRNA transfection confirmed specificity of EMI-137 for c-Met. A HT-29 CRC xenograft model was developed in BALB/c mice, EMI-137 was injected and biodistribution analysed through in vivo fluorescent imaging. Nine patients, received a single intravenous EMI-137 bolus (0.13 mg/kg), 1-3 h before laparoscopic-assisted colon cancer surgery (NCT03360461). Tumour and LN fluorescence was assessed intraoperatively and correlated with c-Met expression in eight samples by immunohistochemistry.

FINDINGS

c-Met expression HT-29 cells was silenced and imaged with EMI-137. Strong EMI-137 uptake in tumour xenografts was observed up to 6 h post-administration. At clinical trial, no serious adverse events related to EMI-137 were reported. Marked background fluorescence was observed in all participants, 4/9 showed increased tumour fluorescence over background; 5/9 had histological LN metastases; no fluorescent LN were detected intraoperatively. All primary tumours (8/8) and malignant LN (15/15) exhibited high c-Met protein expression.

INTERPRETATION

EMI-137, binds specifically to the human c-Met protein, is safe, and with further refinement, shows potential for application in fluorescence-guided surgery.

Complete Mesocolic Excision and D3 Lymphadenectomy versus Conventional Colectomy for Colon Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUNDS

Previous systematic reviews suggest that the implementation of 'complete mesocolon excision' (CME) for colon tumors entails better specimen quality but with limited long-term outcomes. We performed a meta-analysis to compare the pathological, perioperative, and oncological results of CME with conventional surgery (CS) in primary colon cancer.

METHODS

Embase, MEDLINE and CENTRAL databases were searched using Medical Subject Headings for CME and D3 lymphadenectomy. The systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.

RESULTS

A total of 18,989 patients from 27 studies were included. Postoperative complications were higher in the CME group (relative risk [RR] 1.13, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-1.22, I² = 0%), while no differences were observed in terms of anastomotic leak (I² = 0%) or perioperative mortality (I² = 49%). CME was associated with a higher number of lymph nodes harvested (I² = 95%), distance to high tie (I² = 65%), bowel length (I² = 0%), and mesentery area (I² = 95%). CME also had positive effects on 3- and 5-year overall survival (RR 1.09, 95% CI 1.04-1.15, I² = 88%; and RR 1.05, 95% CI 1.02-1.08, I² = 62%, respectively) and 3-year disease-free survival (RR 1.10, 95% CI 1.04-1.17, I² = 22%), as well as decreased local (RR 0.35, 95% CI 0.24-0.51, I² = 51%) and distant recurrences (RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.60-0.85, I² = 34%).

CONCLUSIONS

Limited evidence suggests that CME improves oncological outcomes with a higher postoperative adverse events rate but no increase in anastomotic leak rate or perioperative mortality, compared with CS.

Long-term outcomes of resection for locoregional recurrence of colon cancer: A retrospective descriptive cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Resection for isolated distant recurrence of colon cancer is well accepted. Resection for locoregionally recurrent colon cancer (LRCC) is not well studied. We evaluated the long-term outcomes of curative-intent resection for LRCC.

METHODS

All patients undergoing curative-intent resection for LRCC at three specialized cancer centers affiliated with the University of Toronto were identified (1993-2017). Follow-up included serial clinical assessment, colonoscopy, CEA, and cross-sectional imaging. Overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS) and time to re-recurrence were estimated using Kaplan-Meier method and cumulative incidence function. The association between resection margins and outcome was assessed with Cox models.

RESULTS

117 patients were included in the study cohort. Median follow-up was 53 months (IQR: 34-101). OS was 75% (95% CI: 68-84) at 5 years, and 69% (95% CI: 59-79) at 10 years. CSS was 78% (95% CI: 70-86) at 5 years and 72% (95% CI: 63-83) at 10 years. The rate of re-recurrence was 22% (95% CI: 14-31) at 5 years, and 27% (95% CI: 16-39) at 10 years. Negative resection margin (R0) was associated with improved OS (HR 3.33, 95% CI: 1.85-6.00, p < 0.01). There were no postoperative deaths; complications with Clavien-Dindo grade > II occurred in 12% of patients. Perioperative chemotherapy was used in 63% of patients and radiotherapy in 37%.

CONCLUSION

In selected patients with LRCC, excellent OS, CSS and low re-recurrence rates were observed, and R0 resection predicted better outcomes. These findings support consideration of resection for LRCC in fit patients after review at a multidisciplinary cancer conference.

Robust performance of a novel stool DNA test of methylated SDC2 for colorectal cancer detection: a multicenter clinical study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Stool DNA testing is an emerging and attractive option for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. We previously evaluated the feasibility of a stool DNA (sDNA) test of methylated SDC2 for CRC detection. The aim of this study was to assess its performance in a multicenter clinical trial setting.

METHODS

Each participant was required to undergo a sDNA test and a reference colonoscopy. The sDNA test consists of quantitative assessment of methylation status of SDC2 promoter. Results of real-time quantitative methylation-specific PCR were dichotomized as positive and negative, and the main evaluation indexes were sensitivity, specificity, and kappa value. All sDNA tests were performed and analyzed independently of colonoscopy.

RESULTS

Among the 1110 participants from three clinical sites analyzed, 359 and 38 were diagnosed, respectively, with CRC and advanced adenomas by colonoscopy. The sensitivity of the sDNA test was 301/359 (83.8%) for CRC, 16/38 (42.1%) for advanced adenomas, and 134/154 (87.0%) for early stage CRC (stage I-II). Detection rate did not vary significantly according to age, tumor location, differentiation, and TNM stage, except for gender. The follow-up testing of 40 postoperative patients with CRC returned negative results as their tumors had been surgically removed. The specificity of the sDNA test was 699/713 (98.0%), and unrelated cancers and diseases did not seem to interfere with the testing. The kappa value was 0.84, implying an excellent diagnostic consistency between the sDNA test and colonoscopy.

CONCLUSION

Noninvasive sDNA test using methylated SDC2 as the exclusive biomarker is a clinically viable and accurate CRC detection method.

CHINESE CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY

Chi-CTR-TRC-1900026409, retrospectively registered on October 8, 2019; http://www.chictr.org.cn/edit.aspx?pid=43888&htm=4 .

Development of the 'PREDICT' score through a systematic review and meta-analysis of the predictive parameters for locoregional recurrence after total mesorectal excision

BACKGROUND

Despite robust management techniques, locoregional recurrence rates of rectal cancer are still significant. Although offering intensive follow-up has been shown to be beneficial in the early detection, it can be resource consuming. Having a robust knowledge of risk factors of locoregional recurrence will help in identification of patients who actually need intensive follow-up programs. This review aimed to identify the factors that can predict locoregional recurrence after Total mesorectal excision (TME).

METHODS

We systematically reviewed PubMed, Scopus and Cochrane for relevant articles with no date restrictions while language was restricted to English. We only included articles that had either provided Hazards ratio (HR)/odds ratio (OR) or provided enough data that allowed calculation of HR/OR specifically for rectal cancer. Articles were deemed eligible if they included patients undergoing (TME).

RESULTS

Seventeen studies (18,605 patients) published between 2002 and 2019 were included. A total of 699 patients developed locoregional recurrence at a median time of 25.2 months after surgery. There were eight significant predictors evaluated by more than one study; T3-T4 stage, circumferential resection margin, lymphovascular invasion, mucinous histology, N1-N2 stage, positive distal resection margin, Tumor < 5 cm from anal verge, and lack of neoadjuvant radiotherapy. A scoring system was developed based on the weight and pooled OR/HR of each predictor.

CONCLUSION

Using predictive factors identified in our review in context of scoring system may help in the early detection of locoregional recurrence after TME. This may help in tailoring the application of intensive follow-up programs.

Intra-abdominal recurrence from colorectal carcinoma: Differences and similarities between local and peritoneal recurrence

BACKGROUND

Peritoneal recurrences from colo-rectal cancer can be isolated (PR) or associated with local recurrences (LR). The purpose of this study was to analyze patterns and outcomes of LR and PR.

METHODS

Analyze from a prospective database of 108 patients treated with CCS plus HIPEC at two cancer centers between 2008 and 2015.

RESULTS

The population was divided into an LPR group (presence of LR with or without PR, n = 56) and a PR group (isolated PR, n = 52). The patients characteristics (age, sex, Charlson score, PCI) or perioperative treatments were comparable between the groups. The median number of resected organs for tumor involvement (respectively, 2 vs 1; p < 0.001), the percentage of patients with metastatic lymph nodes (LN+) from the resected specimen (respectively, 25% vs 7%; p = 0.016) and the mortality rate (respectively, 9% vs 0%; p = 0.023) were significantly higher in the LPR group. After a median follow-up of 32 (1-108) months, median overall survival was comparable between the two groups (respectively, 46 vs 42 months; p = 0.262).

CONCLUSIONS

LR is associated with a higher incidence of organ invasion, LN involvement (25%) and postoperative mortality. Optimal surgical resection of LR with systematic lymphadenectomy of invaded organs seems mandatory.

[Local recurrences of colon cancer (in Russian only)]

AIM

To evaluate the outcomes in patients with local recurrences (LR) of colon cancer.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Prospective study included 52 patients with local recurrences of colon cancer MR and no distant metastases or disseminated carcinomatosis. Patients have been treated at Ryzhikh State Research Center for Coloproctology for the period 2009-2017. Median of local recurrence was 17.6 months. By the moment of diagnosis, CEA was increased in 24 (46.2%), CA 19-9 - in 4 (7.7%) patients. Forty-eight (92%) patients underwent surgery for local recurrences of colon cancer. In 26 (54%) cases, low ligation of supplying vessel was made during primary tumor excision that was confirmed by significant fragment of intact mesentery of the colon.

RESULTS

Radical surgery for LR was possible in 34 (70.8%) patients, resection of more than one organ was required in 60% of cases. R1-resection was obtained in 12 (25.0%) cases, palliative resections - in 2 (4.2%) patients. Various complications occurred in 34 (70.8%) patients. Additional intraperitoneal chemotherapy was need in 12 (23.1%) cases. Lethal outcomes were absent. Forty-six out of 48 (95.8%) patients were followed-up. Mean follow-up was 19.5 (8.6-34.7) months. Twelve (26.1%) patients were free from recurrent cancer. Only distant metastases developed in 16 (34.8%) patients. Redo LR occurred in 18 (39.1%) patients including 12 of them with distant metastases. Overall 5-year survival was 38%, disease-free survival - 17.5%, median overall survival - 42.8 months, median disease-free survival - 15.2 months. Intraperitoneal chemotherapy did not significantly affect overall survival. Multivariate analysis confirmed high level of CEA and CA 19-9, positive resection margin as negative predictors. Moreover, impaired survival (p=0.03) was noted in case of LR after non-radical surgery for primary tumor with high ligation of the vessel.

CONCLUSION

R0-resection is essential to improve survival and reduce incidence of recurrences. Intraoperative intra-abdominal chemotherapy does not affect the outcomes in patients with LR of colon cancer. Adherence to surgical principles for cancer can reduce the incidence of LR.

CT-guided cryoablation for unresectable pelvic recurrent colorectal cancer: a retrospective study

Objective

The study aimed to investigate the efficacy of computed tomography (CT)-guided cryoablation debulking of unresectable pelvic recurrent colorectal cancer (CRC).

Patients and methods

From January 2013 to April 2016, 30 patients (18 males and 12 females; aged 57.8±10.5 years) with unresectable pelvic recurrent CRC who had previously received radiotherapy or chemotherapy were included. A total of 35 tumors ranging from 1.2 to 6.3 cm underwent cryoablation. Tumor response was evaluated 1 month after cryoablation according to the Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Logistic regression was used to analyze the risk factors for tumor response. Degree of pain palliation was also determined using the Numerical Rating Scale. Cox proportional hazard models were used to identify predictors of outcomes.

Results

Cryoablation was successfully performed in all patients. Complete response (CR) was achieved for 27 tumors in 23 patients and partial response was achieved for eight tumors in seven patients 1 month after cryoablation. The rate of CR was 77.14%, and tumor size was an independent risk factor for CR. Pain relief was satisfactory in 21 symptomatic patients (P<0.001), and the median duration of pain relief was 6.0 months (95% CI: 2.67–9.33). Serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) was significantly decreased after cryoablation in 15 patients with elevated CEA (P=0.005). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 10.0 months (95% CI: 4.43–15.67). Multivariate analysis revealed that tumor size (HR =3.089, P<0.001), sex (HR =0.089, P=0.002), and elevated CEA (HR =7.015, P=0.002) were independent predictors of PFS.

Conclusion

CT-guided cryoablation is a safe and effective therapeutic option for pelvic recurrent CRC. Tumor size is an important predictor of poor outcomes.

Biology-Based Surgery: The Extent of Lymphadenectomy in Cancer of the Colon

The progression of colon cancer (CC) involves hematogenous and lymphatic spread to locoregional lymph nodes (LN), distant LN, and metastatic sites including the liver. The biological mechanisms that govern CC progression remain elusive. The Halsted model assumes an orderly, stepwise progression from the primary tumor to nearby nodes, henceforth to anatomically more distant nodes, and ultimately to distant organs. The Fisher model, on the other hand, regards the release of metastatic cells as early and essentially random events. The underlying biology has important implications for the ideal extent of surgery: when the Fisher model is correct, efforts to remove apical (central), extramesenteric, or para-aortic LN are unlikely to affect the oncological outcome. Recent data from phylogenetic studies suggest that cancer cell populations differ genetically among different LN stations and from distant metastases. Circulating tumor cells and other liquid biomarkers can be detected in the circulation of patients with early-stage disease. Local recurrence in CC is uncommon, and it is associated with a high risk of systemic progression and poor survival. Clinical studies comparing standard colectomy with extensive surgery (high ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery, complete mesocolic excision, D3 dissection, and para-aortic or extramesenteric node dissection) show that these techniques increase the LN count, while any beneficial effect on the risk of local recurrence or disease-free survival is at present uncertain due to the lack of controlled trials. Ongoing randomized trials comparing extensive vs. standard surgery for CC will generate important answers.

Surgical Resection with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Locoregionally Recurrent Appendiceal Cancer Invading the External Iliac Vessels

Recent advancements in multimodal therapy can provide oncologic benefits for patients with recurrent colorectal cancer. This report presents a case of locoregionally recurrent appendiceal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgical resection with vascular reconstruction. A 68-year-old Japanese woman was diagnosed with appendiceal cancer and underwent ileocecal resection. The pathological evaluation revealed KRAS-mutant adenocarcinoma with the final stage of T4bN1M0. She received oral fluorouracil-based adjuvant chemotherapy. One year later, she was found to have peritoneal dissemination in the pelvic cavity and vaginal metastasis. She received an oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy followed by surgical resection. One year after the second surgery, she developed a locoregional recurrence involving the right external iliac vessels and small intestine. She received an irinotecan-based regimen with bevacizumab as neoadjuvant chemotherapy, followed by surgical resection. At first, a femoro-femoral bypass was made to secure the blood supply to the right lower extremities. Subsequently, an en bloc resection including the recurrent tumor and the external iliac vessels was completed. Surgical resection for recurrent colorectal cancer is often technically challenging because of the tumor location and invasion to adjacent organs. In this case, a surgical approach with persistent chemotherapy achieved oncologic resection of locoregionally recurrent appendiceal cancer.

The prognostic value of combining the CD8 + lymphocyte density and the circulating lymphocyte ratio in circumferential resection margin biopsy in rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

A positive circumferential resection margin (CRM) may result in local recurrence (LR), but the significance remains controversial. We attempted to utilize the lymphocyte ratio (LYMR), neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) count, and their combinations (TIL-LYMR/TIL-NLR) in predicting LR after rectal resection.

METHODS

Patients with rectal cancer who underwent curative resection between January 2016 and December 2018 were enrolled. Biopsy samples and data from the blood tests of 124 patients with rectal cancer who underwent curative resection were retrospectively obtained. Patients were divided into 2 groups: LR group and non-local recurrence (nLR) group. CD8 + TILs were immunostained using an antibody against CD8. The density of TILs was defined as the number of positive CD8 lymphocytes per square millimeter and was then graded as either high or low (cutoff = 80/mm). The count of LYMR and NLR was also graded as either high or low. The associations between TILs, LYMR, NLR, and their combinations (TIL-LYMR/TIL-NLR) were evaluated.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 24.4 months, TIL-LYMR showed a positive correlation with LR (P = .001), but not with the CD8 + TIL count (P = .215) or TIL-NLR count (P = .638). Among inflammatory and immune markers variables, univariate analysis revealed that gender, CD8 + TIL count, and TIL-NLR count were associated with anastomotic leakage (P = .001, P = .014, and P = .036, respectively). In multivariate analysis, TIL-LYMR remained an independent predictor of LR (OR = 8.918, CI = 1.124-70.747, P = .038). We also showed that gender associated with anastomotic leakage in rectal cancer (OR 5.429; 95% CI 1.885-15.637; P = .002).

CONCLUSION

In this study, our data indicate that absence of CD8 + T-cell infiltration in CRM may influence LR. These parameters may help identify LR provide additional information for therapeutic decision-making.

Short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted surgery, mini-laparotomy and conventional laparotomy in patients with Stage I-III colorectal cancer

Background:

Three operative techniques have been used for colorectal cancer (CRC) resection: Conventional laparotomy (CL) and the mini-invasive techniques (MITs)– laparoscopic-assisted surgery (LAS) and mini-laparotomy (ML). The aim of the study was to compare the short- and long-term outcomes of patients undergoing the three surgical approaches for Stage I–III CRC resection.

Patients and Methods:

This study enrolled 688 patients with Stage I–III CRC undergoing curative resection. The primary endpoints were perioperative quality and outcomes. The secondary endpoints were oncological outcomes including disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS) and local recurrence (LR).

Results:

Patients undergoing LAS had significantly less blood loss (P < 0.001), earlier first flatus (P = 0.002) and earlier resumption of normal diet (P = 0.025). Although post-operative complication rates were remarkably higher in patients undergoing CL than in those undergoing MITs (P = 0.002), no difference was observed in the post-operative mortality rate (P = 0.099) or 60-day re-intervention rate (P = 0.062). The quality of operation as assessed by the number of lymph nodes harvested and rates of R0 resection did not differ among the groups (all P > 0.05). During a median follow-up of 5.42 years, no significant difference was observed among the treatment groups in the rates of 3-year late morbidity, 3-year LR, 5-year LR, 5-year OS or 5-year DFS (all P > 0.05).

Conclusions:

Patients undergoing CL had higher post-operative morbidities. Moreover, the study findings confirm the favourable short-term and comparable long-term outcomes of LAS and ML for curative CRC resection. Therefore, both MITs may be feasible and safe alternatives to CL for Stage I-III CRC resection.

Comparative evaluation of oncologic outcomes in colon cancer

PURPOSE

In this paper we report clinical variables on colon cancer series. Oncological outcomes were compared to low-income and high-income countries.

METHODS

We analysed a prospective database of 51 colon cancer patients submitted to primary tumor resection between 2010 and 2011, showing clinical variables and oncologic outcomes.

RESULTS

R0 resection obtained in 80.4%, 21.6% of patients was TNM stage IV, and only 13.7% showed TNM stage I. Disease-free survival was 32 months, overall survival was 46 months, and the tumoral recurrence rate was 9.8%. Univariate analysis showed association of serum CEA levels ≥ 5 ng/dl (p= 0.004), presence of metastasis at diagnosis (p= 0.012), compromised surgical margins (p < 0.001) and poorer tumor differentiation (p= 0.041) to death. Multivariate analysis identified compromised surgical margins as an independent risk factor for death due to colon cancer (P=0.003; odds ratio=0.36; 95% confidence interval=0.004-0.33). Nowadays, 62.7% of patients are alive.

CONCLUSION

Recurrence rate, disease-free survival and overall survival was similar to those observed in more developed countries. Serum CEA levels ≥ 5 ng/dl, the presence of metastasis at diagnosis, compromised surgical margins and poorer tumor differentiation were associated with death. A compromised surgical margin was the only independent risk factor for death.

Carbonic anhydrase IV inhibits colon cancer development by inhibiting the Wnt signalling pathway through targeting the WTAP-WT1-TBL1 axis

OBJECTIVE

We found that carbonic anhydrase IV (CA4), a member of the carbonic anhydrases, is silenced in colorectal cancer (CRC). We analysed its epigenetic inactivation, biological effects and prognostic significance in CRC.

DESIGN

The biological functions of CA4 were determined by in vitro and in vivo tumorigenicity assays. The CA4 co-operator was identified by immunoprecipitation and mass spectrometry. CA4 downstream effectors and signalling pathways were elucidated by promoter luciferase assay, electrophoretic mobility shift assay and chromatin immunoprecipitation. The clinical impact of CA4 was assessed in 115 patients with CRC.

RESULTS

CA4 was silenced in all nine CRC cell lines and 92.6% of CRC tumours. The promoter hypermethylation contributed to the inactivation of CA4, and it was detected in 75.7% of the patients with CRC. After a median follow-up of 49.3 months, multivariate analysis showed that the patients with CA4 hypermethylation had a recurrence of Stage II/III CRC. The re-expression of CA4 inhibited cell proliferation, induced apoptosis and cell cycle arrest in the G1 phase. CA4 inhibited the activity of the Wnt signalling pathway and mediated the degradation of β-catenin. CA4 interacted with Wilms' tumour 1-associating protein (WTAP) and induced WTAP protein degradation through polyubiquitination. Moreover, CA4 promoted the transcriptional activity of Wilms' tumour 1 (WT1), an antagonist of the Wnt pathway, which resulted in the induction of transducin β-like protein 1 (TBL1) and the degradation of β-catenin.

CONCLUSIONS

CA4 is a novel tumour suppressor in CRC through the inhibition of the Wnt signalling pathway by targeting the WTAP-WT1-TBL1 axis. CA4 methylation may serve as an independent biomarker for the recurrence of CRC.

Long-term surveillance of locally advanced rectal cancer patients with neoadjuvant chemoradiation and aggressive surgical treatment of recurrent disease: a consecutive single-centre experience

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to analyse the long-term outcome of rectal cancer patients who submitted to preoperative chemoradiation with consecutive intensive follow-up and aggressive surgical treatment of recurrent disease.

METHODS

Patients with locally advanced (cT3-4 Nx M0-1) mid/low rectal cancer were treated at a tertiary university hospital with preoperative long-course chemoradiation followed by resection (according to a prospective study protocol). After resection, all patients were urged to participate in a standardised, risk-independent intensive follow-up program. All curatively treated patients (n = 153, 96 %) were included in our long-term analysis with respect to curative re-resection of recurrent disease.

RESULTS

Of 153 patients, 143 (93 %) participated in our follow-up program: 63 % were surveyed longer than 5 years after primary therapy (mean follow-up 75 months, 95 % CI 67.8-82.2). Fifty-five (36 %) patients developed cancer recurrence (mean 27.8 months, 95 % CI 20.6-34.9, range 3-108), giving a disease-free survival rate of 68.5 and 60.7 % at 5 and 10 years; 21 (38 %) patients were re-resected curatively and 58 (38 %) patients died during the observation period, giving an overall survival rate of 70.8 and 57.5 % at 5 and 10 years. Multivariate analysis found tumour differentiation (P < 0.01), operative procedure (P < 0.05) and downstaging (P < 0.01) to be independent variables influencing overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of multimodal therapy and aggressive surgical treatment of metastases including repeated re-resections in curative intention is relevant in order to chronify the disease. Thus, both intensive and extended follow-up beyond 5 years appear to be mandatory.

Difference in Time to Locoregional Recurrence Between Patients With Right-Sided and Left-Sided Colon Cancers

BACKGROUND

Locoregional recurrence rates after curative resection for colon cancer vary widely. Identification of factors associated with locoregional recurrence may help in patient management.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to compare time to locoregional recurrence and distribution of locoregional recurrence after curative resection of colon cancer according to primary tumor location and to investigate risk factors for locoregional recurrence of colon cancer.

DESIGN

This was a retrospective observational study.

SETTINGS

This study was conducted at a single institution.

PATIENTS

This study analyzed 1632 patients with colonic adenocarcinoma without distant metastasis who underwent curative resection at the National Cancer Center in Korea between January 2001 and December 2009. The primary end point of the study was time from surgery to locoregional recurrence. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the cumulative incidence of locoregional recurrence, and the log-rank test was used to test the difference in time to locoregional recurrence between patient subgroups. Cox proportional hazards models were used to investigate the risk factors for locoregional recurrence.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The time from surgery to locoregional recurrence was compared between patients with right-sided and left-sided colon cancers.

RESULTS

The time to locoregional recurrence was significantly different between patients with right-sided and left-sided colon cancers (HR = 2.35 for right-sided; p < 0.001). The overall 5-year locoregional recurrence rate was 5.7%, and that in patients with right-sided and left-sided colon cancers was 8.5% and 4.1%. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that right-sided location, female sex, T4 disease, lymph node metastasis, and perineural invasion were independent risk factors for locoregional recurrence of colon cancer.

LIMITATIONS

This was a retrospective design and single-institution study.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with right-sided colon cancers presented with significantly increased risk of locoregional recurrence. Right-sided location, female sex, T4 disease, lymph node metastasis, and perineural invasion are independent risk factors for locoregional recurrence of colon cancer.

Extent of surgery in cancer of the colon: Is more better?

Since the introduction of total mesorectal excision as the standard approach in mid and low rectal cancer, the incidence of local recurrence has sharply declined. Similar attention to surgical technique in colon cancer (CC) has resulted in the concept of complete mesocolic excision (CME), which consists of complete removal of the intact mesentery and high ligation of the vascular supply at its origin. Although renewed attention to meticulous surgical technique certainly has its merits, routine implementation of CME is currently unfounded. Firstly, in contrast to rectal cancer, local recurrence originating from an incompletely removed mesentery is rare in CC and usually a manifestation of systemic disease. Secondly, although CME may increase nodal counts and therefore staging accuracy, this is unlikely to affect survival since the observed relationship between nodal counts and outcome in CC is most probably not causal but confounded by a range of clinical variables. Thirdly, several lines of evidence suggest that metastasis to locoregional nodes occurs early and is a stochastic rather than a stepwise phenomenon in CC, in essence reflecting the tumor-host-metastasis relationship. Unsurprisingly, therefore, comparative studies in CC as well as in other digestive cancers have failed to demonstrate any survival benefit associated with extensive, additional or extra-mesenteric lymphadenectomy. Finally, routine implementation of CME may cause patient harm by longer operating times, major vascular damage and autonomic nerve injury. Therefore, data from randomized trials reporting relevant endpoints are required before CME can be recommended as a standard approach in CC surgery.

Complete mesocolic resection and extended lymphadenectomy for colon cancer: a systematic review

AIM

Complete mesocolic excision (CME) and extended lympha-denectomy (EL) have been proposed as safe procedures for improving colon cancer survival outcomes. The aim of this study was to evaluate the evidence regarding oncological outcomes, morbidity and mortality after such techniques for colon cancer.

METHOD

A systematic review of the literature was conducted to evaluate evidence regarding oncological outcomes, morbidity and mortality after CME or EL. Three major databases (PubMed, MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library) were searched. The review included original articles reporting outcomes after CME or EL from January 1950 to July 2012.

RESULTS

Twenty-one, predominately retrospective, studies involving 5246 patients (mean age 68.2 years, 56.5% men) were included. Reporting of outcomes was inconsistent. Median follow up was 60 months. The operative mortality rate was 3.2% and the cumulative morbidity rate was 21.5%. The weighted mean local recurrence rate and the 5-year overall and disease-free survival rates were 4.5%, 58.1% and 77.4%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The available data for CME and EL have numerous fundamental limitations that prohibit adoption. Contemporary controlled studies are required before universal recommendation.

Isolated pelvic perfusion in irradiated unresectable recurrence of pelvic tumor: preliminary outcome and ongoing study

The technique of isolated pelvic perfusion (IPP) using extracorporeal circulation is capable of delivering high dose chemotherapy in the pelvic cavity. This technique has improved over time, notably with the use of a G-suit placed and inflated above the iliac bifurcation to impede flow through percutaneous vascular routes. This approach is of potential value in patients with previously irradiated, locally advanced recurrences of cancer originating from the gynecological or gastrointestinal organs. Administration of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) in combination with melphalan seems to provide response rates similar to those obtained in the technique of isolated extremity perfusion. A preliminary phase I study has shown promising results in terms of feasibility and response rates. A randomized study is currently underway to compare IPP to standard treatment in patients with unresectable recurrent pelvic tumors of gynecological or gastrointestinal origin.

Prognostic factors associated with locally recurrent rectal cancer following primary surgery (Review)

Locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC) is defined as an intrapelvic recurrence following a primary rectal cancer resection, with or without distal metastasis. The treatment of LRRC remains a clinical challenge. LRRC has been regarded as an incurable disease state leading to a poor quality of life and a limited survival time. However, curative reoperations have proved beneficial for treating LRRC. A complete resection of recurrent tumors (R0 resection) allows the treatment to be curative rather than palliative, which is a milestone in medicine. In LRRC cases, the difficulty of achieving an R0 resection is associated with the post-operative prognosis and is affected by several clinical factors, including the staging of the local recurrence (LR), accompanying symptoms, patterns of tumors and combined therapy. The risk factors following primary surgery that lead to an increased rate of LR are summarized in this study, including the surgical, pathological and therapeutic factors.

Painful pelvic recurrence of rectal cancer: percutaneous radiofrequency ablation treatment

PURPOSE

To retrospectively evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of computed tomography (CT)-guided radiofrequency thermal ablation (RFA) in reducing the pain in patients with painful pelvic recurrence of rectal cancer ineligible for surgical resection.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Twelve consecutive patients (10 men and 2 women; mean age 67 ± 10 years) with painful pelvic recurrence of rectal cancer underwent CT-guided RFA treatments under conscious sedation. At baseline, in all patients pelvic-sacral pain was classified as severe by Visual Analog Scale (VAS; VAS score ≥75 mm). The tumor density and carcinoembryionic antigen (CEA) serum level averages were 46 ± 7 HU and 15.7 ± 9.3 ng/mL, respectively. Clinical outcome was evaluated by VAS with a mean follow-up period of 23 months.

RESULTS

All RFA sessions were completed and well tolerated. Morbidity consisted of recto-vesical fistula (8 %) and rectal abscess (8 %). 1 month after RFA procedure, complete lack of enhancement was obtained in 7 cases (58 %). A significant difference in HU and CEA serum level averages between baseline and 1 month post-RFA was revealed (p < 0.000 and p < 0.002, respectively). A significant reduction in pain was obtained: VAS score was significantly different between baseline and the clinical evaluations at week 1 and month 3, 6, 12, and 22) (p < 0.000). At the end of follow-up, 11 patients (92 %) were symptom free.

CONCLUSIONS

CT-guided RFA of painful pelvic recurrence of rectal cancer can be considered as a feasible and effective treatment for reducing the pain in selected cases.

Cost-effectiveness of adjuvant FOLFOX and 5FU/LV chemotherapy for patients with stage II colon cancer

PURPOSE

We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy using 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin (5FU/LV), and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) compared with 5FU/LV alone and 5FU/LV compared with observation alone for patients who had resected stage II colon cancer.

METHODS

We developed 2 Markov models to represent the adjuvant chemotherapy and follow-up periods and a single Markov model to represent the observation group. We used calibration to estimate the transition probabilities among different toxicity levels. The base case considered 60-year-old patients who had undergone an uncomplicated hemicolectomy for stage II colon cancer and were medically fit to receive 6 months of adjuvant chemotherapy. We measured health outcomes in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and estimated costs using 2007 US dollars.

RESULTS

In the base case, adjuvant chemotherapy of the FOLFOX regimen had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $54,359/QALY compared with the 5FU/LV regimen, and the 5FU/LV regimen had an ICER of $14,584/QALY compared with the observation group from the third-party payer perspective. The ICER values were most sensitive to 5-year relapse probability, cost of adjuvant chemotherapy, and the discount rate for the FOLFOX arm, whereas the ICER value of 5FU/LV was most sensitive to the 5-year relapse probability, 5-year survival probability, and the relapse cost. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis indicates that the ICER of 5FU/LV is less than $50,000/QALY with a probability of 99.62%, and the ICER of FOLFOX as compared with 5FU/LV is less than $50,000/QALY and $100,000/QALY with a probability of 44.48% and 97.24%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Although adjuvant chemotherapy with 5FU/LV is cost-effective at all ages for patients who have undergone an uncomplicated hemicolectomy for stage II colon cancer, FOLFOX is not likely to be cost-effective as compared with 5FU/LV.

Surgical resection of recurrent colonic cancer

Background

Locoregional recurrence of colonic cancer includes anastomotic recurrence, associated nodal masses, masses that involve the abdominal wall and pelvic masses. The aim of this study was to report the outcome of resection of such recurrences and to provide guidance on the management of this disease.

Methods

Patients were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Data were obtained on demographics, surgical procedure, morbidity, histopathology and outcome. Univariable and multivariable analyses of factors influencing survival were performed using stepwise Cox logistic regression.

Results

Forty-two patients (21 men; median age 61 (range 41–82) years) underwent resection of recurrent colonic cancer between 2003 and 2011. The median interval between resection of the primary and recurrent colonic tumour was 37·5 (interquartile range 7–91) months. The recurrences developed at the previous anastomosis (9 patients), elsewhere within the abdominal cavity or wall (8) and as discrete masses within the pelvic cavity (25). Eighteen of 42 patients underwent resection of hepatic or pulmonary metastases at some stage after resection of the primary tumour. Median survival was 29 months after R0 resection and 26 months after R1 resection of the recurrent tumour (P = 0·226). The survival benefit depended on the location of the recurrence (median survival after resection of recurrent disease: anastomotic 33 months, pelvic 26 months, abdominal 19 months; P = 0·010).

Conclusion

This study described a classification system, management algorithm and prognostic factors for recurrent colonic cancer. The distribution of disease influenced survival. Long-term survival was achieved, including a subset of patients with drop metastases and/or previous metastasectomy.

Circumferential resection margin involvement in stage III rectal cancer patients treated with curative resection followed by chemoradiotherapy: a surrogate marker for local recurrence?

PURPOSE

Circumferential resection margin (CRM) involvement is a well-known predictor for poor prognosis in rectal cancer. However, the significance is controversial in some studies. Accordingly, this study attempted to examine the prognostic impact of CRM involvement in stage III rectal cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between January 1990 and December 2007, a total of 449 patients who underwent curative resection followed by complete adjuvant chemoradiotherapy for stage III rectal cancer located within 12 cm from the anal verge were selected. Patients were divided into a CRM-positive group (n=79, 17.6%) and a CRM-negative group (n=370, 82.4%).

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 56.6 months, recurrent disease was seen in 53.2 and 43.5% of the CRM-positive and CRM-negative group, respectively. CRM involvement was an independent prognostic factor for 5-year systemic recurrence-free survival (HR: 1.5, CI: 1.0-2.2, p=0.017). However, no significant difference was observed for local recurrence rate between the two groups (13.0 and 13.5%, respectively, p=0.677).

CONCLUSION

In this study, local recurrence rate did not differ according to CRM involvement status in stage III rectal cancer patients, although CRM involvement was shown to be an independent poor prognostic factor. Accordingly, validation of the results of this study by further large prospective randomized trials is warranted.

Rectal washout and local recurrence in rectal resection for cancer: a meta-analysis

AIM

The effectiveness of rectal washout was compared with no washout for the prevention of local recurrence after anterior rectal resection for rectal cancer.

METHOD

The following electronic databases were searched: PubMed, OVID Medline, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, EBM Reviews, CINAHL and EMBASE.

RESULTS

Five nonrandomized studies including a total of 5012 patients were identified. Meta-analysis suggested that rectal washout significantly reduced the local recurrence rate (P < 0.0001; OR 0.57; 95% CI 0.43-0.74). It was also significantly lower after washout in patients having radical resection only (P = 0.0004; OR 0.54; 95% CI 0.39-0.76), patients treated by a curative resection (P < 0.0001; OR 0.55; 95% CI 0.42-0.72) and those undergoing preoperative radiotherapy (P = 0.04; OR 0.62; 95% CI 0.39-0.98).

CONCLUSION

Taking into account the limitations of the design of the included studies the meta-analysis showed that rectal washout is associated with reduced local recurrence and therefore should be routine during anterior resection for rectal cancer.

Oncologically safe distal resection margins in rectal cancer patients treated with chemoradiotherapy

INTRODUCTION

Although current guidelines recommend distal resection margins (DRM) of 2-5 cm in rectal cancer operation, smaller margins may be safe. We therefore assessed the impact of distal margins on outcomes in patients with rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by radical resection or resection followed by adjuvant CRT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study involved 376 patients who underwent sphincter-saving resection for rectal adenocarcinoma and pre- or postoperative CRT between 2000 and 2006. DRMs were measured on pinned fixed specimens. We excluded patients who did not complete planned CRT and those with stage IV disease. A retrospective cross-sectional analysis was performed.

RESULTS

No significant differences in local recurrence (9.8 versus 7.3%; P = 0.324) and systemic recurrence (16.4 versus 18.7%; P = 0.731) were observed in patients with DRMs of ≤5 and >5 mm, respectively. Moreover, in each DRM category, there were no differences in local and systemic recurrence rates between patients who received pre- or postoperative CRT. DRM did not affect overall survival (P = 0.880) or 5-year survival rate (80.3 versus76.8%; P = 0.340).

CONCLUSION

A distal margin of at least 5 mm with negative resection margin on frozen section does not reduce oncological safety in rectal cancer patients who receive pre- or postoperative CRT.

Locally recurrent colorectal cancer: results of surgical therapy

PURPOSE

Up to 20 % of colorectal cancer patients develop recurrent disease despite standardized surgical techniques and multimodal treatment strategies. Radical resection is the central component of curative therapy in these cases. The aim of this study was to evaluate treatment results in patients with locoregionally recurrent colorectal cancer.

METHODS

From January 1995 to December 2007, surgery was performed for recurrent colorectal cancer in 82 patients who had undergone curative (R0) resection of their primary tumor. Assessment included patient, tumor and treatment characteristics, postoperative complications, and time without re-recurrence; recurrence-free and overall survival rates were calculated according to the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Resection was performed in 60 of the 82 patients (73 %), repeat R0 resection in 52 % (31/60). Patients had a postoperative morbidity of 39 % (31/82), a relaparotomy rate of 13 % (11/82), and a lethality of 7 % (6/82). Forty-eight percent of all surgically-treated patients received a permanent stoma. Re-recurrence was seen in 52 % (16/31). R0 resection was associated with a 5-year survival rate of 35 % (11/31).

CONCLUSIONS

Extensive reinterventions often enable repeat R0 resection. Despite relevant morbidity, the lethality appears to be acceptable. Decisive for the prognosis is re-recurrence.

Palliative treatment of rectal carcinoma recurrence using radiofrequency ablation

PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of CT-guided radiofrequency (RF) ablation for the palliative treatment of recurrent unresectable rectal tumors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-seven patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer were treated with computed tomography (CT)-guided RF ablation. Therapy was performed with the patient under conscious sedation with a seven- or a nine-array expandable RF electrode for 8-10 min at 80-110°C and a power of 90-110 W. All patients went home under instructions the next day of the procedure. Brief Pain Inventory score was calculated before and after (1 day, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months) treatment.

RESULTS

Complete tumor necrosis rate was 77.8% (21 of a total 27 procedures) despite lesion location. BPI score was dramatically decreased after the procedure. The mean preprocedure BPI score was 6.59, which decreased to 3.15, 1.15, and 0.11 at postprocedure day 1, week 1, and month 1, respectively, after the procedure. This decrease was significant (p < 0.01 for the first day and p < 0.001 for the rest of the follow-up intervals (paired Student t test; n - 1 = 26) for all periods during follow-up. Six patients had partial tumor necrosis, and we were attempted to them with a second procedure. Although the necrosis area showed a radiographic increase, no complete necrosis was achieved (secondary success rate 65.6%). No immediate or delayed complications were observed.

CONCLUSION

CT-guided RF ablation is a minimally invasive, safe, and highly effective technique for treatment of malignant rectal recurrence. The method is well tolerated by patients, and pain relief is quickly achieved.

Competing risk models to estimate the excess mortality and the first recurrent-event hazards

BACKGROUND

In medical research, one common competing risks situation is the study of different types of events, such as disease recurrence and death. We focused on that situation but considered death under two aspects: "expected death" and "excess death", the latter could be directly or indirectly associated with the disease.

METHODS

The excess hazard method allows estimating an excess mortality hazard using the population (expected) mortality hazard. We propose models combining the competing risks approach and the excess hazard method. These models are based on a joint modelling of each event-specific hazard, including the event-free excess death hazard. The proposed models are parsimonious, allow time-dependent hazard ratios, and facilitate comparisons between event-specific hazards and between covariate effects on different events. In a simulation study, we assessed the performance of the estimators and showed their good properties with different drop-out censoring rates and different sample sizes.

RESULTS

We analyzed a population-based dataset on French colon cancer patients who have undergone curative surgery. Considering three competing events (local recurrence, distant metastasis, and death), we showed that the recurrence-free excess mortality hazard reached zero six months after treatment. Covariates sex, age, and cancer stage had the same effects on local recurrence and distant metastasis but a different effect on excess mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed models consider the excess mortality within the framework of competing risks. Moreover, the joint estimation of the parameters allow (i) direct comparisons between covariate effects, and (ii) fitting models with common parameters to obtain more parsimonious models and more efficient parameter estimators.

Quality of life after surgery for rectal cancer with special reference to pelvic floor dysfunction

AIM

Conventional outcomes such as survival, tumour recurrence and complication rates after surgery for rectal cancer have been rigorously assessed, but the importance of maintaining quality of life (QOL) after surgery for rectal cancer has received less attention. The aim of the current study was to analyse QOL and the occurrence of pelvic dysfunction after the surgical treatment of rectal cancer.

METHOD

Between May 2005 and May 2008, 150 patients with rectal cancer underwent abdominoperineal resection (APR) or anterior resection (AR). Seventy-four answered two preoperative questionnaires. At a follow up of 1 year, 65 were alive without sign of recurrence and answered the same questionnaires: (a) validated RAND 36-item health survey QOL questionnaire; and (b) self-administered disease-related questionnaire with special reference to anorectal and urogenital function.

RESULTS

The postoperative general QOL was similar after surgery, and mental functioning was better (P < 0.001). Problems with physical functions were associated with anal dysfunction after AR (P < 0.001) and problems with social functioning were associated with urinary dysfunction (P = 0.038). At 1 year after surgery, urinary incontinence was worse (P = 0.026) after all operations, and the incidence of dysuria was higher after APR than AR (P = 0.001). Male sexual function also worsened (P = 0.060). Anorectal dysfunction caused more inconvenience among patients who underwent AR (P = 0.028). Preoperative radiation was associated with postoperative ejaculation problems (P = 0.028) and anal incontinence (P = 0.012).

CONCLUSION

Factors affecting QOL and pelvic floor function should be taken into account when making treatment decisions in rectal cancer.

FDG PET and PET/CT for colorectal cancer

The evaluation of patients with known or suspected recurrent colorectal carcinoma is now an accepted indication for positron emission tomography using (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG-PET) imaging. PET and CT are complimentary, and therefore, integrated PET/CT imaging should be performed where available. FDG-PET/CT is indicated as the initial test for diagnosis and staging of recurrence, and for preoperative staging (N and M) of known recurrence that is considered to be resectable. FDG-PET imaging is valuable for the differentiation of posttreatment changes from recurrent tumor, differentiation of benign from malignant lesions (indeterminate lymph nodes, hepatic, and pulmonary lesions), and the evaluation of patients with rising tumor markers in the absence of a known source. The addition of FDG-PET/CT to the evaluation of these patients reduces overall treatment costs by accurately identifying patients who will and will not benefit from surgical procedures. This new powerful technology provides more accurate interpretation of both CT and FDG-PET images and therefore more optimal patient care. PET/CT fusion images affect the clinical management by guiding further procedures (biopsy, surgery, and radiation therapy), excluding the need for additional procedures, and changing both inter- and intramodality therapy.

Prognostic factors for survival after salvage surgery for locoregional recurrence of colon cancer

BACKGROUND

Although locoregional recurrence after rectal cancer resection has been extensively investigated, studies of salvage surgery for locoregionally recurrent colon cancer are scarce. This study aimed to determine the predictors of postsalvage survival for locoregionally recurrent colon cancer.

METHODS

We studied 45 consecutive patients who underwent macroscopically complete resection of locoregionally recurrent colon cancer between April 1988 and December 2007. The primary end point was cancer-specific survival, and 20 clinical variables were analyzed for their prognostic significance.

RESULTS

Cancer-specific 5-year survival for the entire cohort of 45 patients was 46%. Multivariate survival analysis showed that margin status (P = .0311), number of locoregional recurrent tumors (P = .0002), pathological grade (P = .0416), largest tumor diameter (P = .0247), and distant metastasis (P = .0006) were independently associated with cancer-specific survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Salvage surgery for locoregional recurrence of colon cancer can provide a chance for long-term survival in selected patients.