1
|
Ma Y, Ma D, Xu X, Li J, Guan Z. Progress of MRI in predicting the circumferential resection margin of rectal cancer: A narrative review. Asian J Surg 2024; 47:2122-2131. [PMID: 38331609 DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2024.01.131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2023] [Revised: 01/02/2024] [Accepted: 01/19/2024] [Indexed: 02/10/2024] Open
Abstract
Rectal cancer (RC) is the third most frequently diagnosed cancer worldwide, and the status of its circumferential resection margin (CRM) is of paramount significance for treatment strategies and prognosis. CRM involvement is defined as tumor touching or within 1 mm from the outermost part of tumor or outer border of the mesorectal or lymph node deposits to the resection margin. The incidence of involved CRM varied from 5.4 % to 36 %, which may associate with an in consistent definition of CRM, the quality of surgeries, and the different examination modalities. Although T and N status are essential factors in determining whether a patient should receive neoadjuvant therapy before surgery, CRM status is a powerful predictor of local and distant recurrence as well as survival rate. This review explores the significance of CRM, the various assessment methods, and the role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and artificial intelligence-based MRI in predicting CRM status. MRI showed potential advantage in predicting CRM status with a high sensitivity and specificity compared to computed tomography (CT). We also discuss MRI advancements in RC imaging, including conventional MRI with body coil, high-resolution MRI with phased-array coil, and endorectal MRI. Along with a discussion of artificial intelligence-based MRI techniques to predict the CRM status of RCs before and after treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yanqing Ma
- Department of Radiology, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital (Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College), Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310014, China.
| | - Dongnan Ma
- Yangming College of Ningbo University, Ningbo, Zhejiang, 315010, China.
| | - Xiren Xu
- Department of Radiology, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital (Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College), Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310014, China.
| | - Jie Li
- Department of Radiology, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital (Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College), Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310014, China.
| | - Zheng Guan
- Department of Radiology, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital (Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College), Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310014, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Shin DW, Shin JY, Oh SJ, Park JK, Yu H, Ahn MS, Bae KB, Hong KH, Ji YI. The Prognostic Value of Circumferential Resection Margin Involvement in Patients with Extraperitoneal Rectal Cancer. Am Surg 2016. [DOI: 10.1177/000313481608200421] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
The prognostic influence of circumferential resection margin (CRM) status in extraperitoneal rectal cancer probably differs from that of intraperitoneal rectal cancer because of its different anatomical and biological behaviors. However, previous reports have not provided the data focused on extraperitoneal rectal cancer. Therefore, the aim of this study was to examine the prognostic significance of the CRM status in patients with extraperitoneal rectal cancer. From January 2005 to December 2008, 248 patients were treated for extraperitoneal rectal cancer and enrolled in a pro-spectively collected database. Extraperitoneal rectal cancer was defined based on tumors located below the anterior peritoneal reflection, as determined intraoperatively by a surgeon. Cox model was used for multivariate analysis to examine risk factors of recurrence and mortality in the 248 patients, and multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of recurrence and mortality in 135 patients with T3 rectal cancer. CRM involvement for extraperitoneal rectal cancer was present in 29 (11.7%) of the 248 patients, and was the identified predictor of local recurrence, overall recurrence, and death by multivariate Cox analysis. In the 135 patients with T3 cancer, CRM involvement was found to be associated with higher probability of local recurrence and mortality. In extraperitoneal rectal cancer, CRM involvement is an independent risk factor of recurrence and survival. Based on the results of the present study, it seems that CRM involvement in extraperitoneal rectal cancer is considered an indicator for (neo)adjuvant therapy rather than conventional TN status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dong Woo Shin
- Department of Surgery, Haeundae Paik Hospital, College of Medicine, Inje University, Haeundae-ro, Haeundae-gu, Pusan, Korea
| | - Jin Yong Shin
- Department of Surgery, Haeundae Paik Hospital, College of Medicine, Inje University, Haeundae-ro, Haeundae-gu, Pusan, Korea
| | - Sung Jin Oh
- Department of Surgery, Haeundae Paik Hospital, College of Medicine, Inje University, Haeundae-ro, Haeundae-gu, Pusan, Korea
| | - Jong Kwon Park
- Department of Surgery, Haeundae Paik Hospital, College of Medicine, Inje University, Haeundae-ro, Haeundae-gu, Pusan, Korea
| | - Hyeon Yu
- Department of Surgery, Haeundae Paik Hospital, College of Medicine, Inje University, Haeundae-ro, Haeundae-gu, Pusan, Korea
| | - Min Sung Ahn
- Department of Surgery, Pusan Paik Hospital, College of Medicine, Inje University, Pusan, Korea
| | - Ki Beom Bae
- Department of Surgery, Pusan Paik Hospital, College of Medicine, Inje University, Pusan, Korea
| | - Kwan Hee Hong
- Department of Surgery, Pusan Paik Hospital, College of Medicine, Inje University, Pusan, Korea
| | - Yong Il Ji
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Haeundae Paik Hospital, College of Medicine, Inje University, Haeundae-ro, Haeundae-gu, Pusan, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Khan MAS, Hakeem AR, Scott N, Saunders RN. Significance of R1 resection margin in colon cancer resections in the modern era. Colorectal Dis 2015; 17:943-53. [PMID: 25808496 DOI: 10.1111/codi.12960] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2014] [Accepted: 02/23/2015] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
AIM Circumferential resection margin involvement (R1) in rectal cancer is a predictive factor for poor prognosis. The aim of this study was to confirm the prognostic significance of R1 in colon cancer resection and to establish whether the introduction of laparoscopic colorectal surgery influenced this. METHOD Prospectively collected data on a patient pathway data manager for sequential patients with colon cancer treated at our specialist unit from January 2005 to December 2010 were analysed. There were 1110 colonic resections (elective 865; emergency 245). A circumferential resection margin involvement of < 1 mm was considered positive. RESULTS The total R1 rate was 13.3% (elective 10.4%; emergency 23.6%; P < 0.001). Other statistically significant risk factors for an R1 resection included tumour perforation (P < 0.001), poorly differentiated carcinoma (P < 0.001), T4 tumour (P < 0.001), vascular invasion (P < 0.001), lymph node metastasis (P < 0.001), distant metastasis (P < 0.001) and palliative resection (P < 0.001). Over half of the elective resections were undertaken laparoscopically (486/865; 56.2%). When compared with elective open resection (379/865; 43.8%), the R1 rate was similar (P = 0.491) with similar disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). The overall relapse rate was 18.9% in R0 and 55.5% in R1 resections (P < 0.001). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed significant improvements in DFS and OS in R0 over R1 patients. CONCLUSION The R1 margin in colon cancer resection is an important marker for advanced disease and a prognostic factor for DFS and OS. The introduction of laparoscopic surgery has not influenced the outcome in our unit despite a complex case mix.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M A S Khan
- John Goligher Unit of Coloproctology, Leeds, UK
| | - A R Hakeem
- John Goligher Unit of Coloproctology, Leeds, UK
| | - N Scott
- Department of Pathology, St James's Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zhou ZX, Zhao LY, Lin T, Liu H, Deng HJ, Zhu HL, Yan J, Li GX. Long-term oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic vs open surgery for stages II and III rectal cancer: A retrospective cohort study. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21:5505-5512. [PMID: 25987773 PMCID: PMC4427672 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i18.5505] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2014] [Accepted: 02/13/2015] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM: To evaluate the 5-year survival after laparoscopic surgery vs open surgery for stages II and III rectal cancer.
METHODS: This study enrolled 406 consecutive patients who underwent curative resection for stages II and III rectal cancer between January 2000 and December 2009 [laparoscopic rectal resection (LRR), n = 152; open rectal resection (ORR), n = 254]. Clinical characteristics, operative outcomes, pathological outcomes, postoperative recovery, and 5-year survival outcomes were compared between the two groups.
RESULTS: Most of the clinical characteristics were similar except age (59 years vs 55 years, P = 0.033) between the LRR group and ORR group. The proportion of anterior resection was higher in the LRR group than that in the ORR group (81.6% vs 66.1%, P = 0.001). The LRR group had less estimated blood loss (50 mL vs 200 mL, P < 0.001) and a lower rate of blood transfusion (4.6% vs 11.8%, P = 0.019) compared to the ORR group. The pathological outcomes of the two groups were comparable. The LRR group was associated with faster recovery of bowel function (2.8 d vs 3.7 d, P < 0.001) and shorter postoperative hospital stay (11.7 d vs 13.7 d, P < 0.001). The median follow-up time was 63 mo in the LRR group and 65 mo in the ORR group. As for the survival outcomes, the 5-year local recurrence rate (16.0% vs 16.4%, P = 0.753), 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate (63.0% vs 63.1%, P = 0.589), and 5-year overall survival (OS) rate (68.1% vs 63.5%, P = 0.682) were comparable between the LRR group and the ORR group. Stage by stage, there were also no statistical differences between the LRR group and the ORR group in terms of the 5-year local recurrence rate (stage II: 6.3% vs 8.7%, P = 0.623; stage III: 26.4% vs 23.2%, P = 0.747), 5-year DFS rate (stage II: 77.5% vs 77.6%, P = 0.462; stage III: 46.5% vs 50.9%, P = 0.738), and 5-year OS rate (stage II: 81.4% vs 74.3%, P = 0.242; stage III: 53.9% vs 54.1%, P = 0.459).
CONCLUSION: LRR for stages II and III rectal cancer can yield comparable long-term survival while achieving short-term benefits compared to open surgery.
Collapse
|
5
|
Onyeuku NE, Ayala-Peacock DN, Russo SM, Blackstock AW. The multidisciplinary approach to the treatment of rectal cancer: 2015 update. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2015; 9:507-17. [PMID: 25431898 DOI: 10.1586/17474124.2015.987753] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
The multidisciplinary approach to the management of rectal cancer continues to evolve with developments in surgery, radiation therapy as well as systemic chemotherapy. Refinement of surgical techniques to improve organ preservation, selective use of neoadjuvant (or adjuvant) therapies, improvements in staging modalities and emerging criteria for the selection of tailored therapies are some of the advancements made over the last three decades. In addition, neoadjuvant treatment alternatives, multimodality sequencing and adaptive therapies based on treatment response continue to be a subject of clinical investigation. The current article reviews the salient topics related to the multidisciplinary treatment of resectable rectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nasarachi E Onyeuku
- Comprehensive Cancer Center of Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Oh SJ, Shin JY. Risk factors of circumferential resection margin involvement in the patients with extraperitoneal rectal cancer. JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN SURGICAL SOCIETY 2012; 82:165-71. [PMID: 22403750 PMCID: PMC3294110 DOI: 10.4174/jkss.2012.82.3.165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2011] [Revised: 12/26/2011] [Accepted: 01/13/2012] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
Purpose Currently, circumferential resection margins (CRM) are used as a clinical endpoint in studies on the prognosis of rectal cancer. Although the concept of a circumferential resection margin in extraperitoneal rectal cancer differs from that in intraperitoneal rectal cancer due to differences in anatomical and biologic behaviors, previous reports have provided information on CRM involvement in all types of rectal cancer including intraperitoneal lesions. Therefore, the aim of this study was to analyze risk factors of CRM involvement in extraperitoneal rectal cancer. Methods From January 2005 to December 2008, 306 patients with extraperitoneal rectal cancer were enrolled in a prospectively collected database. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify predictors of CRM involvement. Results The overall rate of CRM involvement was found to be 16.0%. Multivariate analysis showed that male sex, larger tumor size (≥4 cm), stage higher than T3, nodal metastasis, tumor perforation and non-sphincter preserving proctectomy (NSPP) were risk factors for CRM involvement. Conclusion Male sex, larger tumor size (≥4 cm), advanced T stage, nodal metastasis, tumor perforation, and NSPP are significant risk factors of CRM involvement in extraperitoneal rectal cancer. Given that postoperative chemoradiotherapy is recommended for patients with a positive CRM, further oncologic studies are warranted to ascertain which patients with these risk factors would require adjuvant therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sung Jin Oh
- Department of Surgery, Inje University Haeundae Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Yu SKT, Patel UB, Tait DM, Brown G. Primary staging and response assessment postchemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer. COLORECTAL CANCER 2012. [DOI: 10.2217/crc.11.3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
SUMMARY Initial assessment of newly diagnosed patients with rectal cancer includes clinical examination, colonoscopy, pelvic MRI and CT scan of the thorax, abdomen and pelvis. Radiological staging can objectively evaluate both surgical and biological prognostic features of rectal cancer. MRI has emerged to be the most useful preoperative prognostic staging tool and it can predict the risk of tumor involvement of surgical circumferential resection margin. An agreed definition of favorable tumor response to chemoradiotherapy is controversial. The importance of detecting and assessing good versus poor responders to chemoradiotherapy is of increasing relevance. MRI has been found to be useful in assessing tumor response postchemoradiotherapy, especially the assessment of potential circumferential resection margin and magnetic resonance tumor regression grade. These imaging markers predict survival outcomes for good and poor responders and provide an opportunity for clinicians to offer additional neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatments to reduce local or distance failure for the poor responders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stanley KT Yu
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Downs Road, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5PT, UK
| | - Uday B Patel
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Downs Road, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5PT, UK
| | - Diana M Tait
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Downs Road, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5PT, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Hu H, Krasinskas A, Willis J. Perspectives on current tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging of cancers of the colon and rectum. Semin Oncol 2011; 38:500-10. [PMID: 21810509 DOI: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2011.05.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Improvements in classifications of cancers based on discovery and validation of important histopathological parameters and new molecular markers continue unabated. Though still not perfect, recent updates of classification schemes in gastrointestinal oncology by the American Joint Commission on Cancer (tumor-node-metastasis [TNM] staging) and the World Health Organization further stratify patients and guide optimization of treatment strategies and better predict patient outcomes. These updates recognize the heterogeneity of patient populations with significant subgrouping of each tumor stage and use of tumor deposits to significantly "up-stage" some cancers; change staging parameters for subsets of IIIB and IIIC cancers; and introduce of several new subtypes of colon carcinomas. By the nature of the process, recent discoveries that are important to improving even routine standards of patient care, especially new advances in molecular medicine, are not incorporated into these systems. Nonetheless, these classifications significantly advance clinical standards and are welcome enhancements to our current methods of cancer reporting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huankai Hu
- Department of Pathology, Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ota M, Fujii S, Ichikawa Y, Suwa H, Tatsumi K, Watanabe K, Tanaka K, Akiyama H, Endo I. Clinical characteristics of rectal cancer involving the anal canal. J Gastrointest Surg 2011; 15:460-5. [PMID: 21116728 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-010-1393-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2010] [Accepted: 11/12/2010] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study evaluates the clinical characteristics of rectal cancer involving the anal canal. METHODS A total of 346 consecutive patients with primary low rectal cancer located below the peritoneal reflection were reviewed in this study. Patients were divided into two groups according to whether the lower edge of the tumor came in contact with the anal canal (P group, n = 78) or not (Rb group, n = 268). Clinical and pathological parameters, recurrence rates, and survival rates were compared between the two groups. RESULTS The occurrence of uncommon histological types of tumor was significantly higher in the P group than in the Rb group. P group patients also had a significantly higher lateral pelvic node metastasis rate (p < 0.001), lower 5-year overall survival rate (p = 0.0491), and higher 5-year local recurrence rate (p = 0.0171) than Rb group patients. Multivariate analysis revealed that tumor location was a significant risk factor for local recurrence. In the P group, multivariate analysis showed that uncommon histological tumor types were a significant prognostic factor. CONCLUSION Rectal cancer involving the anal canal should be treated with special care, considering the particularly high lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis rate and high local recurrence rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mitsuyoshi Ota
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-9 Fukuura, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama 236-0004, Japan.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Hogan AM, Winter DC. Complete mesocolic excision--a marker of surgical quality? J Gastrointest Surg 2009; 13:1889-91. [PMID: 19655207 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-009-0976-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2009] [Accepted: 07/21/2009] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
|
11
|
Ayala DN, Russo SM, Blackstock AW. Multidisciplinary treatment of resectable rectal cancer. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2009; 3:383-94. [PMID: 19673625 DOI: 10.1586/egh.09.33] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
This review identifies evidence that influences current practices in the multidisciplinary treatment and shapes future directions in the treatment of resectable rectal cancer. Recent advances in surgery, radiotherapy and systemic chemotherapy have provided measurable improvements in disease control, functional outcomes and quality of life for patients with rectal cancer. However, controversies remain regarding the optimum delivery of adjuvant therapies. Preoperative radiation either with or without concurrent chemotherapy demonstrates lower recurrence, with minimal survival benefit. Currently, the use of neoadjuvant standard fractionation chemoradiation versus short-course radiation without chemotherapy is controversial and under investigation. New combinations of chemotherapeutic agents and targeted therapies are also being evaluated. In addition, criteria for patient selection are being re-evaluated to determine the relative benefit of modern treatments, so that we may better tailor adjuvant therapy recommendations to be patient-specific. Recommendations for adjuvant treatments of rectal cancer are continuing to evolve; however, survival has been only marginally affected despite low incidence of local recurrence. Future trials should aim to address the role of adjuvant therapies utilizing new criteria, such as function, quality of life and impact on development of metastatic disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diandra N Ayala
- Comprehensive Cancer Center of Wake Forest University, Winston Salem, NC, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|