Non-cutting setons for progressive migration of complex fistula tracts: a new spin on an old technique

Distalization of perianal fistulas after loose silicone seton drainage is a myth

BACKGROUND

It is often stated that loose seton drainage results in distal migration of a fistula tract in perianal fistula. The aim of the present study was to assess this distalization of trans- and suprasphincteric perianal fistulas after a silicone seton has been inserted.

METHODS

Consecutive patients who underwent loose seton placement for the management of a transsphincteric or suprasphincteric fistula between January 2016 and December 2021 with a pre- and postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were included in the present retrospective study. The height of the external anal sphincter (EAS) and the level of penetration of perianal fistula through the EAS or puborectal muscle (PRM) were determined on MRI. Primary outcome was migration of the fistula tract through the EAS and PRM.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight patients with perianal fistulas were included. Median height of the EAS was 28 (IQR 25-34) mm before seton placement and 27 (IQR 24-33) mm afterward. Median level of perforation was 32 (IQR 17-40) mm before seton placement and 28 (IQR 17-40) mm afterward (p = 0.37). One fistula (3%) was downgraded from mid to low transsphincteric and was laid open after 14.9 months of loose seton drainage.

CONCLUSIONS

No statistically significant distalization of complex fistula tracts after loose silicone seton drainage was found. Some complex fistulas may downgrade to a less complex fistula after long-term seton drainage. However, loose silicone seton drainage should not be offered to patients as a treatment option to downgrade a complex fistula to a simple one or even have the hope to heal it.

Loose combined cutting seton for patients with high intersphincteric fistula: a retrospective study

Background

Achieving a complete cure while maintaining continence constitutes a considerable challenge in the treatment of patients with high anal fistula. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of loose combined cutting seton (LCCS) for treating patients with high intersphincteric fistula.

Methods

Consecutive patients with high intersphincteric fistula who underwent LCCS were retrospectively enrolled. Patient data including demographics, medical history, comorbidities, details of the fistula, operative procedure, and prognosis were collected. Postoperative pain was assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS), which ranged from 0 (no pain) to 10 (extremely severe pain). The severity of fecal incontinence was assessed using the Wexner Continence Grading Scale, with a total score ranging from 0 (no incontinence) to 20 (complete incontinence). The primary outcome was the healing rate of fistula. Secondary outcomes included the recurrence rate of fistula and the severity of fecal incontinence.

Results

The 22 patients (male: female =18:4) in our study had a median follow-up of 55 (range, 32–568) days. The healing rate was 100%, and none of the patients experienced fistula recurrence. At the follow-up visit, 19 patients (86.4%) reported no fecal incontinence. The median total Wexner score was 0. 95.5% patients had VAS score of 0 and only 1 patient (4.5%) had a VAS score of 1, which indicated a low level of postoperative pain.

Conclusions

LCCS achieved a high healing rate with an increased level of continence, as well as a low level of postoperative pain, in most patients with high anal fistula in our study. Further randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm the effectiveness of this novel seton-based technique.

The effect of suture selection in complex anal fistulas on the success of cutting seton placement and patient comfort

Objective:

The aim of our study was to compare the success rates of suture selection, recovery times and pain associated with local wound infection and seton placement in patients undergoing cutting seton placement for complex anal fistula.

Methods:

The study included a total of 90 patients who were admitted with the diagnosis of complex anal fistula between January 2015 and July 2018.

Results:

The first session and other revision appointments demonstrated that the number of patients who required fistulotomy was significantly higher in group-1 as the seton failed to complete the transection (p = 0.001). When the patients were asked to rate pain for 3 different conditions according to numeric rating scale (NRS), the patients in group-2 had significantly higher pain in all 3 cases compared to the patients in group-1 (p 0.001). The impact of the suture material on local infection was examined and it was determined that the results of cultures for seton material were significantly more positive in group-1 (p = 0.001).

Conclusions:

We conclude that a multi-stage tight seton placement with silk material can lead to satisfactory results by aiming to shorten the cutting time of silk seton.

Benign anorectal disease: hemorrhoids, fissures, and fistulas

Hemorrhoids, anal fissures, and fistulas are common benign anorectal diseases that have a significant impact on patients’ lives. They are primarily encountered by primary care providers, including internists, gastroenterologists, pediatricians, gynecologists, and emergency care providers. Most complex anorectal disease cases are referred to colorectal surgeons. Knowledge of these disease processes is essential for proper treatment and follow up. Hemorrhoids and fissures frequently benefit from non-operative treatment; they may, however, require surgical procedures. The treatment of anorectal abscess and fistulas is mainly surgical. The aim of this review is to examine the etiology, diagnosis, medical, and surgical treatment for these benign anorectal diseases.

Efficacy of Plug Treatment for Complex Anorectal Fistulae: Long-term Danish Results

Purpose

Bioprosthetic plugs are appealing, allow simple, repeatable applications, preserve sphincter integrity, minimize patient discomfort, and allow subsequent surgical options when needed. However, success rates vary widely. This study assessed the healing rate in our department when both the Cook-Surgisis and the Gore fistula plugs were used and the long-term effectiveness of using anal plugs for managing anal fistulae.

Methods

A chart review was performed for patients who had undergone plug insertion between January 2008 and December 2015 at Copenhagen University Hospital, Hvidovre. Data were collected through a prospectively collected database. Plugs were inserted according to guidance provided by 2 experienced surgeons. Long-term results were determined by clinical visits 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery and once yearly thereafter.

Results

From 2008 to 2015, 36 fistula plugs were inserted. During the follow-up period with a median duration of 18 months (range, 7-60 months), the fistulae of 52.8% of the patients healed. The plug failure rate was 44.4%, and the fistula recurrence rate was 26.3%. The median time to recurrence was 12 months. The overall success rate for plug treatment in our department was 39% when adjusted for recurrence.

Conclusion

The use of bioprosthetic plugs to treat patients with complex anal fistulae seems to be a safe, viable option for complex fistula repair when other surgical attempts have failed. However, it should not be the treatment of choice. Further prospective randomized studies with a sufficient sample-size and standardized measurements are necessary to evaluate the efficacy of fistula plugs fully.

[Seton drainage in sphincter-sparing treatment of rectal fistulas]

Sphincter-sparing procedures for rectal fistulas are becoming more popular among coloproctologists. However, the outcomes are not optimal that forces surgeons to seek new approaches in order to improve results. Seton drainage prior to radical stage is one of these methods. The effect of seton drainage on the outcomes is reviewed in the article. Elibrary, Pubmed and Google Scholar databases were analyzed. We have assessed 14 out of 151 trials for the period 1984 - 2017. There were no significant advantages of seton drainage compared with single-stage approach (χ² = 3.84, p> 0.05, RR = 0.95, CI 95% 0.84 - 1.08). The same situation is observed for mucomuscular flap bringing down to close internal fistula. Fistula healing was more common after seton drainage deployment within 4 - 8 weeks. Bringing down of the flap to anal canal should be preferred after drainage due to less incidence of recurrences. Further trials are necessary to determine advisability of seton drainage and optimal surgical approach.

The treatment of anal fistula: second ACPGBI Position Statement - 2018

It is over 10 years since the first ACPGBI Position Statement on the management of anal fistula was published in 2007. This second edition is the result of scrutiny of the literature published during this time; it updates the original Position Statement and reviews the published evidence surrounding treatments for anal fistula that have been developed since the original publication.

Video-assisted anal fistula treatment: a high volume unit initial experience

Introduction Perianal fistulas are a common problem. Video-assisted anal fistula treatment is a new technique for the management of this difficult condition. We describe our initial experience with the technique to facilitate the treatment of established perianal fistulas. Methods We reviewed a prospectively maintained database relating to consecutive patients undergoing video-assisted anal fistula treatment in a single unit. Results Seventy-eight consecutive patients had their perianal fistulas treated with video-assistance from November 2014 to June 2016. Complete follow-up data were available in 74 patients, with median follow-up of 14 months (interquartile range 7-19 months). There were no complications and all patients were treated as day cases. Most patients had recurrent disease, with 57 (77%) having had previous fistula surgery. At follow-up, 60 (81%) patients reported themselves 'cured' (asymptomatic) including 5 patients with Crohn's disease and one who had undergone 10 previous surgical procedures. Logistical stepwise regression did not demonstrate any statistically significant factors that may have been considered to affect outcome (age, gender, diabetes, previous I&D, Crohn's disease, smoking, type of fistula). Conclusions Our data have shown that video-assisted anal fistula treatment is safe and effective in the management of perianal fistulas in our patients and this suggests it may be applied to all patients regardless of comorbidity, underlying pathology or type of fistula.

Pulling Seton: Combination of mechanisms

BACKGROUND

Seton-based techniques are among popular methods for treating high type anal fistula. These techniques are categorized to cutting and noncutting regarding their mechanism of action. In this report we are about to describe a new technique, which is a combination of both mechanisms; we call it Pulling Seton.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this technique after determining internal and external orifice of fistula, fistulectomy is done from both ends to the level of external sphincteric muscle. Finally, a remnant of fistula, which remains beneath external sphincteric muscle is excised, and Seton is passed instead of it and tied externally. After the wound heals, patient is asked to pull down the Seton for 3-4 min, 4 times a day. We prospectively enrolled 201 patients with high type anal fistula in this study.

RESULTS

Seton gradually passes through external sphincteric muscle till it is displaced outwards or removed by a surgeon via a small incision. 94% of patients treated by this method accomplished their treatment completely without recurrence. None of the patients developed permanent fecal or gas incontinence. Only 5% of patients developed with recurrence of fistula. Since Seton traction is not permanent in this technique, Seton cuts external sphincter slowly, and minimal rate of incontinence is reported.

CONCLUSION

Pulling Seton seems to be an efficient way in treating high type anal fistula with minimal rate of recurrence and complications such as incontinence and authors suggest further randomized studies to compare its efficacy with other Seton-based techniques.

Application of advancement flap after loose seton placement: a modified two-stage surgical repair of a transsphincteric anal fistula

Purpose

A number of techniques have been described for the treatment of a transsphincteric anal fistula. In this report, we aimed to introduce a relatively new two-stage technique, application of advancement flap after loose seton placement, to present its technical aspects and to document our results.

Methods

Included in this retrospective study were 13 patients (10 males, 3 females) with a mean age of 42 years who underwent a two-stage seton and advancement flap surgery for transsphincteric anal fistula between June 2008 and June 2013. In the first stage, a loose seton was placed in the fistula tract, and in the second stage, which was performed three months later, the internal and external orifices were closed with advancement flaps.

Results

All the patients were discharged on the first postoperative day. The mean follow-up period was 34 months. Only one patient reported anal rigidity and intermittent pain, which was eventually resolved with conservative measures. The mean postoperative Wexner incontinence score was 1. No recurrence or complications were observed, and no further surgical intervention was required during follow-up.

Conclusion

The two-stage seton and advancement flap technique is very efficient and seems to be a good alternative for the treatment of a transsphincteric anal fistula.

Hemorrhoids and fistulas: new solutions to old problems

Symptoms thought related to hemorrhoids must be carefully considered before intervention. The first line of therapy for any hemorrhoidal complaint remains conservative management with increased fluid and fiber intake and appropriate modification of toileting behavior. Bleeding in grades 1 and 2 hemorrhoids that does not respond to this can be satisfactorily and safely managed with office-based therapies; some grade 3 hemorrhoids would also respond to this, though more treatment sessions would likely be required. Operative therapy is the best choice for management of persistently symptomatic grade 2 disease and for grades 3 and 4 symptomatic hemorrhoids as well. With proper patient selection and preparation, along with a familiarity with instrumentation and techniques, good results can be obtained with newer operative interventions for internal hemorrhoids. Outcomes must always be compared with those obtained with classic excisional hemorrhoidectomy.

Surgical treatment of perianal abscess and fistula-in-ano in childhood, with emphasis in children older than 2 years

BACKGROUND

Anal sepsis in children ranges from perianal abscess to fistula-in-ano. It is mostly observed in boys younger than 2 years. Most are treated conservatively. In contrast, anal sepsis in older children presents significant similarities to that of adults and is predominantly treated surgically. We report our outcomes after surgical treatment of anal abscess and fistula-in-ano in children older than 2 years.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Ninety-eight (98) children were operated on for anal abscess (46 patients; 47%) and/or fistula-in-ano (52 patients; 53%). Incision and drainage of the abscess was performed as outpatients. In patients with fistulas, fistulotomy was the main treatment approach. All patients were healthy without risk factors for anal sepsis.

RESULTS

In patients with anal abscess treated with incision and drainage, low recurrence (13%) or fistula formation rates were observed. Most anal fistulas were simple entities. Significant involvement of the anal sphincter was found in 3 (6%) of 52 patients. An abscess cavity between the anal canal and the perianal skin was found in 4 (8%) of 52 patients, and an enlarged cryptic gland was found in 5 (10%) of 52 cases. Fistulotomy was performed in all patients with additional seton placement in 3 (6%) of 52 and a cryptotomy in 5 (10%) of 52 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Anal abscesses in children are easily treated by incision and drainage with low recurrence of perianal sepsis. Fistulas can be treated successfully in most patients with a fistulotomy, whereas complex fistulas are uncommon.

Setons in the treatment of anal fistula: review of variations in materials and techniques

AIM

Anorectal fistulas have been a common surgical problem since ancient times. Age-old seton techniques are still practiced successfully in the treatment of complex anal fistulas. Many variations in materials and techniques are described in the literature. The selection of a seton type and technique depends on personal preferences. Our aim was to put together all the available variations in materials and techniques for seton treatment. This comprehensive review will help the surgeon to become more familiar with the various options available with regard to materials and techniques.

METHODS

A review of the literature using Medline was done using the Key Words 'anal fistula' and 'seton'. All articles published in English were reviewed. The articles which had variations in materials and techniques for seton treatment were studied.

RESULTS

Various aspects of variations in materials, insertion techniques, maintenance of tension, mechanisms of action, drainage techniques and changing the seton have been elaborated in detail.

CONCLUSIONS

Throughout this paper we present the various available variations in setons with regard to materials, placement and maintenance techniques. This study will help clinicians in choosing a new seton variation or modifying their current method of treatment with setons.