Current status of laparoscopic surgery for patients with Crohn's disease

Short-term and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic vs open ileocolic resection in patients with Crohn's disease: Propensity-score matching analysis

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic ileocolic resection (LICR) is the preferred surgical approach for primary ileocolic Crohn’s disease (CD) because it has greater recovery benefits than open ICR (OICR).

AIM

To compare short- and long-term outcomes in patients who underwent LICR and OICR.

METHODS

Patients who underwent ICR for primary CD from 2006 to 2017 at a single tertiary center specializing in CD were included. Patients who underwent LICR and OICR were subjected to propensity-score matching analysis. Patients were propensity-score matched 1:1 by factors potentially associated with 30-d perioperative morbidity. These included demographic characteristics and disease- and treatment-related variables. Factors were compared using univariate and multivariate analyses. Long-term surgical recurrence-free survival (SRFS) in the two groups was determined by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by the log-rank test.

RESULTS

During the study period, 348 patients underwent ICR, 211 by the open approach and 137 laparoscopically. Propensity-score matching yielded 102 pairs of patients. The rate of postoperative complication was significantly lower (14% versus 32%, P = 0.003), postoperative hospital stay significantly shorter (8 d versus 13 d, P = 0.003), and postoperative pain on day 7 significantly lower (1.4 versus 2.3, P < 0.001) in propensity-score matched patients who underwent LICR than in those who underwent OICR. Multivariate analysis showed that postoperative complications were significantly associated with preoperative treatment with biologics [odds ratio (OR): 3.14, P = 0.01] and an open approach to surgery (OR: 2.86, P = 0.005). The 5- and 10-year SRFS rates in the matched pairs were 92.9% and 83.3%, respectively, with SRFS rates not differing significantly between the OICR and LICR groups. The performance of additional procedures was an independent risk factor for surgical recurrence [hazard ratio (HR): 3.28, P = 0.02].

CONCLUSION

LICR yielded better short-term outcomes and postoperative recovery than OICR, with no differences in long-term outcomes. LICR may provide greater benefits in selected patients with primary CD.

Surgical Techniques and Differences in Postoperative Outcomes for Patients With Crohn's Disease With Ileosigmoid Fistulas: A Single-Institution Experience, 2010-2016

BACKGROUND

Surgical treatment of ileosigmoid fistulas in Crohn's disease is poorly characterized.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to identify differences in patient postoperative outcomes for isolated ileosigmoid fistulas by surgical approach (laparoscopic versus open) and sigmoid colon repair type (sigmoid resection versus primary repair).

DESIGN

Using a prospectively collected database, we gathered perioperative data from chart reviews to calculate differences and associations between treatment groups.

SETTINGS

The study was conducted at a single tertiary care center.

PATIENTS

Patients with Crohn's disease who underwent surgery for isolated ileosigmoid fistulas between July 1, 2010, and June 30, 2016 were included.

RESULTS

We identified 84 patients, with an average age of 37 years. A total of 51 were men and 33 were women; 34 underwent a sigmoid resection, whereas 50 had a primary repair of the sigmoid. All of the patients underwent an ileocolic resection. A total of 67 surgeries were initially attempted laparoscopically, of which 17 (25.4%) were converted to open, with 50 (59.5%) completed laparoscopically. There were no significant differences in length of stay or incidence of postoperative complications by surgical approach (laparoscopic versus open). For patients who underwent a primary sigmoid repair versus a sigmoid resection, there were no significant differences in postoperative complications, but there was a significant difference in the length of stay (6.36 vs 9.56 d for primary repair versus resection; multivariate p value of 0.022).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Postoperative complications and length of stay were measured.

LIMITATIONS

The study was limited by its small sample size, cross-sectional nature of the data, and limited information about preoperative outpatient medical treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic surgery for isolated ileosigmoid fistulas in Crohn's disease is safe and does not result in a different length of stay or incidence of postoperative complications. Primary repair (rather than resection) of the sigmoid colon in these cases, when feasible, appears to be safe and is likely to be cost-effective given the reduced length of stay. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A993. TÉCNICAS QUIRÚRGICAS Y DIFERENCIAS EN LOS RESULTADOS POSTOPERATORIOS PARA LOS PACIENTES CON ENFERMEDAD DE CROHN CON FÍSTULAS ILEO-SIGMOIDEAS: UNA EXPERIENCIA EN UNA SOLA INSTITUCIÓN, 2010-2016: El tratamiento quirúrgico de las fístulas ileo-sigmoideas en la enfermedad de Crohn está mal caracterizado.

OBJETIVO

Identificar las diferencias en los resultados postoperatorios de los pacientes para las fístulas ileo-sigmoideas aisladas por abordaje quirúrgico (laparoscópica versus abierta) y tipo de reparación de colon sigmoide (resección sigmoidea versus reparación primaria). DISEÑO:: Utilizando una base de datos recopilada de forma prospectiva, se recopilaron datos perioperatorios de las revisiones de los gráficos para calcular las diferencias y las asociaciones entre los grupos de tratamiento.

AJUSTE

Un solo centro de atención terciaria.

PACIENTES

Pacientes con enfermedad de Crohn que se sometieron a una cirugía para fístulas ileo-sigmoideas aisladas entre el 1 de julio de 2010 y el 30 de junio de 2016.

RESULTADOS

Se identificaron 84 pacientes, con una edad promedio de 37 años. Un total de 51 eran hombres y 33 mujeres; 34 se sometieron a una resección sigmoidea, mientras que 50 tuvieron una reparación primaria del sigmoide. Todos los pacientes fueron sometidos a resección ileocólica. Inicialmente, un total de 67 círugias se intentaron por vía laparoscópica, de las cuales 17 (25,4%) se convirtieron en cirugías abiertas, y 50 (59,5%) se completaron por vía laparoscópica. No hubo diferencias significativas en la duración de la estancia o la incidencia de complicaciones postoperatorias por abordaje quirúrgico (laparoscópica versus abierta). Para los pacientes que se sometieron a una reparación sigmoidea primaria versus una resección sigmoidea, no hubo diferencias significativas en las complicaciones postoperatorias, pero sí hubo una diferencia significativa en la duración de la estancia hospitalaria (6,36 versus a 9,56 días para la reparación primaria frente a la resección; p multivariable -valor de 0.022).

PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADOS

Complicaciones postoperatorias y duración de la estancia.

LIMITACIONES

Tamaño de muestra pequeño, naturaleza transversal de los datos e información limitada sobre el tratamiento médico ambulatorio preoperatorio del paciente.

CONCLUSIONES

La cirugía laparoscópica para fístulas ileo-sigmoideas aisladas en la enfermedad de Crohn es segura y no ocasiona una duración diferente de la estancia hospitalaria ni una incidencia diferente de complicaciones postoperatorias. La reparación primaria (en lugar de la resección) del colon sigmoide en estos casos, cuando es posible, parece ser segura y es probable que sea rentable, dada la duración reducida de la estancia. Vea el Resumen del Video en http://links.lww.com/DCR/A993.

Minimally Invasive Surgery in Complex Crohn's Disease

Minimally invasive approaches are safe, feasible, and often recommended as the initial choice in the surgical management of Crohn's disease. However, a consensus has not been reached as the ideal approach in the surgical treatment of complex and recurrent Crohn's disease. Laparoscopy may provide advantages such as shorter length of stay and decreased postoperative pain and result in less adhesion formation in patients with complex disease. Robotic techniques may be beneficial in selected patients for completion proctectomy, providing better visualization in the narrow pelvis and increased dexterity. Decision of surgical technique should be made on a case-by-case basis.

A review of reports on single-incision laparoscopic surgery for Crohn's disease

The aim of this review was to analyze the currently available literature on single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) for Crohn's disease (CD) with respect to surgical indications, surgical techniques, feasibility, and possible benefits of SILS for CD. A systematic query of articles published from January 2010 to July 2018 was performed. The studies were assessed for patient's age, gender, body mass index, disease type, SILS procedure, surgical procedure, incision length, operation time, rates of conversion to open surgery, postoperative complications, mortality, length of hospital stay, and rates of reoperation. After an initial review, 11 reports were selected. The surgical techniques and instruments showed wide variation. The mean operation time for SILS tended to be shorter than that for multiport laparoscopic surgery (MLS). The reported rates of conversion to open surgery and postoperative complications were not very different from those reported for MLS. In conclusion, the present review suggests that the SILS technique may be feasible and safe for select patients with CD. However, because we reviewed only a few studies with small sample sizes, prospectively designed trials with a large number of patients are required to clarify the true benefits of SILS for CD.

Surgical care of the pediatric Crohn's disease patient

Despite the significant advances in the medical management of inflammatory bowel disease over the last decade, surgery continues to play a major role in the management of pediatric Crohn's disease (CD). While adult and pediatric Crohn's disease may share many clinical characteristics, pediatric Crohn's patients often have a more aggressive phenotype, and the operative care given by the pediatric surgeon to the newly diagnosed Crohn's patient is very different in nature to the surgical needs of adult patients after decades of disease progression. Children also have the unique surgical indication of growth failure to consider in the overall clinical decision making. While surgery is never curative in CD, it has the ability to transform the disease process in children, and appropriately timed operations may have tremendous impact on a child's physical and mental maturation. This monograph aims to address the surgical care of Crohn's disease in general, with a specific emphasis on the surgical treatment of small intestinal and ileocecal involvement.

Laparoscopic Surgery Can Reduce Postoperative Edema Compared with Open Surgery

Aim. The study aimed to investigate the impact of laparoscopic surgery and open surgery on postoperative edema in Crohn's disease. Methods. Patients who required enterectomy were divided into open group (Group O) and laparoscopic group (Group L). Edema was measured using bioelectrical impedance analysis preoperatively (PRE) and on postoperative day 3 (POD3) and postoperative day 5 (POD5). The postoperative edema was divided into slight edema and edema by an edema index, defined as the ratio of total extracellular water to total body water. Results. Patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery had better clinical outcomes and lower levels of inflammatory and stress markers. A total of 31 patients (26.05%) developed slight edema and 53 patients (44.54%) developed edema on POD3. More patients developed postoperative edema in Group O than in Group L on POD3 (p = 0.006). The value of the edema index of Group O was higher than that of Group L on POD3 and POD5 (0.402 ± 0.010 versus 0.397 ± 0.008, p = 0.001; 0.401 ± 0.009 versus 0.395 ± 0.007, p = 0.039, resp.). Conclusions. Compared with open surgery, laparoscopic surgery can reduce postoperative edema, which may contribute to the better outcomes of laparoscopic surgery over open surgery.

Minimally invasive surgery for inflammatory bowel disease: Review of current developments and future perspectives

Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) comprise a population of patients that have a high likelihood of both surgical treatment at a young age and repetitive operative interventions. Therefore surgical procedures need to aim at minimizing operative trauma with best postoperative recovery. Minimally invasive techniques have been one of the major advancements in surgery in the last decades and are nowadays almost routinely performed in colorectal resections irrespective of underlying disease. However due to special disease related characteristics such as bowel stenosis, interenteric fistula, abscesses, malnutrition, repetitive surgeries, or immunosuppressive medications, patients with IBD represent a special cohort with specific needs for surgery. This review summarizes current evidence of minimally invasive surgery for patients with Crohn’s disease or ulcerative colitis and gives an outlook on the future perspective of technical advances in this highly moving field with its latest developments in single port surgery, robotics and trans-anal techniques.

Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) for children with Crohn's disease

PURPOSE

Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) has been described in adults with Crohn's disease, but its use in pediatric Crohn's patients has been limited. The purpose of this study was to review our experience with SILS in pediatric patients with Crohn's disease.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed for patients diagnosed with Crohn's disease who underwent small bowel resection or ileocecectomy at a freestanding children's hospital from 2006 to 2014. Data collected included demographic data, interval from diagnosis to surgery, operative time, length of stay, and postoperative outcomes.

RESULTS

Analysis identified 19 patients who underwent open surgery (OS) and 41 patients who underwent SILS. One patient (2.4 %) within the SILS group required conversion to OS. Demographic characteristics were similar between the 2 cohorts. The most common indication for surgery was stricture/obstruction (SILS 70.7 % vs. OS 68.4 %, p = 0.86), and ileocecectomy was the most common primary procedure performed (SILS 90.2 % vs. OS 100 % OS). Operative times were longer for SILS (135 ± 50 vs. 105 ± 37 min, p = 0.02). However, when the last 20 SILS cases were compared to all OS cases, the difference was no longer statistically significant (SILS 123.3 ± 34.2 vs. OS 105 ± 36.5, p = 0.12). No difference was noted in postoperative length of stay (SILS 6.5 ± 2.2 days vs. OS 7.4 ± 2.2 days, p = 0.16) or overall complication rate (SILS 24.4 % vs. OS 26.3 %, p = 0.16).

CONCLUSION

SILS ileocecectomy is feasible in pediatric patients with Crohn's disease, achieving outcomes similar to OS. As experience increased, operative times also became comparable.

Current management of intestinal bowel disease: the role of surgery

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic affection, in which the two main phenotypical components are Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. In both diseases, medical treatment has the main role; in some phases of the natural history of IBD, surgery becomes an important therapeutic tool. The IBD represents a model of multidisciplinary management. Timing represents the key issue for proper management of IBD patients. For acute and severe IBD, the surgery can be a salvage procedure. Today, the laparoscopic approach plays an important role in armamentarium of the surgeon. Several articles compared the short- and long-term results between laparoscopic and open approaches in IBD. The aim of this review is to focus the role of surgery in IBD as well as the role of laparoscopic approach, and principally, the "state of the art" for surgical treatment, sometimes very challenging for surgeon, in all clinical features of IBD by a review of literature highlighted by the most recent international guidelines.

What are the consequences of enlarging the extraction site to exteriorize a large specimen during laparoscopic surgery for Crohn's enteritis?

AIM

The implications of extraction site enlargement for the removal of large specimens during laparoscopic surgery for Crohn's disease have not been clearly described; such a description is the aim of this study.

METHOD

An institutional database was queried to identify patients undergoing laparoscopic resection for Crohn's disease through midline incision between 1995 and 2013. Perioperative outcomes were compared among cases completed through their initial extraction site (L), completed after increasing the length of the initial extraction site (IL) for specimen exteriorization, and cases converted to open surgery (C). Univariate and multivariate statistical analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Out of 309 patients, 52 required IL and 36 required C. Heavier, older, male patients were more likely to require IL or C. There were no differences in disease behaviour (P = 0.260), procedures performed (P = 0.12) or postoperative morbidity (P = 0.33). IL and L groups had a comparable initial length of hospital stay (LOS), which was shorter than in the C group. While there were no significant differences in causes of readmission (P = 0.31), IL had increased readmission rates compared with L [odds ratio (OR) 2.80, P = 0.021] or C (OR 13.89, P = 0.015). When combining initial and readmission LOS, C and IL groups had comparable overall LOS [median ratio (MR) 1.09, P = 0.57], which was significantly longer than in the L group (MR 1.27, P = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

Extraction site enlargement during laparoscopic surgery for enteric Crohn's disease had no impact on primary LOS. However, the shorter initial LOS was offset by increased readmission rates when compared with formal conversion. The threshold to convert in case of anticipated difficulty due to a large specimen should be low.

Oversewing staple lines to prevent anastomotic complications in primary ileocolic resections for Crohn's disease

BACKGROUND

Oversewing staple lines may be a novel way to reduce anastomotic complications after primary ileocolic resections for Crohn's disease (CD).

STUDY DESIGN

This is a single-institution, non-concurrent cohort study of CD patients undergoing primary ileocolic resections (ICR) with stapled anastomoses from 2007 to 2013. Demographic and clinical characteristics were collected. Propensity scores were calculated for oversewing versus not. Postoperative outcomes within 30 days of surgery were collected. Anastomotic leak, intra-abdominal abscess, small bowel obstruction, and anastomotic bleed were considered major anastomotic complications (MACs). Multivariate analysis controlling for inverse probability weights was used to identify predictors of MACs.

RESULTS

A total of 269 patients were included, of which 120 had undergone oversewing (OS). After controlling for propensity scores, not oversewing (NOS) and OS groups were similar in all preoperative characteristics with the exception of more laparoscopic resections and intracorporeal anastomoses in the NOS group. On univariate analysis, OS was protective against MACs (odds ratio (OR) 0.29, p < 0.01). In a multivariable model using inverse propensity weights and controlling for laparoscopic and intracorporeal approaches, oversewing remained a significant predictor of reduced MACs (OR 0.37, p < 0.001), while intracorporeal anastomoses increased their likelihood (OR 3.7, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

After controlling for clinical and surgical factors, oversewing staple lines in primary ICRs for CD is correlated with reduced MACs.

Laparoscopic surgery in the management of Crohn's disease

Crohn’s disease is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease with surgery still frequently necessary in its treatment. Since the 1990’s, laparoscopic surgery has become increasingly common for primary resections in patients with Crohn’s disease and has now become the standard of care. Studies have shown no difference in recurrence rates when compared to open surgery and benefits include shorter hospital stay, lower rates of wound infection and decreased time to bowel function. This review highlights studies comparing the laparoscopic approach to the open approach in specific situations, including cases of complicated Crohn’s disease.