Incidence, risks and outcome of radiological leak following early contrast enema after anterior resection

Double-stapled anastomosis without "dog-ears" reduces the anastomotic leakage in laparoscopic anterior resection of rectal cancer: A prospective, randomized, controlled study

Background

Anastomotic leakage (AL) is a major cause of postoperative morbidity and mortality in the treatment of colorectal cancer. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the resection of "dog-ears" in laparoscopic anterior resection of rectal cancer (called modified double-stapling technique, MDST) could reduce the rate of AL in patients with middle and high rectal cancer, as compared with the conventional double-stapling technique (DST).

Methods

The clinical data of 232 patients with middle and high rectal cancer were prospectively collected from September 2015 to October 2018. They were randomly divided into the MDST group (n = 116) and the DST group (n = 116) and the data were prospectively analyzed. Morbidity and AL rate were compared between the two groups.

Results

Patient demographics, tumor size, and time of first flatus were similar between the two groups. No difference was observed in the operation time between the two groups. The AL rate was significantly lower in the MDST group than in the DST group (3.4 vs. 11.2%, p = 0.032). The age and anastomotic technique were the factors associated with AL according to the multivariate analysis. The location of the AL in the DST group was further investigated, revealing that AL was in the same place as the "dog-ears" (11/13, 84.6%).

Conclusions

Our prospective comparative study demonstrated that MDST have a better short-term outcome in reducing AL compared with DST. Therefore, this technique could be an alternative approach to maximize the benefit of laparoscopic anterior resection on patients with middle and high rectal cancer. The "dog-ears" create stapled corners potentially ischemic, since they represent the area with high incidence of AL.(NCT:02770911).

Preoperative risk factors associated with anastomotic leakage after colectomy for colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

anastomotic leak (AL) after colectomy for colorectal cancer (CRC) is a life-threatening complication. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the preoperative risk factors for AL in patients submitted to colectomy.

METHODS

the bibliographic search covered 15 years and 9 months, from 1st January 2005 to 19th October 2020 and was performed using PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde, Europe PMC and Web of Science databases. The inclusion criteria were cross-sectional, cohort and case-control studies on preoperative risk factors for AL (outcome). The Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used for bias assessment within studies. Meta-analysis involved the calculation of treatment effects for each individual study including odds ratio (OR), relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) with construction of a random-effects model to evaluate the impact of each variable on the outcome. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05.

RESULTS

cross-sectional studies were represented by 39 articles, cohort studies by 21 articles and case-control by 4 articles. Meta-analysis identified 14 main risk factors for AL in CRC patients after colectomy, namely male sex (RR=1.56; 95% CI=1.40-1.75), smoking (RR=1.48; 95% CI=1.30-1.69), alcohol consumption (RR=1.35; 95% CI=1.21-1.52), diabetes mellitus (RR=1.97; 95% CI=1.44-2.70), lung diseases (RR=2.14; 95% CI=1.21-3.78), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (RR=1.10; 95% IC=1.04-1.16), coronary artery disease (RR=1.61; 95% CI=1.07-2.41), chronic kidney disease (RR=1.34; 95% CI=1.22-1.47), high ASA grades (RR=1.70; 95% CI=1.37-2.09), previous abdominal surgery (RR=1.30; 95% CI=1.04-1.64), CRC-related emergency surgery (RR=1.61; 95% CI=1.26-2.07), neoadjuvant chemotherapy (RR=2.16; 95% CI=1.17-4.02), radiotherapy (RR=2.36; 95% CI=1.33-4.19) and chemoradiotherapy (RR=1.58; 95% CI=1.06-2.35).

CONCLUSIONS

important preoperative risk factors for colorectal AL in CRC patients have been identified based on best evidence-based research, and such knowledge should influence decisions regarding treatment.

Fatores de risco pré-operatórios associados à fístula anastomótica após colectomia para câncer colorretal: revisão sistemática e metanálise

RESUMO Objetivo: fístula anastomótica (FA) após colectomia para câncer colorretal (CCR) é complicação grave. Esta revisão sistemática e meta-análise avaliou os fatores de risco pré-operatórios para FA em pacientes submetidos à colectomia. Métodos: a pesquisa bibliográfica abrangeu 15 anos e 9 meses (1 de janeiro de 2005 - 19 de outubro de 2020), sendo utilizadas as plataformas PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde, Europe PMC e Web of Science. O critério de inclusão foram estudos transversais, coorte e caso-controle em fatores de risco pré-operatórios para FA (desfecho). A escala Newcastle-Ottawa foi usada para avaliação de viés dos estudos. A metanálise envolveu o cálculo dos efeitos de tratamento para cada estudo individualmente incluindo odds ratio (OR), risco relativo (RR) e intervalo de confiança de 95% (IC95%) com construção de modelo de efeitos aleatórios, para avaliar o impacto de cada variável (p<0,05). Resultados: foram selecionados 39 estudos transversais, 21 coortes e quatro casos-controle. A metanálise identificou 14 fatores de risco para FA em pacientes com CCR após colectomia, que são sexo masculino (RR=1,56; IC 95%=1,40-1,75), tabagismo (RR=1,48; IC 95%=1,30-1,69), alcoolismo (RR=1,35; IC 95%=1,21-1,52), diabetes mellitus (RR=1,97; IC 95%=1,44-2,70), doenças pulmonares (RR=2,14; IC 95%=1,21-3,78), doença pulmonar obstrutiva crônica (RR=1,10; IC 95%=1,04-1,16), doença coronariana (RR=1,61; IC 95%=1,07-2,41), doença renal crônica (RR=1,34; IC 95%=1,22-1,47), altas notas na escala ASA (RR=1,70; IC 95%=1,37-2,09), cirurgia abdominal prévia (RR=1,30; IC 95%=1,04-1,64), cirurgia de emergência (RR=1,61; IC 95%=1,26-2,07), quimioterapia neoadjuvante (RR=2,16; IC 95%=1,17-4,02), radioterapia (RR=2,36; IC 95%=1,33-4,19) e quimiorradioterapia (RR=1,58; IC 95%=1,06-2,35). Conclusões: importantes fatores de risco pré-operatórios para FA colorretais em pacientes com CCR foram identificados com base nas melhores pesquisas baseadas em evidências e esse conhecimento deve influenciar decisões relacionadas ao tratamento.

Contrast-enhanced abdominal computed tomography to evaluate anastomotic integrity before ileostomy closure in postoperative colorectal cancer patients

PURPOSE

To investigate the usefulness of contrast-enhanced abdominal computed tomography (CECT) to predict clinically significant anastomotic leakage (CSAL) in patients who received colorectal cancer surgery with diverting ileostomy.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, patients who underwent colorectal cancer surgery with diverting ileostomy from January 2014 to May 2018 and postoperative CECT were included. The performance of significant CECT features, identified using multivariable logistic regression, to predict CSAL was calculated. In subgroup analysis, the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROCs) were compared between CECT and water-soluble contrast enema (WSCE) using DeLong's method.

RESULTS

Of 325 patients (median age, 58 years; 213 men), CECT was routinely performed to evaluate cancer status in 307 (94.5%), and CSAL was observed in 28 (8.6%). After multivariable adjustment, anastomotic mural defect (odds ratio [OR] 5.24; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.77-15.51; p = 0.003), perianastomotic air (OR 7.28; 95% CI 1.82-29.17; p = 0.007) and ischemic colitis (OR 3.30; 95% CI 1.13-9.61; p = 0.029) were significantly associated with CSAL. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and positive and negative predictive values of significant CECT features were 60.7%, 88.2%, 85.9%, 32.7%, and 96.0%, respectively. In subgroup analysis of 144 patients, the AUROC using significant CECT features (optimal sensitivity/specificity, 50.0%/90.4%) was comparable to that using WSCE (optimal sensitivity/specificity, 12.5%/97.8%) to predict CSAL (0.704 vs. 0.552, p = 0.085).

CONCLUSION

CECT performed after colorectal cancer surgery may be useful to assess anastomotic integrity before ileostomy closure, especially to negatively predict CSAL. In the presence of anastomotic mural defect, perianastomotic air, or ischemic colitis, WSCE may be recommended to exclude CSAL.

Effects of Adjuvant Therapy Compliance and Anastomotic Leakage on the Oncologic Outcomes of Patients With Rectal Cancer After Curative Resection

BACKGROUND

Anastomotic leakage might be directly or indirectly related to the prognosis of patients with rectal cancer.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate whether anastomotic leakage affects the oncologic outcomes in patients with rectal cancer.

DESIGN

This was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data.

SETTINGS

This study was conducted at a teaching hospital between January 2009 and December 2013.

PATIENTS

Patients who underwent curative resection for primary rectal cancer were included.

MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURE

Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to evaluate disease-free survival and overall survival.

RESULTS

The overall incidence of anastomotic leakage was 2.7% (107/3865). Local recurrence was more frequent in patients with anastomotic leakage than in those without (14.0% vs 6.7%; p = 0.007). By multivariate analysis, anastomotic leakage was associated with increased local recurrence rate (p = 0.014) and poorer overall survival (p = 0.011). In subgroup analysis, compared with other pathologic risk factors, anastomotic leakage was associated with higher occurrence of local and distant recurrence in patients with stage II rectal cancer (p = 0.031 and <0.001). In patients with stage III rectal cancers, adjuvant therapy was more likely to be delayed or canceled in those experiencing anastomotic leakage (63 vs 39 d, p < 0.001; 37.3% vs 66.7%, p < 0.001). In addition, this patient group had the worst survival outcome when compared with those without anastomotic leakage and those with timely adjuvant therapy (5-year disease-free survival rate, p = 0.013; 5-year overall survival rate, p = 0.001).

LIMITATIONS

This study is limited by its retrospective nature.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a robust association between anastomotic leakage and local recurrence, while also potentially affect long-term survival of the patient group. Delayed or cancelled adjuvant therapy administration because of anastomotic leakage may partly account for the poorer survival in those patients with advanced rectal cancer. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B459.

EFECTOS DE OBSERVANCIA DE TERAPIA ADYUVANTE Y FUGA ANASTOMTICA, EN RESULTADOS ONCOLGICOS DE PACIENTES CON CNCER RECTAL, DESPUS DE UNA RESECCIN CURATIVA

ANTECEDENTES:La fuga anastomótica podría estar relacionada directa o indirectamente, con el pronóstico de los pacientes con cáncer de recto.OBJETIVO:El estudio tuvo como objetivo investigar si la fuga anastomótica afecta los resultados oncológicos, en pacientes con cáncer de recto.DISEÑO:Fue un análisis retrospectivo de datos recolectados prospectivamente.AJUSTE:El estudio se realizó en un hospital universitario entre enero de 2009 y diciembre de 2013.PACIENTES:Pacientes sometidos a resección curativa por cáncer rectal primario.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Se utilizaron análisis de Kaplan-Meier para evaluar la supervivencia libre de enfermedad y supervivencia general.RESULTADOS:La incidencia global de fuga anastomótica fue del 2,7% (107/3865). La recurrencia local fue más frecuente en pacientes con fuga anastomótica, que en aquellos sin ella (14,0% frente a 6,7%, p = 0,007). Por análisis multivariado, la fuga anastomótica se asoció con una mayor tasa de recurrencia local (p = 0,014) y una peor supervivencia general (p = 0,011). En el análisis de subgrupos, en comparación con otros factores de riesgo patológicos, la fuga anastomótica se asoció con una mayor incidencia de recidiva local y a distancia en pacientes con cáncer rectal en estadio II (p = 0,031 y <0,001, respectivamente). En pacientes con cáncer rectal estadio III, la terapia adyuvante tuvo más probabilidades de retrasarse o cancelarse en aquellos que sufrían fuga anastomótica (63 vs 39 días, p <0,001; 37,3% vs 66,7%, p <0,001). Y este grupo de pacientes tuvo el peor resultado de supervivencia en comparación con aquellos sin fuga anastomótica y aquellos con terapia adyuvante oportuna (tasa de supervivencia libre de enfermedad a 5 años, p = 0,013; tasa de supervivencia global a 5 años, p = 0,001).LIMITACIONES:El estudio está limitado por su naturaleza retrospectiva.CONCLUSIONES:Hubo una sólida asociación entre la fuga anastomótica y la recurrencia local, mientras que también afecta potencialmente la supervivencia a largo plazo, del grupo de pacientes. La administración de terapia adyuvante retrasada o cancelada debido a una fuga anastomótica, puede explicar en parte, la menor supervivencia en aquellos pacientes con cáncer rectal avanzado. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B459.

Less is more-the best test for anastomotic leaks in rectal cancer patients prior to ileostomy reversal

PURPOSE

No clear consensus exists on how to routinely assess the integrity of the colorectal anastomosis prior to ileostomy reversal. The objective of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of contrast enema, endoscopic procedures, and digital rectal examination in rectal cancer patients in this setting.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed. Studies assessing at least one index test for which a 2 × 2 table was calculable were included. Hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic curves were calculated and used for test comparison. Paired data were used where parameters could not be calculated. Methodological quality was assessed with the QUADAS-2 tool.

RESULTS

Two prospective and 11 retrospective studies comprising 1903 patients were eligible for inclusion. Paired data analysis showed equal or better results for sensitivity and specificity of both endoscopic procedures and digital rectal examination compared to contrast enema. Subgroup analysis of contrast enema according to methodological quality revealed that studies with higher methodological quality reported poorer sensitivity for equal specificity and vice versa. No case was described where a contrast enema revealed an anastomotic leak that was overseen in digital rectal examination or endoscopic procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopy and digital rectal examination appear to be the best diagnostic tests to assess the integrity of the colorectal anastomosis prior to ileostomy reversal. Accuracy measures of contrast enema are overestimated by studies with lower methodological quality. Synopsis of existing evidence and risk-benefit considerations justifies omission of contrast enema in favor of endoscopic and clinical assessment.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42019107771.

C-reactive protein as a predictor of anastomotic leak in the first week after anterior resection for rectal cancer

AIM

Anastomotic leak (AL) after anterior resection results in increased morbidity, mortality and local recurrence. The aim of this study was to assess the ability of C-reactive protein (CRP) to predict AL in the first week after anterior resection for rectal cancer.

METHOD

A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database that included all patients undergoing anterior resection between January 2008 and December 2013 was performed. The ability of CRP to predict AL was assessed using area under the receiver-operating characteristics (AUC) curves. The severity of AL was defined using the International Study Group of Rectal Cancer (ISREC) grading system.

RESULTS

Two-hundred and eleven patients were included in the study. Statistically significant differences in mean CRP values were found between those with and without an AL on postoperative days 5, 6 and 7. A CRP value of 132 mg/l on postoperative day 5 had an AUC of 0.75, corresponding to a sensitivity of 70%, a specificity of 76.6%, a positive predictive value of 16.3% and a negative predictive value of 97.5%. Multivariable analysis found that a CRP of > 132 mg/l on postoperative day 5 was the only statistically significant patient factor that was linked to an increased risk of AL (HR = 8.023, 95% CI: 1.936-33.238, P = 0.004).

CONCLUSION

Early detection of AL may minimize postoperative complications. CRP is a useful negative predictive test for the development of AL following anterior resection.

Anastomotic leaks in gastrointestinal surgery and their prevention

Anastomotic leak in the gastrointestinal tract is one of the most important complications of resection. They are the main cause of reoperation, their occurrence worsens the prognosis of the patient, increasing the proportion of direct mortality, as well as being a significant risk factor for recurrence of cancer. The risk of leaks within the gastrointestinal tract is greatly varied, depending on the location and extent of the resection, but also on patient, disease or a surgical procedure, including surgeon. To determine the potential risk of leakage can be significant for introduction some prophylactic actions. Some of them have the character of general recommendations, as proper nutrition of the patient in the perioperative period, while another part is directly connected to the surgical procedure. The second group includes protective stoma, the use of tissue glues, insertion transrectal drain for rectal anastomosis decompression, the use of stents or the use of collagen matrix coated with fibrinogen and thrombin. Important to reduce the proportion of leaks can be more precise and targeted prophylactic recommendations, based on the individualized determination of risk factors leaks. Further research for this purpose are necessary for this purpose, the big hope can be associated with data obtained through mobile applications.

Leakage after Surgery for Rectum Cancer: Inconsistency in Reporting to the Danish Colorectal Cancer Group

Purpose. Anastomotic leakage accounts for up to 1/3 of all fatalities after rectal cancer surgery. Evidence suggests that anastomotic leakage has a negative prognostic impact on local cancer recurrence and long-term cancer specific survival. The reported leakage rate in 2011 in Denmark varied from 7 to 45 percent. The objective was to clarify if the reporting of anastomotic leakage to the Danish Colorectal Cancer Group was rigorous and unequivocal. Methods. An Internet-based questionnaire was e-mailed to all Danish surgical departments, who reported to Danish Colorectal Cancer Group (DCCG) in 2011. There were 23 questions. Four core questions were whether pelvic collection, fecal appearance in a pelvic drain, rectovaginal fistula, and "watchfull" waiting patients were reported as anastomotic leakage. Results. Fourteen out of 17 departments, who in 2011 according to DDCG performed rectal cancer surgery, answered the questionnaire. This gave a response rate of 82%. In three of four core questions there was disagreement in what should be reported as anastomotic leakage. Conclusion. The reporting of anastomotic leakage to the Danish Colorectal Cancer Group was not rigorous and unequivocal. The reported anastomotic leakage rate in Danish Colorectal Cancer Group should be interpreted with caution.

Prospective Analysis of More than 1,000 Patients with Rectal Carcinoma: Are There Gender-Related Differences?

Background

Since the beginning of the new millennium gender medicine has become more and more relevant. The goal has been to unveil differences in presentation, treatment response, and prognosis of men and women with regard to various diseases.

Methods

This study encompassed 1,061 patients who underwent surgery for rectal cancer at the Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein Campus Lübeck, Germany, between January 1990 and December 2011. Prospectively documented demographic, clinical, pathological, and follow-up data were obtained. Analysis encompassed the comparison of clinical, histopathological, and oncological parameters with regard to the subcohorts of male and female patients.

Results

No statistically significant differences could be found for clinical and histopathological parameters, location of tumor, resection with or without anastomosis, palliative or curative treatment, conversion rates, duration of surgery, and long-term survival. For the entire cohort, gender-related statistically significant differences in complications encompassed anastomotic leakage, burst abdomen, pneumonia, and urinary tract complications all of which occurred more often in men.

Conclusion

Data obtained in this study suggest that there are no gender-related differences in the oncologic surgical treatment of patients with rectal carcinoma. However, male sex seems to be a risk factor for increased early postoperative morbidity.