Baseline factors predictive of patient satisfaction with sacral neuromodulation for idiopathic fecal incontinence

Gatekeeper™ Prostheses Implants in the Anal Canal for Gas Incontinence and Soiling: Long-Term Follow-Up

Introduction: Although several treatments for faecal incontinence are available, gas incontinence (GI) and soiling are difficult to manage. The aim of this study is to evaluate Gatekeeper™ for this subtype of faecal incontinence. Methods: Prospective single-centre case series. Patients with mainly soiling and/or GI were treated with polyacrylonitrile prostheses. An evaluation was performed with a 3-week continence diary. St. Mark's score and a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) were used to study the patient's continence perception and surgical satisfaction, at baseline and 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. 3D-Endoanal Ultrasound and Anorectal Manometry were performed at baseline and postoperatively. Results: A total of 13 patients were enrolled (11 women), aged (median (IQR)) 62 (13) years, and all implants were uneventful. A significant reduction in soiling and GI episodes was documented at 1 year, 7 (18) baseline days of soiling/3 weeks vs. 2 (4) (p = 0.002); 13 (13) baseline episodes of GI/3 weeks vs. 4 (10) (p = 0.01). This improvement was correlated with a significant increase in VAS (0-10), 3 (2, 5) baseline vs. 7 (1, 5) (p = 0.03), and maintained throughout the follow-up. There was complete remission or significant improvement defined as >70% reduction in gas and soiling days in 6 patients at 2 years follow-up. Soiling episodes were reduced ≥70% in 8/11 patients (72.7%). Nine (70%) patients would repeat the treatment. Conclusions: Gatekeeper™ is a safe, minimally invasive treatment for soiling and GI. A significant reduction in soiling and GI was observed in our series, with a better response to soiling. Most of the patients would repeat the treatment. Other studies are needed to confirm these findings in this subgroup of FI patients.

Patient Satisfaction With Long-term Sacral Neuromodulation for Fecal Incontinence: Experience From a Single Tertiary Center

BACKGROUND

Sacral neuromodulation is an effective treatment for fecal incontinence in the long term. Efficacy is typically assessed using bowel diary, symptom severity, and quality-of-life questionnaires, and "success" is defined as more than 50% improvement in these measures. However, patient satisfaction may be a more meaningful and individualized measure of treatment efficacy.

OBJECTIVE

To assess patient-reported satisfaction with long-term sacral neuromodulation and compare it to the frequently applied efficacy measures.

DESIGN

An observational study of a prospectively maintained database.

SETTING

A single tertiary pelvic floor referral unit.

PATIENTS

Data from 70 patients (68 women, median age 69 [60-74] years) were available. The median time since implantation was 11 (9-14) years. Nineteen patients reported inactive neuromodulation devices.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Bowel diaries, the Manchester Health Questionnaire, and the St. Mark's Incontinence Score were recorded at baseline, after percutaneous nerve evaluation, and at the last follow-up. Patient-reported satisfaction, using a 0% to 100% visual analog scale, with treatment since implantation (overall) and in the 2 weeks preceding completion of the last outcome measures (current) were also assessed.

RESULTS

Satisfaction was significantly higher in those with active sacral neuromodulation devices (75% vs 20%, p < 0.001) at follow-up. No significant relationships exist between symptom improvement using conventional measures and patient-reported satisfaction. Current satisfaction was not associated with changes in bowel diary data after percutaneous nerve evaluation. Despite improvements in the St. Mark's Incontinence Score and Manchester Health Questionnaire below the 50% improvement threshold used to define "success," patients reported high (80%) satisfaction.

LIMITATIONS

Retrospective design with gaps in the available data.

CONCLUSIONS

High patient satisfaction with sacral neuromodulation can be achieved; however, the response to percutaneous nerve evaluation may not predict treatment satisfaction in the long term. The change in questionnaire results, which measure the use of compensatory behaviors and quality-of-life impact, may better correspond to treatment satisfaction.

SATISFACCIN A LARGO PLAZO EN LOS PACIENTES CON LA NEUROMODULACIN SACRA PARA LA INCONTINENCIA FECAL EXPERIENCIA DE UN NICO CENTRO TERCIARIO

ANTECEDENTES:La neuromodulación sacra es un tratamiento eficaz para la incontinencia fecal a largo plazo. La eficacia suele evaluarse mediante cuestionarios sobre la frecuencia diaria intestinal, la gravedad de los síntomas o la calidad de vida, y el "éxito" se define como una mejoría >50% en estas medidas. Sin embargo, la satisfacción del paciente puede ser una medida más significativa e individualizada de la eficacia del tratamiento.OBJETIVO:Evaluar la satisfacción a largo plazo de los pacientes con la neuromodulación sacra y compararla con las medidas de eficacia aplicadas con frecuencia.DISEÑO:Estudio observacional de una base de datos mantenida prospectivamente.LUGAR:Unidad terciaria única de referencia de suelo pélvico.PACIENTES:Se dispuso de datos de 70 pacientes (68 mujeres, mediana de edad 69 [60-74]). La mediana de tiempo transcurrido desde la implantación fue de 11 (9-14) años. Diecinueve pacientes informaron de dispositivos de neuromodulación inactivos.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE VALORACIÓN:Diarios intestinales, el Cuestionario de Salud de Manchester y la Puntuación de Incontinencia de St Marks registrados al inicio, tras la evaluación percutánea del nervio y en el último seguimiento. Los pacientes informaron de su satisfacción, utilizando una escala analógica visual de 0%-100%, con el tratamiento desde la implantación (global) y en las dos semanas anteriores a la realización de las últimas medidas de resultado (actual).RESULTADOS:La satisfacción fue significativamente mayor en los pacientes con dispositivos de neuromodulación sacra activos (75% frente a 20%, p < 0,001) durante el seguimiento. No existen relaciones significativas entre la mejoría de los síntomas mediante medidas convencionales y la satisfacción comunicada por el paciente. La satisfacción actual no se asoció con los cambios en los datos de la frecuencia diaria intestinal tras la evaluación percutánea de los nervios. A pesar de que las mejoras en la puntuación de incontinencia de St Mark y el Cuestionario de Salud de Manchester se situaron por debajo del umbral de mejora del 50% utilizado para definir el "éxito", los pacientes declararon un alto grado de satisfacción (80%).LIMITACIONES:Retrospectivo con lagunas en los datos disponibles.CONCLUSIONES:Puede lograrse una alta satisfacción de los pacientes con la neuromodulación sacra; sin embargo, la respuesta a la evaluación percutánea del nervio puede no predecir la satisfacción con el tratamiento a largo plazo. El cambio en los resultados del cuestionario, que mide el uso de conductas compensatorias y el impacto en la calidad de vida, puede corresponder mejor a la satisfacción con el tratamiento. (Traducción-Dr. Ingrid Melo ).

Long-term Fecal Incontinence, Recurrence, Satisfaction, and Regret After the Transobturator Postanal Sling Procedure

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to assess long-term outcomes after the transobturator postanal sling (TOPAS) procedure for the treatment of fecal incontinence. Long-term recurrence, satisfaction and regret after transobturator postanal sling procedure support the ongoing use of this procedure for patients with fecal incontinence.

METHODS

Both a retrospective review of medical records and a prospective telephone survey were conducted. For the retrospective review of medical records, all patients who underwent the TOPAS procedure at our institution were eligible. Medical records were reviewed to assess for symptom resolution, retreatment, and complications. For the prospective telephone survey, patients who were conversant in English and had a valid contact information were eligible and were asked to complete questions on satisfaction, the Patient Global Impression of Improvement, the Wexner Symptom Severity Score, the Fecal Incontinence Qualify of Life Scale, and the modified Decision Regret Scale.

RESULTS

A total of 134 patients met the inclusion criteria for the retrospective medical record review. Patients were followed in clinic for a median of 24.0 months (interquartile range, 6.0-53.0). Overall, 75.4% reported improvement in fecal incontinence. There were 37 (27.6%) who required subsequent treatment for fecal incontinence. There were 67 patients eligible for the prospective telephone survey, of whom 46 (68.7%) agreed to participate. Median time between surgery and the telephone survey was 63.5 months (interquartile range, 36.0-98.0). Among these participants, 54.3% were satisfied and 60.9% would recommend the procedure to someone else. No adverse events were identified with long-term follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that the TOPAS procedure remains a safe and effective therapy for the treatment of fecal incontinence with favorable long-term outcomes.

Sacral nerve modulation for faecal incontinence: influence of age on outcomes and complications. A multicentre study

AIM

Faecal incontinence is frequent in the elderly. Little is currently known about the efficacy of sacral nerve modulation (SNM) in the elderly. The present study aimed to assess the impact of age on the outcome of SNM and on the surgical revision and explantation rates by comparing the results of a large data set of patients.

METHOD

Prospectively collected data from patients who underwent an implant procedure between January 2010 and December 2015 in seven French centres were retrospectively evaluated. In total, 352 patients [321 women; median age (range): 63 (24-86) years] were included. Clinically favourable and unfavourable outcomes, and surgical revision and explantation rates, were compared according to the age of the patients.

RESULTS

A similar outcome was observed when comparing patients < 70 years and ≥ 70 years (a favourable outcome in 79.2% and 76.2%, respectively, P = 0.89). The probability of a successful treatment as a function of time was similar for the two age groups (< 70 years and ≥ 70 years, P = 0.54). The explantation and revision rates were not influenced by age (explantation rate: 17% in patients < 70 years vs 14% in patients ≥ 70 years, P = 0.89; and revision rate: 42% in patients < 70 years vs 40% in patients ≥ 70 years, P = 0.89). The probability of explantation as a function of time was similar for the two age groups (P = 0.82). The limitations of this study were its retrospective status, the rate of loss at follow-up and different durations of patient follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that patients ≥ 70 years suffering from faecal incontinence benefit from SNM with a similar risk as a younger population.

Is Sacral Nerve Modulation a Good Option for Fecal Incontinence in Men?

OBJECTIVE

The objective was to assess the efficacy and the safety of sacral nerve modulation (SNM) in men with fecal incontinence (FI) compared with those of SNM in women.

METHOD

Prospectively collected data from patients from seven tertiary colorectal units who underwent an implant procedure between January 2010 and December 2015 were reviewed retrospectively. Outcomes and surgical revision and definitive explantation rates were compared between men and women.

RESULTS

A total of 469 patients (60 men [12.8%]; mean age = 61.4 ± 12.0 years) were included in the study, 352 (78.1%) (31 men [8.8%]) of whom received a permanent implant. The ratio of implanted/tested men was significantly lower than the ratio of implanted/tested women (p = 0.0004). After a mean follow-up of 3.4 ± 1.9 years, the cumulative successful treatment rates tended to be less favorable in men than in women (p = 0.0514): 88.6% (75.6-95.1), 75.9% (60.9-86.4), 63.9% (48.0-77.3), and 43.9% (26.7-62.7) at one, two, three, and five years, respectively, in men; 92.0% (89.1-94.2), 84.2% (80.3-87.4), 76.8% (72.3-80.7), and 63.6% (57.5-69.3) at one, two, three, and five years, respectively, in women. The revision rate for infection and the definitive explantation rate for infection were higher in men than in women (p = 0.0001 and p = 0.0024, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Both short- and long-term success rates of SNM for FI were lower in men than in women. The revision and definitive explantation for long-term infection rates were significantly higher in men.

International Continence Society best practice statement for use of sacral neuromodulation

AIMS

Sacral neuromodulation (SNM) is an accepted therapy for a variety of conditions. However, despite over 20 years of experience, it remains a specialized procedure with a number of subtleties. Here we present the recommendations issued from the International Continence Society (ICS) SNM Consensus Panel.

METHODS

Under the auspices of the ICS, eight urologists, three colorectal surgeons and two urogynecologists, covering a wide breadth of geographic and specialty interest representation, met in January 2017 to discuss best practices for neuromodulation. Suggestions for statements were submitted in advance and specific topics were assigned to committee members, who prepared and presented supporting data to the group, at which time each topic was discussed in depth. Best practice statements were formulated based on available data. This document was then circulated to multiple external reviewers after which final edits were made and approved by the group.

RESULTS

The present recommendations, based on the most relevant data available in the literature, as well as expert opinion, address a variety of specific and at times problematic issues associated with SNM. These include the use of SNM for a variety of underlying conditions, need for pre-procedural testing, use of staged versus single-stage procedures, screening for success during the trial phase, ideal anesthesia, device implantation, post-procedural management, trouble-shooting loss of device function, and future directions for research.

CONCLUSIONS

These guidelines undoubtedly constitute a reference document, which will help urologists, gynecologists, and colorectal surgeons optimize their use of SNM for refractory urinary urgency and frequency, UUI, NOR, and FI.

Sacral neuromodulation for faecal incontinence following obstetric sphincter injury - outcome of percutaneous nerve evaluation

AIM

The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of percutaneous nerve evaluation (PNE) in women with faecal incontinence (FI) following obstetric anal sphincter injury and to relate the outcomes to baseline factors, with special emphasis on the extent of the sphincter defect.

METHOD

This was a prospective study at a tertiary colorectal referral unit at the University Hospital of North Norway conducted from 2012 to 2014. Sixty-three women underwent a 3-week PNE using a tined lead and the Verify^® external neurostimulator. The primary outcome was efficacy, defined as the percentage reduction in weekly FI episodes, and patients with a reduction of 50% or more were defined as responders. Baseline factors affecting the primary outcome were explored. Sphincter defects were classified with a validated three-dimensional endoanal ultrasound defect score.

RESULTS

Fifty-six (89%) of the 63 women were responders with a reduction in weekly FI episodes of 94.5%, from a median (interquartile range) of 4.8 (2.0-11.0) to 0.5 (0-2.0) (P < 0.001). Twenty-nine (52%) reported no weekly FI episodes, and urgency episodes disappeared in 18 (32%). In the multivariable linear regression model, efficacy was related to concomitant urinary incontinence (P = 0.04), body mass index (BMI) (P = 0.03) and pain during PNE (P = 0.046) but not to the extent of the sphincter defect (P = 0.1). Responders had a higher St Mark's score than nonresponders (P = 0.046).

CONCLUSIONS

The vast majority of women had successful PNE tests. Responders had higher baseline St Mark's scores than nonresponders. Efficacy was related to concomitant urinary incontinence, BMI and pain, not to the extent of the sphincter defect.

Adverse events of sacral neuromodulation for fecal incontinence reported to the federal drug administration

AIM: To investigate the nature and severity of AE related to sacral neurostimulation (SNS).

METHODS: Based on Pubmed and Embase searches, we identified published trials and case series of SNS for fecal incontinence (FI) and extracted data on adverse events, requiring an active intervention. Those problems were operationally defined as infection, device removal explant or need for lead and/or generator replacement. In addition, we analyzed the Manufacturer and User Device Experience registry of the Federal Drug Administration for the months of August - October of 2015. Events were included if the report specifically mentioned gastrointestinal (GI), bowel and FI as indication and if the narrative did not focus on bladder symptoms. The classification, reporter, the date of the recorded complaint, time between initial implant and report, the type of AE, steps taken and outcome were extracted from the report. In cases of device removal or replacement, we looked for confirmatory comments by healthcare providers or the manufacturer.

RESULTS: Published studies reported adverse events and reoperation rates for 1954 patients, followed for 27 (1-117) mo. Reoperation rates were 18.6% (14.2-23.9) with device explants accounting for 10.0% (7.8-12.7) of secondary surgeries; rates of device replacement or explant or pocket site and electrode revisions increased with longer follow up. During the period examined, the FDA received 1684 reports of AE related to SNS with FI or GI listed as indication. A total of 652 reports met the inclusion criteria, with 52.7% specifically listing FI. Lack or loss of benefit (48.9%), pain or dysesthesia (27.8%) and complication at the generator implantation site (8.7%) were most commonly listed. Complaints led to secondary surgeries in 29.7% of the AE. Reoperations were performed to explant (38.2%) or replace (46.5%) the device or a lead, or revise the generator pocket (14.6%). Conservative management changes mostly involved changes in stimulation parameters (44.5%), which successfully addressed concerns in 35.2% of cases that included information about treatment results.

CONCLUSION: With reoperation rates around 20%, physicians need to fully disclose the high likelihood of complications and secondary interventions and exhaust non-invasive treatments, including transcutaneous stimulation paradigms.

Management of patients with faecal incontinence

Faecal incontinence, defined as the involuntary loss of solid or liquid stool, is a common problem affecting 0.8-8.3% of the adult population. Individuals suffering from faecal incontinence often live a restricted life with reduced quality of life. The present paper is a clinically oriented review of the pathophysiology, evaluation and treatment of faecal incontinence. First-line therapy should be conservative and usually include dietary adjustments, fibre supplement, constipating agents or mini enemas. Biofeedback therapy to improve external anal sphincter function can be offered but the evidence for long-term effect is poor. There is good evidence that colonic irrigation can reduce symptoms and improve quality of life, especially in patients with neurogenic faecal incontinence. Surgical interventions should only be considered if conservative measures fail. Sacral nerve stimulation is a minimally invasive procedure with high rate of success. Advanced surgical procedures should be restricted to highly selected patients and only performed at specialist centres. A stoma should be considered if other treatment modalities fail.