Sacral neuromodulation for fecal incontinence and constipation in adult patients with anorectal malformation--a feasibility study in patients with or without sacral dysgenesis

Injectable bulking treatment of persistent fecal incontinence in adult patients after anorectal malformations

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Injectable bulking therapy has emerged as a treatment for fecal incontinence (FI), however there are no studies including adult patients with anorectal malformations (ARM). This study aimed to evaluate non-animal stabilized hyaluronic acid with dextranomer (NASHA/Dx) for the treatment of adult ARM patients with persistent FI.

METHODS

Seven adults with ARM and incontinence to loose stool at least once weekly and without rectal or mucosal prolapse were treated with anal NASHA/Dx injection. They were evaluated preoperatively, at 6 and 18 months with a bowel function questionnaire and a 2-week bowel diary as well as FIQL and SF-36 quality of life questionnaires.

RESULTS

Before treatment, the mean number of incontinence episodes over 2 weeks was 20.7 (median 16, range 8-52). At 6 months, the corresponding figures were 5.3 (median 4, range 0-19, p = 0.018), and at 18 months the figures were 4.3 (median 2, range 1-20, p = 0.018). An improved physical function in SF-36 from 74.3 at baseline to 86.4 at 6 months was noted (p = 0.04). No serious adverse events occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

NASHA/Dx is a promising treatment option for selected adult patients with persistent FI after ARM. Longer follow up of larger patient series and studies on patients in adolescence is needed.

TYPE OF STUDY

Treatment Study.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Controversies in anorectal malformations

Anorectal malformations are uncommon but complex congenital anomalies that require an individualised strategy of care for each step of the treatment process. These steps, which include preoperative evaluation, operative reconstruction, and postoperative care, are each unique and vitally important to overall patient outcomes. In this Review, we discuss some of the pivotal decisions that should be made at each stage of patient care. Through this process, we highlight some of the more controversial aspects of caring for patients with anorectal malformation and offer insights into various management philosophies.

Sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence in patients with sacral malformation

INTRODUCTION

Sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) is a common and effective treatment for faecal incontinence (FI), but accessibility of the sacral nerves is mandatory. In some cases, electrode placement fails for unknown reasons. A frequent cause could be sacral malformations, which have a high incidence (up to 24.1%) and can be unsuspected.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We report two patients with FI consequent to congenital anorectal malformation and associated sacral malformation. Despite partial sacral agenesis, SNS was feasible in both. They benefitted greatly from SNS, with an improved ability to postpone the urge up to at least 15 min, reduced incontinence episodes (at least 50%), and significantly better quality of life.

CONCLUSION

SNS may be feasible in patients with FI, even in the presence of sacral malformation. However, clinicians should be aware of the attendant technical difficulties. Preoperative imaging, preferably with MRI of the sacrum, is advisable. If the sacral spinal nerves are inaccessible technically, pudendal nerve stimulation could be considered, if anatomy permits.