Endoscopic evaluation of clinical response after preoperative chemoradiotherapy for lower rectal cancer: the significance of endoscopic complete response

Nonoperative management of rectal cancer

The management of locally advanced rectal cancer has changed drastically in the last few decades due to improved surgical techniques, development of multimodal treatment approaches and the introduction of a watch and wait (WW) strategy. For patients with a complete response to neoadjuvant treatment, WW offers an opportunity to avoid the morbidity associated with total mesorectal excision in favor of organ preservation. Despite growing interest in WW, prospective data on the safety and efficacy of nonoperative management are limited. Challenges remain in optimizing multimodal treatment regimens to maximize tumor regression and in improving the accuracy of patient selection for WW. This review summarizes the history of treatment for rectal cancer and the development of a WW strategy. It also provides an overview of clinical considerations for patients interested in nonoperative management, including restaging strategies, WW selection criteria, surveillance protocols and long-term oncologic outcomes.

Interdisciplinary Spanish consensus on a watch-and-wait approach for rectal cancer

Watch-and-wait has emerged as a new strategy for the management of rectal cancer when a complete clinical response is achieved after neoadjuvant therapy. In an attempt to standardize this new clinical approach, initiated by the Spanish Cooperative Group for the Treatment of Digestive Tumors (TTD), and with the participation of the Spanish Association of Coloproctology (AECP), the Spanish Society of Pathology (SEAP), the Spanish Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (SEED), the Spanish Society of Radiation Oncology (SEOR), and the Spanish Society of Medical Radiology (SERAM), we present herein a consensus on a watch-and-wait approach for the management of rectal cancer. We have focused on patient selection, the treatment schemes evaluated, the optimal timing for evaluating the clinical complete response, the oncologic outcomes after the implementation of this strategy, and a protocol for surveillance of these patients.

Endoscopic Predictors of Residual Tumor After Total Neoadjuvant Therapy: A Post Hoc Analysis From the Organ Preservation in Rectal Adenocarcinoma Trial

BACKGROUND

Restaging endoscopy plays a critical role in selecting patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who respond to neoadjuvant therapy for nonoperative management.

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluated the restaging endoscopic features that best predict the presence of residual tumor in the bowel wall.

DESIGN

This was a post hoc analysis of a prospective randomized trial.

SETTINGS

The Organ Preservation in Rectal Adenocarcinoma Trial randomly assigned patients across 18 institutions with stage II/III rectal adenocarcinoma to receive either induction or consolidation total neoadjuvant therapy. Surgeons completed a restaging tumor assessment form, which stratified patients across 3 tiers of clinical response.

PATIENTS

Patients enrolled in the Organ Preservation in Rectal Adenocarcinoma Trial with a completed tumor assessment form were included.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The main outcome was residual tumor, which was defined as either an incomplete clinical response or local tumor regrowth within 2 years of restaging. Independent predictors of residual tumor were identified using backward-selected multivariable logistic regression analysis. Subgroup analyses for complete and near complete clinical responders were performed.

RESULTS

Surgeons completed restaging forms for 263 patients at a median of 7.7 weeks after neoadjuvant therapy; 128 patients (48.7%) had a residual tumor. On multivariable regression analysis, several characteristics of a near complete response, including ulcer (OR 6.66; 95% CI, 2.54-19.9), irregular mucosa (OR 3.66; 95% CI, 1.61-8.68), and nodularity (OR 2.96; 95% CI, 1.36-6.58), remained independent predictors of residual tumor. A flat scar was associated with lower odds of harboring residual disease (OR 0.32; 95% CI, 0.11-0.93) for patients categorized as clinical complete responders.

LIMITATIONS

Limitations include analysis of endoscopic features at a single time point and ambiguities in tumor assessment form response criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with ulcer, nodularity, or irregular mucosa, on restaging endoscopy have higher odds of residual tumor. Recognizing negative prognostic implications of these features will help surgeons better select candidates for nonoperative management and suggests that patients with high-risk characteristics would benefit from close interval surveillance. See Video Abstract .

PREDICTORES ENDOSCPICOS DE TUMOR RESIDUAL DESPUS DE TERAPIA NEOADYUVANTE TOTAL UN ANLISIS POST HOC DEL ENSAYO DE PRESERVACIN DE RGANOS EN ADENOCARCINOMA RECTAL

ANTECEDENTES:La reestadificación por endoscopia juega un papel crítico en la selección de pacientes con cáncer de recto localmente avanzado que responden a la terapia neoadyuvante para el manejo no quirúrgico.OBJETIVO:Este estudio evaluó las características endoscópicas de reestadificación que mejor predicen la presencia de tumor residual en la pared intestinal.DISEÑO:Este fue un análisis post hoc de un ensayo prospectivo aleatorizado.ESCENARIO:El ensayo Organ Preservation in Rectal Adenocarcinoma aleatorizó a pacientes de 18 instituciones con adenocarcinoma de recto en estadio II/III para recibir terapia neoadyuvante total de inducción o consolidación. Los cirujanos completaron un formulario de reestadificación de evaluación del tumor, que estratificó a los pacientes en tres niveles de respuesta clínica.PACIENTES:Se incluyeron pacientes inscritos en el ensayo de preservación de órganos en adenocarcinoma rectal con un formulario de evaluación del tumor completado.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:El resultado principal fue presencia de tumor residual, que se definió como una respuesta clínica incompleta o un nuevo crecimiento local del tumor dentro de los dos años posteriores a la reestadificación. Los predictores independientes de tumor residual se identificaron mediante un análisis de regresión logística multivariable seleccionado hacia atrás. Se realizaron análisis de subgrupos para pacientes con respuesta clínica completa y casi completa.RESULTADOS:Los cirujanos completaron formularios de reestadificación para 263 pacientes en una mediana de 7.7 semanas después de la terapia neoadyuvante; 128 (48.7%) tenían tumor residual. En el análisis de regresión multivariable, varias características de una respuesta casi completa, incluyendo úlcera (OR 6.66; IC 95% 2.54-19.9), mucosa irregular (OR 3.66; IC 95% 1.61-8.68) y nodularidad (OR 2.96; IC 95% 1.36 -6.58) siguieron siendo predictores independientes de tumor residual. Una cicatriz plana se asoció con menores probabilidades de albergar enfermedad residual (OR 0.32; IC del 95 %: 0.11-0.93) para los pacientes clasificados como respondedores clínicos completos.LIMITACIONES:Las limitaciones de este estudio incluyen el análisis de las características endoscópicas en un solo momento y las ambigüedades en los criterios de respuesta.en la forma de evaluación del tumorCONCLUSIONES:Los pacientes con úlcera, nodularidad o mucosa irregular en la endoscopia de reestadificación tienen mayores probabilidades de tumor residual. El reconocer las implicaciones pronósticas negativas de estas características ayudará a los cirujanos a seleccionar mejor a los candidatos para el tratamiento no quirúrgico y sugiere que los pacientes con características de alto riesgo se beneficiarían de una vigilancia a intervalos estrechos. (Traducción-Dr. Jorge Silva Velazco ).

A multicentre cohort study assessing the utility of routine blood tests as adjuncts to identify complete responders in rectal cancer following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy

PURPOSE

Management of rectal cancer with a complete clinical response (cCR) to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) is controversial. Some advocate "watch and wait" programmes and organ-preserving surgery. Central to these strategies is the ability to accurately preoperatively distinguish cCR from residual disease (RD). We sought to identify if post-NACRT (preoperative) inflammatory markers act as an adjunct to MRI and endoscopy findings for distinguishing cCR from RD in rectal cancer.

METHODS

Patients from three specialist rectal cancer centres were screened for inclusion (2010-2015). For inclusion, patients were required to have completed NACRT, had a post-NACRT MRI (to assess mrTRG) and proceeded to total mesorectal excision (TME). Endoluminal response was assessed on endoscopy at 6-8 weeks post-NACRT. Pathological response to therapy was calculated using a three-point tumour regression grade system (TRG1-3). Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), serum albumin (SAL), CEA and CA19-9 levels post-NACRT (preoperatively) were recorded. Variables were compared between those who had RD on post-operative pathology and those with ypCR. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS (version 21).

RESULTS

Six hundred forty-six patients were screened, of which 422 were suitable for inclusion. A cCR rate of 25.5% (n = 123) was observed. Sixty patients who achieved cCR were excluded from final analysis as they underwent organ-preserving surgery (local excision) leaving 63 ypCR patients compared to 359 with RD. On multivariate analysis, combining cCR on MRI and endoscopy with NLR < 5 demonstrated the greatest odds of ypCR on final histological assessment [OR 6.503 (1.594-11.652]) p < 0.001]. This method had the best diagnostic accuracy (AUC = 0.962 95% CI 0.936-0.987), compared to MRI (AUC = 0.711 95% CI 0.650-0.773) or endoscopy (AUC = 0.857 95% CI 0.811-0.902) alone or used together (AUC = 0.926 95% CI 0.892-0.961).

CONCLUSION

Combining post-NACRT inflammatory markers with restaging MRI and endoscopy findings adds another avenue to aid distinguishing RD from cCR in rectal cancer.

Optimized tools and timing of response reassessment after neoadjuvant chemoradiation in rectal cancer

PURPOSE

Reassessment tools of response to long-course neoadjuvant chemoradiation treatment (nCRT) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) are important in predicting complete response (CR) and thus deciding whether a wait-and-watch strategy can be implemented in these patients. Choosing which routine reassessment tools are optimal and when to use them is still unclear and will be researched in the study.

METHODS

Altogether, 250 patients with LARC who received nCRT from 2013 to 2021 and were followed up were retrospectively reviewed. Common reassessment tools of response included digital rectal examination (DRE), clinical examination and symptoms, endoscopy, biopsy, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and blood biomarkers.

RESULTS

Overall, 27.20% (68/250) patients had a complete response and 72.80% (182/250) did not. The combination of MRI, endoscopy, and biopsy showed the best performance in terms of accuracy of 74% and area under the curve (AUC, 0.714, 95% CI 0.546-0.882). Reassessing through DRE and presence of symptoms failed to improve the efficacy of response reassessment. After 100 days, biopsy as an assessment tool would obtain a substantial rise in accuracy from 51.28 to 100% (p = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

The combination of MRI, endoscopy, and biopsy is suitable as the reassessment tool of response for applying a wait-and-watch strategy after long-course nCRT in patients with LARC. The accuracy of biopsy as reassessment tools would be improved if they were used over 100 days after nCRT in patients with rectal cancer.

Diagnostic performance of MRI and endoscopy for assessing complete response in rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: a systematic review of the literature

BACKGROUND

The diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) modalities and/or endoscopy for assessing complete response in rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) is unclear.

PURPOSE

To summarize existing evidence on the diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted MRI, perfusion-weighted MRI, T2-weighted MR tumor regression grade, and/or endoscopy for assessing complete tumor response after nCRT.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

MEDLINE and Embase databases were searched. The PRISMA guidelines were followed. Sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive, and positive predictive values were retrieved from included studies.

RESULTS

In total, 81 studies were eligible for inclusion. Evidence suggests that combined use of MRI and endoscopy tends to improve the diagnostic performance compared to single imaging modality. The positive predictive value of a complete response varies substantially between studies. There is considerable heterogeneity between studies.

CONCLUSION

Combined re-staging tends to improve diagnostic performance compared to single imaging modality, but the vast majority of studies fail to offer true clinical value due to the study heterogeneity.

Adding Narrow-Band Imaging to Chromoendoscopy for the Evaluation of Tumor Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy in Rectal Cancer

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic assessment is crucial in diagnosing clinical complete response after neoadjuvant therapy in rectal cancer.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this research was to evaluate the benefits of adding narrow-band imaging endoscopy to conventional chromoendoscopy in predicting pathologic complete response in the surgical specimen.

DESIGN

This was a prospective nonrandomized study.

SETTINGS

This was an ad hoc study of a prospective phase II trial at a single comprehensive cancer center that evaluated oncologic outcomes of a neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer.

PATIENTS

Patients with high-risk stage II to III low rectal cancer who received neoadjuvant modified folinic acid, fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin plus bevacizumab followed by chemoradiotherapy and surgery were included.

INTERVENTION

Tumor response after neoadjuvant therapy was evaluated using conventional white light endoscopy plus chromoendoscopy then followed by using narrow-band imaging based on a predefined diagnostic protocol.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Diagnostic accuracy for predicting pathologic complete response and inter-rater agreement between an expert and trainee endoscopists were compared between the assessments using conventional white light endoscopy plus chromoendoscopy and the assessment adding narrow-band imaging.

RESULTS

In total, 61 patients were eligible for the study, and 19 had pathologic complete response (31.1%). Although the addition of narrow-band imaging correctly converted the diagnosis in 3 patients, overall diagnostic improvement in predicting pathologic complete response was limited (conventional chromoendoscopy vs adding narrow-band imaging: accuracy, 70.5% vs 75.4%; sensitivity, 63.2% vs 73.7%; specificity, 73.8% vs 76.2%; positive predictive value, 52.2% vs 58.3%; and negative predictive value, 81.6% vs 86.5%). A κ value for the inter-rater agreement improved from 0.599 to 0.756 by adding narrow-band imaging.

LIMITATIONS

This was a single-center study with a relatively small sample size.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the limited improvement in diagnostic accuracy, adding narrow-band imaging to chromoendoscopy improved inter-rater agreement between the expert and nonexpert endoscopists. Narrow-band imaging is a reliable and promising modality for universal standardization of the diagnosis of clinical complete response. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B275. ADICIÓN DE IMÁGENES DE BANDA ESTRECHA A LA CROMOENDOSCOPÍA PARA LA EVALUACIÓN DE LA RESPUESTA TUMORAL A LA TERAPIA NEOADYUVANTE EN EL CÁNCER DE RECTO: La evaluación endoscópica es fundamental para valorar la respuesta clínica completa después de la terapia neoadyuvante en el cáncer de recto.Evaluar los beneficios de agregar endoscopia de imagen de banda estrecha a la cromoendoscopía convencional para predecir la respuesta patológica completa en la muestra quirúrgica.Estudio prospectivo no aleatorizado.Un estudio ad hoc de un ensayo prospectivo de fase II en un solo centro integral de cáncer que evaluó los resultados oncológicos de una terapia neoadyuvante para el cáncer rectal.Pacientes con cáncer rectal bajo de alto riesgo en estadio II-III que recibieron ácido folínico neoadyuvante modificado, fluorouracilo y oxaliplatino más bevacizumab seguido de quimiorradioterapia y cirugía.La respuesta tumoral después de la terapia neoadyuvante se evaluó mediante endoscopia de luz blanca convencional más cromoendoscopía, seguido de imágenes de banda estrecha basadas en un protocolo de diagnóstico predefinido.La precisión diagnóstica para predecir la respuesta patológica completa y el acuerdo entre evaluadores entre un experto y un endoscopista en entrenamiento se compararon entre las evaluaciones utilizando endoscopia de luz blanca convencional más cromoendoscopía y la evaluación agregando imágenes de banda estrecha.En total, 61 pacientes fueron elegibles para el estudio, y 19 tuvieron una respuesta patológica completa (31.1%). Aunque la adición de imágenes de banda estrecha convirtió correctamente el diagnóstico en 3 pacientes, la mejora diagnóstica general en la predicción de la respuesta patológica completa fue limitada (cromoendoscopía convencional versus adición de imágenes de banda estrecha: precisión, 70.5% versus 75.4%; sensibilidad, 63.2% versus 73.7%; especificidad, 73.8% versus 76.2%; valor predictivo positivo, 52.2% versus 58.3%; y valor predictivo negativo, 81.6% versus 86.5%). Un valor de kappa para el acuerdo entre evaluadores mejoró de 0.599 a 0.756 al agregar imágenes de banda estrecha.Un estudio de centro único con un tamaño de muestra relativamente pequeño.A pesar de la mejora limitada en la precisión diagnóstica, agregar imágenes de banda estrecha a la cromoendoscopía mejoró el acuerdo entre evaluadores entre los endoscopistas expertos y no expertos. La imagenología de banda estrecha es una modalidad confiable y prometedora para la estandarización universal del diagnóstico de respuesta clínica completa. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B275.

Endoscopy and magnetic resonance imaging-based prediction of ypT stage in patients with rectal cancer who received chemoradiotherapy: Results from a prospective study of 110 patients

Accurate tumor response determination remains inconclusive after preoperative chemoradiation therapy (CRT) for rectal cancer. This study aimed to investigate whether clinical assessment, such as endoscopy and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), can accurately predict ypT stage and select candidates for pelvic organ-preserving surgery in rectal cancer after preoperative CRT. A total of 110 patients who underwent preoperative CRT followed by curative resection for rectal cancer were prospectively enrolled. Magnetic resonance tumor regression grade (mrTRG) using T2-MRI, endoscopic evaluation, and combination modality (combination of endoscopy and mrTRG) were used to analyze tumor response after preoperative CRT. Endoscopic findings were categorized as 3 grades and the mrTRG was assessed into 5 grades. Twenty-nine patients (26.4%) had achieved pathologic complete response. When predicting ypT0, endoscopy showed significantly higher area under the curve (AUC 0.818) than did mrTRG (AUC 0.568) and combination modality (AUC 0.768) in differentiating good response from poor response (P < .001). Both endoscopy and combination modality showed significantly higher diagnostic performance in sensitivity (79.31%), positive predictive value (PPV 67.65%), negative predictive value (NPV 92.11%), and accuracy (84.55%) than those of MR tumor response (sensitivity 37.93%, PPV 36.67%, NPV 77.50%, and accuracy 66.36%) for the prediction of ypT0 (P < .001). Combination modality showed significantly higher diagnostic performance in sensitivity (56.92%), NPV (56.92%), and accuracy (67.27%) compared with those of mrTRG. Neither endoscopy, nor mrTRG, nor the combination modality had adequate diagnostic performances to be clinically acceptable in selecting candidates for nonoperative treatment strategies. However, endoscopy may be incorporated in clinical restaging strategy in planning the extent of surgical resection in patients with rectal cancer.

Advances in organ preserving strategies in rectal cancer patients

Treatment of rectal cancer patients has been subjected to change over the past thirty years. Total mesorectal excision is considered the cornerstone of rectal cancer treatment, but is also associated with significant morbidity resulting in an impaired quality of life. The addition of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy to surgery has shown to improve survival and local control and may lead to a partial or even complete response (CR). This raises questions regarding the necessity for subsequent radical surgery. After careful patient selection local excision and wait-and-see approaches are explored, aiming to improve quality of life without compromising oncological outcome. A multimodality diagnostic approach for optimal staging is crucial in determining the appropriate neoadjuvant treatment regimen. Adequate endoscopic restaging of rectal tumours after multimodality treatment will aid in selecting patients who are eligible for an organ preserving approach. The role and accuracy of imaging in the detection of the primary tumour, residual rectal cancer or local recurrence seems vital. Alternative neoadjuvant regimens are currently explored to increase the rate of clinical CRs, which may support organ preserving approaches. This review aims to generate insight into the advances in diagnostics and treatment modalities in all stages of rectal cancer and will highlight future studies that may support further implementation of organ preservation treatment in rectal cancer.

Clinical Significance of the Endoscopic Finding in Predicting Complete Tumor Response to Preoperative Chemoradiation Therapy in Rectal Cancer

BACKGROUND

There are reports that suggest conservative treatment when a tumor shows clinically complete response (CR) after preoperative chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer. The aim of this study is to investigate the association between endoscopic complete response (E-CR) and pathologic CR (pCR) and to determine the sensitivity and specificity of E-CR and its clinical utility after preoperative chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer.

METHODS

We analyzed prospectively collected data of patients with middle and lower rectal cancers who underwent preoperative chemoradiotherapy, between January 2010 and January 2015.

RESULTS

Nineteen patients (17.9 %) showed E-CR, and 87 patients showed E-non CR. Twenty-three patients (21.7 %) were confirmed to have pCR. E-CR was closely associated with pCR (p < 0.001). E-CR reflected pCR with an accuracy of 88.7 %, sensitivity of 65.2 %, specificity of 95.2 %, PPV of 78.9 %, NPV of 90.8 %, and a p value of <0.001.

CONCLUSIONS

E-CR after preoperative chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer is significantly associated with pCR. However, a wait and see policy should be performed carefully with current endoscopic prediction for pCR to avoid inadequate treatment in patients who show E-CR after preoperative chemoradiotherapy.

Understanding Complete Pathologic Response in Oesophageal Cancer: Implications for Management and Survival

Despite significant improvement over recent decades, oesophageal cancer survival rates remain poor. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by oesophageal resection is mainstay of therapy for resectable oesophageal tumours. Operative morbidity and mortality associated with oesophagectomy remain high and complications arise in up to 60% of patients. Management strategies have moved towards definitive chemoradiotherapy for a number of tumour sites (head and neck, cervical, and rectal) particularly for squamous pathology. We undertook to perform a review of the current status of morbidity and mortality associated with oesophagectomy, grading systems determining pathologic response, and data from clinical trials managing patients with definitive chemoradiotherapy to inform a discussion on the topic.