A trial of radiofrequency ablation for anal intraepithelial neoplasia

Association of body mass index with anal human papillomavirus infection and histologically confirmed high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions in people who receive services at the Anal Neoplasia Clinic in Puerto Rico

Objective

This study aimed to assess the association of body mass index (BMI) with anal high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) and biopsy-confirmed histologic anal high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) among a clinic-based sample of Hispanics in Puerto Rico.

Methods

This cross-sectional study evaluated medical records of adults who received services at the Anal Neoplasia Clinic of the University of Puerto Rico Comprehensive Cancer Center between October 2014 and December 2022. The study included 543 records with complete clinical information regarding anal HR-HPV and anal HSIL status. Chi-square and logistic regression analyses were performed.

Results

Mean age of participants was 44.10 ± 13.24 years, 65.2% were men, 71.7% were HIV-infected, 74.4% had anal HR-HPV infection, and 37.9% had biopsy-confirmed HSIL. Regarding BMI, 2.4% were underweight, 31.9% normal weight, and 39.0 % overweight; while 17.3 % had class I, 5.2% class II, and 4.2% class III obesity. No significant association was observed between BMI and anal HR-HPV infection in adjusted analyses. Lower odds of anal HSIL were observed among overweight individuals (OR: 0.63, 95% CI: 0.41 - 0.99) and those with class II/III obesity (OR: 0.48, 95% CI: 0.22 - 1.01) compared to adults with underweight/normal BMI, after adjusting for potential confounders. No significant association was observed for class I obesity.

Conclusion

BMI was not associated with anal HR-HPV infection. Overweight and obese individuals had lower odds of having anal HSIL than adults with underweight/normal BMI. This finding could suggest underdiagnosis of HSIL among overweight/obese individuals, or reduced risk in this group.

A Prospective, Dual-Center Trial of Circumferential Radiofrequency Ablation of Anal High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions Demonstrate Improved Long-term Efficacy Over Historical Controls of Targeted Ablation

BACKGROUND

Targeted ablation of anal canal high-grade dysplasia results in high recurrence over time. Circumferential radiofrequency ablation might decrease recurrence.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine the safety and efficacy of circumferential radiofrequency ablation for anal high-grade dysplasia.

DESIGN

This was a dual-center, prospective trial of circumferential radiofrequency ablation with a 1-year follow-up with longer follow-up data abstracted from medical records of study patients returning after trial for surveillance. Ten participants from the identically conducted pilot circumferential radiofrequency ablation trial were included to improve sample size for longer-term analysis.

SETTINGS

This study included 3 surgeons at 2 sites.

PATIENTS

The study included 51 patients undergoing circumferential radiofrequency ablation for anal canal high-grade dysplasia.

INTERVENTION

Circumferential radiofrequency ablation of anal canal high-grade dysplasia and targeted radiofrequency ablation of recurrence.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome measures were circumferential radiofrequency ablation efficacy and associated morbidity.

RESULTS

Fifty-one participants underwent circumferential radiofrequency ablation but 48 participants returned for 1 or more postprocedure high-resolution anoscopy and were evaluable. The mean age of participants was 43 years, most were male (94%), 33% were living with HIV, and 58% had 3 or more high-grade dysplasias treated. Sixty percent had no recurrence, whereas 19% had 1 recurrence, 15% had 2 recurrences, and 6% had 3 recurrences. Most recurrences (66%) developed within the first 6 months. Kaplan-Meier probability of recurrence combining both series was 19% at 3 months, 30% at 6 months, and approximately 40% after 6 months out to 30 months. Most common morbidities were pain (85.4%) lasting for a median of 21 (range, 4-91) days and bleeding (91%) lasting for a median of 21 (range, 5-87) days. Of those with pain and bleeding, 65% and 85%, respectively, described it as mild. No patients developed fistulas, stricture, or incontinence. No serious adverse events related to circumferential radiofrequency ablation occurred. Having a previous recurrence was the only significant predictor of a subsequent recurrence (HR, 28.53) for recurrence at 9 months or before.

LIMITATIONS

Enrollment ended prematurely, 10 participants from the pilot study were combined to increase the sample size, and longer-term follow-up was collected retrospectively were the limitations of this study.

CONCLUSIONS

Circumferential radiofrequency ablation has improved efficacy over targeted ablation but with increased pain and bleeding. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B973 .

ESTUDIO PROSPECTIVO BICNTRICO SOBRE LA ABLACIN POR RADIOFRECUENCIA CIRCUNFERENCIAL DE LESIONES ANALES INTRAEPITELIALES ESCAMOSAS DE ALTO GRADO DEMOSTRANDO MAYOR EFICACIA A LARGO PLAZO CON RELACIN A CONTROLES HISTRICOS DE ABLACIN DIRIGIDA

ANTECEDENTES:La ablación dirigida de la displasia de alto grado en el canal anal proporciona como resultados una alta recidiva a largo plazo. La ablación por radiofrecuencia circunferencial podría disminuir la reincidencia.OBJETIVO:Determinar la seguridad y eficacia de la ablación por radiofrecuencia circunferencial para la displasia anal de alto grado.DISEÑO:Estudio prospectivo bicéntrico de ablación por radiofrecuencia circunferencial con un seguimiento de 1 año, en base al monitoreo prolongado de datos, obtenidos de los registros medicos, de todos los pacientes incluidos en el estudio y que fueron controlados clinicamente. Diez participantes del estudio piloto de ablación por radiofrecuencia circunferencial realizada de manera idéntica, se combinaron para mejorar el análisis del tamaño de la muestra a largo plazo.PACIENTES:Se incluyeron 51 pacientes sometidos a la ablación por radiofrecuencia circunferencial de una lesion displásica de alto grado en el canal anal.AJUSTES:Tres cirujanos en 2 centros.INTERVENCIÓN:Ablación por radiofrecuencia circunferencial de la displasia de alto grado en el canal anal y ablación por radiofrecuencia dirigida de la recidiva.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADOS:Las medidas primarias fueron la eficacia de la ablación por radiofrecuencia circunferencial y la morbilidad asociada.RESULTADOS:Cincuenta y un participantes se sometieron a la ablación por radiofrecuencia circunferencial, de los cuales, 48 regresaron para ser evaluados con ≥1 anuscopias de alta resolución, después del procedimiento. La edad media de los participantes fue de 43 años, en su mayoría hombres (94%), el 33% eran portadores de VIH y el 58% tenía ≥3 lesiones displásicas de alto grado tratadas. El sesenta por ciento no tuvo recidiva, mientras que el 19%, 15% y 6% tuvieron 1, 2 o 3 recidivas. La mayoría de las recaídas (66%) se desarrollaron dentro de los primeros 6 meses. La probabilidad de recurrencia de Kaplan-Meier combinando ambas series fue del 19 % a los 3 meses, del 30 % a los 6 meses y aproximadamente del 40 % entre los 6 y 30 meses. Los indicadores de morbilidad más frecuentes fueron, el dolor (85,4%) con una mediana de duración de 21 días (rango, 4-91) y sangrado (91%) con una mediana de duración de 21días (rango, 5-87). Aquellos pacientes con dolor (65%) y sangrado (85%) respectivamente, los describieron como leves. Ningún paciente desarrolló fístula, estenosis o incontinencia. No se produjeron eventos adversos graves relacionados con la ablación por radiofrecuencia circunferencial. Tener una recurrencia previa fue el único factor predictivo importante de una recidiva ulterior (RH 28,53) en casos de recaída a los 9 meses o antes.LIMITACIONES:Como el registro finalizó prematuramente, se agregaron 10 participantes del estudio piloto para aumentar el tamaño de la muestra. El seguimiento a largo plazo fué recopilado retrospectivamente.CONCLUSIONES:La ablación por radiofrecuencia circunferencial ha mejorado la eficacia sobre la ablación dirigida pero con dolor y sangrado mas importantes. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B973 . ( Traducción-Dr. Xavier Delgadillo ).

Anal Cancer Screening and Prevention: Summary of Evidence Reviewed for the 2021 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Sexually Transmitted Infection Guidelines

In June 2019 the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) convened an advisory group to assist in development of the 2021 CDC sexually transmitted infections (STI) guidelines. The advisory group on anal cancer screening and prevention met to formulate key questions in this field. The group examined published literature and abstracts to assess evidence and give recommendations for development of the CDC guidelines. This article summarizes key questions, evidence, recommendations, and areas for further research for the screening, diagnosis, and prevention of anal cancer.

Anal cancer and precancerous lesions: a call for improvement

Anal squamous cell carcinoma is the most common type of anal cancer and is largely associated with anal human papillomavirus infection. The incidence of anal squamous cell carcinoma is increasing, and although still uncommon in the general population, a high incidence has been noted in specific population groups (eg, patients with HIV, men who have sex with men [MSM], recipients of solid organ transplants, women with genital neoplasia, and patients with systemic lupus erythematosus or inflammatory bowel disease). The higher incidence among individuals who are HIV-positive makes anal squamous cell carcinoma one of the most common non-AIDS-defining cancers among HIV-positive individuals. Anal cancer screening in high-risk groups aims to detect high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions, which are considered anal precancerous lesions, and for which identification can provide an opportunity for prevention. A blind anal cytology is normally the first screening method, and for patients with abnormal results, this approach can be followed by an examination of the anal canal and perianal area under magnification, along with staining-a technique known as high-resolution anoscopy. Digital anorectal examination can enable early anal cancer detection. Several societies are in favour of screening for HIV-positive MSM and recipients of transplants. There are no current recommendations for screening of anal precancerous lesions via endoscopy, but in high-risk groups, a careful observation of the squamocolumnar junction should be attempted. Several treatments can be used to treat high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions, including argon plasma coagulation or radiofrequency ablation, which are largely limited by high recurrence rates. Gastroenterologists need to be aware of anal squamous cell carcinoma and anal precancerous lesions, given that patients at high risk are frequently encountered in the gastroenterology department. We summarise simple procedures that can help in early anal squamous cell carcinoma detection.

Outcomes of radiofrequency ablation for anal high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions

BACKGROUND

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) is a promising minimally invasive technique but its oncologic and functional outcomes are not well studied. The primary outcome was the efficacy of RFA, and the secondary outcomes were the functional and anatomical anal changes related to RFA.

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of our prospectively collected database of patients who had RFA for HSIL at our institution, between August 2018 and March 2020. To be eligible for RFA, all patients had impairment of their immune function. Targeted ablation was applied in all cases, with 5 overlapping pulsations at the targeted HSILs (delivering 12 J/cm² per application) followed by circumferential, 2-pulsation (12 J/cm²) overlapping anal ablation, to cover the entire anal transition zone. Patients were assessed for recurrence or metachronous disease at 3-month intervals by means of high-resolution anoscopy (HRA) and targeted biopsies. Anorectal manometry, endoanal ultrasound, the 36-Item Short Form and Massachusetts General Hospital-Sexual Functioning Questionnaire (MGH-SFQ) were assessed at baseline and 12 months after intervention.

RESULTS

We included a total of 12 patients with anal HSILs. The mean age was 38.6 (± 7.68) years, and 7 (58.3%) were males. Six were HIV positive, 2 had a primary immunodeficiency disease, and 4 were receiving immunosuppressive therapy. A mean of 2.1 anal HSILs per patient were treated. At 12 months, high-resolution anoscopy showed that 7/12 (58.3%) patients had normal high-resolution anoscopy, 3/12 patients had recurrent HSILs, and 2/12 had a persistent lesion. Those lesions were treated with electrocautery, and reached complete response in the following the 6 months (total of 18 months). In particular, there were no metachronous lesions detected. Patients reported moderate to severe pain during the first 24 h after RFA, but only mild discomfort was present at 30 days. Patients were asymptomatic at their 6- and 12-month visits. RFA was not associated with changes in anorectal manometry or ultrasound examination. The 36-SF survey reported improvement in the general health domain (p = 0.038), while the MGH-SFQ showed improvements in sexual function.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, targeted plus circumferential RFA had a 58.3% efficacy rate for the treatment of anal HSIL in immunocompromised patients, achieving 100% eradication after adding electrocautery ablation. No metachronous lesions were detected. Patients presented relatively mild symptoms after the procedure, no changes in anorectal anatomy or function, and some improvements in their sexual function. These results seem promising in light of the high recurrence reported after HSIL treatment. Larger studies are needed to validate our results.

Evaluating the efficacy of treatment options for anal intraepithelial neoplasia: a systematic review

PURPOSE

Anal intraepithelial neoplasia (AIN) is the accepted precursor of anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC). There has long been a hypothesis that treating AIN may prevent ASCC. Many different treatment modalities have been suggested and studied. We conducted this systematic review to evaluate their efficacy and the evidence as to whether we can prevent ASCC by treating AIN.

METHODS

MEDLINE and EMBASE were electronically searched using relevant search terms. All studies investigating the use of a single treatment for AIN that reported at least one end outcome such as partial or complete response to treatment, recurrence after treatment and/or ASCC diagnosis after treatment were included.

RESULTS

Thirty studies were included in the systematic review investigating 10 treatment modalities: 5% imiquimod, 5-fluorouracil, cidofovir, trichloroacetic acid, electrocautery, surgical excision, infrared coagulation, radiofrequency ablation, photodynamic therapy and HPV vaccination. All treatment modalities demonstrated some initial regression of AIN after treatment; however, recurrence rates were high especially in HIV-positive patients. Many of the studies suffered from significant bias which prevented direct comparison.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the theory persists that by inducing the regression of AIN, we may be able to reduce the risk of ASCC, there was no clinical evidence within the literature advocating that treating AIN does prevent ASCC.

The importance of anal cancer screening and high-resolution anoscopy to gastroenterology practice

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Although human papillomavirus (HPV)-related anal squamous cell cancer (ASCC) is rare, its incidence has been rising and in high-risk populations exceeds the incidence of cancers for which screening programs are implemented. Therefore, targeted screening techniques are being evaluated with high-resolution anoscopy (HRA) as the current gold standard because of its ability to detect anal intraepithelial dysplasia (AIN) and premalignant high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSILs). However, a scarcity of trained providers presents a barrier to screening.

RECENT FINDINGS

ASCC incidence is rising especially in elderly women and young black men. Premalignant HSIL may not only progress to ASCC but also regress. Biomarkers such as HPV type, p16 immunostaining and DNA methylation markers may emerge as predictors of disease progression.HRA with acetic acid and Lugol's iodine staining can be used to detect HSIL and ASCC. Recent studies suggest that anal cancer screening may have an impact on the stage of ASCC at diagnosis and the incidence of anal cancer.The Anal Cancer HSIL Outcomes Research (ANCHOR) study is underway to determine whether treating HSIL effects ASCC incidence.

SUMMARY

Although there are no consensus screening guidelines for anal cancer, it is reasonable to screen high-risk populations with physical examination, anal cytology and HRA. Gastroenterologists can support anal cancer screening programmes through identifying patients at risk, performing noninvasive screening and considering to incorporate endoscopic techniques to examine the anal canal. VIDEO ABSTRACT: http://links.lww.com/COG/A32.

Expectant management surveillance for patients at risk for invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the anus: a large US healthcare system experience

PURPOSE

To determine the impact of expectant management surveillance for patients at risk for squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA).

METHODS

Adult patients at risk for anal cancer, specifically those with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) or known human papilloma virus (HPV) infections (anal dysplasia, anogenital warts, cervical dysplasia, or cervical cancer), underwent expectant management surveillance with targeted therapy of only grossly abnormal or symptomatic anoderm lesions. A retrospective analysis investigated the SCCA incidence in these surveilled populations and in the general population patients without known HIV or HPV infection.

RESULTS

There were 452 incident SCCA in a population of 5,978,510 patients (mean follow-up per patient of 5.4 years). Four hundred ten cancers (90.7%) developed in 5,750,501 HIV-negative patients without documented history of HPV infection (cumulative incidence 0.007%). In at-risk patient populations, the cumulative incidence was 0.69% in patients with anal dysplasia (6 out of 872 patients), 0.14% in HIV+ patients (8 out of 5626 patients), and less than 0.1% in the remaining at-risk groups: cervical cancer (1 out of 1168 patients), cervical dysplasia (14 out of 125,604 patients), and genital warts (14 out of 94,739 patients).

CONCLUSIONS

Expectant management surveillance, with targeted treatment for symptomatic or abnormal lesions, is an effective strategy for the diagnosis of anal cancer in at-risk patient populations. In this study, most patients who developed anal cancer had no known risk factors. A screening strategy for the general population needs to be further delineated.

Testing for Human Papillomavirus Strains 16 and 18 Helps Predict the Presence of Anal High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions

BACKGROUND

More than 90% of anal cancers are caused by human papillomavirus, and human papillomavirus strains 16 and 18 are the most oncogenic. Anal high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions are cancer precursors. Treating these high-grade intraepithelial lesions likely reduces the risk of cancer, but cytology is an imperfect screening test.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine whether human papillomavirus 16 and/or 18 testing better predicts the presence of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.

DESIGN

In this retrospective study, 894 consecutive patients underwent anal dysplasia screening with digital anorectal examination, anal cytology, high-risk human papillomavirus testing, and high-resolution anoscopy with biopsy. We calculated the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of each test and for a novel screening protocol. The absolute and relative risk of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions for all of the cytology/human papillomavirus combinations were also calculated.

SETTINGS

The study was conducted at a single practice specializing in anal dysplasia.

PATIENTS

Ninety-two percent of participants were men who have sex with men. Forty-four percent were HIV-positive individuals who were well controlled on antiretroviral therapy. The median age was 50 years.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The presence of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions as a function of human papillomavirus and the cytology results were measured.

RESULTS

High-risk human papillomavirus testing alone demonstrated better sensitivity (96% vs 89%; p = 0.03) and negative predictive value (99% vs 96%; p = 0.008) over cytology. Human papillomavirus 16/18 testing increased specificity (48% to 71%; p < 0.0001) and positive predictive value (24% to 37%; p = 0.003) over testing for all of the high-risk strains. For each cytology category, high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions were more prevalent when human papillomavirus 16/18 was detected. Benign cytology with 16/18 had a 31-fold increased risk of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.

LIMITATIONS

This study was conducted in a single private practice specializing in anal dysplasia screening with a mostly male population, and results might not be generalizable.

CONCLUSIONS

Testing of high-risk human papillomavirus strains 16/18 improves specificity and positive predictive value over cytology for anal dysplasia screening. Patients testing positive for strains 16/18 are at a high risk for high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions and should undergo high-resolution anoscopy regardless of the cytology result. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A654.

Initial Development and Content Validation of a Health-Related Symptom Index for Persons either Treated or Monitored for Anal High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions

BACKGROUND

Anal cancer, caused by oncogenic types of human papillomavirus, is a growing problem in the United States. A key focus of anal cancer prevention has been screening for and treating precancerous high-grade squamous intraepithelial anal lesions (HSILs).

OBJECTIVES

To develop a health-related symptom index for HSIL using qualitative techniques because anal HSIL and its treatment may have a negative impact on health-related quality of life (HRQOL), and no HRQOL measure specific to this condition and treatment currently exists.

METHODS

Expert consultation was used to guide one-on-one concept elicitation interviews with participants to identify HRQOL aspects they attribute to their anal HSIL and its treatment. This resulted in a draft instrument, which was administered to an independent participant sample, where cognitive interview techniques assessed comprehension.

RESULTS

Eighteen anal HSIL-related concepts were identified by the expert panel. Across the 41 concept elicitation interviews, 23 items representing physical symptoms, physical impacts, and psychological symptoms were identified to comprise the initial measure, which was then evaluated during three rounds of cognitive interviews (n = 45). Several questionnaire aspects were refined on the basis of participant input, with three additional items added per expert/participant recommendation. One item was removed because of poor comprehension, resulting in a 25-item measure.

CONCLUSIONS

Using state-of-the-art qualitative methodology, we have established the content validity of this new instrument, the ANCHOR Anal HSIL Health-Related Symptom Index. Quantitative validation efforts are currently underway. The participant-driven process of developing this tool will facilitate a participant-centered evaluation of the impact on morbidity for treatment of anal HSIL or observation without treatment.

The Diagnostic and Therapeutic Challenge of Anal Intraepithelial Neoplasia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

No single modality of care serves as the defined best practice for the treatment of anal intraepithelial neoplasia (AIN). This review aims to present the common treatment modalities germane to AIN while considering evolving evidence.

RECENT FINDINGS

AIN affords an opportunity to evaluate and treat patients before the development of invasive diseases. Efforts to screen for AIN have yielded mixed results. The major available pharmacotheraputic and surgical options offer efficacious options to reduce the bioburden of disease but can be met with high levels of recurrent disease. None affords a predictably durable response in severe disease. Vaccination as primary prevention will likely reduce the overall upward trend in AIN. Evidence suggests vaccination also affords improvement in recurrent disease. Early evidence reveals potential benefit in multimodal approaches to control AIN. Valuable data is anticipated from the phase III, randomized ANCHOR study evaluating the management of high-grade AIN in HIV +patients.

Brief Report: Radiofrequency Ablation Therapy for Anal Intraepithelial Neoplasia: Results From a Single-Center Prospective Pilot Study in HIV+ Participants

BACKGROUND

HIV-positive individuals have high incidence of anal high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) at the squamocolumnar junction (SCJ), which can progress to cancer. Focal radiofrequency ablation (RFA) treats HSIL, but metachronous recurrence remains high and may be improved with circumferential treatment.

SETTING

The study was performed at a single center.

METHODS

This was a prospective trial of circumferential anal RFA using Barrx 60 RFA focal catheters in participants with ≥1 anal SCJ HSIL. The entire SCJ was ablated by RFA. Adverse events (AEs), symptoms, including pain, and quality of life were assessed. High-resolution anoscopy assessed recurrences at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. Lesion site biopsies occurred at month 12. Recurrences were retreated with focal RFA.

RESULTS

Ten male participants (9 HIV+), with a median 2 HSILs (range 2-8) each, enrolled. Median T-cell count and viral load were 730 cells/mcL and 38 copies/mL. Median duration of RFA treatment was 6.5 (5-13) minutes. Lesion persistence occurred in 4 participants (3 at 3 months, 1 at 6 months). Recurrence at a new site occurred in 1 participant at 3 months. No lesion persisted after retreatment. All participants were HSIL free and completely healed by 12 months. Two device-related mild AEs occurred in 1 participant each (thrombosed external hemorrhoid and soft anal scar; both resolved). No serious AEs occurred.

CONCLUSION

Circumferential anal SCJ RFA produced total HSIL eradication with no more than 2 treatments. Circumferential RFA seems to be well tolerated with minimal pain and no serious AEs in HIV+ participants. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV:: NCT02189161.