Systematic review and meta-analysis of the use of serum procalcitonin levels to predict intra-abdominal infections after colorectal surgery

Bile acid in drainage fluid for early diagnosis of anastomotic leakage and safe discharge after minimally invasive rectal cancer resection: A prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

This study was designed to evaluate the diagnostic value of bile acid levels in drainage fluid for early prediction and exclusion of anastomotic leakage, and assess the performance in allowing a safe discharge.

METHODS

This prospective single-center study was conducted in patients diagnosed with rectal cancer who had received minimally invasive anterior resection consecutively from December 2021 to March 2024. Bile acid in drainage fluid, C-reactive protein, and procalcitonin in serum were measured on the third and fifth day after surgery. Four criteria were considered in discharging patients: a C-reactive protein level below 100 mg/L, flatus with or without defecation, a restore of liquid diet, a bile acid level less than 2 μmol/L.

RESULTS

A total of 419 patients were included and divided into an anastomotic leakage group (n = 37; 8.8%) and a nonanastomotic leakage group (n = 382; 91.2%). Of those patients, 384 accorded with the discharge criteria and 380 of them (99%) discharged safely. The rate of anastomotic leakage after discharge and readmission was 0.5% and 0.3%. Bile acid levels in drainage fluid in the anastomotic leakage group were significantly greater than that in the nonanastomotic leakage group on both postoperative days 3 and 5 (postoperative day 3: 3.00 [2.00-5.17] μmol/L vs 0.80 [0.40-1.30] μmol/L, P < .001; and postoperative day 5: 5.17 [3.00-9.20] μmol/L vs 2.00 [1.40-3.50] μmol/L, P < .001). The negative predictive value in ruling out an anastomotic leakage were 0.96 on postoperative day 3 and 0.97 on postoperative day 5 for bile acid alone.

CONCLUSION

Drainage bile acid has a high negative predictive value in the early diagnosis of anastomotic leakage and showed potential to allow for safe discharge.

Procalcitonin as an Early Marker of Colorectal Anastomotic Leakage in Postoperative Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background The timely identification of colorectal anastomotic leakage (CAL) is still a significant challenge, and identifying reliable markers is essential to minimize patient morbidity and mortality. While procalcitonin (PCT) has shown promise as a biomarker for CAL, its effectiveness must be specifically evaluated in colorectal cancer patients. This systematic review and meta-analysis sought to assess the mean differences in PCT levels between individuals with and without CAL who underwent colorectal surgery for colorectal cancer. Methodology A comprehensive search of the "PubMed," "Scopus," and "Web of Science" databases was carried out, covering studies published through April 2024. The objective was to identify studies examining PCT levels in colorectal cancer patients who underwent colorectal surgery, with a particular focus on the occurrence of CAL. Data on the mean of PCT levels in CAL and non-CAL patients were extracted from the selected studies. The mean differences in PCT levels were subsequently analyzed for each postoperative day (POD). Results Seventeen articles were selected for inclusion in this systematic review. The statistical analysis included five eligible articles that assessed PCT levels in groups exclusively involving patients with colorectal cancer. The findings showed no significant increase in PCT levels in CAL patients compared to non-CAL patients on any POD when a leave-one-out sensitivity analysis was performed to validate the results. Conclusions To date, PCT levels should not be regarded as early indicators of CAL after colorectal surgery in patients with colorectal cancer. Additional research is necessary to evaluate if PCT could be a dependable marker for CAL in this particular setting.

Serial monitoring of pancreatic stone protein for the detection of sepsis in intensive care unit patients with complicated abdominal surgery: A prospective, longitudinal cohort study

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to assess the performance of pancreatic stone protein (PSP) monitoring for the detection of sepsis, prediction of outcome and distinction between bacterial and fungal infections in intensive care unit (ICU) patients with complicated abdominal surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this prospective multicenter cohort study, patients with complicated abdominal surgery had serial PSP measurements during their ICU stay. Infectious episodes were classified as bacterial, fungal or mixed. PSPmax (maximal PSP value within 48 h of the diagnosis of infection) and ΔPSP (difference between PSPmax and the preceding PSP value) were used for analyses.

RESULTS

PSPmax was obtained for 118 infectious episodes (68 patients). ΔPSP was available for 73 episodes (48 patients). Both PSPmax and ΔPSP were significantly higher in patients with sepsis and in patients with a fatal outcome. A PSPmax ≥124 ng/ml and a ΔPSP ≥34 ng/ml could detect sepsis with a sensitivity/specificity of 84%/54% and 69%/76%, respectively. There was no significant difference of PSPmax or ΔPSP between patients with bacterial/mixed versus fungal infections.

CONCLUSIONS

Serial PSP monitoring may be an additional tool for the early detection of sepsis in patients with complicated abdominal surgery who are at high risk of severe infections.

Development and Validation of a Novel Nomogram Model for Early Diagnosis of Anastomotic Leakage After Laparoscopic Colorectal Cancer Surgery

Background: This study aimed to investigate the clinical value of inflammatory factors for predicting anastomotic leakage (AL) after laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery and establish a nomogram model to assess the probability of its occurrence. Patients and Methods: Data of 637 patients who underwent laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery between June 2019 and June 2022 were collected. Differences in procalcitonin (PCT), C-reactive protein (CRP), and white blood cell (WBC) levels before surgery and on postoperative day (POD) 3 and 5 were compared between patients with and without AL (AL and non-AL groups, respectively). The diagnostic accuracy was determined using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), and a nomogram model was developed. Results: Post-operative AL occurred in 46 (7.2%) patients. Procalcitonin, CRP, and WBC levels on POD 3 and 5 were higher in the AL group than in the non-AL group. The AUCs of PCT, CRP, and WBC levels for predicting AL on POD 3 were 0.833, 0.757, and 0.756, respectively, which were better than those on POD 5 (AUC = 0.669, 0.581, and 0.588, respectively). The nomogram model for AL was developed based on five variables (PCT, CRP, WBC, American Society of Anesthesiologists [ASA] grade and comorbidities), and it had an AUC of 0.922. Calibration curves demonstrated that the nomogram had good fit. The Delong test showed that the AUC of the nomogram for predicting the probability of AL was higher than that of PCT alone (z = 2.311, p = 0.02). Conclusions: Procalcitonin measured on POD 3 seems to be a promising negative predictor of AL after laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery. Furthermore, the nomogram model developed in our study, which utilizes a series of predictors that can be easily accessed, has demonstrated potential to further improve the prediction accuracy.

Postoperative procalcitonin is a biomarker for excluding the onset of clinically relevant pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy

BACKGROUND

Early detection and therapy of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy is crucial to improve outcomes of this surgery. Since it is not clear if procalcitonin (PCT), can predict the onset of clinically relevant post-operative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF), we aimed to investigate this ability.

METHODS

One-hundred-thirty pancreaticoduodenectomies (PD) were analyzed. Receiver Operating Characteristic curves analysis defined the optimal cut-offs for PCT and drains amylase levels (DAL). Complications were compared using chi-square for proportions test.

RESULTS

DAL ≥2,000 U/L in postoperative day (POD) 2 had 71% positive predictive value (PPV) and 91% negative predictive value (NPV) for CR-POPF (P<0.001). In POD2, PCT ≥0.5 ng/mL showed NPV 91% (P<0.045) and increased DAL PPV for CR-POPF to 81%. In POD3, POD4 and POD5, DAL (cut-offs 780, 157 and 330 U/L, respectively) showed NPV for CR-POPF >90% (P<0.0001). PCT ≥0.5 ng/mL showed NPV for CR-POPF of about 90%. In POD5, combining DAL (cut-off 330 U/L) and PCT (cut-off 0.5 ng/mL), a PPV for CR-POPF of 81% was detected. A progressive increased risk of CR-POPF from POD2 [odds ratio (OR) =3.05; P=0.0348] to POD5 (OR =4.589; P=0.0082) was observed. In POD2 and 5, PCT ≥0.5 ng/mL, alone and in combination with DAL, may be a reliable marker for identifying patients at highest risk of CR-POPF after PD.

CONCLUSIONS

This association could be proposed to select high risk patients that could benefit of "intensive" postoperative management.

Surgical Site Infections in Gastroenterological Surgery

Surgical site infections (SSIs) remain one of the most common serious surgical complications and are the second most frequent healthcare-associated infection. Patients with SSIs have a significantly increased postoperative length of hospital stay, hospital expenses, and mortality risk compared with patients without SSIs. The prevention of SSI requires the integration of a range of perioperative measures, and approximately 50% of SSIs are preventable through the implementation of evidence-based preventative strategies. Several international guidelines for SSI prevention are currently available worldwide. However, there is an urgent need for SSI prevention guidelines specific to Japan because of the differences in the healthcare systems of Japan versus western countries. In 2018, the Japan Society for Surgical Infection published SSI prevention guidelines for gastroenterological surgery. Although evidence-based SSI prevention guidelines are now available, it is important to consider the appropriateness of these guidelines depending on the actual conditions in each facility. A systemic inflammatory host response is a hallmark of bacterial infection, including SSI. Therefore, blood inflammatory markers are potentially useful in SSI diagnosis, outcome prediction, and termination of therapeutic intervention. In this review, we describe the current guideline-based perioperative management strategies for SSI prevention, focusing on gastroenterological surgery and the supplemental utility of blood inflammatory markers.

Diagnostic accuracy of procalcitonin and interleukin-6 for postoperative infection in major gastrointestinal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

We aim to assess the diagnostic accuracy of procalcitonin (PCT) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) as diagnostic biomarkers for postoperative infection/sepsis following major abdominal surgery. Postoperative infection is an important cause for morbidity and mortality in major surgery. Early diagnosis and antimicrobial treatment improves outcomes, and high-performing biomarkers could guide clinical decision making.

METHODS

A systematic database search was conducted for studies reporting diagnostic performance of biomarkers (including PCT and IL-6) for infection/sepsis following major abdominal surgery. Studies were assessed for reporting of diagnostic accuracy, relevance and quality. Data were extracted for meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Ten studies with 1,611 participants reported the diagnostic accuracy of PCT, with pooled sensitivity, specificity and summary receiver operator curve of 72% (95% CI 66-78), 62% (95% CI 59-64) and 0.766, respectively. Four studies with 175 participants reported the diagnostic accuracy of IL-6, with pooled sensitivity, specificity and summary receiver operator curve of 84% (95% CI 72-92), 76% (95% CI 68-84) and 0.878, respectively There was variability in the timing of sampling and cut-off values and significant heterogeneity and inconsistency between studies (I2 diagnostic odds ratio (DOR)= 43.2% for PCT, I2 DOR=0% for IL-6).

CONCLUSIONS

PCT performs only moderately well as a diagnostic test for postoperative infection/sepsis in major abdominal surgery, demonstrating limited sensitivity and specificity. Heterogeneity between studies is a limitation of the meta-analysis. There is an ongoing need for a rapid, accurate biomarker for postoperative infection or sepsis.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of procalcitonin for post-operative sepsis/infection in liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Post-operative infection is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in Liver Transplantation (LT). Early diagnosis and antimicrobial treatment improves outcomes and ruling out sepsis aids immunosuppression decisions. Procalcitonin (PCT) has recently become part of such decision making in COVID-19 pneumonia but its role in LT is not established. We assessed the diagnostic accuracy of PCT as a diagnostic biomarker for infection or sepsis following LT.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted for studies reporting diagnostic performance of PCT for infection/sepsis following LT. Studies were assessed for reporting of diagnostic accuracy, relevance and quality.

RESULTS

Eight studies with 363 participants reported data on the diagnostic accuracy of PCT, with pooled sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio and summary receiver operator curve of 70% (95% CI 62-78), 77% (95% CI 73-83), 15.82 (95% CI 5.82-43.12) and 0.871 respectively. There was variability in the timing of sampling (post-operative day 1-8) and range of cut-off values (0.48 to 42.8 ng/mL). Heterogeneity was reduced when only studies with adult LT recipients were considered.

CONCLUSIONS

PCT performs moderately well as a diagnostic test for postoperative infection/sepsis following LT. This marker is more suited for use in adult LT populations.

Updates of Risk Factors for Anastomotic Leakage after Colorectal Surgery

Anastomotic leakage is a potentially severe complication occurring after colorectal surgery and can lead to increased morbidity and mortality, permanent stoma formation, and cancer recurrence. Multiple risk factors for anastomotic leak have been identified, and these can allow for better prevention and an earlier diagnosis of this significant complication. There are nonmodifiable factors such as male gender, comorbidities and distance of tumor from anal verge, and modifiable risk factors, including smoking and alcohol consumption, obesity, preoperative radiotherapy and preoperative use of steroids or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Perioperative blood transfusion was shown to be an important risk factor for anastomotic failure. Recent studies on the laparoscopic approach in colorectal surgery found no statistical difference in anastomotic leakage rate compared with open surgery. A diverting stoma at the time of primary surgery does not appear to reduce the leak rate but may reduce its clinical consequences and the need for additional surgery if anastomotic leakage does occur. It is still debatable if preoperative bowel preparation should be used, especially for left colon and rectal resections, but studies have shown similar incidence of postoperative leak rate.

Diagnosis of Anastomotic Leak

Anastomotic leaks after colorectal surgery is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Understanding the impact of anastomotic leaks and their risk factors can help the surgeon avoid any modifiable pitfalls. The diagnosis of an anastomotic leak can be elusive but can be discerned by the patient's global clinical assessment, adjunctive laboratory data and radiological assessment. The use of inflammatory markers such as C-Reactive Protein and Procalcitonin have recently gained traction as harbingers for a leak. A CT scan and/or a water soluble contrast study can further elucidate the location and severity of a leak. Further intervention is then individualized on the spectrum of simple observation with resolution or surgical intervention.

THE ROLE OF MARKERS OF SYSTEMIC INFLAMMATORY RESPONSE IN THE POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD. REVIEW

Despite all the achievements of modern surgery, the number of postoperative infectious complications in the world remains high. Their occurrence leads to a longer period of patients’ hospitalization, requires the use of additional medical and diagnostic measures, which ultimately leads to higher treatment costs and significant financial losses in the health care system. Therefore, it is important to identify postoperative complications at an early stage, even before the development of pronounced clinical symptoms, and to predict their possible development in a certain category of patients. For these purposes, scientists try to use various laboratory markers. In this paper, we analyzed both well-known indicators of the inflammatory response, such as: C-reactive protein, albumin, their ratio, procalcitonin and interleukin-6, and relatively new parameters that research teams are trying to apply for these purposes: neutrophil granularity intensity and neutrophil reactivity intensity, pancreatic stone protein and pancreatitis-associated protein. We tried to collect the most complete information available at the moment, evaluate the opinions of researchers, identify contradictions in their works and try to explain their cause. As a result, it turned out that even the markers of inflammation known for many years are not absolutely specific for postoperative infectious complications. We concluded that most of the laboratory parameters described in this article can be used to some extent in the early diagnosis of postoperative infectious complications, but if we want to obtain more complete information in this area of knowledge, it is necessary to conduct new largescale studies.

Postoperative serum procalcitonin versus C-reactive protein as a marker of postoperative infectious complications in pancreatic surgery: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Aim of this meta-analysis was to compare diagnostic accuracy C-reactive protein and procalcitonin between postoperative days 3 and 5 to predict infectious complications post pancreatic surgery.

METHODS

A systemic literature search was performed using MEDLINE, EMBASE and SCOPUS to identify studies evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of procalcitonin and C-reactive protein to predict infectious complications between postoperative days 3 and 5 following pancreatic surgery. A meta-analysis was performed using random-effect model and pooled predictive parameters.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies consisting of 2212 patients were included in the final meta-analysis. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, area under curve and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) for day 3 C-reactive protein were 62%, 67%, 0.772 and 6.54, respectively. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, area under curve and DOR for day 3 procalcitonin were 74%, 79%, 0.8453 and 11.03, respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, area under the curve and DOR for day 4 C-reactive protein were 60%, 68%, 0.8022 and 11.90, respectively. Sensitivity, specificity and DOR of postoperative day 5 procalcitonin level for predicting infectious complications were 83%, 70% and 12.9, respectively. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, Area Under Receiver Operating Curve and DOR were 50%, 70%, 0.777 and 10.19, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Postoperative procalcitonin is a better marker to predict postoperative infectious complications after pancreatic surgeries.

Management of perforated diverticulitis with generalized peritonitis. A multidisciplinary review and position paper

Perforated diverticulitis is an emergent clinical condition and its management is challenging and still debated. The aim of this position paper was to critically review the available evidence on the management of perforated diverticulitis and generalized peritonitis in order to provide evidence-based suggestions for a management strategy. Four Italian scientific societies (SICCR, SICUT, SIRM, AIGO), selected experts who identified 5 clinically relevant topics in the management of perforated diverticulitis with generalized peritonitis that would benefit from a multidisciplinary review. The following 5 issues were tackled: 1) Criteria to decide between conservative and surgical treatment in case of perforated diverticulitis with peritonitis; 2) Criteria or scoring system to choose the most appropriate surgical option when diffuse peritonitis is confirmed 3); The appropriate surgical procedure in hemodynamically stable or stabilized patients with diffuse peritonitis; 4) The appropriate surgical procedure for patients with generalized peritonitis and septic shock and 5) Optimal medical therapy in patients with generalized peritonitis from diverticular perforation before and after surgery. In perforated diverticulitis surgery is indicated in case of diffuse peritonitis or failure of conservative management and the decision to operate is not based on the presence of extraluminal air. If diffuse peritonitis is confirmed the choice of surgical technique is based on intraoperative findings and the presence or risk of severe septic shock. Further prognostic factors to consider are physiological derangement, age, comorbidities, and immune status. In hemodynamically stable patients, emergency laparoscopy has benefits over open surgery. Options include resection and anastomosis, Hartmann’s procedure or laparoscopic lavage. In generalized peritonitis with septic shock, an open surgical approach is preferred. Non-restorative resection and/or damage control surgery appear to be the only viable options, depending on the severity of hemodynamic instability. Multidisciplinary medical management should be applied with the main aims of controlling infection, relieving postoperative pain and preventing and/or treating postoperative ileus. In conclusion, the complexity and diversity of patients with diverticular perforation and diffuse peritonitis requires a personalized strategy, involving a thorough classification of physiological derangement, staging of intra-abdominal infection and choice of the most appropriate surgical procedure.

Early detection of infectious complications using C-reactive protein and the procalcitonin levels after laparoscopic colorectal resection: a prospective cohort study

PURPOSE

The predictive values of the C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT) levels for postoperative infectious complications were investigated in patients who underwent elective laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer.

METHODS

A total of 154 consecutive patients who underwent elective laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer (CRC) were prospectively studied. The CRP and PCT levels on the first postoperative day (POD1) and the fourth postoperative day (POD4) were measured. Any correlations between the CRP and PCT levels on POD1 and POD4 with the occurrence of infectious complications were examined.

RESULTS

Infectious complications occurred in 18 (11.7%) patients. CRP on POD1 and CRP and PCT on POD4 were significantly higher in patients who developed infectious complications than in those who did not. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves of CRP on POD1 and CRP and PCT on POD4 were 0.597, 0.763 and 0.768, respectively. The cut-off values of CRP and PCT levels on POD4 were 14.33 mg/dl and 0,264 ng/ml, respectively. Whereas the positive predictive value of an elevated CRP level was high, the negative predictive value of an elevated PCT was high.

CONCLUSION

The CRP and PCT levels on POD4 are both considered to be useful for the early detection of infectious complications after laparoscopic resection of CRC.

Consensus on the definition of colorectal anastomotic leakage: A modified Delphi study

BACKGROUND

Despite the emerging knowledge about colorectal anastomotic leakage (CAL) through the increasing number of clinical and experimental studies, there is no generally accepted definition of CAL. Because of the wide variety of definitions used in literature, comparison of study outcomes and quality of care is complicated.

AIM

To reach consensus on the definition of CAL using a modified Delphi method.

METHODS

The RAND/UCLA appropriateness method was used. The expert panel consisted of international colorectal surgeons and researchers who had published three or more articles about CAL. The consensus process consisted of two online distributed questionnaires and a third round with a recommendation. In the questionnaires participants were asked to rate the appropriateness of statements using a 1-9 Likert scale. Consensus was defined as a panel median between 1-3 or 7-9 without disagreement. In the final round a recommendation was formed regarding the definition of CAL and the expert panel was asked if they agreed or disagreed.

RESULTS

Twenty-three authors participated in the first round and twenty-one finished the second round. After two rounds consensus was reached on 37 items (80%) in nine different categories. The International Study Group of Rectal Cancer definition is the most frequently advised general definition by our panel. Consensus was reached regarding the clinical symptoms of CAL, which serum markers contributes to the suspicion of CAL, which radiological and perioperative findings should be considered as CAL, which grading system is appropriate and if there should be a range of postoperative days in the definition. Eventually, 19 experts completed all three rounds of which 16 (84%) agreed with our final recommendations for the definition of CAL.

CONCLUSION

A consensus-based recommendation for the definition of CAL was formed using our modified Delphi method that can be widely incorporated in the field.

Predictive value of inflammatory markers for postoperative recovery following colorectal surgery

BACKGROUND

Using biological markers to predict serious complications and global postoperative recovery, to ensure safe and timely patient discharge after elective colorectal surgery represents a major challenge. The aim of this study was to demonstrate that C-reactive protein levels < 172 mg/l on postoperative day 3 were associated with postoperative recovery within 5 days.

METHODS

This is a prospective study of a consecutive bicentric cohort. Successive patients scheduled for bowel resection with anastomosis, without stoma, were included. The main composite endpoint for overall postoperative recovery included absence of fever, absence of pain > 2 on the visual analog scale, intestinal gas transit, and patient autonomy for mobility and body care.

RESULTS

One hundred sixty-height patients, with a mean age of 65 years old, were analyzed. Ninety patients (53%) underwent right colectomy and 131 (77%) were operated on by laparoscopy. Severe postoperative complications were observed in 11 patients (6%). One hundred twenty patients (71%) recovered within 5 days. C-reactive protein levels < 172 mg/L on postoperative day 3 had a negative predictive value of 80% to predict recovery within 5 days. Ninety-five percent of patients with C-reactive protein < 172 mg/L at postoperative day 3 had no severe postoperative complications.

CONCLUSION

Levels of C-reactive protein < 172 mg/L at postoperative day 3 corresponded with an early recovery in 80% of cases, thus allowing safe and early discharge without risk of serious complications.

Meta-analysis of the Diagnostic Accuracy of C-Reactive Protein for Infectious Complications in Laparoscopic Versus Open Colorectal Surgery

INTRODUCTION

C-reactive protein may predict anastomotic complications after colorectal surgery, but its predictive ability may differ between laparoscopic and open resection due to differences in stress response. Therefore, the objective of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis on the diagnostic characteristics of C-reactive protein to detect anastomotic leaks and infectious complications after laparoscopic and open colorectal surgery.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed according to PRISMA. Studies were included if they reported on the diagnostic characteristics of postoperative day 3-5 values of serum C-reactive protein to diagnose anastomotic leak or infectious complications specifically in patients undergoing elective laparoscopic and open colorectal surgery. The main outcome was a composite of anastomotic leak and infectious complications. A random-effects model was used to perform a meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy.

RESULTS

A total of 13 studies were included (9 for laparoscopic surgery, 8 for open surgery). The pooled incidence of the composite outcome was 14.8% (95% CI 10.2-19.3) in laparoscopic studies and 21.0% (95% CI 11.9-30.0) for open. The pooled diagnostic accuracy characteristics were similar for open and laparoscopic studies. However, the C-reactive protein threshold cutoffs were lower in laparoscopic studies for postoperative days 3 and 4, but similar on day 5.

CONCLUSIONS

The diagnostic characteristics of C-reactive protein in the early postoperative period to detect infectious complications and leaks are similar after laparoscopic and open colorectal surgery. However, thresholds are lower for laparoscopic surgery, suggesting that the interpretation of serum CRP values needs to be tailored based on operative approach.

Colonic diverticular disease

Diverticula are outpouchings of the intestinal wall and are common anatomical alterations detected in the human colon. Colonic diverticulosis (the presence of diverticula in the colon; referred to as diverticulosis) remains asymptomatic in most individuals but ~25% of individuals will develop symptomatic diverticulosis, termed colonic diverticular disease (also known as diverticular disease). Diverticular disease can range in severity from symptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease (SUDD) to symptomatic disease with complications such as acute diverticulitis or diverticular haemorrhage. Since the early 2000s, a greater understanding of the pathophysiology of diverticulosis and diverticular disease, which encompasses genetic alterations, chronic low-grade inflammation and gut dysbiosis, has led to improvements in diagnosis and management. Diagnosis of diverticular disease relies on imaging approaches, such as ultrasonography, CT and MRI, as biomarkers alone are insufficient to establish a diagnosis despite their role in determining disease severity and progression as well as in differential diagnosis. Treatments for diverticular disease include dietary fibre, pharmacological treatments such as antibiotics (rifaximin), anti-inflammatory drugs (mesalazine) and probiotics, alone or in combination, and eventually surgery. Despite being effective in treating primary disease, their effectiveness in primary and secondary prevention of complications is still uncertain.

C-reactive protein and drain amylase accurately predict clinically relevant pancreatic fistula after partial pancreaticoduodenectomy

BACKROUND

C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT) have shown to be reliable predictors of inflammatory complications and anastomotic leak after colorectal surgery. Their predictive value after partial pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) remains unclear.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies (2009-2018) at our hospital were included. Drain amylase was evaluated on postoperative day (POD) 1, serum CRP and PCT were evaluated on POD 1-3. Receiver-operating characteristics curves were performed and significant cut-off values were tested using logistic regression.

RESULTS

Among 188 patients who underwent partial PD, clinically relevant pancreatic fistulas (POPF) occurred in 30 (16%) patients, including 20 (10.6%) with Grade B and 10 (5.3%) patients with Grade C. Postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ III) were reported in 46 (24.5%) patients, including Grade IIIa in 16 (8.5%), IIIb in 18 (9.6%), IVa in 3 (1.6%), IVb in 2 (1.1%) and V in 7 (3.7%) patients. Drain amylase on POD 1 showed the largest area under the curve (0.872, p < 0.001), followed by CRP (0.803, p < 0.001) and PCT on POD 3 (0.651, p < 0.011). Drain amylase on POD 1 > 303 U/l (OR 0.045, 95% CI 0.010-0.195, p < 0.001), CRP > 203 mg/l (OR 0.098, 95% CI 0.041-0.235, p < 0.001) and PCT > 0.85 μg/l (OR 0.393, 95%CI 0.178-0.869, p = 0.02) were significant predictors of relevant POPF in the univariate analysis. CRP > 203 mg/l (OR 0.098, 95% CI 0.024-0.403, p = 0.001) and drain amylase > 303 U/l (OR 0.064, 95% CI 0.007-0.554, p = 0.01) remained independent predictors in the multivariable analysis. The combination of drain amylase on POD 1 and CRP on POD 3 had a sensitivity and specificity of 87.4% and 90.9% to predict relevant POPF.

CONCLUSION

Drain amylase on POD 1 and CRP on POD 3 can accurately predict clinically relevant POPF after partial pancreaticoduodenectomy. The accuracy of PCT on POD 3 is limited.

Diagnostic accuracy of procalcitonin as an early predictor of infection after radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A prospective bicenter cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the diagnostic accuracy of procalcitonin (PCT) as an early predictor of infection following radical gastrectomy to treat gastric cancer (GC).

METHODS

A prospective, observational, cohort study was conducted in two high-volume tertiary centers (registered under ClinicalTrials.gov). A total of 552 consecutive adult patients undergoing radical gastrectomy for GC from June 2018 to July 2019 were included. Routine blood tests (white blood cell count (WBC); neutrophil count; the neutrophil:WBC ratio, N%) and PCT were measured on post-operative day (POD) 3 and 5. Post-operative infection was recorded based on the criteria of the Center for Disease Control. The area under the curve (AUC) summarizing receiver-operating characteristic was calculated and compared for each biomarker measured.

RESULTS

Ninety three adverse events occurred in 70 patients (12.7%), with infections being the most common (n = 37, 6.7%). With cutoff values of 0.695 ng/mL at POD 3 and 0.515 ng/mL at POD 5, specificity and negative predictive value for infections were 0.656 and 96.3%, 0.816 and 96.1%, respectively. PCT had a better AUC than the WBC and neutrophil count to detect post-operative complications, especially infections (AUC: 0.678, 0.600, 0.592, P = 0.028 and 0.017, respectively) at POD 3, but which were comparable at POD 5. Additionally, 4 of the 8 patients with PCT levels ≥3 ng/mL on POD 5 were confirmed to have an infection.

CONCLUSION

PCT is a more reliable predictor than WBC and neutrophil count to detect infections following radical gastrectomy for GC. PCT levels <0.695 ng/mL at POD 3 and < 0.515 ng/mL at POD 5 makes post-operative infections very unlikely but extreme high PCT levels should alert the surgeon to the possibility of infections.