Results of the double-blind randomized controlled trial comparing laser hemorrhoidoplasty with sutured mucopexy and excisional hemorrhoidectomy

Comparative analysis of Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy combined with doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation and Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy in hemorrhoidal disease treatment

BACKGROUND

In hemorrhoidal disease, despite the existence of numerous treatment options to alleviate symptoms, surgical intervention continues to be the gold standard. The advantages and disadvantages of many methods have been shown in numerous studies However, only a few studies have compared the effectiveness of combined methods.

AIM

To compare the results of a coloproctology clinic that switched to the Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation (DG-HAL) + Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy (FH) technique from the FH in the treatment of hemorrhoidal disease.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort, data from a total of 45 patients who underwent DG-HAL + FH (n = 24) and FH (n = 21) for grade III hemorrhoidal disease between 2020 and 2022 were analyzed. Demographic and clinical data, surgical duration, intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay, postoperative analgesic consumption, pain scores using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), complications, time to return to normal activities, and the recurrence rate were compared in both groups.

RESULTS

The study included 45 patients, with 75.6% (n = 34) male and 24.4% (n = 11) female. The rate of intraoperative blood loss was higher in the FH group (P < 0.05). The VAS scores and postoperative complication rates were similar in both groups. The need for postoperative analgesics was lower in the DG-HAL + FH group (2 vs 4 days, P < 0.05), while the FH group showed a shorter time to return to normal activities (9.5 vs 6.0 days, P = 0.02). The recurrence rate (16.7% vs 0%) and Clavien-Dindo Score-1 complications (20.8% vs 9.5%, P = 0.29) were higher in the DG-HAL + FH group but were insignificant.

CONCLUSION

Our study revealed that the addition of the DG-HAL to classical hemorrhoidectomy caused less intraoperative bleeding and a lower postoperative analgesia requirement.

Multilayered numerical modelling of bio-thermal aspects during laser assisted treatment of internal haemorrhoid developed in rectum

Haemorrhoids are swollen blood vessels developed around the anus. Internal haemorrhoids are generally not visible from outside due to its growth inside the rectum and it is generally considered as painless. However, a prolapsed internal haemorrhoid may cause discomfort, pain and irritation. For the treatment of internal haemorrhoid, laser assisted therapy would be helpful due to its rooted advantages such as post-surgery minimal pain, lesser bleeding, quicker healing, shorter recovery period, shorter surgical and overall treatment duration, lower risk of recurrence and least risk of post-surgical infections. The genesis of present research work deals with the development of mathematical modelling to capture the bio-thermal response during laser assisted therapy of internal haemorrhoid developed in the rectum. The explicit form of finite difference method is employed as numerical tool for the mathematical study and the physical domain is considered as multilayered tissue (three different layers of rectum: muscle, submucosa and mucosa). A Gaussian laser beam is considered as heat source to destroy the abnormal growth inside the rectum. Temperature variation in multi-layered tissue is investigated for laser heat input and absorption radius along the temporal and spatial coordinate. Temperature drop has been evidenced in the interfaces of multi-layered rectum tissue. The research outcome is verified with the published numerical model with negligible variation.

The LHP Recommendation Development Group, Ambe PC, Martin-Martin GP, Vasas N, Piponski I, Roman IH, Hernandez JDP, Ma H, Lin H, Weyand G, Mazlan L, García Flórez LJ, Wolff K, Dessily M, Wang C, Dobricanin V, Yang W, Bruketa T, Zeng X, Avdicausevic S, Zhang Z, Wais S, Kalaskar S, Cui Z, Pestonit IB, Cao Y, Suárez Sánchez A, Ren D, Vargas Castillo E, Zheng D, Bogdanic B, Wölk A, Yao Y, Issaad S, Nasser T, Guo X, Nagar MM, Merkle M, Ruiz-Lopez M, Zhang Y, Blumberg C, Alam AA, Acosta AC, Schouten R, Istok P, Demtröder C, Wang Z, Dong Q, Wu J. Best clinical practice recommendations for the management of symptomatic hemorrhoids via laser hemorrhoidoplasty: the LHP recommendations

BACKGROUND

Laser hemorrhoidoplasty (LHP) has emerged as a novel, minimally invasive technique for managing symptomatic hemorrhoids, gaining popularity among clinicians. Despite its increasing adoption, significant variations exist in the application of LHP across different practices.

PURPOSE

The aim of these recommendations was to spell out some basic principles and recommendations for performing a standard LHP procedure.

METHODS

The Recommendation Development Group (RDG) consisting of surgeons with experience in LHP were invited to formulate recommendations for the procedure. The recommendations were generated following systematic literature research and discussion amongst experts (expert opinion) where no substantial literature was available. The developed recommendations were voted upon by a panelist via the Delphi process. Consensus was a priori defined as agreement of 75% and above, with strong consensus defined as 85% and above.

RESULTS

The RDG developed 21 recommendations that were voted upon by 49 panelists. Consensus was reached for all 21 recommendations after the first Delphi round, including 16 recommendations with strong consensus.

CONCLUSION

The RDP offers a comprehensive suite of guidelines to enhance the safety and efficacy of standard LHP procedures. Out of 21 detailed recommendations, 16 reached strong consensus, collectively addressing the full spectrum of LHP procedures-from laser settings and preoperative preparations to perioperative strategies and postoperative care. This coherent framework is anticipated not only to standardize but also to refine the LHP technique across the board, thereby elevating the management of symptomatic hemorrhoidal disease.

Outcomes of laser hemorrhoidoplasty for grade II-IV hemorrhoidal disease in Bangladesh

Background

Laser hemorrhoidoplasty is a minimally invasive procedure to treat hemorrhoids and has shown better outcomes. Less is known about its utility in a lower middle-income country; Bangladesh.

Method

Between March 2023 and December 2023, 86 patients with grade II-IV hemorrhoids underwent laser hemorroidoplasty. Follow up was assessed on 1st week, 2nd week, and 6th week including pain, satisfaction, symptom improvement, incapacity for work, complications, reduction, and recurrence.

Results

The study included 86 patients, with a higher proportion of male participants (73.3%) and a mean age of 55.43±13.6 years. The majority of subjects (68.60%) had grade 3 hemorrhoids. The average surgery duration was 14.70±4.70 minutes All individuals experienced substantial decreases in the size of their hemorrhoids (100%) and reported high levels of satisfaction after the operation (97.7%). The use of the Wilcoxon signed-rank test demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in both the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) ratings during the three subsequent observation periods (1st week, 2nd week, and 6th week). The 6th week complication rate was 19.8%. Additional mucopexy was performed on all patients with grade IV and three patients with grade III hemorrhoids.

Conclusion

Laser hemorroidoplasty is a day-care procedure, that is safe and efficacious and can be used in rural area settings with good patient satisfaction. Mucopexy is required in some cases of large hemorrhoidal mass to prevent recurrence.

Propensity-Score Matching Analysis for Laser Hemorrhoidoplasty Versus Circumferential Stapler Hemorrhoidectomy: One-Year Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Laser hemorrhoidectomy (LHP) is a minimally invasive procedure with less pain, short operative time and length of stay, and a low recurrent rate. This study aimed to analyze the surgical outcomes of the circumferential stapler hemorrhoidectomy (CSH, Longo operation) by propensity score-matching analysis, including perioperative outcomes and quality of life.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between March 2022 and March 2023, 216 patients underwent CSH and 198 LHP in Binh Dan Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. Potential confounding factors for operative outcomes were adjusted by propensity score-matching analysis. The gender, age, Goligher classification, symptoms, Hemorrhoidal Disease Symptom Score (HDSS), and the number of hemorrhoidal columns were matching variables. After 1:1 propensity score-matching, 115 patients from each group were evaluated for perioperative outcomes and compared for a prospective study.

RESULTS

There was no difference in potential preoperative confounders such as gender, hemorrhoid classification, symptoms, and HDSS between the two groups after propensity score-matching. However, there was a difference in age (52 in the Longo group and 43 in the LHP group) and the number of columns (the LHP group had more). Postoperative outcomes such as operative time, blood loss, general complications, and postoperative interventions were less in the LHP group. However, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) (4 vs. 4), length of stay (1 day vs. 1 day), quality of life (both groups improved quality of life after the procedure), and recurrence rate (2 in the Longo group vs. 0 in the LHP group, p=0.5) had no difference between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Propensity-score matching analysis showed that the LHP procedure was superior to the Longo operation (CSH) in operative time, blood loss, general complications, and postoperative intervention. Other outcomes such as VAS, length of stay, quality of life, and recurrence rate have no difference.

A systematic review comparing the efficacy of 980 nm vs. 1470 nm wavelengths in laser hemorrhoidoplasty

BACKGROUND

Laser Hemorrhoidoplasty (LHP) is a minimally invasive surgical option for the management of hemorrhoidal disease that has been increasingly adopted by surgeons over the last decade. Two wavelengths; 980 nm and 1470 nm have been employed in LHP. However, no data exist comparing the effects of these two wavelengths for this indication. This systematic review investigates both wavelengths for the management of hemorrhoids via the LHP procedure.

METHODS

This systematic analysis and meta-analysis was performed following the PICOS and PRISMA guidelines. A systematic research of MEDLINE, Scopus, Clinicaltrials.gov, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CENTRAL and Google Scholar databases from inception until March 2024 was performed.

RESULTS

Overall, 19 studies including seven randomized control trials (RCT) and 12 non-randomized control trials with a total of 2492 patients were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. The duration of LHP with both wavelengths was significantly shorter compared to open hemorrhoidectomy, postoperative pain and the rate of postoperative complications were significantly lower following LHP. There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of recurrence between LHP with the 980-nm wavelength and open hemorrhoidectomy. However, LHP with 1470-nm wavelength resulted in significantly higher recurrence rate compared to hemorrhoidectomy.

CONCLUSION

Although no direct studies have compared the two wavelengths used in LHP, the outcomes of LHP seem to be independent of the wavelength used. Both wavelengths, when correctly used provide similar results, which are mostly better compared to open hemorrhoidectomy in terms of postoperative complications and postoperative pain, but not in terms of recurrence, where at least for the 1470-nm wavelength, LHP seems to show a higher recurrence rate when compared to open hemorrhoidectomy. Although a direct comparison of both wavelengths was not possible, technical issues regarding number of shots and energy per pile represent relevant parameters for recurrence after LHP.

Clinical outcomes of laser hemorrhoidoplasty with feeding vessels suture ligation: a retrospective study in a single center

BACKGROUND

Laser hemorrhoidoplasty has demonstrated significant therapeutic effectiveness. To diminish postoperative bleeding and enhance overall outcomes, we have additionally adopted suture ligating the feeding vessels. This study aimed to understand the treatment outcomes and any associated complications.

METHODS

This study comprised patients with symptomatic grade II-III hemorrhoids who underwent laser hemorrhoidoplasty with feeding vessel suture ligation and Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy between 1 September 2020, and 31 August 2022. Surgical-related details, postoperative pain, discomfort after discharge, hemorrhoid recurrence, and any complications were collected from inpatient records, outpatient follow-ups, and telephone interviews. Initially, we will analyze the distinctions between the laser group and the traditional group, followed by an investigation into complications and satisfaction within the laser surgery subgroup.

RESULTS

The study included 323 patients, with 173 undergoing laser hemorrhoidoplasty (LHP) and 150 undergoing Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy. Regarding pain assessment, the LHP group exhibited superior performance compared to traditional surgery at postoperative 4 h, before discharge, and during the first and second outpatient visits, with statistically significant differences. Additionally, the LHP group had a lower rate of urinary retention and experienced significantly less pain, with statistically significant differences.

CONCLUSIONS

Laser hemorrhoidoplasty with feeding vessels suture ligation has been shown to reduce postoperative pain and appears to be a promising minimally invasive treatment option for symptomatic grade II and III hemorrhoids.

Laser hemorrhoidoplasty vs. rubber band ligation: a randomized trial comparing 2 mini-invasive treatment for grade II hemorrhoids

PURPOSE

As a minimally invasive procedure, laser hemorrhoidoplasty (LHP) can not only relieve the symptoms of hemorrhoids, but also protect the anal cushion structure. This study aimed to investigate the clinical efficacy of LHP in the treatment of grade II hemorrhoids.

METHODS

A total of 70 patients with grade II hemorrhoids were randomly assigned to receive LHP or Rubber Band Ligation (RBL) (n = 35 per group) in 2019 from a single center. The postoperative pain, bleeding, feeling of anal distension(local falling, swelling, foreign body sensation, stool) and postoperative recurrence rate were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The postoperative pain, bleeding, and feeling of anal distension in the LHP group were improved significantly as compared with the RBL group within 2 weeks after surgery (P < 0.01). Both methods can relieve the symptoms of grade II hemorrhoids. There was no difference in the recurrence rate between the two groups at 1 year after surgery (P > 0.05). The patients in LHP group took less time to return to normal activities (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

As a minimally invasive treatment, LHP is easy and not traumatic and results in mild postoperative pain and few complications. It is an ideal choice for grade II hemorrhoids.

Precision and Power: A Comprehensive Review of Exploring the Role of Laser Treatment in Hemorrhoidal Management

Hemorrhoids are a prevalent condition that significantly impacts the quality of life of affected individuals. Traditional treatment modalities range from conservative management to invasive surgical procedures, each with varying degrees of effectiveness and patient burden. Recently, laser treatment has emerged as a promising alternative, offering a minimally invasive approach with the potential for reduced complications and faster recovery. This comprehensive review aims to evaluate the role of laser treatment in hemorrhoidal management, exploring its mechanisms, clinical outcomes, safety, and economic implications. Through an extensive literature review and analysis of clinical trials, this paper assesses the efficacy of laser therapy compared to conventional treatments, highlighting its advantages in pain reduction, healing times, and patient satisfaction. The review also discusses the different types of lasers, including diode and Nd:YAG, and their specific applications in hemorrhoidal treatment. The findings indicate that laser treatment can be an effective and safe option for patients, encouraging its consideration as part of standard hemorrhoidal care protocols. However, gaps in long-term outcome data and the need for further studies on cost-effectiveness are identified. The review concludes with recommendations for future research, the advancement of laser technology, and the potential integration of laser treatment into clinical practice, aiming to enhance patient outcomes in hemorrhoidal management.

Comparison of Laser Hemorrhoidoplasty and Milligan-Morgan Hemorrhoidectomy Techniques in the Treatment of Grade 2 and 3 Hemorrhoidal Disease

INTRODUCTION

The estimated prevalence of hemorrhoidal disease (HD) worldwide ranges from 2.9% to 27.9%. Conservative, medical, non-operative, and surgical therapy approaches are applied in HD treatment. Milligan-Morgan (MM) hemorrhoidectomy which is the most well-known and frequently applied surgical treatment method, and Laser hemorrhoidoplasty (LH) are among the accepted treatment methods in Grade 2-3 HD treatment where medical treatment is insufficient.

PURPOSE

In this study, the early results of laser hemorrhoidoplasty and Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy techniques were compared.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A randomized clinical trial. The study included ASA 1-3, total 85 patients aged 18-70 years old with symptomatic Grade 2 and Grade 3 hemorrhoidal disease whose symptoms persisted despite at least one month of medical treatment. Fifty-four patients were allocated to Group L, whereas 31 were allocated to Group M. Age, gender, weight, body mass index, preoperative symptoms, presence of additional disease, use of anticoagulant medication, and length of hospital stay of the patients included in the study were recorded. Rescue analgesic used was recorded. Postoperative VAS score and complications were recorded within 10 days. The total energy numbers applied to all packages were recorded.

RESULTS

The incidence of minor perioperative hemorrhage was significantly lower in Group L compared to Group M (P = .035). The postoperative 3rd-hour VAS scores were statistically significantly lower in Group L compared to Group (P < .001). At the 3rd hour postoperatively, the need for rescue analgesia was statistically significantly higher in Group M compared to Group L. On the seventh postoperative day, Group M needed considerably more rescue analgesia compared to Group L (P < .001, P = 1.00, P = .035, respectively). The cut-off value of 571 J was calculated in Group L.

CONCLUSION

We believe that it is not an advantageous method compared to MM hemorrhoidectomy, both in terms of patient comfort and cost-effectiveness, since postoperative pain, which is shown as the most important advantage of LH over conventional hemorrhoidectomy methods in the literature, can be relieved with simple NSA-I rescue analgesia in patients undergoing MM. Trial Registration: 03.06.2021/21-63.

Laser hemorrhoidoplasty in the treatment of symptomatic hemorrhoids: a pilot Australian study

PURPOSE

Traditional therapeutic approaches to the surgical management of hemorrhoid disease such as hemorrhoidectomies are plagued with severe postoperative pain and protracted recovery. Our pilot study aims to the laser hemorrhoidoplasty (LH) patients with symptomatic hemorrhoid disease that have failed conservative management for the first time in an Australian population.

METHODS

Thirty patients were prospectively enrolled to undergo LH. Postoperative pain, time to return to function, and quality of life (QoL) were determined through the Hemorrhoid Disease Symptom Score and Short Health Scale adapted for hemorrhoidal disease and compared to a historical group of 43 patients who underwent a Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy by the same surgeon at 3, 6, and 12 months.

RESULTS

The LH group had significantly lower mean predicted pain scores on days 1 and 2 and lower defecation pain scores and lower opioid analgesia use on days 1, 2, 3, and 4. The median time to return to normal function was significantly lower in the LH group (2 days vs. 9 days, P<0.001). Similarly, the median days to return to the workplace was significantly lower in the LH group (6 days vs. 13 days, P=0.007). During long-term follow-up (12 months), hemorrhoid symptoms and all QoL measures were significantly improved, especially among those with grade II to III disease.

CONCLUSION

This pilot study demonstrates low pain scores with this revivified procedure in an Australian population, indicating possible expansion of the therapeutic options available for this common condition. Further head-to-head studies comparing LH to other hemorrhoid therapies are required to further determine the most efficacious therapeutic approach.

Hemorrhoidal laser ablation procedure: a minimally invasive treatment for grades II, III, and IV using a 1470 nm diode laser

<b>Indroduction:</b> Hemorrhoids often cause pain, and achieving painless outcomes through surgery is challenging. Hemorrhoidal Laser Ablation, a method for treating severe hemorrhoids, has limited documentation in clinical trials.</br> <br><b>Aim:</b> This retrospective study aimed to present our experience with Hemorrhoidal Laser Ablation in symptomatic grade II, III, and IV internal hemorrhoids and evaluate the efficacy and safety of this relatively recent technique.</br> <br><b>Material and methods:</b> The cohort included 138 patients with symptomatic hemorrhoids who underwent Hemorrhoidal Laser Ablation at three different medical centers in 2017-2022. Patients were treated with a 1470 nm diode laser. Data were collected on clinical and perioperative characteristics and outcomes.</br> <br><b>Results:</b> No evidence of intraoperative complications occurred. There was no rectal tenesmus or alteration of defecation habits. Early mild postoperative symptoms were observed for an average of one week after the operation. The plateau of symptom resolution and downgrading of hemorrhoid size reached approximately six months post-procedure. The short- -term recurrence rate was 0.8% within roughly a month after the laser surgery, while the long-term recurrence rate was 5% over up to five years of follow-up. The overall satisfaction rate was 95% with symptomatic relief.</br> <br><b>Conclusions:</b> Hemorrhoidal Laser Ablation is a painless outpatient technique that does not require general anesthesia. It is an easy-to-perform, convenient, safe, and efficient modality in reducing symptoms and complications of grades II, III, and IV internal hemorrhoids. Hemorrhoidal Laser Ablation limits postoperative discomfort and allows the patient to return to daily routines quickly.</br>.

Laser technology in proctological diseases: is it really the wave of the future?

Different types of lasers have been applied for various proctological conditions. We discuss about published articles regarding the application of lasers, with concern about evidence-based use of these techniques and technologies. We performed a literature search about laser treatments for proctological conditions. 55 studies were included for the final revision. Meta-analysis of data was not performed because of heterogeneity of study designs and outcome measures. A scoping review was performed. Laser treatments for hemorrhoids require a shorter operative time and show less postoperative pain and bleeding compared to conventional hemorrhoidectomy, but are more expensive. Studies are heterogeneous in design, endpoints, postoperative assessment, length of follow-up and outcome measures. Only 3 RCTs are available and only three studies evaluate long-term outcomes. FiLaC (fistula laser closure) was initially described in 2011 for the treatment of anal fistula. In the published studies the reported healing rates vary between 20 and 82%, and the ideal indication is yet to be defined. Studies with long-term follow-up are lacking. SiLaT (sinus laser treatment) applied the technology used for FiLaC to the treatment of pilonidal sinus disease. This technique had less perioperative pain and shorter hospital stay, but a lower primary healing rate when compared to traditional techniques. Available data is very limited, and no randomized trials are published to date. Laser assisted techniques are a viable, minimally invasive, but expensive option for the treatment of several proctological conditions. Further researches are needed to assess if patients could benefit of their use, and for what indication.

PROSPECT guideline for haemorrhoid surgery: A systematic review and procedure-specific postoperative pain management recommendations

BACKGROUND

Haemorrhoidectomy is associated with moderate-to-severe postoperative pain.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this systematic review was to assess the available literature and update previous PROSPECT (procedure specific postoperative pain management) recommendations for optimal pain management after haemorrhoidectomy.

DESIGN AND ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

A systematic review utilising PROSPECT methodology was undertaken.

DATA SOURCES

Randomised controlled trials published in the English language from January 1, 2016 to February 2, 2022 assessing postoperative pain using analgesic, anaesthetic, and surgical interventions were identified from MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Database.

RESULTS

Of the 371 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) identified, 84 RCTs and 19 systematic reviews, meta-analyses met our inclusion criteria (103 publications). Interventions that improved postoperative pain relief included: paracetamol and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or cyclo-oxygenase-2 selective inhibitors, systemic steroids, pudendal nerve block, topical metronidazole, topical diltiazem, topical sucralfate or topical glyceryl trinitrate, and intramuscular injection of botulinum toxin.

DISCUSSION

This review has updated the previous recommendations written by our group. Important changes are abandoning oral metronidazole and recommending topical metronidazole, topical diltiazem, topical sucralfate, topical glyceryl trinitrate. Botulinum toxin can also be administered. Contemporary publications confirm the analgesic effect of bilateral pudendal nerve block but invalidate recommendations on perianal infiltration. The choice of the surgery is mostly left to the discretion of the surgeons based on their experience, expertise, type of haemorrhoids, and risk of relapse. That said, excisional surgery is more painful than other procedures.

Mid-term efficacy and postoperative wound management of laser hemorrhoidoplasty (LHP) vs conventional excisional hemorrhoidectomy in grade III hemorrhoidal disease: the twisting trend

PURPOSE

Hemorrhoidal disease (HD) is a common condition, and several surgical techniques have been proposed to date without being able to achieve definitive consensus on their use and indications. Laser hemorrhoidoplasty (LHP) is a minimally invasive procedure for HD treatment determining the shrinkage of the hemorrhoidal piles by diode laser limiting the postoperative discomfort and pain. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the postoperative outcomes of HD patients undergoing LHP vs conventional Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy (MM).

METHOD

Postoperative pain, wound care management, symptoms' resolution, patients' quality of life, and length of return to daily activity of grade III symptomatic HD patients undergoing LHP vs MM were retrospectively evaluated. The patients were followed-up for recurrence of prolapsed hemorrhoid or symptoms.

RESULT

From January 2018 to December 2019, 93 patients received conventional Milligan Morgan as control group and 81 patients received laser hemorrhoidoplasty treatment using a 1470-nm diode laser. No significant intraoperative complications occurred in both groups. Laser hemorrhoidoplasty patients experienced lower postoperative pain score (p < 0.0001) and smoother wound management. After 25 ± 8 months follow-up, the recurrence of symptoms occurred in 8.1% after Milligan-Morgan and 21.6% after laser hemorrhoidoplasty (p < 0.05) with a similar Rorvik score (7.8 ± 2.6 in LHP group vs 7.6 ± 1.9 in MM group, p = 0.12).

CONCLUSION

LHP demonstrated high efficacy in selected HD patients guaranteeing lower postoperative pain, easier wound care, higher rate of symptoms resolution, and greater patient appreciation compared to MM, even though it had a higher recurrence rate. Larger comparative studies are needed to address this issue.

Laser hemorrhoidoplasty for II-IV grade hemorrhoids: should we treat them the same?

Laser Hemorrhoidoplasty (LHP) is a novel therapeutic option for hemorrhoids. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the post-operative outcomes of patients undergoing LHP surgery based on hemorrhoid grade. A retrospective analysis of a prospective database of all patients who underwent LHP surgery between September 2018 and October 2021 was performed. Patients' demographics, clinical perioperative data, and post-operative outcomes were recorded and analyzed. One hundred and sixty two patients that underwent laser hemorrhoidoplasty (LHP) were included. Median operative time was 18 min (range 8-38). Median total energy applied was 850 Joule (450-1242). Complete remission of symptoms following surgery was reported by 134 patients (82.7%), while 21 patients (13%) reported partial symptomatic relief. Nineteen patients (11.7%) presented with post-operative complications, and 11 patients (6.75%) were re-admitted following surgery. Post-operative complication rate was significantly higher in patients with grade 4 hemorrhoids compared to grades 3 or 2, due to a higher rate of post-operative bleeding (31.6% vs. 6.5% and 6.7%, respectively; p = 0.004). Furthermore, post-operative readmission rate (26.3% vs. 5.4% and 6.2%; p = 0.01) and reoperation rate were also significantly higher in grade IV hemorrhoids (21.1% vs. 2.2% and 0%; p = 0.001). Multivariate analysis found that grade IV hemorrhoids had a significantly higher risk for post-operative bleeding (OR 6.98, 95% CI 1.68-28.7; p = 0.006), 30-day readmission (OR 5.82, 95% CI 1.27-25.1; p = 0.018), and hemorrhoids recurrence (OR 11.4, 95% CI 1.18-116; p = 0.028). LHP is an effective treatment for hemorrhoids grades II-IV, but carries significant risk for bleeding and re-intervention in patients with grade IV hemorrhoids.

Does minimally invasive laser-assisted treatment of pilonidal sinus disease live up to its expectations: a multi-center study with 226 patients

PURPOSE

The minimally invasive character, the possibility to perform under local anesthesia, and the ease to repeat have led to increasing popularity of laser-assisted treatment of pilonidal sinus disease. Hereby, potentially avoiding prolonged need for medical care at home, incapacity to work, and high expenses for patients and society. This retrospective, multi-center study is aimed at evaluating the feasibility of laser-assisted treatment for pilonidal sinus disease.

METHODS

The patient population is comprised of all patients undergoing laser-assisted treatment of pilonidal sinus disease at three Belgian hospitals between January 2017 and December 2021. Data were retrospectively collected. The primary endpoint was overall wound healing after one or more laser assisted procedures.

RESULTS

A total of 226 patients were included with a mean follow-up time of 129 days [7-1120]. The healing rate after one laser procedure was 78.8%. Some of these patients were healed by a second or third procedure adding up to an overall healing rate of 85.4% after one or more laser procedures. Wound infections were the main postoperative complication (8.0%) of which 5 patients required drainage (2.2%). For 29 patients (12.8%), laser-assisted treatment was insufficient, leading to a secondary operation (drainage, excision, or flap).

CONCLUSION

This study shows that laser-assisted treatment is feasible for pilonidal sinus disease. The minimally invasive character of this technique might make up for a higher non-healing rate compared to other techniques like flap repair. However, care must be taken that healing rate might be related to the presentation of the sinus and expectations should be lowered as presumed high healing rates are not always achieved.

The efficacy of laser haemorrhoidoplasty (LHP) in the treatment of symptomatic haemorrhoidal disease: An observational cohort study

AIM

Laser haemorrhoidoplasty (LHP) is an emerging nonexcisional surgical procedure in which the arteriovenous flow of the haemorrhoidal plexus is interrupted through laser coagulation. The aim of this cohort study was to assess efficacy of LHP in treating symptomatic haemorrhoidal disease through patient satisfaction, remission of symptoms (blood loss, pain, itching, soiling, mucosal prolapse) and recurrence of haemorrhoids.

METHODS

Patients who underwent treatment for symptomatic haemorrhoids (degrees 1-4) through an LHP procedure between 2015 and 2021 were included in the study. A 1470 nm-diode laser was used. A total of 200 patients (71% male, average age 51 years) were analysed. Primary outcomes were patient satisfaction and/or complete recovery of symptoms. Secondary outcomes were operating time, complications and recurrence rates. Patient satisfaction, postoperative blood loss, pain and complications were evaluated 6-7 weeks postoperatively. Room turnover time and operating time were documented. Recurrence of haemorrhoids following LHP treatment within 1 year was evaluated.

RESULTS

Patient satisfaction regarding LHP treatment was reached in 155 (84,7%) patients. Postoperative blood loss was reported by 44 (24,0%) patients during time of evaluation. Twenty-four (13,1%) patients reported postoperative pain after 6-7 weeks. Postoperative complications occurred in seven patients (3 anal fissures, 2 perianal abscess, 1 perianal fistula, 1 postoperative anaemia). Room turnover time (patient in to patient out) was 21 min with an average operating time of 7 min. Recurrence of haemorrhoids within 1 year occurred in 50 (27,3%) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Laser haemorrhoidoplasty appears to be a promising and effective nonexcisional surgical procedure in the treatment of symptomatic haemorrhoidal disease with high patient satisfaction, acceptable postoperative symptoms, minimal complications and short operating times.

Laser hemorrhoidoplasty versus conventional hemorrhoidectomy for grade II/III hemorrhoids: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

This study compared the short- and long-term clinical outcomes of laser hemorrhoidoplasty (LH) vs. conventional hemorrhoidectomy (CH) in patients with grade II/III hemorrhoids.

METHODS

PubMed/Medline and the Cochrane Library were searched for randomized and nonrandomized studies comparing LH against CH in grade II/III hemorrhoids. The primary outcomes included postoperative use of analgesia, postoperative morbidity (bleeding, urinary retention, pain, thrombosis), and time of return to work/daily activities.

RESULTS

Nine studies totaling 661 patients (LH, 336 and CH, 325) were included. The LH group had shorter operative time (P<0.001) and less intraoperative blood loss (P<0.001). Postoperative pain was lower in the LH group, with lower postoperative day 1 (mean difference [MD], -2.09; 95% confidence interval [CI], -3.44 to -0.75; P=0.002) and postoperative day 7 (MD, -3.94; 95% CI, -6.36 to -1.52; P=0.001) visual analogue scores and use of analgesia (risk ratio [RR], 0.59; 95% CI, 0.42-0.81; P=0.001). The risk of postoperative bleeding was also lower in the LH group (RR, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.12- 0.28; P<0.001), with a quicker return to work or daily activities (P=0.002). The 12-month risks of bleeding (P>0.999) and prolapse (P=0.240), and the likelihood of complete resolution at 12 months, were similar (P=0.240).

CONCLUSION

LH offers more favorable short-term clinical outcomes than CH, with reduced morbidity and pain and earlier return to work or daily activities. Medium-term symptom recurrence at 12 months was similar. Our results should be verified in future well-designed trials with larger samples.

Hemorrhoid laser dearterialization: systematic review and meta-analysis

Hemorrhoidal disease is a common and troublesome condition. Excisional hemorrhoidectomy can assure the best chance of cure but it is hampered by postoperative pain and potential long-term morbidity therefore minimally invasive techniques have been developed. Since 2009 a doppler-guided hemorrhoidal dearterialization with laser (the hemorrhoidal laser procedure; HeLP) has been proposed to control symptoms without significant sequelae. The aim of this systematic review is to analyze the benefits and disadvantages of HeLP for symptomatic hemorrhoids. The Medline/PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane library databases were searched from January 2010 to March 2022, language was restricted to English and documents to the full text. Randomized and non-randomized, prospective and retrospective cohort studies were included. Risk of bias assessment was performed using the Risk of bias for non-randomized studies (ROBINS-I) and the RoB2 Tool for randomized clinical trial. Primary outcome was to assess the efficacy of HeLP on symptoms' resolution. Secondary objectives were postoperative pain and complications, comparison with other interventional techniques, and evaluation of long-term recurrence. Whenever possible, a meta-analysis was conducted. The GRADE approach was employed to assess the certainty of evidence. We included six non-randomized and one randomized study. HeLP improved or resolved preoperative symptoms in 83.6 to 100% of patients during follow-up. In the randomized study symptoms resolved in 90% of patients after HeLP and 53.3% after rubber band ligation as comparator. Published data indicate that HeLP is effective, relatively safe, with limited recurrence rate, after a short to medium follow-up. The quality of evidence was however low. There is a paucity of studies assessing the benefits or harms of laser dearterialization for the treatment of hemorrhoids and randomized trials are furthermore rare, therefore trials with adequate power and proper design, assessing the advantages and disadvantages of HeLP versus other minimally invasive techniques, are needed. Furthermore, studies evaluating long-term follow-up are wanted.

Laser hemorrhoidoplasty for hemorrhoidal disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Laser hemorrhoidoplasty (LHP) is known as a new minimally invasive and painless procedure for symptomatic hemorrhoids. However, Milligan-Morgan (MM) may offer the best result of long-term cure rates. In this study, we aim to compare the efficacy between LHP and MM for hemorrhoidal disease treatment. Using specific keywords, we comprehensively go through the potential articles on PubMed, Europe PMC, and Google Scholar sources until April 19, 2022. All published studies on LHP and MM hemorrhoidectomy were collected. Statistical analysis was done by using Review Manager 5.4 software. Twelve studies with a total of 1756 patients with hemorrhoid grades II-IV were included for the analysis. Our pooled analysis revealed that LHP was associated with shorter operative time (p < 0.00001), shorter length of hospital stay (p = 0.0005), lower risk of urinary retention (p = 0.005) and anal stenosis (p = 0.0004), and lower VAS 24-h post-operative (p < 0.00001) when compared with MM. However, LHP and MM did not differ in terms of recurrence rate (p = 0.70). LHP was superior to MM procedure in terms of shortening the recovery time and minimizing post-operative complications for patients with hemorrhoidal disease.

Comprehensive literature review of the applications of surgical laser in benign anal conditions

Surgery for benign anal conditions is a common practice and is usually followed by a good outcome. The present review aimed to summarize the emergence and evolution of different laser techniques used for the treatment of benign anal conditions and report their current outcome. PubMed and Scopus were searched for studies that assessed the use of laser in benign anal conditions. Anal conditions reviewed were hemorrhoids, anal fistula, anal warts, anal stenosis, and anal fissure. The full text of the studies retrieved was summarized in a narrative and tabular form. Laser techniques used for the treatment of hemorrhoidal disease were laser open hemorrhoidectomy, laser hemorrhoidoplasty, and Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal laser dearterialization. Resolution of hemorrhoidal symptoms was reported in 72-100% of patients after laser treatment. YAG laser, fistula laser closure, and photodynamic therapy have been used for the treatment of anal fistula with success rates ranging from 20 to 92.6%. Anal warts can be treated with photodynamic therapy with or without YAG or CO2 laser with a success rate up to 88%. A few studies reported the use of laser in the treatment of chronic anal fissure and anal stenosis. The use of laser in the treatment of benign anal conditions is associated with promising outcomes. Laser was most assessed in hemorrhoidal disease and anal fistula and showed more consistent success rates with hemorrhoidal disease than with anal fistula. Preliminary reports assessed the outcome of laser treatment in other conditions as anal fissure and warts with acceptable outcomes.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of postoperative pain and symptoms control following laser haemorrhoidoplasty versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy for symptomatic haemorrhoids: a new standard

PURPOSE

Haemorrhoidal disease (HD) plagues one in every ten people, with a plethora of surgical treatment modalities, of which laser haemorrhoidoplasty (LHP) is a relatively novel option. This systematic review and meta-analysis objectively evaluated the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of LHP compared against conventional (Milligan-Morgan) open haemorrhoidectomy (CoH).

METHOD

A comprehensive search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and Google Scholar was conducted. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and comparative cohort studies (CCSs) which compared LHP against CoH were included, with postoperative pain as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included intraoperative characteristics, short- and moderate-term outcome, and complications.

RESULTS

A total of 12 studies (6 RCTs and 6 CCSs), with a total of 1824 patients, were analysed. LHP resulted in reduced postoperative pain for the first day (mean difference of 2.07 visual analogue scale units), week, and month. The mean dosage and duration of postoperative analgesia use was similarly lower, with a mean difference of 4.88 mg (morphine) and 2.25 days, respectively. Crucially, recurrence was equivocal (HR: 0.72, CI: 0.21-2.40) at a mean follow-up duration of 8.58 ± 9.55 months. LHP resulted in lower blood loss and was 12.74 min shorter on average. LHP's postoperative recovery time was 9.03 days less with equivalent or decreased risk of most short- and moderate-term complications except anal thrombosis.

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that LHP is more tolerable than CoH, providing patients with superior postoperative quality of life at equivalent moderate-term efficacy. These findings contribute to improved understanding of LHP and its potential at enhancing the quality of HD care.

Comparison of post-operative bleeding incidence in laser hemorrhoidoplasty with and without hemorrhoidal artery ligation: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial

Introduction

The effectiveness of hemorrhoidal artery ligation supplementation in reducing the incidence of post laser hemorrhoidoplasty bleeding has not been investigated.

Methods

This was a double-blind, randomized controlled trial comparing post-operative bleeding incidence in patients undergoing laser hemorrhoidoplasty (LHP) only versus LHP with hemorrhoidal artery ligation (HAL). Outcome measures included post-operative bleeding and its severity (i.e. verbal rating scale and Clavien-Dindo classification), presence of perianal swelling and pain score (visual analog score) at 1-day, 1-week and 6-weeks post-operatively. Statistical tests were performed and a value of P < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

Seventy-six patients were randomized. There was no difference in median operating time. The bleeding incidence was highest at 1-week post-operatively (17.1%), and decreased to 1.3% at 6-weeks. There was no significant difference in bleeding incidence between both groups at any of the measured timepoints (P > 0.05). Severity of bleeding and incidence of post-operative perianal swelling were similar in both groups (P > 0.05). There was no difference in median pain scores.

Conclusion

Supplementation of HAL to LHP does not reduce the post-operative bleeding incidence. LHP is sufficient as a stand-alone procedure for treating haemorrhoids.

Trial registration: National Registration Number is NMRR-15-1112-24065 (IIR). The trial start date was 1st January 2015 with the ClinicalTrials.gov identifier and registration number as NCT04667169.

Perianal Diseases in Pregnancy and After Childbirth: Frequency, Risk Factors, Impact on Women's Quality of Life and Treatment Methods

Hemorrhoids and anal fissures occur in about 40% of pregnant women and women during postpartum period. Usually they occur during the third trimester of pregnancy and 1-2 days after giving birth. Constipation during pregnancy, perianal diseases during previous pregnancy and childbirth, instrumental delivery, straining duration of more than 20 min, and weight of the newborn more than 3,800 g are associated with hemorrhoids. Perianal diseases reduce the quality of life of both pregnant and postpartum women. In the absence of acute conditions, surgical treatment of hemorrhoids is delayed after pregnancy, childbirth, and lactation. Thrombosed internal hemorrhoids and perianal thrombosis are to be treated conservatively in most instances by prescribing adequate pain relief, oral, and topical flavonoid preparations.

Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal dearterialization with laser (HeLP): indications and clinical outcome in the long-term. Results of a multicenter trial

BACKGROUND

Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal laser procedure consists of sutureless closure of terminal branches of the superior hemorrhoidal artery by laser energy. Clinical results of patients treated with this procedure were analyzed at the completion of 2-year follow-up. Primary endpoint was resolution of symptoms and secondary endpoints were recurrence rate, type of recurrences, re-operation rate, and potential predictive factors for failure.

METHODS

Bleeding was assessed on a score from 0 to 4 (none = 0; < 1/month = 1; 1/week = 2; > 1/week = 3; 3-4/week = 4), frequency of hemorrhoid-related symptoms with a score of 0-3 (2/year = 1; 3-5/year = 2; < 5/year = 3). Constipation and fecal incontinence were assessed by means of validated scores. Quality of life and pain at defecation were assessed using a visual analog scale of 0-10 (0 = worst possible-10 = best possible quality of life and 0 = no pain-10 = worst pain imaginable, respectively). Recurrence rate and need for re-operation were reported. Potential predictive factors of failure were analyzed by means of univariate analysis.

RESULTS

Two-hundred-eighty-four patients (183 males, 101 females; mean age: 47.5 years) were included in the trial; 8 patients were lost at follow-up. Analysis of 276 patients who completed the 2-year follow-up showed an overall resolution of symptoms in 89.9% (248/276) of patients. Statistically significant improvement of quality of life, pain reduction, bleeding and frequency of acute symptoms were reported. Of 28 patients with persistent or recurrent symptoms, 12 had pain (4.35%), 10 had bleeding (3.6%) and 6 had increasing prolapse at defecation (2.2%). Eleven out of twenty-eight patients required additional surgery. Constipation and III-IV grade hemorrhoids were associated with statistically significant higher failure rates (p = 0.046 and 0.012, respectively). Better results were reported in patients reporting preoperative high-grade pain at evacuation.

CONCLUSIONS

The Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal laser procedure showed efficacy at long-term follow-up. It can be considered as 'first-line' treatment in patients with low-grade hemorrhoids suffering from bleeding, pain and recurrent acute symptoms in whom conservative treatment failed.

Interventional treatments for prolapsing haemorrhoids: network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Multiple treatments for early-moderate grade symptomatic haemorrhoids currently exist, each associated with their respective efficacy, complications, and risks. The aim of this study was to compare the relative clinical outcomes and effectiveness of interventional treatments for grade II-III haemorrhoids.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA criteria for all the RCTs published between 1980 and 2020; manuscripts were identified using the MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL databases. Inclusion criteria were RCTs comparing procedural interventions for grade II-III haemorrhoids. Primary outcomes of interest were: symptom recurrence at a minimum follow-up of 6 weeks, postprocedural pain measured on a visual analogue scale (VAS) on day 1, and postprocedural complications (bleeding, urinary retention, and bowel incontinence). After bias assessment and heterogeneity analysis, a Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Seventy-nine RCTs were identified, including 9232 patients. Fourteen different treatments were analysed in the network meta-analysis. Overall, there were 59 RCTs (73 per cent) judged as being at high risk of bias, and the greatest risk was in the domain measurement of outcome. Variable amounts of heterogeneity were detected in direct treatment comparisons, in particular for symptom recurrence and postprocedural pain. Recurrence of haemorrhoidal symptoms was reported by 54 studies, involving 7026 patients and 14 treatments. Closed haemorrhoidectomy had the lowest recurrence risk, followed by open haemorrhoidectomy, suture ligation with mucopexy, stapled haemorrhoidopexy, and Doppler-guided haemorrhoid artery ligation (DG-HAL) with mucopexy. Pain was reported in 34 studies involving 3812 patients and 11 treatments. Direct current electrotherapy, DG-HAL with mucopexy, and infrared coagulation yielded the lowest pain scores. Postprocedural bleeding was recorded in 46 studies involving 5696 patients and 14 treatments. Open haemorrhoidectomy had the greatest risk of postprocedural bleeding, followed by stapled haemorrhoidopexy and closed haemorrhoidectomy. Urinary retention was reported in 30 studies comparing 10 treatments involving 3116 participants. Open haemorrhoidectomy and stapled haemorrhoidopexy had significantly higher odds of urinary retention than rubber band ligation and DG-HAL with mucopexy. Nine studies reported bowel incontinence comparing five treatments involving 1269 participants. Open haemorrhoidectomy and stapled haemorrhoidopexy had the highest probability of bowel incontinence.

CONCLUSION

Open and closed haemorrhoidectomy, and stapled haemorrhoidopexy were associated with worse pain, and more postprocedural bleeding, urinary retention, and bowel incontinence, but had the lowest rates of symptom recurrence. The risks and benefits of each treatment should be discussed with patients before a decision is made.

Non-excisional laser therapies for hemorrhoidal disease: a systematic review of the literature

Non-excisional laser therapies are emerging treatment for grades II and III hemorrhoidal disease (HD). However, so far, their efficiency is based on low-level evidence. Therefore, we aimed to systematically review the efficiency of non-excisional laser therapies for HD. MEDLINE/Pubmed, Web of science, Embase, and Cochrane were searched from database implementation until the April 17th, 2020. We included studies reporting at least one of surgical indicators of postoperative outcomes of laser therapies, encompassing laser hemorrhoidoplasty (LH) and hemorrhoidal laser procedure (HeLP). Fourteen studies describing LH and HeLP were included, representing 1570 patients. The main intraoperative complication was bleeding (0-1.9% of pooled patients for LH, 5.5-16.7% of pooled patients for HeLP). Postoperative complications occurred in up to 64% of patients after LH and 23.3% after HeLP. Resolution of symptoms ranged between 70 and 100% after LH and between 83.6 and 90% after HeLP. Moreover, four randomized controlled trials included in our review reported similar resolution after LH compared with hemorrhoidectomy or mucopexy and after HeLP compared with rubber band ligation. Recurrence rate was reported to range between 0 and 11.3% after LH and between 5 and 9.4% after HeLP. When compared with hemorrhoidectomy, LH showed conflicting results with one randomized controlled trial reporting similar recurrence rate, but another reporting decreased recurrences associated with hemorrhoidectomy. Laser therapies showed lower postoperative pain than hemorrhoidectomy or rubber band ligation. LH and HeLP are safe and effective techniques for the treatment of grades II and III HD.

Clinical Outcomes and Effectiveness of Laser Treatment for Hemorrhoids: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Laser treatment is increasingly used in the treatment of symptomatic hemorrhoids, and several studies have attempted to describe its clinical outcomes. In this systematic review, we aimed to comprehensively analyze the clinical outcomes and effectiveness of laser treatment.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of currently available data on laser treatment for hemorrhoids. We searched MEDLINE and Google Scholar between January 2009 and May 2020. Studies that described the clinical outcomes and effectiveness of laser treatment were selected based on pre-specified inclusion criteria with a minimum follow-up period of 3 months. Qualitative synthesis of the clinical outcomes, effectiveness and complications was performed.

RESULTS

Nineteen studies including 1937 patients were analyzed. The majority were males (n = 1239) and included grade 2 and 3 hemorrhoids. In the majority (n = 1750, 90.34%), the 980 nm wave length diode laser was used as the energy source. Doppler-guided localization was performed in six studies (n = 579, 29.89%). All studies (n = 1937) reported low postoperative pain scores and nine studies (n = 1131) showed significantly lower pain compared to open technique. Furthermore, six studies (n = 1023) showed significantly less intra- and postoperative bleeding compared to open technique. Seven studies (n = 1052) reported long-term follow-up results and were found to be satisfactory in terms of symptom relief and recurrence. This study was limited by heterogeneity of outcomes precluding a meta-analysis.

CONCLUSION

Laser treatment had acceptable clinical outcomes for grade 2 and 3 hemorrhoids with lower rates of postoperative pain and bleeding with satisfactory long-term outcomes.

Treatment of haemorrhoidal disease by laser haemorrhoidoplasty at Dakar preliminary study of 21 patients

Background:

Surgical treatment of haemorrhoidal disease by laser haemorrhoidoplasty is a minimally invasive procedure that facilitates the postoperative course. Due to less aggression on the anoderm and the anal canal mucosa, it causes less significant postoperative pain and low morbidity compared with conventional excision according to the Milligan–Morgan or Fergusson procedure. We report, through a preliminary study, our data on laser haemorrhoidoplasty and discuss the indications and results.

Materials and Methods:

This is a descriptive prospective study carried out on 21 patients operated on for haemorrhoidal disease by laser haemorrhoidoplasty with or without mucopexy.

Results:

The series was composed of 17 men and 4 women with a male/female ratio of 4.25:1. The average age was 39.6 years with a range of 27–62 years. The symptomatology was rectal bleeding in 16 cases (76%) and anal swelling in 18 cases (85.7%). These include grade 2 haemorrhoids in 2 cases (9.5%), grade 3 in 12 cases (57%), and grade 4 in 7 cases (33%). It was associated with an anal fissure in four cases (19%) and an anal fistula in three cases (14.2%). Mucopexy and laser coagulation were performed therapeutically in 13 cases (61.9%) and laser coagulation without mucopexy was performed in 8 cases (38%). The energy delivered was on average 1488 or 496 J per pile. It was associated with skin tag excision in 18 cases (85.7%), fissurectomy, sphincterotomy, anoplasty in 4 cases (19.2%), and fistulectomy for low anal fistula in 2 cases (9.5%). Piles retraction was judged sufficient in 17 patients (81%). The postoperative course was simple with no notable complaints in 16 patients (76%). Complications consisted of minimal bleeding in six cases (28%), significant bleeding in two cases with readmission, residual skin tag in six cases (28.5%), and subcutaneous fistula in two cases (9.5%). No recurrence of the symptoms of the haemorrhoidal disease was noted.

Conclusion:

Laser haemorrhoidoplasty is a minimally invasive alternative for the treatment of haemorrhoidal disease, especially for grade 2 and 3 haemorrhoids without major prolapse. Postoperative pain is minimal, and the risk of stenosis or incontinence is almost non-existent.

Belgian consensus guideline on the management of hemorrhoidal disease

Introduction

Hemorrhoidal disease is a common problem that arises when hemorrhoidal structures become engorged and/or prolapse through the anal canal. Both conservative and invasive treatment options are diverse and guidance to their implementation is lacking.

Methods

A Delphi consensus process was used to review current literature and draft relevant statements. These were reconciliated until sufficient agreement was reached. The grade of evidence was determined. These guidelines were based on the published literature up to June 2020.

Results

Hemorrhoids are normal structures within the anorectal region. When they become engorged or slide down the anal canal, symptoms can arise. Every treatment for symptomatic hemorrhoids should be tailored to patient profile and expectations. For low-grade hemorrhoids, conservative treatment should consist of fiber supplements and can include a short course of venotropics. Instrumental treatment can be added case by case : infrared coagulation or rubber band ligation when prolapse is more prominent. For prolapsing hemorrhoids, surgery can be indicated for refractory cases. Conventional hemorrhoidectomy is the most efficacious intervention for all grades of hemorrhoids and is the only choice for non-reducible prolapsing hemorrhoids.

Conclusions

The current guidelines for the management of hemorrhoidal disease include recommendations for the clinical evaluation of hemorrhoidal disorders, and their conservative, instrumental and surgical management.

Evaluation of the efficacy and morbidity of radiofrequency thermocoagulation in the treatment of hemorrhoidal disease

INTRODUCTION

Grade III hemorrhoidal disease may require surgical treatment. Several minimally invasive techniques can be offered to the patient, particularly ligation of the hemorrhoidal arteries/mucopexy or even stapled hemorrhoidopexy. A technique of radiofrequency thermocoagulation of hemorrhoids has recently been introduced. The aim of our study was to assess the efficacy and early morbidity of this procedure.

METHODS

Data from successive patients undergoing radiofrequency thermocoagulation for grade II to IV hemorrhoidal disease between December 2017 and December 2019 were retrospectively collated.

RESULTS

Seventy-four patients, with a mean age of 53 years, underwent operation during the study period. The major indication was grade III hemorrhoidal disease in 95% of patients. More than 80% of patients underwent operation as an outpatient. Eighteen (24.3%) patients developed a postoperative complication within 30 days, of whom two (2.7%) required revisional surgery for rectal bleeding and severe anal pain, respectively. Seven (9.5%) patients were re-admitted to hospital and 18 (24.3%) had an unscheduled early return visit within 30 postoperative days. At three months following surgery, the anatomical and functional result was satisfactory in more than 93% of patients.

CONCLUSION

Radiofrequency hemorrhoidal thermocoagulation is an effective technique in the treatment of grade III hemorrhoidal disease. Despite a non-negligible rate of minor postoperative complications requiring an early consultation or re-hospitalisation, severe complications occurred in less than 3% of operated patients.

Ultrasound-guided pudendal nerve block in patients undergoing open hemorrhoidectomy: a double-blind randomized controlled trial

PURPOSE

In this double-blind randomized trial, we aimed to compare the postoperative pain, complications, and length of hospital stay in patients undergoing open hemorrhoidectomy under spinal anesthesia with or without the pudendal nerve block.

METHODS

Patients undergoing Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy under spinal anesthesia were randomized to undergo a pudendal nerve block or no intervention. Postoperative pain on the visual analogue scale (VAS) at 6, 12, 24, and 48 h; opioid administration; and length of hospital stay were recorded and analyzed.

RESULTS

Over the study period, 49 patients were included and 23 randomized in the treatment arm. No differences in terms of age, gender, and preoperative risk factors were noted between groups. The pain on the VAS at 6, 12, 24, and 48 h was 2.8 vs. 4.6 (p = 0.046), 3.4 vs. 4.7 (p = 0.697), 1.4 vs. 3.1 (p = 0.016), and 1.0 vs. 2.1 (p = 0.288) in the treatment and control groups respectively. No differences in opioids use or complications were noted. Length of hospital stay was 1.2 vs. 1.8 days respectively (p = 0.046). No complications directly associated to the pudendal nerve block were observed. Multivariate analysis revealed that the pudendal nerve block was an independent factor reducing the postoperative pain.

CONCLUSIONS

The ultrasound-guided pudendal nerve block in patients undergoing open hemorrhoidectomy under spinal anesthesia showed a statistically significant reduction in postoperative pain and length of hospital stay. The proposed technique appeared to be safe and feasible and may be recommendable in patients undergoing open hemorrhoidectomy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04251884.

Still a Case of "No Pain, No Gain"? An Updated and Critical Review of the Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Management Options for Hemorrhoids in 2020

The treatment of haemorrhoids remains challenging: multiple treatment options supported by heterogeneous evidence are available, but patients rightly demand a tailored approach. Evidence for newer surgical techniques that promise to be less painful has been conflicting. We review the current evidence for management options in patients who present with varying haemorrhoidal grades. A review of the English literature was performed utilizing MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases (31 May 2019). The search terms (haemorrhoid OR haemorrhoid OR haemorrhoids OR haemorrhoids OR "Hemorrhoid"[Mesh]) were used. First- and second-degree haemorrhoids continue to be managed conservatively. The easily repeatable and cost-efficient rubber band ligation is the preferred method to address minor haemorrhoids; long-term outcomes following injection sclerotherapy remain poor. Conventional haemorrhoidectomies (Ferguson/Milligan-Morgan/Ligasure haemorrhoidectomy) still have their role in third- and fourth-degree haemorrhoids, being associated with lowest recurrence; nevertheless, posthaemorrhoidectomy pain is problematic. Stapled haemorrhoidopexy allows quicker recovery, albeit at the costs of higher recurrence rates and potentially serious complications. Transanal Haemorrhoidal Dearterialization has been promoted as nonexcisional and less invasive, but the recent HubBLe trial has questioned its overall place in haemorrhoid management. Novel "walk-in-walk-out" techniques such as radiofrequency ablations or laser treatments will need further evaluation to define their role in modern-day haemorrhoid management. There are numerous treatment options for haemorrhoids, each with their own evidence-base. Newer techniques promise to be less painful, but recurrence rates remain an issue. The balance continues to be sought between long-term efficacy, minimisation of postoperative pain, and preservation of anorectal function.

Tissue Coagulation in Laser Hemorrhoidoplasty - An Experimental Study

BACKGROUND

Laser hemorrhoidoplasty (LHP) is a new technique for treatment of hemorrhoids. The exact extent of coagulation is not visible at the time of the procedure. There currently is no experimental or clinical data on the subject.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the length of coagulation defect according to power and activation time of 1470nm diode laser on the perianal tissue model.

METHODS

Fresh anorectal tissue of twenty-four pigs was used to produce 54 experimental samples. Each sample was randomly assigned to the laser power of 6, 8 and 10 W and 1, 2 or 3-second pulses. The procedure was performed using Biolitec Ceralas © diode laser with 1.85 mm optical fiber. The fiber was inserted in a manner, similar to intrahemorrhoidal laser application. Samples were evaluated using low-power and high-power light microscopy by a single pathologist. The length of tissue injury was measured on high-magnification microscopy.

RESULTS

The longest tissue injury (mean 3.93 mm) was caused by the longest laser exposure time (3 sec) with no significant difference between laser power used.

CONCLUSIONS

8 W 3-second application of the 1470nm diode laser results in coagulation area approximately 4 mm, and further coagulation should be initiated approximately 5 mm from the first one.