The impact of gender and HPV status on anal squamous cell carcinoma survival

Health inequities in human papillomavirus prevention, diagnostics and clinical care in the USA: a scoping review

BACKGROUND

Human papillomavirus (HPV) represents the most common STI in the USA. HPV inequities in prevention, diagnostics and clinical care persist. We define inequities as systematic, avoidable and unfair differences in health outcomes.

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of this scoping review are to chart existing data on HPV-related inequities, identify gaps in existing literature and guide future research to reduce these inequities.

METHODS

We completed a scoping review following guidelines from the Joanna Briggs Institute and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses scoping reviews extension. We performed a literature search on PubMed and Ovid Embase in July 2022 for articles pertaining to HPV and evaluating populations within the USA. We included English language publications from 2018 to 2022 evaluating at least one health inequity outlined by the National Institutes of Health. General publication characteristics and health inequity data were charted in a masked, duplicate fashion using a pilot-tested Google Form. We analysed frequencies of health inequities and summarised main findings from included studies.

RESULTS

Our final sample included 170 publications. The most common inequities examined were race/ethnicity (140 studies), sex or gender (97 studies), and income (69 studies). Many historically marginalised racial/ethnic groups had lower rates of HPV-related knowledge, vaccination and worse overall outcomes related to HPV. Compared with women, men had lower rates of HPV vaccination and provider recommendation, and higher rates of HPV-infection. Results regarding income were largely conflicting.

CONCLUSION

Findings from our review demonstrate clear gaps in HPV-related inequity research. Vaccine completion, provider recommendation and intersectionality should continue to be evaluated to implement targeted interventions.

Impact of Time From Diagnosis to Treatment Start on the Outcomes of Patients With Nonmetastatic Anal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

To assess the impact of time from diagnosis to treatment on the survival outcomes of patients with nonmetastatic anal squamous cell carcinoma, controlling for other clinicopathological features.

METHODS

Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results research plus database was accessed, and patients with nonmetastatic anal squamous cell carcinoma were reviewed. Factors associated with longer time to treatment were evaluated through multivariable logistic regression analysis. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were used to examine survival differences according to time to treatment (≤2 vs. >2 mo), and multivariable Cox regression analysis was used to examine factors associated with worse overall and cancer-specific survival.

RESULTS

A total of 13,032 patients were considered eligible and they were included in this study. The following factors were associated with longer time to treatment (>2 mo): male sex (odds ratio [OR]: 1.503; 95% CI, 1.292 to 1.749), and non-White race (OR for Black vs. White patients: 1.846; 95% CI, 1.488 to 2.290; OR for American Indian vs. White patients: 2.414; 95% CI, 1.197 to 4.872; OR for Asian-Pacific Islanders vs. White patients: 2.182; 95% CI, 1.440 to 3.309). Using Kaplan-Meier survival estimates, longer time to treatment was associated with worse overall survival (median OS for >2 mo=109 mo; for ≤2 mo=164 mo P <0.0001). Using multivariable Cox regression analysis, the following factors were associated with worse overall survival: older age (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.037; 95% CI, 1.034 to 1.039), male sex (HR: 1.650; 95% CI, 1.548 to 1.758), Black race (HR: 1.341; 95% CI, 1.210 to 1.487), advanced stage (HR for regional vs. localized stage: 1.596; 95% CI, 1.500 to 1.698), and longer time to treatment (HR: 1.385; 95% CI, 1.222 to 1.571).

CONCLUSIONS

Time from diagnosis to treatment longer than 2 months is associated with worse survival outcomes among patients with nonmetastatic anal squamous cell carcinoma.

Evaluation of prognostic factors after primary chemoradiotherapy of anal cancer: A multicenter study of the German Cancer Consortium-Radiation Oncology Group (DKTK-ROG)

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Prognosis after chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC) shows marked differences among patients according to TNM subgroups, however individualized risk assessment tools to better stratify patients for treatment (de-) escalation or intensified follow-up are lacking in ASCC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients' data from eight sites of the German Cancer Consortium - Radiation Oncology Group (DKTK-ROG), comprising a total of 605 patients with ASCC, treated with standard definitive CRT with 5-FU/Mitomycin C or Capecitabine/Mitomycin C between 2004-2018, were used to evaluate prognostic factors based on Cox regression models for disease-free survival (DFS). Evaluated variables included age, gender, Karnofsky performance score (KPS), HIV-status, T-category, lymph node status and laboratory parameters. Multivariate cox models were separately constructed for the whole cohort and the subset of patients with early-stage (cT1-2 N0M0) tumors.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 46 months, 3-year DFS for patients with early-stage ASCC was 84.9%, and 67.1% for patients with locally-advanced disease (HR 2.4, p < 0.001). T-category (HR vs. T1: T2 2.02; T3 2.11; T4 3.03), N-category (HR versus N0: 1.8 for N1-3), age (HR 1.02 per year), and KPS (HR 0.8 per step) were significant predictors for DFS in multivariate analysis in the entire cohort. The model performed with a C-index of 0.68. In cT1-2N0 patients, T-category (HR 2.14), HIV status (HR 2.57), age (1.026 per year), KPS (HR 0.7 per step) and elevated platelets (HR 1.3 per 100/nl) were associated with worse DFS (C-index of 0.7).

CONCLUSION

Classical clinicopathologic parameters like T-category, N-category, age and KPS remain to be significant prognostic factors for DFS in patients treated with contemporary CRT for ASCC. HIV and platelets were significantly associated with worse DFS in patients with early stage ASCC.