A clinical risk analysis of early post-operative delirium after laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery in elderly patients: a retrospective study

Hypnotic drug use and intraoperative fluid balance associated with postoperative delirium following pancreatic surgery: A retrospective, observational, single-center study

BACKGROUND

Postoperative delirium is a common complication after various types of major surgery. The aim of this study was to identify risk factors associated with delirium following pancreatic surgery.

METHODS

Data from the patients who had pancreatic surgery between July 2020 and March 2021 in Ruijin Hospital affiliated with Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine were retrospectively analysed. The postoperative risk factors related to delirium were analyzed by univariate and multivariate Logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

59 of 385 patients (15.3%) developed postoperative delirium after pancreatic surgery. The ROC curve revealed the optimal cutoff of intraoperative fluid balance was 2863ml. Furthermore, the multivariate analysis demonstrated that age ≥  65 years old [Odds ratio (OR) 2.01; 95% Confidence interval (CI) 1.12-3.63; p =  0.019], hypnotic drug use (OR 4.17; 95% CI 1.50-11.10; p =  0.005), and intraoperative fluid balance (OR 2.57; 95% CI 1.37-4.84; p =  0.003) were the independent risk factors of postoperative delirium.

CONCLUSION

This study identified that intraoperative fluid balance and hypnotic drug use were independent risk factors associated with postoperative delirium development after pancreatic surgery.

Development of an individualized model for predicting postoperative delirium in elderly patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

Postoperative delirium (POD) is a common complication in older patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) that adversely impacts clinical outcomes. We aimed to evaluate the risk factors for POD and to construct a predictive nomogram. Data for a total of 1481 older patients (training set: n=1109; validation set: n=372) who received liver resection for HCC were retrospectively retrieved from two prospective databases. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration plot, and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to evaluate the performance. The rate of POD was 13.3% (148/1109) in the training set and 16.4% (61/372) in the validation set. Multivariate analysis of the training set revealed that factors including age, history of cerebrovascular disease, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, albumin level, and surgical approach had significant effects on POD. The area under the ROC curves (AUC) for the nomogram, incorporating the aforementioned predictors, was 0.798 (95% CI 0.752-0.843) and 0.808 (95% CI 0.754-0.861) for the training and validation sets, respectively. The calibration curves of both sets showed a degree of agreement between the nomogram and the actual probability. DCA demonstrated that the newly established nomogram was highly effective for clinical decision-making. We developed and validated a nomogram with high sensitivity to assist clinicians in estimating the individual risk of POD in older patients with HCC.

Mechanical Bowel Preparation Is a Risk Factor for Postoperative Delirium as It Alters the Gut Microbiota Composition: A Prospective Randomized Single-Center Study

Background and Objective

Postoperative delirium (POD) is a frequent complication in patients undergoing gastrectomy. Increasing evidence suggests that abnormal gut microbiota composition may contribute to its morbidity. However, it is unclear whether mechanical bowel preparation would cause postoperative delirium by altering the gut microbiota of patients. This study aimed to investigate the association between mechanical bowel preparation and postoperative delirium in patients undergoing gastrectomy.

Methods

A prospective randomized single-center study was performed. A total of 81 patients with gastric cancer were enrolled and randomly assigned to two groups: preparation group and non-preparation group according to whether the patient received MBP before surgery. To diagnose postoperative delirium, we used the 3-Min Diagnostic Interview for Confusion Assessment Method-defined delirium for five successive days after surgery. 16s rRNA gene sequencing was used to investigate changes in the intestinal bacteria. The linear discriminant analysis and effect size (LefSe) analysis were also used to identify the different taxa of fecal microbiota between the postoperative delirium and non-postoperative delirium groups.

Results

We found that there was a significant difference in β-diversity of the gut microbiota between the preparation group and non-preparation group (P = 0.048). Furthermore, patients in the preparation group had a much higher rate of postoperative delirium (13/40, 32.5%) compared with that in non-preparation groups (4/41, 9.8%). Multivariate regression analysis adjusted by other risk factors indicated that mechanical bowel preparation was associated with the occurrence of delirium (odds ratio = 4.792; 95% confidence interval: 1.274–18.028; P = 0.020). When comparing the gut microbiota of patients with and without POD, Bacteroides and Veillonella (genus), which were higher in the preparation group, were also higher in delirium patients (P < 0.05). Genus Olsenella was both relatively higher in the non-preparation group and non-POD group (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Mechanical bowel preparation not only altered the gut microbiota composition of patients with gastric cancer but also increased the incidence of postoperative delirium. Among all the gut microbiota altered by mechanical bowel preparation, Bacteroides and Veillonella genus might be a risk factor of POD. Genus Olsenella might be a beneficial bacteria to reduce the incidence of POD.