Low anterior resection syndrome: can it be prevented?

And after surgery, what's new for the rectal cancer survivor?

Low anterior resection syndrome is a common but underestimated complication after rectal cancer surgery that significantly impacts the quality of life of the surviving patient. It is characterised by symptoms such as faecal incontinence and voiding dysfunction and affects up to 90% of patients undergoing low anterior rectal resection. The aetiology of the syndrome is multifactorial with no clear determining factor. It includes the use of preoperative radiotherapy, the indication for a protective ileostomy, sphincteric lesions, nerve damage to the rectal autonomic plexuses, and changes in left colon motor function. Although various therapeutic modalities have been shown to be effective in the management of the symptoms of the syndrome, there is still no standard treatment or patient selection pattern. In this article, a critical review of the therapeutic possibilities for patients who have survived rectal surgery will be made.

Research on preventing low anterior resection syndrome following sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer through high-risk screening and pelvic floor biofeedback therapy

PURPOSE

This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of high-risk screening combined with pelvic floor biofeedback therapy in preventing low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) after sphincter-preserving surgery (SPS) for rectal cancer.

METHODS

Forty-three patients who underwent SPS for rectal cancer at Jiangxi Cancer Hospital from January to December 2022 were assigned to the standard care group and received standard care plus pelvic floor biofeedback therapy. Forty-nine patients treated from January to December 2023 were designated as the high-risk screening group and received high-risk screening for LARS in addition to the standard care group's treatment protocol. LARS scores and incidence rates at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively, anorectal pressure values, quality of life scores at 3 and 9 months, and treatment adherence were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The high-risk screening group showed significantly lower LARS scores and incidence rates at all postoperative intervals compared to the standard care group. Additionally, the high-risk screening group demonstrated better anorectal pressure and quality of life scores and achieved higher treatment adherence, with statistically significant differences between groups (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

High-risk screening combined with targeted pelvic floor biofeedback therapy following SPS for rectal cancer can effectively prevent LARS and improve postoperative recovery quality.

Prediction model construction for the occurrence of LARS after neoadjuvant therapy combined with laparoscopic total mesorectal excision in male patients with mid-low rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer improves surgical outcomes and reduces recurrence but can cause low anterior resection syndrome (LARS), affecting quality of life. This study aims to predict the risk of LARS in male patients with mid-low rectal cancer after laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (TME).

METHODS

Clinical data from 203 male patients with mid-low rectal cancer who underwent neoadjuvant therapy and laparoscopic resection were collected. Patients were divided into training (n=143) and validation (n=60) cohorts. LARS risk factors were identified using logistic regression, and a predictive model was constructed and validated using ROC curve, Hosmer-Lemeshow test, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA).

RESULTS

LARS occurred in 53.6% of the patients in this study. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that BMI ≥ 25 kg/m², tumor distance from the anal margin < 5 cm, radiotherapy, and anastomotic leakage were independent risk factors for postoperative LARS in patients (P < 0.05). The areas under the ROC curves for the training cohort and validation cohort were 0.866 (95% CI: 0.807-0.925) and 0.724 (95% CI: 0.595-0.853), respectively, with both groups showing good goodness-of-fit test results (P > 0.05). The DCA curve indicated that the model had a high clinical utility.

CONCLUSIONS

BMI ≥ 25 kg/m², tumor distance from the anal margin < 5 cm, radiotherapy, and anastomotic leakage are independent risk factors for the occurrence of LARS after neoadjuvant therapy combined with laparoscopic TME in male patients with mid-low rectal cancer. These factors should be emphasized in clinical practice, and corresponding preventive measures should be promptly implemented.

Analysis of the correlation between defunctioning stoma and postoperative low anterior resection syndrome in rectal cancer: a prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the effect of stoma-related factors (stoma or no stoma, stoma type, and stoma reversal time) on the occurrence of low anterior resection syndrome (LARS), a highly prevalent condition that can develop after anal sphincter-sparing surgery for rectal cancer and impair quality of life, which includes fecal incontinence, fecal urgency and frequent defecation.

METHODS

Patients who underwent radical rectal cancer surgery from July 2018 to July 2022 in a tertiary hospital were included. Baseline data, tumor condition, operation condition and postoperative recovery were obtained by clinical observation. Follow-up data were collected by telephone follow-up. The chi-square and Fisher exact tests were used to analyse differences, coefficient of contingency was used to determine correlations, and independent risk factors for the occurrence of LARS (Patients with a score of 21 or more points were defined as having LARS using the LARS score) were further determined by binary logistic regression.

RESULTS

A total of 480 patients met the inclusion criteria, of which 267 used a defunctioning stoma and 213 did not use a defunctioning stoma. There was a positive correlation between defunctioning stoma (P < 0.001, P < 0.001, P < 0.05) and the occurrence of LARS at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively, and there was no significant correlation between the stoma type or stoma reversal time and the occurrence of LARS at 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively (P > 0.05). In binary logistic regression analysis, high BMI (Exp(B) = 1.072, P = 0.039), tumor closer to dentate line (Exp(B) = 0.910, P = 0.016), and ultra-low anterior resection (Exp(B) = 2.264, P = 0.011) increased the possibility of LARS at 3 months postoperatively; high BMI, proximity of the tumor to the dentate line, and ultra-low anterior resection were not independent risk factors for LARS at 6 months postoperatively (P > 0.05). However, proximity of the tumor to the dentate line (Exp(B) = 0.880, P = 0.035) increased the likelihood of LARS at 12 months postoperatively, while high BMI and ultra-low anterior resection remained non-significant as independent risk factors for LARS at 12 months postoperatively (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Defunctioning stoma was not an independent risk factor for the occurrence of LARS, whereas high BMI, tumor closer to dentate line, and ultra-low anterior resection were independent risk factors for the occurrence of LARS.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Not applicable.

Development and validation of an MRI and clinicopathological factors prediction model for low anterior resection syndrome in anterior resection of middle and low rectal cancer

OBJECTIVE

To validate the predictive power of newly developed magnetic resonance (MR) morphological and clinicopathological risk models in predicting low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) 6 months after anterior resection of middle and low rectal cancer (MLRC).

METHODS

From May 2018 to January 2021, 236 patients with MLRC admitted to two hospitals (internal and external validation) were included. MR images, clinicopathological data, and LARS scores (LARSS) were collected. Tumor morphology data included longitudinal involvement length, maximum tumor diameter, proportion of tumor to circumference of the intestinal wall, tumor mesorectal infiltration depth, circumferential margin status, and distance between the tumor and anal margins. Pelvic measurements included anorectal angle, mesenterial volume (MRV), and pelvic volume. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression was used to obtain independent risk factors of LARS after anterior resection Then, the prediction model was constructed, expressed as a nomogram, and its internal and external validity was assessed using receiver operating characteristic curves.

RESULTS

The uni- and multivariate analysis revealed distance between the tumor and anal margins, MRV, pelvic volume, and body weight as significant independent risk factors for predicting LARS. From the nomogram, the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity were 0.835, 75.0 %, and 80.4 %, respectively. The AUC, sensitivity, and specificity in the external validation group were 0.874, 83.3 %, and 91.7 %, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that MR imaging and clinicopathology presented by a nomogram can strongly predict LARSS, which can then individually predict LARS 6 months after anterior resection in patients with MLRC and facilitate clinical decision-making.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

We believe that our study makes a significant contribution to the literature. This method of predicting postoperative anorectal function by preoperative measurement of MRV provides a new tool for clinicians to study LARS.

Assessing Severity of Low Anterior Resection Syndrome After Intersphincteric Resection for Ultralow Rectal Cancer: A Pilot Study Using an Exploratory Instrument

BACKGROUND

The Delphi consensus identified 8 symptoms and 8 consequences as the highest priorities for defining low anterior resection syndrome.

OBJECTIVE

To describe an exploratory scoring instrument correlating the Delphi consensus on low anterior resection syndrome with functional and quality-of-life scores following intersphincteric resection for ultralow rectal cancer.

DESIGN

This was a prospective pilot study. In accordance with the Wexner incontinence score, 5 frequency responses ranging from never (score 0) to always (score 4) were used to measure the severity of symptom- and consequence-specific variables.

SETTINGS

Colorectal surgery referral center.

PATIENTS

Among 161 eligible patients, 137 participants (85%) completed an electronic self-assessment survey regarding function and quality of life at scheduled follow-up, including 3 to 6, 12, and ≥24 months after ileostomy reversal.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Outcome measures included patient-reported severity of the identified priorities, and their correlation with condition-specific quality of life.

RESULTS

The most frequent symptom and consequence were "emptying difficulties" and "dissatisfaction with the bowels," respectively. Aside from "emptying difficulties," the proportions of negative symptom domains increased after reversal. In particular, neither the frequency responses nor the severity scores of "emptying difficulties" differed between groups. The percentages of "always" selection for consequence domains improved at 12-month follow-up, whereas a higher rate was observed at 24 months, except for "toilet dependence" and "dissatisfaction with the bowels." We found significant improvements in the summary score of the Fecal Incontinence Quality-of-Life Scale ( p = 0.04) and our exploratory instrument ( p = 0.009) but not in functional scores measured by traditional questionnaires. Furthermore, the condition-specific quality of life strongly correlated with the Delphi consensus severity score ( rs = -0.73).

LIMITATIONS

Single-institution data and limited sample size.

CONCLUSIONS

The important priorities identified by the Delphi consensus might enable a comprehensive overview and a better assessment of low anterior resection syndrome after intersphincteric resection. See Video Abstract .

EVALE LA GRAVEDAD DEL SNDROME DE RESECCIN ANTERIOR BAJA DESPUS DE LA RESECCIN INTERESFINTRICA PARA EL CNCER DE RECTO ULTRABAJO UN ESTUDIO PILOTO QUE UTILIZA UN INSTRUMENTO EXPLORATORIO

ANTECEDENTES:El consenso Delphi identificó ocho síntomas y ocho consecuencias como las máximas prioridades para definir el síndrome de resección anterior baja.OBJETIVO:Describir un instrumento de puntuación exploratorio que correlaciona el consenso Delphi sobre el síndrome de resección anterior baja con puntuaciones funcionales y de calidad de vida después de la resección interesfinteriana para el cáncer de recto ultrabajo.DISEÑO:Este fue un estudio piloto prospectivo. De acuerdo con la puntuación de incontinencia de Wexner, se utilizaron cinco respuestas de frecuencia que van desde nunca (puntuación 0) hasta siempre (puntuación 4) para medir la gravedad de las variables específicas de los síntomas y las consecuencias.AJUSTES:Centro de referencia de cirugía colorrectal.PACIENTES:Entre 161 pacientes elegibles, 137 (85%) participantes completaron una encuesta electrónica de autoevaluación sobre la función y la calidad de vida en el seguimiento programado, incluidos 3 a 6, 12 y ≥ 24 meses después de la reversión de la ileostomía.MEDIDAS PRINCIPALES DE RESULTADO:Las medidas de resultado incluyeron la gravedad de estas prioridades informada por los pacientes, así como su correlación con la calidad de vida específica de la afección.RESULTADOS:El síntoma y la consecuencia más frecuentes fueron "dificultades para vaciar" e "insatisfacción con las deposiciones", respectivamente. Aparte de las "dificultades de vaciado", las proporciones de dominios de síntomas negativos aumentaron después de la reversión. En particular, tanto las respuestas de frecuencia como las puntuaciones de gravedad de las "dificultades para vaciar" no difirieron entre los grupos. Los porcentajes de "opción siempre" para los dominios de consecuencias mejoraron a los 12 meses de seguimiento, mientras que se observó una tasa más alta a los 24 meses después, excepto para "dependencia del baño" e "insatisfacción con los intestinos". Encontramos mejoras significativas en la puntuación resumida de la Escala de calidad de vida de incontinencia fecal ( p = 0,04) y nuestro instrumento exploratorio ( p = 0,009), pero no en las puntuaciones funcionales medidas con los cuestionarios tradicionales. Además, la calidad de vida específica de la condición se correlacionó fuertemente con la puntuación de gravedad del consenso Delphi (rs = -0,73).LIMITACIONES:Datos de una sola institución y tamaño de muestra limitado.CONCLUSIONES:Las importantes prioridades identificadas por el consenso Delphi podrían permitir una visión global y una mejor evaluación del síndrome de resección anterior baja después de la resección interesfintérica. (Traducción-Dr. Yesenia Rojas-Khalil ).

Automatic muscle impedance and nerve analyzer (AMINA) as a novel approach for classifying bioimpedance signals in intraoperative pelvic neuromonitoring

Frequent complications arising from low anterior resections include urinary and fecal incontinence, as well as sexual disorders, which are commonly associated with damage to the pelvic autonomic nerves during surgery. To assist the surgeon in preserving pelvic autonomic nerves, a novel approach for intraoperative pelvic neuromonitoring was investigated that is based on impedance measurements of the innervated organs. The objective of this work was to develop an algorithm called AMINA to classify the bioimpedance signals, with the goal of facilitating signal interpretation for the surgeon. Thirty patients included in a clinical investigation underwent nerve-preserving robotic rectal surgery using intraoperative pelvic neuromonitoring. Contraction of the urinary bladder and/or rectum, triggered by direct stimulation of the innervating nerves, resulted in a change in tissue impedance signal, allowing the nerves to be identified and preserved. Impedance signal characteristics in the time domain and the time-frequency domain were calculated and classified to develop the AMINA. Stimulation-induced positive impedance changes were statistically significantly different from negative stimulation responses by the percent amplitude of impedance change Amax in the time domain. Positive impedance changes and artifacts were distinguished by classifying wavelet scales resulting from peak detection in the continuous wavelet transform scalogram, which allowed implementation of a decision tree underlying the AMINA. The sensitivity of the software-based signal evaluation by the AMINA was 96.3%, whereas its specificity was 91.2%. This approach streamlines and automates the interpretation of impedance signals during intraoperative pelvic neuromonitoring.

Risk factors for severe low anterior resection syndrome in patients with rectal cancer undergoing sphincter‑preserving resection: A systematic review and meta‑analysis

The present study aimed to evaluate the incidence and risk factors of severe low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) in patients with rectal cancer undergoing sphincter-preserving resection, and to provide the clinical basis and reference for the treatment of rectal cancer and the prevention of LARS. Studies on the incidence and risk factors for severe LARS in patients with rectal cancer undergoing sphincter-preserving resection were searched using PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus and Web of Science, according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. After evaluating the study quality and extracting relevant data, RevMan 5.2 and STATA software were used to conduct a meta-analysis. A total of 12 articles were considered eligible for the present meta-analysis. Within these articles, there were 3,877 cases of sphincter-preserving resection for rectal cancer and 1,589 cases of severe LARS; the incidence of severe LARS was 40.99%. The results of the meta-analysis revealed that sex [female; odds ratio (OR), 6.54; 95% CI, 3.63-11.76; Z, 6.27; P<0.00001], radiotherapy and chemotherapy (OR, 3.45; 95% CI, 2.29-5.21; Z, 5.91; P<0.00001), total mesorectal excision (TME; OR, 4.39; 95% CI, 3.32-5.79; Z, 10.41; P<0.00001), and distance between tumor and anal margin (OR, 2.74; 95% CI, 0.86-8.72; Z, 1.70; P<0.00001) may be the risk factors for severe LARS.

Preventative strategies for low anterior resection syndrome

BACKGROUND

A common and debilitating complication of low anterior resection for rectal cancer is low anterior resection syndrome (LARS). As a multifactorial entity, LARS is poorly understood and challenging to treat. Despite this, prevention strategies are commonly overlooked. Our aim was to review the pathophysiology of LARS and explore current evidence on the efficacy and feasibility of prophylactic techniques.

METHODS

A literature review was performed between [1st January 2000 to 1st October 2023] for studies which investigated preventative interventions for LARS. Mechanisms by which LARS develop are described, followed by a review of prophylactic strategies to prevent LARS. Medline, Cochrane, and PubMed databases were searched, 189 articles screened, 8 duplicates removed and 18 studies reviewed.

RESULTS

Colonic dysmotility, anal sphincter dysfunction and neorectal dysfunction all contribute to the development of LARS, with the complex mechanism of defecation interrupted by surgery. Transanal irrigation (TAI) and pelvic floor rehabilitation (PFR) have shown benefits in preventing LARS, but may be limited by patient compliance. Intraoperative nerve monitoring (IONM) and robotic-assisted surgery have shown some promise in surgically preventing LARS. Nerve stimulation and other novel strategies currently used in treatment of LARS have yet to be investigated in their roles prophylactically.

CONCLUSIONS

To date, there is a limited evidence base for all preventative strategies including IONM, RAS, PFP and TAI. These strategies are limited by either access (IONM, RAS and PFP) or acceptability (PFP and TAI), which are both key to the success of any intervention. The results of ongoing trials will serve to assess acceptability, while technological advancement may improve access to some of the aforementioned strategies.

Low anterior resection syndrome and its impact on quality of life of ovarian carcinoma patients: A prospective longitudinal study

OBJECTIVES

Bowel dysfunction is frequently reported in patients with ovarian carcinoma (OC). Our aim was to evaluate the incidence of low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) like symptoms in patients with primary OC and its impact on quality of life (QoL).

METHODS

A prospective longitudinal observational cohort study was performed, including patients with newly diagnosed OC treated by primary or interval surgery with residual tumor <1 cm, from 2018 until 2021. Patients with a stoma or recurrence of disease were excluded. Intestinal dysfunction was assessed using the validated LARS score questionnaire pre- and postoperatively. There are 3 subgroups based on the results: no, minor, or major LARS. The impact on QoL was evaluated by an additional question to demonstrate the severity of patient's life impairment.

RESULTS

The questionnaire was answered by 78 patients pre- and post-operatively. LARS like symptoms were reported preoperatively in 34.6% (24.4% minor/10.2% major) and significantly increased postoperatively to 47.4% (28.2% minor/19.2% major; p = 0.011). Moderate to severe impairment of QoL correlated with LARS scores pre- (80%) and post-operatively (90%). Patients with two bowel anastomoses (mean score 18.6 pre- and 24.9 post-operatively, p = 0.041) showed a significant increase of the questionnaire score.

CONCLUSIONS

Major LARS like symptoms appear in 10% of OC patients preoperatively and significantly increase to almost two-fold postoperatively. Multiple bowel anastomoses had a significant risk for higher postoperative LARS score. QoL impairment correlates linearly with LARS positive scoring, independent on the timing of the complaints.

Clinical Management of Low Anterior Resection Syndrome: Review of the Current Diagnosis and Treatment

BACKGROUND

Low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) is a series of bowel dysfunction symptoms, including altered bowel frequency, irregular bowel rhythms, fecal incontinence, and constipation. LARS occurs in 80% of patients undergoing sphincter-preserving surgery, affecting patients' quality of life along with social avoidance. Different measurements and treatments have been raised to deal with LARS, but no systematic standard has been developed.

OBJECTIVE AND METHODS

To promote the standardization of clinical trials and clinical management of LARS, this review summarizes the latest findings up until 2023 regarding the diagnostic criteria, assessment protocols, and treatment modalities for postoperative LARS in rectal cancer.

RESULTS

The diagnostic criteria for LARS need to be updated to the definition proposed by the LARS International Collaborative Group, replacing the current application of the LARS score. In both clinical trials and clinical treatment, the severity of LARS should be assessed using at least one symptom assessment questionnaire, the LARS score or MSKCC BFI, and at least one scale related to quality of life. Anorectal manometry, fecoflowmetry, endoscopic ultrasonography, and pelvic floor muscle strength testing are recommended to be adopted only in clinical trials. After analysis of the latest literature on LARS treatment, a stepwise classification model is established for the standardized clinical management of LARS. Patients with minor LARS can start with first-line treatment, including management of self-behavior with an emphasis on diet modification and medication. Lamosetron, colesevelam hydrochloride, and loperamide are common antidiarrheal agents. Second-line management indicates multi-mode pelvic floor rehabilitation and transanal irrigation. Patients with major LARS should select single or several treatments in second-line management. Refractory LARS can choose antegrade enema, neuromodulation, or colostomy.

CONCLUSIONS

In clinical trials of LARS treatment between 2020 and 2022, the eligibility criteria and evaluation system have been variable. Therefore, it is urgent to create a standard for the diagnosis, assessment, and treatment of LARS. Failure to set placebos and differentiate subgroups are limitations of many current LARS studies. Randomized controlled trials comparing diverse therapies and long-term outcomes are absent, as well. Moreover, a new scale needs to be developed to incorporate the patient's perspective and facilitate outpatient follow-up. Though the establishment of a stepwise classification model for LARS treatment here is indispensable, the refinement of the guidelines may be improved by more standardized studies.

Assessing the role of anastomotic level in low anterior resection (LAR) surgery among rectal cancer patients in the development of LAR syndrome: a systematic review study

BACKGROUND

The etiology of LARS has not been elaborated on clearly. Studies have reported neoadjuvant therapy, low-lying rectal cancers, adjuvant therapy and anastomotic leakage as risk factors for the development of LARS. Anastomotic level has also been proposed as a possible risk factor; However, there have been conflicting results. This study aims to evaluate the role of the level of anastomosis as a potential risk factor for the development of LARS.

METHOD

A systematic literature search was conducted on Pubmed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science databases using Mesh terms and non-Mesh terms from 2012 to 2023. Original English studies conducted on rectal cancer patients reporting of anastomotic level and LARS status were included in this study. Eligible studies were assessed regarding quality control with Joanna-Briggs Institute (JBI) questionnaires.

RESULTS

A total of 396 articles were found using the research queries, and after applying selection criteria 4 articles were selected. A sample population of 808 patients were included in this study with a mean age of 61.51 years with male patients consisting 59.28% of the cases. The Mean assessment time was 15.6 months which revealed a mean prevalence of 48.89% for LAR syndrome. Regression analysis revealed significantly increased risk of LAR syndrome development due to low anastomosis level in all 4 studies with odds ratios of 5.336 (95% CI:3.197-8.907), 3.76 (95% CI: 1.34-10.61), 1.145 (95% CI: 1.141-2.149) and 2.11 (95% CI: 1.05-4.27) for low anastomoses and 4.34 (95% CI: 1.05-18.04) for ultralow anastomoses.

CONCLUSIONS

LARS is a long-term complication following surgery, leading to reduced quality of life. Low anastomosis level has been reported as a possible risk factor. All of the studies in this systematic review were associated with an increased risk of LARS development among patients with low anastomosis.

Advances in diagnosis and treatment of low anterior resection syndrome

Rectal cancer is one of the most common cancers. As much as 90% of patients with low rectal cancer complain of increased frequency of defecation, fecal incontinence, and evacuation problems after surgery, which is termed as low anterior resection syndrome (LARS). LARS detrimentally affects the quality of life for patients with rectal cancer. In this paper, we review the pathogenesis, risk factors, assessment tools, and treatment strategies for LARS.

СRITERIA FOR ASSESSING ENDOGENOUS INTOXICATION IN PATIENTS WITH MULTIPLE PERITONITIS

OBJECTIVE

The aim: To determine the diagnostic significance of the level of malondialdehyde (MDA) in various biological media for RP for assessing and predicting the course of the disease.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Materials and methods: Our study included The work was based on the results of surgical treatment of 60 patients with RP: according to MPI I - in 17 (28.3%), MPI II - in 23 (38.4%) and MPI III - in 20 (33.3%) patients. Surgical intervention for RP was aimed at sanitation and drainage of the abdominal cavity. The control group included 15 practi¬cally healthy people, whose blood and urine biochemical parameters served as the norm. According to the clinical course of the disease, the patients were divided depend on admission, The secondary product of lipid peroxidation - MDA was studied in blood serum, peritoneal exudate and urine in patients with RP, depending on the severity of the pathological process according to the Mannheim peritoneal index (MPI) - I severity (I), II severity (II), III severity (III). The work was based on the results of surgical treatment of 60 patients with RP: according to MPI I - in 17 (28.3%), MPI II - in 23 (38.4%) and MPI III - in 20 (33.3%) patients.

RESULTS

Results: Analyses of results showed that the average value of MDA in various biomedicals of recovered (n = 18) and subsequently died (n = 5) patients with MPI II are given in Table. 2. As can be seen from the presented data, the average value of MDA in blood serum and peritoneal exudate in patients with a lethal outcome is significantly higher than in those who have recovered. This fact indicates a more pronounced endogenous intoxication in patients who died from RP.

CONCLUSION

Conclusions: The content of MDA in the blood serum before surgery in patients with a lethal outcome was 190% (p <0.001). The level of MDA in urine in patients according to MPI II who subsequently died before surgery was 110% (p <0.001), and in those who recovered by 300% (p <0.001) it was higher than the norm. exudate taken during the operation averaged 4.14 ± 0.33 nmol / ml, then in the recovered - 2.89 ± 0.08 nmol / ml. A high level of MDA in the blood serum, peritoneal exudate with a decrease in the elimination of MDA in the urine in the postoperative period are prognostically unfavorable signs in patients, indicating the continuation of endogenous intoxication and a possible death.

A novel nomogram to predict low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) after ileostomy reversal for rectal cancer patients

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) in patients undergoing low or ultra-low anterior resection (LAR) is a common problem and significantly impacts the quality of life. Patients with an ileostomy after LAR are more likely to develop LARS. However, there hasn't been a model predicting LARS occurrence in these patients. This study aims to construct a nomogram to predict the probability of LARS occurrence in patients with temporary ileostomy and guide preventive strategies before reversal.

METHODS

168 patients undergoing LAR with ileostomy from one center were enrolled as the training cohort, and 134 patients of the same inclusion criteria from another center were enrolled as the validation cohort. The training cohort was screened for risk factors for major LARS using univariate and multivariate logistic regression. The nomogram was constructed using the filtered variables, the ROC curve was used to describe the model's discrimination, and the calibration was used to describe the accuracy.

RESULTS

The optimal cut-off value for stoma closure time was 128 days. Three risk factors were identified using logistic regression analysis: preoperative radiotherapy (OR = 3.038, [95%CI 1.75-5.015], P = 0.005), stoma closure time (OR = 2.298, [95%CI 1.088-4.858], P = 0.029) and pN stage (OR = 1.739, [95%CI 1.235-3.980], P = 0.001). A nomogram was constructed based on these three variables and showed good performance predicting major LARS after stoma reversal. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.827 in the training group and 0.821 in the validation group; The calibration curve suggested good precision in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This novel nomogram can accurately predict the probability of major LARS occurrence after ileostomy reversal for rectal cancer patients. This model can help screen ileostomy patients with high risks and guide individualized preventive strategies before stoma reversal.

Application of laparoscopic modified Bacon operation in patients with low rectal cancer and analysis of the changes in anal function: A retrospective single-center study

Purpose

To investigate the value of modified Bacon operation in patients with low rectal cancer.

Methods

Retrospective analysis of 60 patients treated with laparoscopic surgery for low rectal cancer in the Department of Colorectal and Anal Surgery, Jingzhou Hospital affiliated to Yangtze University, from 2019 to 2022, divided into observation and control groups based on the method of the operation (laparoscopic modified Bacon operation group and laparoscopic Dixon operation with prophylactic ileostomy group). We compared the variations between the two groups.

Results

The length of the abdominal surgical incision was shorter in the observation group than in the control group(P<0.05). In the observation group, the length of hospital stay after the first operation was shorter(P<0.05), the both operations time and the second intraoperative bleeding were less(P<0.05), the DET score at one week after the first operation and the VAS after both operations were fewer than in the control group(P<0.05), the postoperative rate of ischemic necrosis of the exposed bowel was higher(P<0.05), and the anal function was poorer in the short term after the second operation compared with the control group(P<0.05), but there was no significant difference between the anal function at 6 months after the second operation compared with the control group(P>0.05).12 months after the second operation, the anal function has recovered to the preoperative level in the observation group(P>0.05).

Conclusion

The laparoscopic modified Bacon operation has smaller abdominal wounds, which reduces postoperative pain; it does not require the use of staplers, which reduces the patient's financial burden; no postoperative anastomotic leakage occurs, and a more satisfactory anal function can be obtained.

Experience and coping strategies of bowel dysfunction in postoperative patients with rectal cancer: a systematic review of qualitative evidence

Aim

Due to the changes of bowel physiological structure and functional disorders after rectal cancer surgery, patients will face many bowel dysfunction for a long time, which will greatly affect their quality of life. The purpose of this review is to integrate the qualitative research on the experience of bowel dysfunction and coping strategies in postoperative patients with rectal cancer.

Methods

Systematic retrieval of PubMed, EMbase, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Web of Sciences, PsycINFO, Willey and other databases was carried out by using the method of subject words and keywords. The Critical Appraisal Skill Programme (CASP) Qualitative Studies Checklist was used for Qualitative assessment. The findings were extracted from the included study and synthesized into the final themes, which was evaluated strictly in accordance with the ConQual process.

Results

Nine studies involving 345 participants were included and two main themes were extracted: "Experience a series of changes caused by bowel dysfunction" and "nmet needs and coping strategies facing bowel dysfunction". The changes of rectal cancer patients who experience bowel dysfunction after operation mainly include three parts: bowel dysfunction is more than just a bowel reaction, which covers the bowel symptoms themselves and the subsequent body-related symptoms. The interruption of a normal life, mainly reflected in personal, family, and social life. Complex psychological reactions to bowel dysfunction, psychological changes have a dual nature, showing a positive and negative intertwined. There are two main aspects of unmet needs and coping strategies: the demand is mainly manifested in the need for information and support from medical professionals, while the coping strategy mainly includes diet, activity and drug management.

Conclusion

Rectal cancer patient often experience persistent bowel dysfunction after operation, which has a certain physical and mental effects. A series of new needs of postoperative patients are often not fully met, and patients often rely on their own empirical attempts to seek balance, less can get professional support. Future studies need to focus on how to provide continuous information support for postoperative rectal cancer patients, especially professional care from health care staff.

Effects of Preoperative Radiotherapy on Long-Term Bowel Function in Patients With Rectal Cancer Treated With Anterior Resection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Background: Anterior resection is a common surgical approach used in rectal cancer surgery; however, this procedure is known to cause bowel injury and dysfunction. Neoadjuvant therapy is widely used in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. In this study, we determined the effect of preoperative radiotherapy on long-term bowel function in patients who underwent anterior resection for treatment of rectal cancer. Methods: We performed a comprehensive literature search of the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library databases. A random-effects model was used in the meta-analysis by the Review Manager software, version 5.3. Results: This systematic review and meta-analysis included 12 studies, which used low anterior resection syndrome score with a total of 2349 patients. Based on them, we concluded that low anterior resection syndrome was significantly more common in the preoperative radiotherapy group (odds ratio 3.59, 95% confidence interval 2.68-4.81, P < .00001) and that major low anterior resection syndrome also occurred significantly more frequently in the preoperative radiotherapy group (odds ratio 3.28, 95% confidence interval 2.05-5.26, P < .00001). Subgroup analyses of long-course radiation, total mesorectal excision, and non-metastatic tumors were performed, and the results met the conclusions of the primary outcomes. Conclusions: Preoperative radiotherapy negatively affects long-term bowel function in patients who undergo anterior resection for rectal cancer.