Cytomegalovirus-related colitis in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

Integrating transcriptomics and proteomics to analyze the immune microenvironment of cytomegalovirus associated ulcerative colitis and identify relevant biomarkers

BACKGROUND

In recent years, significant morbidity and mortality in patients with severe inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and cytomegalovirus (CMV) have drawn considerable attention to the status of CMV infection in the intestinal mucosa of IBD patients and its role in disease progression. However, there is currently no high-throughput sequencing data for ulcerative colitis patients with CMV infection (CMV + UC), and the immune microenvironment in CMV + UC patients have yet to be explored.

METHOD

The xCell algorithm was used for evaluate the immune microenvironment of CMV + UC patients. Then, WGCNA analysis was explored to obtain the co-expression modules between abnormal immune cells and gene level or protein level. Next, three machine learning approach include Random Forest, SVM-rfe, and Lasso were used to filter candidate biomarkers. Finally, Best Subset Selection algorithms was performed to construct the diagnostic model.

RESULTS

In this study, we performed transcriptomic and proteomic sequencing on CMV + UC patients to establish a comprehensive immune microenvironment profile and found 11 specific abnormal immune cells in CMV + UC group. After using multi-omics integration algorithms, we identified seven co-expression gene modules and five co-expression protein modules. Subsequently, we utilized various machine learning algorithms to identify key biomarkers with diagnostic efficacy and constructed an early diagnostic model. We identified a total of eight biomarkers (PPP1R12B, CIRBP, CSNK2A2, DNAJB11, PIK3R4, RRBP1, STX5, TMEM214) that play crucial roles in the immune microenvironment of CMV + UC and exhibit superior diagnostic performance for CMV + UC.

CONCLUSION

This 8 biomarkers model offers a new paradigm for the diagnosis and treatment of IBD patients post-CMV infection. Further research into this model will be significant for understanding the changes in the host immune microenvironment following CMV infection.

A diagnostic dilemma: cytomegalovirus colitis as an uncommon comorbidity in inflammatory bowel disease: a case report

BACKGROUND

The role of cytomegalovirus infection as an opportunistic pathogen in exacerbating ulcerative colitis and its response to treatment remain a topic of ongoing debate. Clinicians encounter numerous challenges, including the criteria for differentiating between an acute ulcerative colitis flare and true cytomegalovirus colitis, the diagnostic tests for identifying cytomegalovirus colitis, and determining the appropriate timing for initiating antiviral therapy.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 28-year-old Syrian female with a seven-year history of pancolitis presented with worsening bloody diarrhea, abdominal pain, and tenesmus despite ongoing treatment with azathioprine, mesalazine, and prednisolone. She experienced a new flare of acute severe ulcerative colitis despite recently completing two induction doses of infliximab (5 mg/kg) initiated four weeks prior for moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis. She had no prior surgical history. Her symptoms included watery, bloody diarrhea occurring nine to ten times per day, abdominal pain, and tenesmus. Initial laboratory tests indicated anemia, leukocytosis, elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) and fecal calprotectin levels, and positive CMV IgG. Stool cultures, Clostridium difficile toxin, testing for Escherichia coli and Cryptosporidium, and microscopy for ova and parasites were all negative. Sigmoidoscopy revealed numerous prominent erythematous area with spontaneous bleeding. Biopsies demonstrated CMV inclusions confirmed by immunohistochemistry, although prior biopsies were negative. We tapered prednisolone and azathioprine and initiated ganciclovir at 5 mg/kg for ten days, followed by valganciclovir at 450 mg twice daily for three weeks. After one month, she showed marked improvement, with CRP and fecal calprotectin levels returning to normal. She scored one point on the partial Mayo score. The third induction dose of infliximab was administered on schedule, and azathioprine was resumed.

CONCLUSION

Concurrent cytomegalovirus infection in patients with inflammatory bowel disease presents a significant clinical challenge due to its associated morbidity and mortality. Diagnosing and managing this condition is particularly difficult, especially regarding the initiation or continuation of immunosuppressive therapies.

Diagnostic Utility of Cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNA Quantitation in Ulcerative Colitis

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) colitis is a critical condition associated with severe complications in ulcerative colitis (UC). This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic value of the presence of CMV DNA in intestinal mucosa tissue and blood samples in patients with active UC. This study included 81 patients with exacerbated symptoms of UC. Patient data were obtained from the Hospital Information Management System. CMV DNA in colorectal tissue and plasma samples were analyzed using a real-time quantitative PCR assay. CMV markers were detected using immunohistochemistry and hematoxylin-eosin staining. Immunohistochemistry positivity was observed in tissue samples from eight (9.9%) patients. Only one (1.2%) patient showed CMV-specific intranuclear inclusion bodies. CMV DNA was detected in 63.0% of the tissues (median: 113 copies/mg) and in 58.5% of the plasma samples (median: 102 copies/mL). For tissues, sensitivity and the negative predictive value (NPV) for qPCR were excellent (100.0%), whereas specificity and the positive predictive value (PPV) were low (41.9% and 15.7%, respectively). For plasma, sensitivity and NPV were high (100.0%) for qPCR, whereas specificity and PPV were low (48.6% and 24.0%, respectively). CMV DNA ≥392 copies/mg in tissue samples (sensitivity 100.0% and specificity 83.6%) and ≥578 copies/mL (895 IU/mL) in plasma samples (sensitivity 66.7% and specificity 100.0%) provided an optimal diagnosis for this test. The qPCR method improved patient management through the early detection of CMV colitis in patients with UC. However, reliance on qPCR positivity alone can lead to overdiagnosis. Quantification of CMV DNA can improve diagnostic specificity, although standardization is warranted.

Colonic cytomegalovirus DNA detection by polymerase chain reaction does not influence outcomes in inflammatory bowel disease and immunosuppressed cohorts

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) colitis is associated with negative outcomes in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and immunosuppressed cohorts and therefore requires timely recognition for appropriate management. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic tools for CMV colitis and their associations with clinical outcomes.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of patients in a metropolitan health service with colonic samples analysed for CMV between 2012 and 2022, stratified into IBD and non-IBD groups, was performed. The main outcome measures were the prevalence of positive and negative results for each CMV test, as well as need for colectomy, use of antiviral and hospital length of stay.

RESULTS

Five hundred eighty-two biopsies from 418 patients were included; the median age was 36 years (interquartile range, 24-52 years) and 223 (53.3%) were men. Four hundred sixty-one (79.2%) biopsies were from patients with IBD and 121 (20.8%) were from those without IBD. There were similar proportions of positive CMV histology (IBD 5.9% and non-IBD 7.4%) and tissue CMV polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in the two groups (IBD 5.6% and non-IBD 5.0%), but within each group, results were discordant. Positive CMV histology was significantly associated with need for colectomy in the IBD group, while positive tissue CMV PCR was not. Positive CMV histology, and tissue and serum CMV PCR were all significantly associated with antiviral use. Positive serum CMV PCR was significantly associated with colectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

Histopathology remains the most predictive tool in assessing CMV colitis, while qualitative tissue CMV PCR was found to have limited utility. Quantitative serum CMV PCR may be useful but requires further evaluation.

Baseline Clinical Factors Are Associated With Risk of Complications in Crohn's Disease: Appraisal of the American Gastroenterological Association Clinical Care Pathway

INTRODUCTION

The American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) has compiled risk factors that may be predictive of disease complications in Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of the AGA risk factors for risk stratification in UC and CD.

METHODS

We included participants of 2 cohorts: the Ocean State Crohn's and Colitis Area Registry cohort and the Mayo Clinic cohort. Baseline clinical risk factors were extracted according to the AGA pathway. Our primary end point was defined as follows: (i) any inflammatory bowel disease related-hospitalization, (ii) any inflammatory bowel disease-related bowel surgery, or (iii) any progression of disease. We analyzed the association of the number of AGA risk factors with our end point. Statistical multivariable modeling was performed with Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

A total of 412 patients with CD were included. Comparing ≥3 risk factors with 0-1 risk factor, we found a significantly increased risk of complications in both the Ocean State Crohn's and Colitis Area Registry cohort (hazard ratio [HR] 2.75, 95% confidence interval 1.71-4.41) and Mayo Clinic cohort (HR 2.07, 95% confidence interval 1.11-3.84). Diagnosis at younger age (HR 2.07), perianal disease (HR 1.99), and B2/B3 behavior (HR 1.92) were significantly associated with disease complications. We did not observe a consistent association between number of risk factors nor any specific individual risk factors and risk of disease complications in the 265 patients with UC included.

DISCUSSION

We found a significant association between the number of AGA risk factors and the risk of disease complication in CD; this association was not significant in UC. The presence of ≥ 3 risk factors in CD leads to the highest risk of complications. The AGA care pathway is a useful tool to stratify patients who are at higher risk of disease complications in patients with CD.