Perioperative intravenous dexamethasone for patients undergoing colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The Effects of Perioperative Corticosteroids on Postoperative Complications After Pancreatoduodenectomy: A Debated Topic of Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The intraoperative administration of corticosteroids has been shown to improve postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing surgery; however, the impact of corticosteroids on complications following pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) remains controversial.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of perioperative corticosteroids on postoperative complications after PD.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A comprehensive search was conducted using the PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases for studies published prior to 1 July 2024. Of 7418 articles identified, a total of 5 studies were eligible for inclusion in this meta-analysis. The primary outcome was incidence of postoperative major complications (PMCs), while the additional outcomes were incidences of postoperative pancreatic fistulas (POPFs), infection, delayed gastric emptying (DGE), post-pancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH), bile leakage, reoperation, and 30-day mortality. The study was registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42024524936).

RESULTS

Finally, 5 studies involving 1449 patients (537 with corticosteroids and 912 without corticosteroids) were analyzed. Intraoperative corticosteroids were not associated with any improvement in PMCs (p = 0.41). The incidence of POPF (p = 0.12), infectious complications (p = 0.15), or DGE (p = 0.81) were not significantly different between the two groups. No obvious differences were found in the incidence of PPH (p = 0.42), bile leakage (p = 0.68), 30-day mortality (p = 0.99), or reoperation (p = 0.26).

CONCLUSION

Perioperative corticosteroids did not significantly demonstrate any protective advantage in terms of postoperative complications after PD. This finding may serve as a reference for the perioperative use of corticosteroids in pancreatic surgery. Well-designed clinical trials are warranted in the near future in order to provide high-level evidence.

Postoperative neurocognitive disorders in the elderly: how can we stop the harm? A literature review

Postoperative neurocognitive disorders (PND) represent a significant challenge affecting patients undergoing surgical procedures, particularly in the elderly population. These disorders can lead to profound impairments in cognitive function, impacting memory, attention, and overall quality of life. Despite ongoing research efforts to identify risk factors and improve management strategies, PND remains underdiagnosed and poorly understood, complicating postoperative recovery and rehabilitation. This review aims to explore the recent advancement in the literature about PND, focusing on the underlying mechanisms, risk factors, and potential therapeutic approaches. We highlight recent advancements in the understanding of neuroinflammation, and it is implications for novel therapies to prevent PND. By synthesizing the latest research, we hope to provide insights that could lead to improved outcomes for patients at risk for PND and foster a shift towards more effective preventive measures in such population.

Perioperative Dexamethasone in Diabetic Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND

The perioperative use of dexamethasone in diabetic patients remains controversial due to concerns related to infection and adverse events. This study aimed to determine whether clinical evidence supports withholding dexamethasone in diabetic patients due to concern for infection risk. We hypothesized that there is no difference in infectious outcomes between dexamethasone-treated patients and controls.

METHODS

A literature search was performed on November 22, 2022 to identify randomized, placebo-controlled trials investigating short-course (<72 hours), perioperative dexamethasone that explicitly included diabetic patients and measured at least 1 clinical outcome. Pertinent studies were independently searched in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane. Authors for all identified studies were contacted with the aim of performing quantitative subgroup analyses of diabetic patients. The primary end point was surgical site infection and the secondary end point was a composite of adverse events. Qualitative remarks were reported based on the total available data and a quality assessment tool. Meta-analyses were performed using inverse variance with random effects. Heterogeneity was assessed via standard χ2 and I2 tests.

RESULTS

Sixteen unique studies were included, 5 of which were analyzed quantitatively. Of the 2592 diabetic patients, 2344 (1184 randomized to dexamethasone and 1160 to placebo) were analyzed in at least 1 quantitative outcome. Quantitative analysis showed that the use of perioperative dexamethasone had no effect on the risk of surgical site infections (log odds ratio [LOR], -0.10, 95%; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.64 to 0.44) while significantly reducing the risk of composite adverse events (LOR, -0.33; 95% CI, -0.62 to -0.05). Qualitative analysis reinforced these findings, demonstrating noninferior to superior results across all clinical outcomes. There was high heterogeneity between the included studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Current evidence suggests perioperative dexamethasone may be given to diabetic patients without increasing the risk of infectious complications. Prospective investigations aimed at optimizing dose, frequency, and timing are needed, as well as studies aimed explicitly at exploring the use of dexamethasone in patients with poorly controlled diabetes.

Dexamethasone-Associated Hyperglycemia is Not Associated With Infectious Complications After Total Joint Arthroplasty in Diabetic Patients

BACKGROUND

Postoperative infection is a devastating complication of total joint arthroplasty (TJA). Perioperative use of dexamethasone in patients who have diabetes mellitus (DM) remains controversial due to concern for increased infection risk. This study aimed to evaluate the association between dexamethasone and infection risk among patients who have DM undergoing TJA.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study conducted on adult patients who underwent primary, elective total knee arthroplasty (TKA) or total hip arthroplasty (THA) between January 2016 and December 2021 using a large national database. We identified 110,568 TJA patients (TKA: 66.6%; THA: 33.4%), 31.0% (34,298) of which had DM. Patients who received perioperative dexamethasone were compared to those who did not. The primary end points were the 90-day risk of postoperative periprosthetic joint infection, surgical site infection (SSI), and other non-SSI (urinary tract infection, pneumonia, sepsis).

RESULTS

When modeling the association between dexamethasone exposure and study outcomes while accounting for the interaction between dexamethasone and morning blood glucose levels, dexamethasone administration conferred no increased odds of postoperative periprosthetic joint infection nor SSI in diabetics. However, dexamethasone significantly lowered the adjusted odds of other postoperative infections in diabetic patients (TKA: adjusted odds ratio = 09, 95% confidence interval = 0.8 to 1.0, P = .030; THA: adjusted odds ratio = 0.7, 95% confidence interval = 0.6 to 0.9, P = .001); specifically in patients with morning blood glucose levels between 110 to 248 mg/dL in TKA and ≤ 172 mg/dL in THA.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides strong evidence against withholding dexamethasone in diabetic patients undergoing TJA based on concern for infection. Instead, short-course perioperative dexamethasone reduced infection risk in select patients. The narrative surrounding dexamethasone should shift away from questions about whether dexamethasone is appropriate for diabetic patients, and instead focus on how best to optimize its use.

Strategies to reduce ileus after colorectal surgery: A qualitative umbrella review of the collective evidence

BACKGROUND

Various strategies were proposed to reduce postoperative ileus after colorectal surgery. This umbrella review aimed to provide a comprehensive overview of current evidence on measures to reduce the incidence and severity of postoperative ileus after colorectal surgery.

METHODS

A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses-compliant systematic search was conducted in PubMed and Scopus to identify systematic reviews that assessed the efficacy of interventions used to prevent postoperative ileus after colorectal surgery. Data on study characteristics, interventions, and outcomes were summarized in a narrative manner.

RESULTS

A total of 26 systematic reviews incorporating various strategies like early oral feeding, gum chewing, coffee consumption, medications, and acupuncture were included. Early oral feeding reduced postoperative ileus and accelerated bowel function return. The most assessed intervention was chewing gum, which was associated with a median reduction of postoperative ileus by 45% (range, 11%-59%) and shortening of the time to first flatus and time to defecation by a median of 11.9 and 17.7 hours, respectively. Coffee intake showed inconsistent results, with a median shortening of time to flatus and time to defecation by 1.32 and 14.45 hours, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Early oral feeding, chewing gum, and alvimopan were the most commonly assessed and effective strategies for reducing postoperative ileus after colorectal surgery. Medications used to reduce postoperative ileus included alvimopan, intravenous lidocaine, dexamethasone, probiotics, and oral antibiotics. Intravenous dexamethasone and lidocaine and oral probiotics helped hasten bowel function return. Acupuncture positively impacted the recovery of bowel function.