Use of heparin upon reoperation in a pediatric patient with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia after disappearance of antibodies

Heparin Reexposure in Patients With a History of Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia

Objectives:

Patients with a history of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), who require subsequent anticoagulation, have limited options. Rechallenge with unfractionated heparin (UFH) has been reported but may be associated with a risk of recurrence of HIT. The objective of this study was to determine the safety of heparin reexposure in patients with a history of HIT.

Methods:

Using several search terms, all cases of heparin reexposure in patients with HIT indexed in MEDLINE (English language only) by June 2014 were reviewed. The bibliography of each relevant article was searched for additional reports. In cases of multiple reexposures, each reexposure was identified as a separate instance of reexposure during analysis.

Results:

A total of 136 patients with a history of HIT had 141 instances of heparin reexposure. Cardiac (76%) and vascular surgeries (11%) were the most common indications. Antiplatelet factor 4/heparin antibodies were positive in 63% of evaluable cases before reexposure. Preexposure plasma exchange (11%) and postexposure nonheparin anticoagulants (63%) were frequently utilized. Complications with heparin reexposure included recurrence of HIT (2.1%, 95% confidence interval 0.73%-6.07%) and bleeding (2.1%).

Conclusion:

Intraoperative heparin reexposure in patients with a history of HIT has a small risk of developing HIT recurrence. The use of preexposure plasma exchange in patients with positive antiplatelet factor 4/heparin antibody and postexposure nonheparin anticoagulants arguably may have reduced the risk of recurrence of HIT.

Cardiac transplantation and/or mechanical circulatory support device placement using heparin anti-coagulation in the presence of acute heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

BACKGROUND

Patients with congestive heart failure, decreased left ventricular function, and debilitation are frequently maintained on anti-coagulants, including heparin. As such, these patients are at high risk for developing heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). Some of these HIT-positive individuals will ultimately undergo urgent heart transplantation or placement of a mechanical circulatory support device (MCSD). Such procedures require cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and full anti-coagulation. The safety of re-exposure to heparin during CPB despite the presence of recent-onset thrombocytopenia and Hep/PF4 antibodies has not been studied in the transplant or MCSD populations.

METHODS

Over a 24-month period, 75 heart transplants and 55 MCSD implants were performed. Fourteen patients with acute HIT (thrombocytopenia and positive Hep/PF4 antibody by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay [ELISA]) and 3 patients with a history of remote HIT underwent cardiac transplantation (n = 9) and/or MCSD placement (n = 8) using heparin as the anti-coagulant during CPB. The median time from diagnosis to CPB was 4.5 days in patients with acute HIT.

RESULTS

Thirty-day survival was 100% in transplant patients and 75% in MCSD patients. Post-transplant ELISA testing was found to be negative in 4 patients with acute HIT and 3 with remote HIT.

CONCLUSIONS

This series demonstrates that short-term re-exposure to heparin during urgent CPB for heart transplantation or MCSD placement is safe despite the presence of thrombocytopenia and Hep/PF4 antibodies. Moreover, the rapid clearance of Hep/PF4 antibodies in our transplant patients suggests a potential therapeutic role for immunosuppressive therapy in the management of HIT in the acute setting.

[Direct thrombin inhibitors: pharmacology and application in cardiovascular anesthesia]

The options for drug-controlled anticoagulation are becoming noticeably more manifold. In the area of anaesthesiology and intensive care, there are furthermore special disease patterns, such as heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) to be known, diagnosed and treated. This article gives a review of the substance groups of the direct thrombin inhibitors (DTI) as alternative anticoagulants for HIT in combination with cardiovascular diseases. For the administration of DTIs, experience and the correct dose are the keys to success and are the deciding factors for the two sides of haemostasis: thrombosis and haemorrhage.

Treatment and prevention of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition)

This chapter about the recognition, treatment, and prevention of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is part of the Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition). Grade 1 recommendations are strong and indicate that the benefits do, or do not, outweigh risks, burden, and costs. Grade 2 suggests that individual patient values may lead to different choices. Among the key recommendations in this chapter are the following: For patients receiving heparin in whom the clinician considers the risk of HIT to be > 1.0%, we recommend platelet count monitoring over no platelet count monitoring (Grade 1C). For patients who are receiving heparin or have received heparin within the previous 2 weeks, we recommend investigating for a diagnosis of HIT if the platelet count falls by >/= 50%, and/or a thrombotic event occurs, between days 5 and 14 (inclusive) following initiation of heparin, even if the patient is no longer receiving heparin therapy when thrombosis or thrombocytopenia has occurred (Grade 1C). For patients with strongly suspected (or confirmed) HIT, whether or not complicated by thrombosis, we recommend use of an alternative, nonheparin anticoagulant (danaparoid [Grade 1B], lepirudin [Grade 1C], argatroban [Grade 1C], fondaparinux [Grade 2C], or bivalirudin [Grade 2C]) over the further use of unfractionated heparin (UFH) or low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) therapy or initiation/continuation of vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) [Grade 1B]. The guidelines include specific recommendations for nonheparin anticoagulant dosing that differ from the package inserts. For patients with strongly suspected or confirmed HIT, we recommend against the use of vitamin K antagonist (VKA) [coumarin] therapy until after the platelet count has substantially recovered (usually, to at least 150 x 10(9)/L) over starting VKA therapy at a lower platelet count (Grade 1B); that VKA therapy be started only with low maintenance doses (maximum, 5 mg of warfarin or 6 mg of phenprocoumon) over higher initial doses (Grade 1B); and that the nonheparin anticoagulant (eg, lepirudin, argatroban, danaparoid) be continued until the platelet count has reached a stable plateau, the international normalized ratio (INR) has reached the intended target range, and after a minimum overlap of at least 5 days between nonheparin anticoagulation and VKA therapy rather than a shorter overlap (Grade 1B). For patients receiving VKAs at the time of diagnosis of HIT, we recommend use of vitamin K (10 mg po or 5 to 10 mg IV) [Grade 1C].