Occlusion of the femoral artery after using the percutaneous suture-mediated closure system perclose

Stenosis Caused by Suture-Mediated Vascular Closure Device in an Angiographic Normal Common Femoral Artery: Its Mechanism and Management

Vascular closing devices (VCDs) are widely used to replace manual compression at the femoral puncture site and to reduce the discomfort of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary procedure by shortening bed rest. Among the vascular complications related to these devices, the femoral artery stenosis or occlusion is rarely reported, and its standard management is not well established. We report a case of symptomatic femoral artery stenosis caused by suture-mediated VCD and managed using rotational atherectomy device and balloon angioplasty. In addition, we propose the possible mechanisms for this complication.

Carotid stenting and bivalirudin with and without vascular closure: 3-year analysis of procedural outcomes

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to examine the outcome of carotid stenting using bivalirudin and the influence of vascular closure devices (VCD) on the incidence and severity of peri-procedural hypotension.

BACKGROUND

Bivalirudin, a short-acting direct thrombin inhibitor, has been shown to be an effective anticoagulant in coronary interventions, with less risk of bleeding compared with heparin. Routine use of VCD has become the standard of care, facilitating patient ambulation after percutaneous carotid and coronary interventions. The combined use of these two therapies (bivalirudin and VCD) may improve outcomes in carotid interventions where prolonged patient immobilization may exacerbate hypotension following stenting.

METHODS

A total of 514 patients underwent 536 carotid stenting procedures in the 3-year period from September 2004 to September 2007. All patients received adjunctive bivalirudin, with and without VCD. This cohort was analyzed for peri-procedural and 30-day clinical outcomes and length of hospitalization.

RESULTS

Thirty-day stroke and death rate was 1.7%. A total of 83 patients (15.4%) experienced intra- or post-procedural hypotension (systolic BP < 80 mm Hg). There were four (0.7%) major bleeding complications requiring transfusion, and length of stay was delayed more than 24 hr in five patients (0.93%), all of whom were in the manual compression group.

CONCLUSIONS

This was a negative study, with no significant difference on prolonged hypotensive events in patients with vascular closure device and bivalirudin, compared with those with manual compression and bivalirudin. Vascular closure devices were safe and effective with a low incidence of complications. In carotid artery stenting, bivalirudin is safe with low incidence of major bleeding and acceptable 30-day adverse event rates (stroke and death).

Randomized comparison of effects of suture-based and collagen-based vascular closure devices on post-procedural leg perfusion

BACKGROUND

Vascular closure devices (VCD) are well established to facilitate hemostasis after cardiac catheterization procedures. However, impairment of flow due to the reduction of femoral artery diameter remains a major concern. The present study aims to evaluate leg perfusion before and after application of collagen- and suture-based vascular closure devices.

METHODS

A total of 366 patients (age: 64.3 years+/-10.7, male: 71.3%) were randomized to receive femoral access site closure with either a collagen-based closure device (group A) (n=214) or a suture-mediated device (group B) (n=152), immediately following coronary catheterization procedures. In all patients, the ankle-brachial-index (ABI) was measured before and the day after closure device application.

RESULTS

In group A, mean ABI at baseline was 1.09+/-0.2, in group B 1.11+/-0.2. In both groups, there was a significant, albeit clinically not relevant, reduction in post-procedural ABI (group A: 1.04+/-0.2, p<0.01 vs baseline, group B: 1.06+/-0.2, p<0.01 vs baseline). DeltaABI was not different between both VCD groups (p=0.55). In patients with peripheral vascular disease (PVD), neither the Angioseal device (mean ABI at baseline 0.76+/-0.1) nor the Perclose-device (mean ABI at baseline 0.79+/-0.1) induced a remarkable impairment of leg perfusion (Angioseal: 0.77+/-0.1, p=0.9 vs baseline, Perclose: 0.78+/-0.1, p=1.0 vs baseline). Clinically, no aggravation of claudication was observed in the PVD patient group.

CONCLUSION

Both vascular closure devices are not associated with clinically relevant reduction in ABI. There was no difference between the two groups with respect to the level of flow impairment. Both devices may be safely used in patients with reduced ABI.