Treatment of in-stent restenosis with sirolimus-eluting-stents: results from the prospective German Cypher stent registry

The 'all comer' Coroflex Please drug-eluting stent registry in Europe and Asia - an overall and transcontinental assessment of the 10-month major adverse cardiac events

BACKGROUND

Randomized trials assess the potential of a medical device in well defined indications while "all comer studies" reveal the device performance in the real clinical environment.

AIMS

This 'all comers' registry assessed the 10-month outcome of the Coroflex(®) Please drug-eluting stent in Europe and Asia by clinically driven major adverse cardiac events.

METHODS

The Coroflex(®) Please Registry was an international, prospective, multicenter registry enrolling patients with symptomatic ischemic heart disease. The primary endpoint was clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 9 months. Secondary endpoints were technical success, in-hospital outcomes, definite stent thrombosis and major adverse cardiac events (death, myocardial infarction, or TLR) for subgroup analyses.

RESULTS

Of the enrolled 1230 patients (63.6 ± 11.2 years, 33.9% diabetics), 339 (27.6%) had an acute coronary syndrome, 148 (12.1%) STEMI and 191 (15.6%) NSTEMI. After 10.5 ± 3.8 months (follow-up rate 92.8%), the target lesion revascularization rate (TLR) was 7.8% overall, 8.3% in STEMI, and 11.3% in NSTEMI patients. Total MACE was 11.1% and significantly higher in ACS with either diabetes mellitus (22.9%, p = 0.017) or age ≥75 years (25.4%, p = 0.026). In European and Asian patients MI rates (5.2% vs 3.1%, p = 0.135) and cardiac death rates (1.6% vs 0.9%, p = 0.414) were similar. The MACE rate was higher in Europe (13.6% vs 4.7%, p < 0.001) driven by a six times higher TLR rate.

CONCLUSIONS

TLR and MACE occurred within the range of previously published data. The incidence of MI and cardiac death were not different between Europe and Asia. MACE were higher in Europe driven by target lesion revascularization.

Cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty and paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation for treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis in patients with stable coronary artery disease

BACKGROUND

Recent studies have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty for the treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis (ISR). The cost-effectiveness of this practice is unknown.

METHODS

A Markov state-transition decision analytic model accounting for varying procedural efficacy rates, complication rates, and cost estimates was developed to compare DCB angioplasty with drug-eluting stent (DES) placement in patients with bare-metal stent (BMS)-ISR. Data on procedural outcomes associated with both treatment strategies were derived from the literature, and the cost analysis was conducted from a health care payer perspective. Effectiveness was expressed as life-years gained.

RESULTS

In the base-case analysis, initial procedure costs amounted to €3,604.14 for DCB angioplasty and to €3,309.66 for DES implantation. Over a 12-month time horizon, the DCB strategy was found to be less costly (€4,130.38 vs. €5,305.30) and slightly more effective in terms of life expectancy (0.983 vs. 0.976 years) than the DES strategy. Extensive sensitivity analyses indicated that, in comparison with DES implantation, the cost advantage of the DCB strategy was robust to clinically plausible variations in the values of key model input parameters. The variables with the greatest impact on base-case results were the duration of dual antiplatelet therapy with acetylsalicylic acid and clopidogrel after DCB angioplasty, the use of generic clopidogrel, and variations in the costs associated with the DCB device.

CONCLUSION

DCB angioplasty is a cost-effective treatment option for coronary BMS-ISR. The higher initial costs of DCB are more than offset by later cost-savings, predominantly as a result of reduced medication costs.

Tacrolimus-eluting carbon-coated stents versus sirolimus-eluting stents for prevention of symptom-driven clinical end points

BACKGROUND

Coating of stents has been shown to minimize the interactions between platelets, stent surface and vascular response following stent implantation. The aim of our study was to compare the tacrolimus-eluting carbon-coated JANUS(®) stent with sirolimus-eluting CYPHER(®) stent for the prevention of symptom-driven clinical end points in a real world clinical setting.

METHODS

This prospective registry with a follow-up period of 24 months was conducted in 90 consecutive patients undergoing coronary artery stenting receiving CYPHER(®) (n = 48) or JANUS(®) (n = 42) stents. The primary end point was a composite of death from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction and target vessel revascularisation, and the secondary end point was clinically driven in-stent restenosis.

RESULTS

The primary combined endpoint occurred in 38% of patients (n = 16) in the JANUS(®) group compared to 10% (n = 5) in the CYPHER(®) group. The relative risk increase of the composite end point was therefore 63% higher in patients receiving JANUS(®) stents compared to the CYPHER(®) stents (crude HR = 1.63, 95% CI = 1.17-2.28, p = 0.004; adjusted HR = 1.79, CI = 1.26-2.55, p = 0.001). Interestingly, 75% of events in the JANUS(®) group occurred during the first 6 months after stent implantation. Similarly, the rate of clinically driven in-stent restenosis was higher in patients receiving JANUS(®) stent (n = 10, 2%) compared to the CYPHER(®) stent (n = 2, 4%). Concordantly, the relative risk for clinically driven in-stent restenosis was 81% higher in the JANUS(®) group compared to the CYPHER(®) group (crude HR = 1.81, 95% CI = 1.08-3.02, p = 0.02; adjusted HR = 2.24, CI = 1.26-3.96, p = 0.006).

CONCLUSION

The use of tacrolimus-eluting carbon coated JANUS(®) stent was associated with worse clinical outcome compared to the sirolimus-eluting CYPHER(®) stent in clinical routine use.

Coronary stenting with the sirolimus-eluting stent in patients with restenosis after intracoronary brachytherapy: results from the prospective multicentre German Cypher Stent Registry

BACKGROUND

Treatment of restenosis following intracoronary brachytherapy (ICB) is still a challenging problem. Implantation of sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) in this setting may be an option to be evaluated.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We analysed the prospective multicentre SES registry, the German Cypher Stent Registry. 7,445 patients treated with an SES during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were registered. Out of these patients, 61 (0.8%) were treated for restenosis after ICB: 56 patients with completed follow-up could be evaluated. Median age was 65 years, with 80% male patients. 48% of patients had a prior myocardial infarction and 25% had already coronary bypass surgery (CABG). Type B2 lesion was present in 40% and type C lesion in 22.4%. Event rates from SES implantation until 6.6 months follow-up were death 0%, myocardial infarction 3.6%, stroke 2.1%. Target vessel revascularization rate (TVR) was 16.4%, and major adverse cardiovascular or cerebral events (MACCE) or TVR occurred in 17.9% of patients. This TVR rate was higher compared with that of other patients treated with an SES: 8.4% (P = 0.04). During 65 months follow-up MACCE or TVR occurred in 44.6% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The treatment of lesions after ICB occurred in 0.8% out of all patients treated with an SES. Clinical event rates during early follow-up were low. However, the TVR rate was 16.4%, which was significantly higher when compared with other SES-treated patients (8.4%, P = 0.04). The treatment of restenosis after ICB with SES seems to be safe and reasonably effective; however, there might be a late catch-up phenomenon.

Reduction of neointimal hyperplasia in porcine coronary arteries by 2-deoxy-D-glucose

BACKGROUND

The drug eluting stents have been shown to play a substantial role in preventing in-stent restenosis. This study was initiated to determine the efficacy of 2-deoxy-D-glucose (2-DG) in an in-stent restenosis model for reducing neointimal hyperplasia after coronary stent placement.

METHODS

In a porcine overstretch model, three kinds of stents were investigated (n = 12 per group): bare metal stents (BMS), rapamycin-eluted stents (RES), and BMS after intracoronary short-term application of 2-DG (DGS). After 42 days histomorphometric and histopathological analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Neointimal thickness (BMS: 0.38 +/- 0.08, RES: 0.24 +/- 0.11, DGS: 0.15 +/- 0.01), area stenosis (BMS: 47.39 +/- 2.76, RES: 32.2 +/- 2.08, DGS: 29.30 +/- 2.98) did not differ after 42 days between the RES and DGS but were significantly lower as compared to BMS only. Lumen area (BMS: 3.15 +/- 1.53, RES: 4.37 +/- 1.72, DGS: 4.77 +/- 2.14) was significantly higher in the DGS group in comparison to the BMS group. The calculated injury and inflammation scores were similar and re-endothelialization was confirmed in all groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This study could demonstrate that in porcine stent model neointimal hyperplasia and re-endothelialization after application of 2-DG are comparable to those seen in RES. Thus, 2-DG might be a promising clinical application for coronary stent coating.

Azithromycin does not prevent six-month myointimal proliferation but attenuates the transient systemic inflammation occurring after coronary stenting

OBJECTIVES

Stent implantation produces a systemic increase of inflammatory markers that correlates with Chlamydophila pneumoniae infection in atherosclerotic plaque. We performed a clinical intervention study to investigate the effect of antibiotic treatment on 6-month follow-up angiographic minimal luminal diameter after stenting.

METHODS

Ninety patients were randomly assigned to oral azithromycin or placebo in a double-blinded and randomized fashion. Medication was initiated 2 weeks before a pre-scheduled stenting procedure and maintained 12 weeks thereafter. Angiographic outcomes were evaluated by a six-month follow-up angiography and laboratorial parameters were accessed by blood sampling 2 weeks before stenting, within the first 24 h after procedure and additional samples after four weeks and 6 months.

RESULTS

Minimal luminal diameter (1.76 +/- 0.56 mm Vs. 1.70 +/- 0.86 mm; P = 0.7), restenosis rate, diameter stenosis, late loss, and binary restenosis rates were comparable in placebo and azithromycin group in the 6 months follow-up. Serum levels of C-reactive protein presented a three fold significant increase in the control group one day after stenting but did not change in the azithromycin group (8.5 [3.0;16.4] Vs. 2.9 [1.7;6.6]-median [25;75 percentile] P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Azithromycin does not improve late angiographic outcomes but attenuates the elevation of C-reactive protein levels after stenting, indicating an anti-inflammatory effect.