Adenosine stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of ischemic heart disease

Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of Stress Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Known or Suspected Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Importance

The clinical utility of stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) in stable chest pain is still debated, and the low-risk period for adverse cardiovascular (CV) events after a negative test result is unknown.

Objective

To provide contemporary quantitative data synthesis of the diagnostic accuracy and prognostic value of stress CMR in stable chest pain.

Data Sources

PubMed and Embase databases, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, PROSPERO, and the ClinicalTrials.gov registry were searched for potentially relevant articles from January 1, 2000, through December 31, 2021.

Study Selection

Selected studies evaluated CMR and reported estimates of diagnostic accuracy and/or raw data of adverse CV events for participants with either positive or negative stress CMR results. Prespecified combinations of keywords related to the diagnostic accuracy and prognostic value of stress CMR were used. A total of 3144 records were evaluated for title and abstract; of those, 235 articles were included in the full-text assessment of eligibility. After exclusions, 64 studies (74 470 total patients) published from October 29, 2002, through October 19, 2021, were included.

Data Extraction and Synthesis

This systematic review and meta-analysis adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Diagnostic odds ratios (DORs), sensitivity, specificity, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), odds ratio (OR), and annualized event rate (AER) for all-cause death, CV death, and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) defined as the composite of myocardial infarction and CV death.

Results

A total of 33 diagnostic studies pooling 7814 individuals and 31 prognostic studies pooling 67 080 individuals (mean [SD] follow-up, 3.5 [2.1] years; range, 0.9-8.8 years; 381 357 person-years) were identified. Stress CMR yielded a DOR of 26.4 (95% CI, 10.6-65.9), a sensitivity of 81% (95% CI, 68%-89%), a specificity of 86% (95% CI, 75%-93%), and an AUROC of 0.84 (95% CI, 0.77-0.89) for the detection of functionally obstructive coronary artery disease. In the subgroup analysis, stress CMR yielded higher diagnostic accuracy in the setting of suspected coronary artery disease (DOR, 53.4; 95% CI, 27.7-103.0) or when using 3-T imaging (DOR, 33.2; 95% CI, 19.9-55.4). The presence of stress-inducible ischemia was associated with higher all-cause mortality (OR, 1.97; 95% CI, 1.69-2.31), CV mortality (OR, 6.40; 95% CI, 4.48-9.14), and MACEs (OR, 5.33; 95% CI, 4.04-7.04). The presence of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) was associated with higher all-cause mortality (OR, 2.22; 95% CI, 1.99-2.47), CV mortality (OR, 6.03; 95% CI, 2.76-13.13), and increased risk of MACEs (OR, 5.42; 95% CI, 3.42-8.60). After a negative test result, pooled AERs for CV death were less than 1.0%.

Conclusion and Relevance

In this study, stress CMR yielded high diagnostic accuracy and delivered robust prognostication, particularly when 3-T scanners were used. While inducible myocardial ischemia and LGE were associated with higher mortality and risk of MACEs, normal stress CMR results were associated with a lower risk of MACEs for at least 3.5 years.

Reduced global myocardial perfusion reserve in DCM and HCM patients assessed by CMR-based velocity-encoded coronary sinus flow measurements and first-pass perfusion imaging

BACKGROUND

Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) is an independent predictor of poor prognosis in patients suffering from dilative or hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (DCM/HCM). To assess CMD, quantitative myocardial first-pass perfusion (1P) cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) can be performed. Coronary sinus flow (CSF) measurements at rest and during maximal vasodilatation are an alternative and well-validated approach for the quantification of global myocardial blood flow (MBF) in CMR.

METHODS

Global myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR) was used to compare both methods, 1P and CSF. This measure reflects the ratio of myocardial blood flow during maximal coronary vasodilatation over rest. 1P-MPR and CSF-MPR were calculated in 17 HCM patients, 14 DCM patients and 16 controls, who underwent a stress CMR study to rule out obstructive coronary artery disease. All patients were examined on a 1.5-T system and the study protocol comprised both, first-pass myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) and velocity-encoded (VENC) phase-contrast imaging of CSF during rest and adenosine stress.

RESULTS

1P-MPR was significantly decreased only in HCM patients compared to controls (1.14 vs. 1.43, p = 0.045) whereas CSF-MPR was significantly reduced in both patient groups, HCM and DCM, compared to controls (2.38 and 2.07 vs. 3.18, p = 0.041 and p = 0.032). CSF-MBF at maximal stress was significantly lower in HCM and DCM patients compared to the control group (0.11 and 1.23 vs. 1.58 ml/min/g, p = 0.008 and p = 0.040). A moderate but significant correlation between CSF-MPR and 1P-MPR was observed (r = 0.39, p = 0.011). A negative correlation between LV wall thickness and CSF-MBF at rest and stress was found in the DCM group using VENC-based CSF measurements (r = - 0.64, p = 0.013 and r = - 0.69, p = 0.006)-but not using 1P-MPI. Post-proceeding analysis regarding 1P-MPR and CSF-MPR measurements required 20.1 and 6.5 min, respectively (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The presence of microvascular disease can be non-invasively and quickly detected by VENC-based CSF-MPR measurements during routine stress perfusion CMR in both HCM and DCM patients. Compared to conventional 1P-MPI, VENC-based CSF-MPR is particularly useful in DCM patients with thinned ventricular walls.

The elusive role of myocardial perfusion imaging in stable ischemic heart disease: Is ISCHEMIA the answer?

The assessment of ischemia through myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) is widely accepted as an index step in the diagnostic evaluation of stable ischemic heart disease (SIHD). Numerous observational studies have characterized the prognostic significance of ischemia extent and severity. However, the role of ischemia in directing downstream SIHD care including coronary revascularization has remained elusive as reductions in ischemic burden have not translated to improved clinical outcomes in randomized trials. Importantly, selection bias leading to the inclusion of many low risk patients with minimal ischemia have narrowed the generalizability of prior studies along with other limitations. Accordingly, an ongoing randomized controlled trial entitled ISCHEMIA (International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness with Medical and Invasive Approaches) will compare an invasive coronary revascularization strategy vs a conservative medical therapy approach among stable patients with moderate to severe ischemia. The results of ISCHEMIA may have a substantial impact on the management of SIHD and better define the role of MPI in current SIHD pathways of care.

Diagnosis and management of ischemic cardiomyopathy: Role of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging

Coronary artery disease (CAD) represents an important cause of mortality. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging evolved as an imaging modality that allows the assessment of myocardial function, perfusion, contractile reserve and extent of fibrosis in a single comprehensive exam. This review highlights the role of CMR in the differential diagnosis of acute chest pain by detecting the location of obstructive CAD or necrosis and identifying other conditions like stress cardiomyopathy or myocarditis that can present with acute chest pain. Besides, it underlines the prognostic implication of perfusion abnormalities in the setting of acute chest pain. Furthermore, the review addresses the role of CMR to detect significant CAD in patients with stable CAD. It elucidates the accuracy and clinical utility of CMR with respect to other imaging modalities like single-photon emission computed tomography and positron emission tomography. Besides, the prognostic value of CMR stress testing is discussed. Additionally, it summarizes the available CMR techniques to assess myocardial viability and describes algorithm to identify those patient who might profit from revascularization those who should be treated medically. Finally, future promising imaging techniques that will provide further insights into the fundamental disease processes in ischemic cardiomyopathy are discussed.

A gender-specific blood-based gene expression score for assessing obstructive coronary artery disease in nondiabetic patients: results of the Personalized Risk Evaluation and Diagnosis in the Coronary Tree (PREDICT) trial

BACKGROUND

Currently available noninvasive tests to risk stratify patients for obstructive coronary disease result in many unnecessary cardiac catheterizations, especially in women. We sought to compare the diagnostic accuracy of presenting symptoms, noninvasive test results, and a gene expression score (GES) in identifying obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) according to gender, using quantitative coronary angiography as the criterion standard.

METHODS

The PREDICT trial is a prospective multicenter observational study designed to develop and validate gene expression algorithms to assess obstructive CAD, defined as at least one ≥50% diameter stenosis measured by quantitative coronary angiography. Patients referred for diagnostic cardiac catheterization with suspected but previously unknown CAD were enrolled. Noninvasive myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) was available in 60% of patients. The GES, comprising gender-specific age functions and 6 gene expression terms containing 23 genes, was performed for all patients.

RESULTS

A total of 1,160 consecutive patients (57.6% men and 42.4% women) were enrolled in PREDICT. The prevalence of obstructive CAD was 46.7% in men and 22.0% in women. Chest pain symptoms were a discriminator of obstructive CAD in men (P < .001) but not in women. The positive predictive value of MPI was significantly higher in men (45%) than in women (22%). An abnormal site-read MPI was not significantly associated with obstructive or severity of CAD. The GES was significantly associated with a 2-fold increase in the odds of obstructive CAD for every 10-point increment in the GES and had a significant association with all measures of severity and burden of CAD. By multivariable analysis, GES was an independent predictor of obstructive CAD in the overall population (odds ratio [OR] 2.53, P = .001) and in the male (OR 1.99, P = .001) and female (OR 3.45, P = .001) subgroups separately, whereas MPI was not.

CONCLUSIONS

Commonly used diagnostic approaches including symptom evaluation and MPI performed less well in women than in men for identifying significant CAD. In contrast, gender-specific GES performed similarly in women and men. Gene expression score offers a reliable diagnostic approach for the assessment of nondiabetic patients and, in particular, women with suspected obstructive CAD.

Prognostic value of adenosine stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance and dobutamine stress echocardiography in patients with low-risk chest pain

Excluding obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) as the etiology of acute chest pain in patients without diagnostic electrocardiographic changes or elevated serum cardiac biomarkers is challenging. Stress testing is a valuable risk-stratifying technique reserved for the subset of these patients with low-risk chest pain who have an intermediate clinical probability of obstructive CAD. Given the risks of radiation inherent to nuclear and computed tomography imaging, both adenosine stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance (AS-CMR) imaging and dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) are attractive alternative stress modalities. An essential characteristic of stress modalities is their negative prognostic value; as one must exclude clinically-relevant CAD such that patients can be discharged safely. Therefore, the aim of this study was to validate a favorable negative prognostic value for both AS-CMR and DSE in patients presenting with low-risk acute chest pain. This retrospective study included 255 patients with low-risk acute chest pain and no prior history of CAD presenting to the emergency department at our institution, with 89 patients evaluated by AS-CMR and 166 by DSE. Median follow-up was 292 days, and consisted of medical record review. The primary end-point was the composite of cardiac death, nonfatal acute myocardial infarction, obstructive CAD on invasive coronary angiography (ICA) or recurrent chest pain requiring hospital admission. Test characteristics such as sensitivity and specificity could not be evaluated as patients were not routinely evaluated with ICA. All patients completed the stress protocol without adverse events during testing. 82/89 patients (92.1%) and 164/166 patients (98.8%) had negative AS-CMR and DSE studies, respectively. Both AS-CMR and DSE had excellent negative prognostic values for the primary endpoint, 100 and 99%, respectively. Both AS-CMR and DSE are effective stress modalities for excluding clinically significant coronary artery disease in patients presenting acute low-risk chest pain. Patients without findings to suggest ischemia have an excellent intermediate-term prognosis.

Influence of small caliber coronary arteries on the diagnostic accuracy of adenosine stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging

Background and aims

Positive predictive value (PPV) of adenosine stress cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) for coronary artery disease (CAD) is unsatisfactory. We investigated the impact of coronary caliber variability on this limitation in CMR performance.

Methods and results

206 consecutive patients with myocardial ischemia during CMR and subsequent coronary angiography (CA) were studied. Patients were examined in a 1.5-T scanner. After adenosine infusion, myocardial first-pass sequence using gadolinium-based contrast agent was performed and compared with rest perfusion. CAD was invasively confirmed in 165 [true positive (TP); PPV, 80.1%] and ruled out in 41 patients [false positive (FP)]. TP and FP were comparable for pre-test risk and CMR findings. We found a significant association between FP CMR and the presence of a small caliber coronary vessel (proximal diameter < one standard deviation below the mean) supplying the area of ischemia (chi-square 42.6, p < 0.0001). A small caliber artery ipsilateral to the ischemic region was a predictive parameter for FP versus TP discrimination (ROC area, 0.84 ± 0.04 vs. 0.59 ± 0.05; p < 0.0001). Further increment in diagnostic accuracy was achieved by including proximal ipsilateral/contralateral coronary diameter ratios (ROC area, 0.90 ± 0.03; p < 0.03).

Conclusions

Small caliber coronary arteries found as normal variations in right-dominant or left-dominant circulation may account for hypoperfusion in the absence of coronary stenosis and thus may cause FP adenosine stress CMR results. Non-invasive assessment of proximal coronary diameters in the vessel supplying the area of ischemia could reduce FP rates, raise the diagnostic accuracy of CMR for CAD and minimize subsequent superfluous CA.

Visualization of transcoronary ablation of septal hypertrophy in patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy: a comparison between cardiac MRI, invasive measurements and echocardiography

Objective

Hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM) is treated by surgical myectomy or transcoronary ablation of septal hypertrophy (TASH). The aim of this study was to visualize the feasibility, success and short-term results of TASH on the basis of cardiac MRI (CMR) in comparison with cardiac catheterization and echocardiography.

Methods

In this in vivo study, nine patients with HOCM were treated with TASH. Patients were evaluated by transthoracic echocardiography, invasive cardiac angiography and CMR. Follow-up examinations were carried out after 1, 3 and 12 months. MR imaging was performed on a 1.5-T scanner. All images were processed using the semiautomatic Argus software and were evaluated by an attending thoracic radiologist and cardiologist.

Results

The echocardiographic pressure gradient (at rest) was 69.3 ± 15.3 mmHg before and 22.1 ± 5.7 mmHg after TASH (P < 0.01, n = 9). The flux acceleration over the aortic valve examined (V_max) was 5.1 ± 0.6 m/s before and 3.4 ± 0.3 m/s after the TASH procedure (P < 0.05). Also, there was a decrease of septum thickness from 22.0 ± 1.2 to 20.2 ± 1.0 mm (P < 0.05) after 6 ± 3 weeks. The invasively assessed pressure gradient at rest was reduced from 63.7 ± 15.2 to 21.2 ± 11.1 mmHg (P < 0.01) and the post-extrasystolic gradient was reduced from 138.9 ± 12.7 to 45.6 ± 16.5 mmHg (P < 0.01). All differences as well as the quantity of injected ethanol were plotted against the size or amount of scar tissue as assessed in the MRI. There was a statistically significant correlation between the post-extrasystolic gradient decrease and the amount of scar tissue (P = 0.03, r² = 0.5). In addition, the correlation between the quantity of ethanol and scar tissue area was highly significant (P < 0.01, r² = 0.6), whereas the values for the gradient deviation (P = 0.10, r² = 0.34), ΔV_max (P = 0.12, r² = 0.31), as well as the gradient at rest (P = 0.27, r² = 0.17) were not significant.

Conclusion

TASH was consistently effective in reducing the gradient in all patients with HOCM. In contrast to the variables investigated by echocardiography, the invasively measured post-extrasystolic gradient correlated much better with the amount of scar tissue as assessed by CMR. We conclude that the optimal modality to visualize the TASH effect seems to be a combination of CMR and the invasive identification of the post-extrasystolic gradient.

Prognostic value of adenosine stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients with low-risk chest pain

BACKGROUND

Approximately 5% of patients with an acute coronary syndrome are discharged from the emergency room with an erroneous diagnosis of non-cardiac chest pain. Highly accurate non-invasive stress imaging is valuable for assessment of low-risk chest pain patients to prevent these errors. Adenosine stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance (AS-CMR) is an imaging modality with increasing application. The goal of this study was to evaluate the negative prognostic value of AS-CMR among low-risk acute chest pain patients.

METHODS

We studied 103 patients, mean 56.7 + or - 12.3 years of age, with chest pain and no electrocardiographic evidence of ischemia and negative cardiac biomarkers of necrosis, who were admitted to the Cardiac Decision Unit of our institution. All patients underwent AS-CMR. A negative AS-CMR was defined as absence of all the following: regional wall motion abnormalities at rest; perfusion defects during stress (adenosine) and rest; and myocardial scar on late gadolinium enhancement images. The patients were followed for a mean of 277 (range 161-462) days. The primary end point was defined as the combination of cardiac death, nonfatal acute myocardial infarction, re-hospitalization for chest pain, obstructive coronary artery disease (>50% coronary stenosis on invasive angiography) and coronary revascularization.

RESULTS

In 14 patients (13.6%), AS-CMR was positive. The remaining 89 patients (86.4%), who had negative AS-CMR, were discharged. No patient with negative AS-CMR reached the primary end-point during follow-up. The negative predictive value of AS-CMR was 100%.

CONCLUSION

AS-CMR holds promise as a useful tool to rule out significant coronary artery disease in patients with low-risk chest pain. Patients with negative AS-CMR have an excellent short and mid-term prognosis.

High resolution myocardial magnetic resonance stress perfusion imaging at 3 T using a 1 M contrast agent

OBJECTIVE

Stress perfusion magnetic resonance imaging (MSPMRI) is an established technique for the assessment of myocardial perfusion. Shortcomings at 1.5 T are low signal to noise ratio (SNR) and contrast to noise ratio (CNR). One approach to overcome these shortcomings is to increase field strength and contrast concentration. The aim of our study was to investigate the diagnostic capability of high resolution MSPMRI at 3-T field strength using a 1 M contrast agent.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Fifty-seven patients (62.3 +/- 11.0 years) with symptoms of coronary artery disease (CAD) were examined at 3 T. MMRSPI was assessed using a 2D saturation recovery gradient echo (SR GRE) sequence in short axis orientation (TR 1.9 ms, TE 1.0 ms, flip 12 degrees , 0.1 mmol gadobutrol/kg body weight (bw), 140 microg adenosine/kg bw/min). Perfusion images were assessed visually and semiquantitatively (upslope, peak signal intensity (SI), and myocardial perfusion reserve index (MPRI)). Standard of reference was invasive coronary angiography.

RESULTS

Stress-induced hypoperfusion was found in 43 patients. Sensitivity for hemodynamically relevant CAD (stenoses greater than 70%) was 95%/98%, specificity 80%/87%, diagnostic accuracy 91%/95% (reader 1/reader 2). The MPRI was significantly lower in hypoperfused myocardium (1.3 +/- 0.2) compared with normal myocardium (2.6 +/- 0.7).

CONCLUSION

High resolution MMRSPI at 3 T using 1 M contrast agent under daily routine conditions provides reliable detection of stress-induced myocardial hypoperfusion with higher diagnostic accuracy than 1.5-T conditions.

Diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance first pass perfusion imaging is equally potent in female compared to male patients with coronary artery disease

BACKGROUND

Noninvasive diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD) in women is crucial because of a lower prevalence of CAD in premenopausal women, different cardiac risk profile and pattern of CAD, lower exercise tolerance and more atypical symptoms compared to men. Therefore, we tested the diagnostic power of cardiac magnetic resonance first pass perfusion imaging (CMR-FPPI) for the diagnosis of significant coronary stenoses in females versus males.

METHODS AND RESULTS

256 consecutive patients, 77 females and 179 males with atypical or typical chest pain and intermediate risk of CAD were studied by coronary angiography and CMR-FPPI (1.5T Intera CV). A three-slice, short-axis perfusion scan with a saturation prepulse was performed during infusion of adenosine and at rest followed by late enhancement imaging for myocardial scar. Gadolinium-DTPA was administered at 0.1 mmol/kg body weight. Perfusion images were visually analysed, coronary stenoses by quantitative coronary angiography. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of CMR-FPPI for detection of a significant coronary artery stenosis (> or = 50% luminal narrowing) in the entire group were 91.3, 81.7 and 88.6%, the corresponding values for females were 90.9, 90.6 and 90.8% and for males 91.4, 74.4 and 87.7%, and in the subgroup of females with suspected primary CAD 83.3, 96.0 and 93.6%, and for suspected progression 92.1, 71.4 and 88.9%.

CONCLUSION

Diagnostic accuracy of CMR-FPPI is very high in women with intermediate risk of CAD and comparable or in part superior to results in males. With the advantage of the absence of radiation exposure and high spatial and temporal resolution, CMR-FPPI has the potential to become the preferred imaging test to select women for coronary angiography.