Optimizing of thienopyridine therapy by multiple electrode platelet aggregometry in clopidogrel low responders undergoing PCI

Prevalence of poor biological response to clopidogrel

The existence of poor biological response to clopidogrel has been shown in some patients. Despite the increasing number of studies, this phenomenon remains difficult to quantify. We performed a systematic review to estimate the prevalence of poor biological response to clopidogrel and investigate the factors known to modulate this. An exhaustive search was performed. Altogether 171 publications were identified, providing data for a total of 45,664 subjects. The estimated prevalence of poor biological response to clopidogrel ranged from 15.9% to 49.5% according to the platelet function assay employed. The assays most frequently used were light transmittance aggregometry (LTA), the vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) assay and the Verify -now® assay. For all these assays, higher cut-off values were associated with a lower prevalence of poor biological response to clopidogrel. However, when choosing a fixed cut-off point for each assay, the prevalence of poor biological response to clopidogrel was highly variable suggesting that other factors could modulate poor biological response to clopidogrel. Finally, none of the studied factors could apparently explain the variability of poor biological response to clopidogrel. This meta-analysis shows that the prevalence of poor biological response depends on the assay employed, the cut-off value and on various unidentified additional factors.

Pneumatic tube transport affects platelet function measured by multiplate electrode aggregometry

Multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA) is used to measure platelet function. Pneumatic tube transport systems (PTS) for delivery of patient samples to a central laboratory are often used to reduce turnaround time for vital analyses. We evaluated the effects of PTS transport on platelet function as measured by MEA. Duplicate samples were collected from 58 individuals. One sample was sent using PTS and the other was carried by personnel to the lab. Platelet function was measured by means of a Multiplate® analyzer using the ADP test, ASPI test, COL test, RISTO test and TRAP test. Samples transported using PTS showed a reduction of AUC-values of up to a 100% of the average as compared to samples carried by personnel and a majority showed reductions of AUC-values greater than 20% of the average. Bias±95% limits of agreement for the ADP test were 26±56% of the average. Bias±95% limits of agreement for the ASPI test were 16±58% of the average. Bias±95% limits of agreement for the COL test were 20±54% of the average. Bias±95% limits of agreement for the RISTO were 14±79% of the average. Bias±95% limits of agreement for the TRAP test were 19±45% of the average. We conclude that PTS transport affect platelet activity as measured by MEA. We advise against clinical decisions regarding platelet function on the basis of samples sent by PTS in our hospital settings.

Frequency of heparin/platelet factor 4-dependent platelet antibodies in patients undergoing angioplasty and stenting for cardiovascular disease and their role for on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity

BACKGROUND

The frequency of heparin-induced platelet antibodies (H/PF4 antibodies) following heparin exposure during percutaneous intervention with stent implantation is unknown. These antibodies may activate platelets and therefore contribute to high on-clopidogrel residual platelet reactivity (HRPR).

METHODS

We screened 288 patients after angioplasty and stenting for H/PF4 antibodies by an IgG/A/M ELISA. The 44 (15.3%) positive samples were further evaluated for IgG only antibodies, by the particle gel immunoassay (PaGIA), the heparin induced platelet activation assay (HIPA) and MEA. Further, we determined on-treatment platelet reactivity by multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA) in these patients. In vivo platelet activation was assessed by P-selectin expression.

RESULTS

The prevalence of H/PF4 antibodies in the total patients' cohort was 15.3% (95% CI 11.3-20%) by the IgG/A/M ELISA, 9.4% (95% CI 6.3-13.4%) by the IgG ELISA, 11.5% (95% CI 8-15.7%) by PaGIA, 14.2% (95% CI 10.4-18.8%) by MEA, and 2.4% (95% CI 1-4.9%) by HIPA. On-treatment platelet reactivity was similar between patients without and with H/PF4 antibodies [39 AU (6-110 AU) vs. 41 AU (7-91 AU); P = 0.85]. HRPR was seen in 105 patients (37.5%), and occurred to a similar extent in patients without and with H/PF4 antibodies in all test systems (all P > 0.2). Further, there was no difference of the ELISA optical densities using the IgG/A/M or the IgG only ELISA between patients without or with HRPR (all P > 0.3). There was no significant difference of P-selectin expression between patients without or with H/PF4 antibodies (P = 0.97). Noteworthy, none of the patients who developed H/PF4 antibodies had heparin-induced thrombocytopenia or a thromboembolic event.

CONCLUSION

H/PF4 antibodies are not rare in patients undergoing angioplasty and stenting. However, these antibodies are not associated with the occurrence of HRPR.