Everolimus-eluting stents for treatment of chronic total coronary occlusions

Safety of percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute ischemic stroke/transient ischemic attack and acute coronary syndrome

BACKGROUND

Cardiac events in patients with acute stroke are frequent. Urgent PCI in myocardial infarction is crucial to improve outcome. However, the situation is complex as intracranial hemorrhage is a frequent complication of stroke but antithrombotic medication is indispensable during and after PCI. Therefore in this study, we aimed to investigate the safety of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients hospitalized with acute ischemic stroke and concomitant acute coronary syndrome (ACS).

METHODS AND RESULTS

In a single-center, case-series study we investigated 80 patients hospitalized with acute stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA) and concomitant ACS undergoing coronary angiography. Patients with subsequent PCI were compared to patients with medical treatment alone. The primary end point was the composite of death, recurrent MI, coronary re-intervention, recurrent stroke or bleeding during 1-year follow-up. The secondary end point consisted of the components of the primary end point. Age, gender and cardiovascular risk factors did not differ between groups. However, severity of initial stroke and coronary artery disease was higher in the PCI group. Accordingly, antiplatelet medication with aspirin and clopidogrel was prescribed more frequently in the PCI group. Nevertheless, during 1-year follow-up, the primary end point did not differ between groups [38 vs. 50 %, odds ratio (OR) 1.7, CI 0.69-4.07, P = 0.23]. Intracranial hemorrhage was even numerically lower in patients undergoing PCI (5 vs. 3 %, OR 0.4, CI 0.04-5.6, P = 0.46).

CONCLUSIONS

The primary and secondary end points were not enhanced in patients undergoing PCI. Therefore PCI is safe in patients with stroke/TIA and concomitant ACS.

Bifurcation treatment with novel, highly flexible drug-eluting coronary stents in all-comers: 2-year outcome in patients of the DUTCH PEERS trial

Background

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in bifurcated lesions with second-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) was associated with increased myocardial infarction (MI) rates. Flexible stent designs that accommodate well to vessel tapering may be of benefit in challenging anatomies such as bifurcated target lesions, but so far data are scarce.

Methods

We analyzed the 2-year follow-up data of the DUTCH PEERS (TWENTE II) trial, which randomized 1811 all-comer patients to PCI with newer generation resolute integrity zotarolimus-eluting (Medtronic) or promus element everolimus-eluting stents (Boston Scientific). In bifurcated lesions, provisional stenting was generally performed. Target vessel failure is a composite endpoint, consisting of cardiac death, target vessel MI, or target vessel revascularization.

Results

Patients with at least one bifurcated lesion (n = 465, 25.7 %) versus patients with non-bifurcated target lesions only (n = 1346, 74.3 %) showed similar rates of clinical endpoints including target vessel failure (9.2 versus 7.9 %, p = 0.36) and definite stent thrombosis (0.4 versus 1.0 %, p = 0.38). Target vessel MI was more common in patients with bifurcated lesions (3.4 versus 1.6 %, p = 0.02); but after multivariate analysis with propensity score adjustment, bifurcation treatment was found not to be an independent predictor of target vessel MI (HR 1.40, 95 % CI 0.71–2.76; p = 0.34). Among patients with bifurcated lesions, DES type and side-branch size did not affect outcome, but periprocedural MI occurred more often after two-stent approaches (9.0 versus 2.1 %; p = 0.002).

Conclusion

All-comer patients treated for bifurcated and non-bifurcated target lesions showed similar and low rates of clinical endpoints, suggesting that the DES used are efficacious and safe for treating bifurcated target lesions.

Outcomes and computed tomography scan follow-up of bioresorbable vascular scaffold for the percutaneous treatment of chronic total coronary artery occlusion

Everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) implantation in chronic total occlusion (CTO) could provide theoretical advantages at follow-up compared with metallic stents. This study aimed to assess the feasibility of BVS use for the percutaneous treatment of CTO by analyzing clinical outcomes and patency at midterm follow-up. From February 2013 to June 2014, 42 patients with 46 CTOs were treated by BVS implantation. Once the guidewire reached the distal lumen, all the occluded segments were predilated. Postdilation was performed in all patients. A multislice computed tomography was scheduled for all patients at 6 months. The mean age was 58 ± 9 years, 41 (98%) were men and 14 (33%) diabetic. The target vessel was predominantly the left anterior descending artery (22, 48%). According to the Japanese-CTO score, 21 CTOs (46%) were difficult or very difficult. Most cases were treated with an anterograde strategy (34 lesions, 74%). A hybrid procedure with a drug-eluting stent at the distal segment was the applied treatment in 7 CTOs (15%). The mean scaffold length was 43 ± 21 mm. Technical success was achieved in 45 lesions (98%), and 1 patient (2.4%) presented a non-Q periprocedural myocardial infarction. Re-evaluation was obtained in all patients at 6 ± 1 months. Two re-occlusions and a focal restenosis were identified. After 13 ± 5 months of follow-up, there were 2 repeat revascularizations (4.8%). Neither death nor myocardial infarction was documented. In conclusion, BVS for CTO seems to be an interesting strategy with a high rate of technical success and low rate of cardiac events at midterm follow-up in selected patients.

Drug-eluting stent thrombosis in the treatment of chronic total coronary occlusions: incidence, presentation and related factors. Data from the CIBELES trial

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to analyze the incidence of drug-eluting stent thrombosis (sirolimus or everolimus) in patients with chronic total coronary occlusions (CTO) and to determine its clinical implications and related factors.

METHODS

Data from the 12-month follow-up of the 207 patients included in the CIBELES trial with CTO were analyzed.

RESULTS

Stent thrombosis occurred in three patients, two definite and one probable (overall thrombosis rate: 1.4%). However, there were no cases of death or Q-wave myocardial infarction. In univariate analysis, patients with a higher incidence of stent thrombosis were those in whom the target vessel was the left anterior descending, who had single-vessel disease, were assigned to treatment with sirolimus-eluting stents, and those with smaller minimum luminal diameter immediately after the procedure. In multivariate analysis, the only independent predictor of stent thrombosis was minimal luminal diameter immediately after the procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

The rate of drug-eluting stent thrombosis in patients with CTO is relatively low (1.4%). The only independent predictor of stent thrombosis in this context was minimal luminal diameter after the procedure and the clinical presentation was in all cases relatively benign.

Procedural and follow-up outcomes among patients undergoing successful recanalisation of coronary chronic total occlusions using biolimus drug-eluting stents

This study aimed at evaluating the outcome of Biolimus eluting stent (BES) implantation in the treatment of chronic total coronary occlusions (CTO). We identified patients who underwent successful angioplasty for a CTO lesion with ≥1 BES between June 2008 and March 2012. All patients were followed up for major adverse cardiac events (MACE), which comprised death, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), cerebrovascular accident, target vessel revascularization (TVR), target lesion revascularization (TLR) and stent thrombosis. 125 patients underwent successful CTO angioplasty with ≥1 Biolimus-eluting stents. Mean age was 63.8 ± 12.0 years, and 82.4 % were males. Lesion location was right coronary artery (n = 80, 64 %), left anterior descending artery (n = 35, 28 %) and left circumflex artery (n = 10, 8 %). During follow-up of 579 ± 293 days, all cause mortality was n = 8 (6.4 %) patients, non-fatal MI was n = 3 (2.4 %), TVR was n = 3 (2.4 %) and TLR was n = 1 (0.8 %). Overall MACE was, therefore, n = 15 (12 %). BES is safe and effective in treatment of CTO lesions, with a low rate of major adverse cardiovascular events during follow-up.

Everolimus-eluting stents compared with paclitaxel-eluting stents for treatment of coronary in-stent restenoses

BACKGROUND

Everolimus-eluting stent (EES) implantation was superior to paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES) implantation for treatment of de-novo coronary artery disease. We evaluated the outcome of EES compared with PES for treatment of restenosis in bare-metal and drug-eluting stents (DES).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

In a prospective observational study patients with in-stent restenosis (ISR) were treated with EES (N=91) or PES (N=107). Dual antiplatelet therapy was given for 6 months. Patients were scheduled for 6 months angiographic follow-up and 24 months clinical follow-up. Primary outcome measure was the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) defined as a composite of cardiac death, any myocardial infarction and target lesion revascularization (TLR).

RESULTS

Baseline data showed some differences between groups including frequency of DES restenosis, length of stented segment and reference vessel diameter. For EES versus PES occurrence of MACE (18.7% vs. 15.0%, p=0.48) and need for TLR did not differ (13.2% vs. 9.3%, p=0.39). In-stent late loss was similar with 0.20±0.39 mm for EES and 0.18±0.31mm for PES (p=0.34). Binary angiographic restenosis rate for the total segment was 18.0% and 16.7% (p=0.85), respectively. In multivariable analysis the stented length (p=0.014), minimal lumen diameter post stenting (p<0.01) and repeated restenosis (p<0.001) were risk factors for a higher late loss but not type of DES or presence of diabetes mellitus.

CONCLUSIONS

In this observational registry treatment of DES and BMS restenosis with EES versus PES implantation resulted in similar clinical and angiographic outcome.

First in vitro and in vivo results of an anti-human CD133-antibody coated coronary stent in the porcine model

BACKGROUND

Drug-eluting stents successfully reduce restenosis at the cost of delayed re-endothelialization. A novel concept to enhance re-endothelialization is the use of antibody-coated stents which capture circulating progenitor cells. A CD34-positive-cell-capturing stent was recently developed with conflicting clinical results. CD133 is a glycoprotein expressed on circulating hematopoietic and putative endothelial-regenerating cells and may be superior to CD34.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of our study was to develop a CD133-cell-capturing bare-metal stent and investigate feasibility, safety, and efficacy of CD133-stents in terms of re-endothelialization and neointima inhibition.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Anti-human CD133-antibodies were covalently attached to bare-metal stents. In vitro, binding capacity of CD133-stents was studied, revealing a significantly higher affinity of human CD133-positive cells to CD133-stents compared with mononuclear cells (MNCs). In vivo, 15 landrace pigs received BMS and CD133-stents in either RCX or LAD (n = 30 stents). Re-endothelialization was examined on day 1 (n = 4), 3 (n = 4) and day 7 (n = 4) using scanning electron microscopy. In histology, injury and inflammatory scores, as well as diameter restenosis were evaluated after day 7 (n = 3), 14 (n = 4), and 28 (n = 2). Overall no reduction in re-endothelialization, diameter stenosis or inflammatory score was seen with CD133-stents.

CONCLUSION

Stent coating with anti-human CD133-antibodies was successfully achieved with effective binding of CD133-positive cells. However, in vivo, no difference in re-endothelialization or neointima formation was evident with the use of CD133-stents compared with BMS. The low number of circulating CD133-positive cells and an increase in unspecific binding of MNCs over time may account for the observed lack of efficacy.

A randomized multicenter comparison of hybrid sirolimus-eluting stents with bioresorbable polymer versus everolimus-eluting stents with durable polymer in total coronary occlusion: rationale and design of the Primary Stenting of Occluded Native Coronary Arteries IV study

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous recanalization of total coronary occlusion (TCO) was historically hampered by high rates of restenosis and reocclusions. The PRISON II trial demonstrated a significant restenosis reduction in patients treated with sirolimus-eluting stents compared with bare metal stents for TCO. Similar reductions in restenosis were observed with the second-generation zotarolimus-eluting stent and everolimus-eluting stent. Despite favorable anti-restenotic efficacy, safety concerns evolved after identifying an increased rate of very late stent thrombosis (VLST) with drug-eluting stents (DES) for the treatment of TCO. Late malapposition caused by hypersensitivity reactions and chronic inflammation was suggested as a probable cause of these VLST. New DES with bioresorbable polymer coatings were developed to address these safety concerns. No randomized trials have evaluated the efficacy and safety of the new-generation DES with bioresorbable polymers in patients treated for TCO.

METHODS/DESIGN

The prospective, randomized, single-blinded, multicenter, non-inferiority PRISON IV trial was designed to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and angiographic outcome of hybrid sirolimus-eluting stents with bioresorbable polymers (Orsiro; Biotronik, Berlin, Germany) compared with everolimus-eluting stents with durable polymers (Xience Prime/Xpedition; Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA, USA) in patients with successfully recanalized TCOs. In total, 330 patients have been randomly allocated to each treatment arm. Patients are eligible with estimated duration of TCO ≥4 weeks with evidence of ischemia in the supply area of the TCO. The primary endpoint is in-segment late luminal loss at 9-month follow-up angiography. Secondary angiographic endpoints include in-stent late luminal loss, minimal luminal diameter, percentage of diameter stenosis, in-stent and in-segment binary restenosis and reocclusions at 9-month follow-up. Additionally, optical coherence tomography is performed in the first 60 randomized patients at 9 months to assess neointima thickness, percentage of neointima coverage, and stent strut malapposition and coverage. Personnel blinded to the allocated treatment will review all angiographic and optical coherence assessments. Secondary clinical endpoints include major adverse cardiac events, clinically driven target vessel revascularization, target vessel failure and stent thrombosis to 5-year clinical follow-up. An independent clinical event committee blinded to the allocated treatment will review all clinical events.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinical Trials.gov: NCT01516723. Patient recruitment started in February 2012.

Paclitaxel-coated balloon with bare-metal stenting in patients with chronic total occlusions in native coronary arteries

OBJECTIVES

We sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of paclitaxel-coated balloon plus bare-metal stenting (BMS) in chronic total occlusions (CTOs).

BACKGROUND

Drug-eluting stent implantation after recanalization of CTOs is limited by the occurrence of restenosis and risk for late stent thromboses.

METHODS

In this prospective, bicenter trial we treated 48 patients after successful chronic total occlusion (CTO) recanalization in a native coronary artery with paclitaxel-coated balloon plus BMS. Patients were matched according to stent length, reference diameter, and diabetes mellitus with 48 patients treated with Taxus stent implantation. Dual antiplatelet therapy was prescribed for 6 months. Angiographic (clinical) follow-up was obtained after 6 (12) months. Primary endpoint was in-stent late lumen loss.

RESULTS

There was no difference in patient baseline characteristics or procedural results. Stent length was 59.7 ± 32.4 mm (16-151 mm) for paclitaxel-coated balloon plus BMS versus 56.2 ± 25.9 mm (16-132 mm) for Taxus stent. Late loss was statistically not different within the stent with 0.64 ± 0.69 mm versus 0.43 ± 0.64 mm (difference 0.20 mm, 95% confidence interval -0.07 to 0.47, P = 0.14) and at the occlusion site with 0.33 ± 0.69 mm versus 0.26 ± 0.70 mm, respectively. Restenosis rate was 27.7% compared with 20.8% (P = 0.44) and the combined clinical endpoint (cardiac death, myocardial infarction attributed to the target vessel, target lesion revascularization) was 14.6% versus 18.8% (P = 0.58), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, for patients with complex CTOs in native coronary arteries the use of paclitaxel-coated balloon after bare-metal stenting was associated with similar clinical results and a nonsignificantly higher in-stent late loss compared with a matched population with paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation.

A randomized, multicenter, single-blinded trial comparing paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty with plain balloon angioplasty in drug-eluting stent restenosis: the PEPCAD-DES study

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to define the impact of paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty for treatment of drug-eluting stent restenosis compared with uncoated balloon angioplasty alone.

BACKGROUND

Drug-coated balloon angioplasty is associated with favorable results for treatment of bare-metal stent restenosis.

METHODS

In this prospective, single-blind, multicenter, randomized trial, the authors randomly assigned 110 patients with drug-eluting stent restenoses located in a native coronary artery to paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty or uncoated balloon angioplasty. Dual antiplatelet therapy was prescribed for 6 months. Angiographic follow-up was scheduled at 6 months. The primary endpoint was late lumen loss. The secondary clinical endpoint was a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction attributed to the target vessel, or target lesion revascularization.

RESULTS

There was no difference in patient baseline characteristics or procedural results. Angiographic follow-up rate was 91%. Treatment with paclitaxel-coated balloon was superior to balloon angioplasty alone with a late loss of 0.43 ± 0.61 mm versus 1.03 ± 0.77 mm (p < 0.001), respectively. Restenosis rate was significantly reduced from 58.1% to 17.2% (p < 0.001), and the composite clinical endpoint was significantly reduced from 50.0% to 16.7% (p < 0.001), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty is superior to balloon angioplasty alone for treatment of drug-eluting stent restenosis. (PEPCAD DES-Treatment of DES-In-Stent Restenosis With SeQuent® Please Paclitaxel Eluting PTCA Catheter [PEPCAD-DES]; NCT00998439).