Transcatheter mitral valve repair with the MitraClip(®) can be performed without general anesthesia and without conscious sedation

Dexmedetomidine Sedation Combined With Remifentanil in MitraClip Procedures is Feasible and Improves Hemodynamics

OBJECTIVES

The objective of the study was to compare the overall feasibility, respiratory and hemodynamic stability, as well as process times of a dexmedetomidine-based sedative regimen compared with general anesthesia among patients undergoing MitraClip procedures.

DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

A single tertiary care university center.

PARTICIPANTS

The study included 79 patients.

INTERVENTIONS

Dexmedetomidine sedation versus general anesthesia.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Seventy-nine MitraClip procedures in dexmedetomidine/remifentanil conscious sedation (DCS, n = 26) or general anesthesia (GA, n = 53), performed between 2018 and 2020 at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, were analyzed retrospectively. Patients' median age was 81 years in both groups without differences in preinterventional EuroScore I (DCS 6 [5; 8], GA 7 [6; 8]) or systolic function (left ventricular ejection fraction: DCS 50% [32; 60] v. GA 50% [36; 60]; tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion: DCS 19 mm [16; 22] v GA 19 mm [15; 22]). During MitraClip procedures, respiratory parameters revealed no differences between groups, whereas patients under DCS showed higher mean arterial pressures (DCS 64 mmHg [59; 74] v GA 58 mmHg [53; 66]) and needed less norepinephrine (DCS 0.0µg/kg/min [0.0; 0.2] v GA 0.08 µg/kg/min [0.05; 0.15]). Emergence from both anesthesia regimens to readiness for intensive care unit transfer was faster in DCS (8 min [4; 18] v GA 16 min [11; 23]); however, total process time was comparable between groups (DCS 128 min [104; 155] v GA 142 min [117; 190]). Two patients required a switch from DCS to GA due to oral bleeding or prolonged procedure time. Both were excluded from the analysis. There was no switch to open surgery and no differences in postoperative complications between DCS and GA.

CONCLUSION

Dexmedetomidine/remifentanil sedation appears to be feasible and a safe option for MitraClip procedures, and provides better hemodynamic stability with faster emergence times compared with general anesthesia.

Safety of transoesophageal echocardiography during structural heart disease interventions under procedural sedation: a single-centre study

AIMS

The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of transoesophageal echocardiography (TOE)-related adverse events (AEs) during structural heart disease (SHD) interventions and to identify potential risk factors.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We retrospectively analysed 898 consecutive patients undergoing TOE-guided SHD interventions under procedural sedation. TOE-related AEs were classified as bleeding complications, mechanical lesions, conversion to general anaesthesia with intubation, and the occurrence of pneumonia. A follow-up was conducted up to 3 months after the intervention. TOE-related AEs were observed in 5.3% of the patients (n = 48). The highest rate of AEs was observed in the percutaneous mitral valve repair (PMVR) group with 8.2% (n = 32), whereas 4.8% (n = 11) of the patients in the left atrial appendage group and 1.8% (n = 5) in the patent foramen ovale/atrial septal defect group developed a TOE-related AE (P = 0.001). The most frequent AE was pneumonia with an incidence of 2.6% (n = 26) in the total cohort. Bleeding events occurred in 1.8% (n = 16) of the patients, mostly in the PMVR group with 2.1% (n = 8). In the multivariate regression analysis, we found a lower haemoglobin {odds ratio (OR) [95% confidence interval (CI)]: 8.82 (0.68-0.98) P = 0.025} and an obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome (OSAS) [OR (95% CI): 2.51 (1.08-5.84) P = 0.033] to be associated with AE. Furthermore, AEs were related to procedural time [OR (95% CI): 1.01 (1.0-1.01) P = 0.056] and oral anticoagulation [OR (95% CI): 1.97 (0.9-4.3) P = 0.076] with borderline significance in the multivariate regression analysis. No persistent damages were observed.

CONCLUSION

TOE-related AEs during SHD interventions are clinically relevant. It was highest in patients undergoing PMVR. A lower baseline haemoglobin level and an OSAS were found to be associated with the occurrence of a TOE-related AE.

Percutaneous mitral valve repair in severe secondary mitral regurgitation: Analysis of index hospitalization and economic evaluation based on the MITRA-FR trial

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous mitral valve repair (pMVR) is reimbursed in France for severe secondary mitral regurgitation (SMR), but French data regarding the hospitalization index stay are lacking.

AIMS

Our objectives were to describe the index hospitalization stay and to evaluate the cost of hospital stay for pMVR used in SMR.

METHODS

A secondary evaluation based on patients who were randomized to the intervention group of the MITRA-FR study was undertaken. The economic evaluation was conducted according to the French hospital perspective. Medical resource use was estimated using specific data collected from patients enrolled in the MITRA-FR study and non-specific data from national statistics.

RESULTS

The population was represented by 144 patients who underwent pMVR at 33 French centres. There was a mean±standard deviation of 7.9±1.5 hospital staff during procedures. The mean procedure duration was 154±68 minutes and increased with the number of implanted clips. Median total length of stay was 8 days. The occurrence of a serious adverse event was not associated with an increased risk of admission to the critical care unit, but was associated with an increased length of stay. The mean total cost was 28,025±3424€, which includes 21,547€ for the cost of medical devices used during pMVR and 6478±3424€ for other costs.

CONCLUSION

The cost of pMVR is substantial for patients with SMR, which advocates for further efforts to identify the patients with SMR who are likely to derive a clear clinical benefit from the procedure.

Re-do MitraClip in patients with functional mitral valve regurgitation and advanced heart failure

Aim

Percutaneous mitral valve repair (PMVR) via MitraClip implantation is a therapeutic option for severe mitral regurgitation (MR) in advanced stages of heart failure (HF). However, progressive left ventricular dilation in these patients may lead to recurrent MR after PMVR and consequent re‐do MitraClip implantation. Here, we describe the characteristics and outcomes of this clinical scenario.

Methods and results

Patients with systolic HF and functional MR undergoing a re‐do MitraClip procedure were retrospectively analysed. Inclusion criteria were age ≥18 years, technical, device and procedural success at first MitraClip procedure, functional MR and systolic HF with an ejection fraction (EF) of <45%. Seventeen out of 684 patients undergoing PMVR with the MitraClip device at our institution between September 2009 and July 2019 were included. All patients displayed advanced HF with an EF of 20% (±9.9) and highly elevated N‐terminal pro‐brain natriuretic peptide. Technical success of the re‐do MitraClip procedure was 100%, whereas procedural and device success were only achieved in 11 patients (65%). Unsuccessful re‐do procedures were related to lower EF and implantation of more than one clip at initial procedure. However, despite reduction in MR grade and no occurrence of significant mitral stenosis after the procedure, the mortality during 12 months follow‐up remained high (8 of 17; 47%).

Conclusions

In a cohort of patients with advanced HF undergoing PMVR, re‐do MitraClip procedure was feasible, but procedural success was unsatisfactory and morbidity and mortality remained high, possibly reflecting the advanced stage of HF in these patients.

Comparison of Transcatheter and Open Mitral Valve Repair Among Patients With Mitral Regurgitation

In 2013, the Food and Drug Administration approved the first transcatheter mitral valve repair (TMVr) device for degenerative mitral regurgitation for patients at prohibitive surgical risk. To better understand contemporary utilization trends and outcomes, we reviewed hospitalizations, identified using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision and International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision codes, in which the patient underwent TMVr or mitral valve repair (MVr) with a diagnosis of mitral regurgitation, without stenosis, from the National (Nationwide) Inpatient Sample from 2014 to 2017. We included 10,020 hospitalizations in which the patient underwent TMVr and 5845 in which the patient underwent MVr and assessed trends in demographic characteristics, patient comorbidities, total hospital charges, and outcomes. Transcatheter mitral valve repair experienced exponential growth, increasing from 150 to 5115 over the study period (P<.001 for trend), whereas MVr grew to a lesser degree. The median length of stay for TMVr decreased from 4 to 2 days; mortality declined from 3.3% to 1.6% (P<.001 for both). Both TMVr and MVr rates of discharge home increased over the study period. Total charges for TMVr increased from $149,582 to $178,109, whereas those for MVr increased to a lesser degree, from $149,426 to $157,146 (P<.001 for both). Discharge disposition, length of stay, and in-hospital mortality all exhibited favorable trends for both procedures. Caution must be exercised in direct comparisons between procedures as they target somewhat different populations. With expanded indications for TMVr, we anticipate further increases in procedural volume, although the effect on MVr remains unclear.

Deep sedation versus general anaesthesia for transcatheter mitral valve repair: an individual patient data meta-analysis of observational studies

AIMS

The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare general anaesthesia (GA) and deep sedation (DS) with regard to safety and length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay in patients undergoing percutaneous edge-to-edge mitral valve repair (PMVR).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Four studies comparing GA and DS in patients undergoing PMVR were included in an individual patient data meta-analysis. Data were pooled after multiple imputation. The composite safety endpoint of all-cause death, stroke, pneumonia, or major to life-threatening bleeding occurred in 87 of 626 (13.9%) patients with no difference between patients treated with DS as compared to GA (56 and 31 events in 420 and 206 patients, respectively). In this regard, the odds ratio (OR) was 1.27 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.78 to 2.09; p=0.338) and 1.26 (95% CI: 0.49 to 3.22; p=0.496) following the one-stage and two-stage approach, respectively. Length of ICU stay was longer after GA as compared to DS (ratio of days 3.08, 95% CI: 2.18 to 4.36, p<0.001, and 2.88, 95% CI: 1.45 to 5.73, p=0.016, following the one-stage and two-stage approach, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Both DS and GA might offer a similar safety profile. However, ICU stay seems to be shorter after DS.

Procedural sedation and analgesia for percutaneous high-tech cardiac procedures

The interest in percutaneous high-tech cardiac procedures has increased in recent years together with its safety and efficacy. In fragile patients, procedural sedation and analgesia are used to perform most of the procedures. General anesthesia remains the technique of choice during the team learning curve and might be required in selected patients or in emergent situations. Despite the high costs of percutaneous high-tech cardiac procedures, the decrease in length of hospital stays, rate of intensive care admission and complications, balance the increase in devices costs. In fragile patients who undergo percutaneous high tech cardiac procedures, the primary role of the anesthesiologist is to prevent the need for postprocedural intensive care unit and complications rate. Starting from the experience of a large university third level hospital we identified the eight most commonly performed contemporary percutaneous high tech cardiac procedures (ventricular tachycardia and atrial fibrillation ablation, protected percutaneous coronary intervention, transcatheter aortic valve implantation, MitraClip® (Abbott Laboratories; Abbott Park, IL, USA), percutaneous patent foramen ovale closure, left atrial appendage closure, and dysfunctional lead extraction), discuss the role of procedural sedation and analgesia in this setting, and explore future perspectives.

Comparing sedation vs. general anaesthesia in transoesophageal echocardiography-guided percutaneous transcatheter mitral valve repair: a meta-analysis

AIMS

Transoesophageal echocardiography-guided percutaneous transcatheter mitral valve repair (TOE-guided PMVR) using edge-to-edge leaflet plication is typically performed under general anaesthesia (GA). Increasing evidence supports the efficacy and safety of PMVR performed under conscious sedation (CS) or deep sedation (DS). We performed a meta-analysis comparing safety and efficacy of CS/DS vs. GA in PMVR.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A comprehensive search was performed using PubMed, CINAHL, Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. Study characteristics, participant demographics, and procedural outcomes with both types of anaesthesia were analysed. Out of 73 articles, five met inclusion criteria. Overall, there was no significant difference in the primary outcome of procedural success rate [odds ratio (OR) 0.75; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.30-1.88, I2= 0.0%, P = 0.538] or post-procedure in-hospital mortality (OR 1.02; 95% CI 0.38-2.71, I2= 0.0%, P = 0.970) in the patients undergoing PMVR under CS/DS vs. GA. The secondary endpoint of intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS) was significantly shorter in patients under CS/DS vs. GA (standardized mean difference, SMD = -0.97; 95% CI -1.75 to -0.20; P = 0.014), but the hospital LOS (SMD = 0.36; 95% CI -0.77 to 0.04, P = 0.078) did not show a statistically significant difference between the groups, although it was shorter in the CS/DS group. No difference was observed between CS/DS and GA in fluoroscopy time, procedure time, or complications, including pneumonia, stroke/transient ischaemic attack, and major bleeding.

CONCLUSION

CS or DS has lower ICU LOS, but comparable procedural success rate and in-hospital mortality, making it a potential alternative to GA for TOE-guided PMVR.

Cerebrovascular events after transcatheter mitral valve interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective

Current guidelines support the use of transcatheter mitral valve interventions to treat some selected high-risk patients with significant mitral valvulopathy. As with any other interventional cardiac procedure, concerns have been raised about cerebrovascular event. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the incidence of cerebrovascular events following (1) transcatheter mitral valve edge-to-edge repair with mitral valve clip and (2) transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR).

Methods

We conducted a systematic review of studies reporting the cerebrovascular adverse events after transcatheter mitral valve edge-to-edge repair and TMVR procedures. The primary endpoint was the incidence of cerebrovascular events as defined by the Mitral Valve Academic Research Consortium. An event that occurred within 30 days or during index hospitalisation was defined as periprocedural; otherwise it was defined as non-periprocedural. This study was designed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Aggregated study-level data were pooled using a random effect model. The quality of each study was appraised with the Hawker checklist, a method of systematically reviewing research from different paradigms.

Results

Sixty studies totalling 28 155 patients undergoing edge-to-edge repair with mitral valve clip were included in the analysis. Periprocedural stroke and non-periprocedural stroke rates were 0.9% (95% CI 0.6 to 1.1) and 2.4% (95% CI 1.6 to 3.2), respectively. For TMVR procedures, 26 studies including 1910 patients were analysed. The estimated periprocedural stroke incidence was 1% (95% CI 0.5 to 1.8) compared with 7% (95% CI 0.8 to 18.5) for non-periprocedural stroke.

Conclusions

Transcatheter mitral valve interventions are associated with low rates of cerebrovascular events. The exact mechanisms of these complications are still poorly understood given the relative paucity of good quality data.

Trial registration number

CRD42019117257.

One more option in heart failure: correction of mitral regurgitation with MitraClip®

Degenerative mitral regurgitation in elderly patients and functional mitral regurgitation secondary to severe left ventricular dysfunction are not easy options for conventional surgery. Recently, a new percutaneous approach has been proposed with the MitraClip^®, based on the Alfieri edge-to-edge repair technique. The aim of the study is to report, compare and discuss the results of two multicenter randomized trials: MITRA.FR and COAPT in light of the current practice. In both trials patients with functional mitral regurgitation grade 3/4+ or 4/4+ were randomly assigned, in 1:1 ratio, to undergo percutaneous repair and optimal medical therapy or optimal medical therapy alone. Other baseline characteristics reflecting severity of mitral regurgitation and of left ventricular impairment were statistically different, such as the effective regurgitant orifice area (0.31 cm² in MITRA.FR vs 0.41 cm² in COAPT) and the indexed LVEDV (135 ± 37 ml/m² in MITRA.FR vs 101 ± 34 ml/m² in COAPT). A 24 months follow-up and a 12 months follow-up have been completed, respectively, in COAPT and MITRA.FR. Out of the 307 patients enrolled in the MITRA.FR, 152 were randomized to percutaneous treatment but only in 138 (95.8%) the MitraClip^® was actually implanted. At the end of the follow-up a residual mitral regurgitation of at least grade 3+ has been observed in 17% of the patients. A composite of death from any cause or unplanned hospitalizations for heart failure at 12 months respectively occurred in 83 patients (54.6%) treated percutaneously and 78 patients (51.3%) treated with medical therapy only. A total of 614 patients have been enrolled in the COAPT and 293 underwent transcatheter treatment. A successful implantation of the MitraClip^® was achieved in 287 patients (98.0%). Hospitalization for heart failure at 24 months occurred in 160 patients in the device group and in 283 in the control group, with an annualized ratio of 35.8% and 67.9%, respectively (p > 0.001). The conflicting results of the two trials may have many explanations, but probably the main cause is the most stringent inclusion criteria in COAPT. The effective reduction of mitral regurgitation and improvement in exercise capacity already observed in registries including more than 70,000 patients was confirmed in a randomized trial with improvement observed in hard end-points. This has already led to an extension of FDA approval to functional regurgitation and a more liberal use across the world.

The Importance of Conscious Sedation for Life-Saving Valve Procedures in Patients With Rheumatic Heart Disease From Low- to Middle-Income Countries

BACKGROUND

Severe valve disease, which requires intervention, remains strongly associated with mortality in patients with rheumatic heart disease. Percutaneous mitral commissurotomy (PMC) is the procedure of choice for the treatment of patients with isolated or predominantly rheumatic mitral stenosis. This procedure has been performed under sedation to avoid the potential effects of general anesthesia on intracardiac pressure measurements. However, there are limited data on sedation during PMC, especially using easily available medications in low- and middle-income countries.

OBJECTIVES

This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and hemodynamic effects of conscious sedation during PMC in patients with significant mitral stenosis.

METHODS

This study prospectively enrolled 23 patients who underwent PMC with the Inoue balloon technique for hemodynamically significant mitral stenosis. For conscious sedation, midazolam 25 μg/kg and fentanyl 1 μg/kg were administered, and 5 min after the infusion, the level of sedation was evaluated by Ramsay sedation scale. A range of invasive hemodynamic measurements, including cardiac output and pulmonary artery pressures, were recorded before and immediately after sedation.

RESULTS

The mean age was 44.9 ± 10.8 years, and 19 patients (83%) were women. After sedation, the majority of patients were in categories 2 and 3 of the Ramsay sedation scale (cooperative, orientated, tranquil, and responding to commands). Oxygen saturation dropped from an average of 98.5% to 96.0% without supplementary oxygen. Left ventricular systolic pressure and central aortic pressures decreased after sedation. However, none of the other parameters changed significantly after sedation, including pulmonary artery pressures, pulmonary vascular resistance, and cardiac index.

CONCLUSIONS

This simple model of conscious sedation was able to promote anxiolysis, analgesia, and comfort for the procedure without serious hemodynamic effects, which can be a reasonable choice in developing countries.

Invasive hemodynamics and cardiac biomarkers to predict outcomes after percutaneous edge-to-edge mitral valve repair in patients with severe heart failure

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous mitral valve repair (PMVR) via MitraClip implantation is a therapeutic option for high-risk or non-surgical candidates with severe mitral regurgitation (MR) and advanced stages of heart failure (HF). However, these patients have a high mortality despite PMVR, and predictors for outcomes are not well established. Here, we evaluated invasive hemodynamics, echocardiography parameters, and biomarkers to predict outcomes after PMVR in severe HF patients.

METHODS

Patients with reduced ejection fraction (EF) and severe and moderate-to-severe MR undergoing PMVR at our centre between September 2009 and January 2016 were analysed retrospectively. Inclusion criteria were: left ventricular EF < 45%, preoperative right heart catheterization, successful MitraClip deployment ("technical success"), and follow-up for at least 1 year after the procedure. Data from preoperative right heart catheterization, echocardiography, and biomarkers were assessed. Primary endpoint was all-cause mortality at 1 year after PMVR. We performed univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses and generated a risk score to predict outcomes.

RESULTS

Of 174 patients with PMVR and severe HF, 79.9% had functional MR. Mean EF was 25% (17.2; 30.7) and advanced New York Heart Association functional class was prevalent (class II: 13%; class III: 70%; and class IV: 17%). The cumulative incidences of all-cause death were 6.9% and 17.8% at 30 days and 1 year, respectively. In the Cox multivariate model, high-sensitive troponin T [hsTnT; hazard ratio (HR) 1.01; confidence interval (CI) 1.01-1.02; p < 0.0001] and mixed venous O₂-saturation (HR 0.92; CI 0.89-0.96; p < 0.0001) were found to significantly and independently predict outcomes. A simple risk score including these two parameters was sufficient to discriminate between low- and high-risk patients (HR 7.22; CI 3.4-15.5; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

In a cohort of patients with severe HF undergoing PMVR, patients with elevated hsTnT and reduced mixed venous O₂-saturation carried the worst prognosis. A simple risk score including these two parameters may improve patient selection and outcomes after PMVR.

High body mass index is a risk factor for difficult deep sedation in percutaneous mitral valve repair

Background

The safety and efficacy of deep sedation (DS) in MitraClip^® procedures have been shown previously. However, clinical experience demonstrates that in some patients DS is difficult to achieve. We hypothesize that some patient characteristics can predict difficult DS.

Methods

We prospectively analysed 69 patients undergoing MitraClip^® procedures using DS. Application of DS was graded as simple (group 1) or difficult (group 2) depending on a cumulative score based on one point for each of the following criteria: decrease in oxygen saturation, retention of carbon dioxide, disruptive body movements, and the need for catecholamines. Patients with one point or less were classified as group 1, and patients with two or more points were classified as group 2.

Results

In 58 of 69 patients (84.1%), the performance of DS was simple, while in 11 patients (15.9%), DS was difficult to achieve. Patients with difficult DS were characterized by a higher body mass index (33.7 ± 6.0 kg/m² vs. 26.1 ± 4.1; p = 0.001), younger age (67 ± 13 years vs. 75 ± 13 years; p = 0.044), and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (36% ± 10 vs. 45% ± 14; p = 0.051) and presented more often with an obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome (6.9% vs. 45.5%; p = 0.003). In the multivariate analysis, body mass index was an independent predictor of difficult DS. Using a body mass index of 31 kg/m² as a cut-off value, the sensitivity of predicting difficult DS was 73%, and the specificity was 88%. Using a body mass index of 35 kg/m² as a cut-off value, the specificity increased to 97%, with a sensitivity of 36%.

Conclusion

In patients with a higher body mass index who undergo MitraClip^® procedures, DS might be difficult to perform.

Comparison of Deep Sedation With General Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Mitral Valve Repair

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous edge-to-edge mitral valve repair (PMVR) has become an established treatment option for mitral regurgitation in patients not eligible for surgical repair. Currently, most procedures are performed under general anesthesia (GA). An increasing number of centers, however, are performing the procedure under deep sedation (DS). Here, we compared patients undergoing PMVR with GA or DS.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 271 consecutive patients underwent PMVR at our institution between May 2014 and December 2016. Seventy-two procedures were performed under GA and 199 procedures under DS. We observed that in the DS group, doses of propofol (743±228 mg for GA versus 369±230 mg for DS, P<0.001) and norepinephrine (1.1±1.6 mg for GA versus 0.2±0.3 mg for DS, P<0.001) were significantly lower. Procedure time, fluoroscopy time, and dose area product were significantly higher in the GA group. There was no significant difference between GA and DS with respect to overall bleeding complications, postinterventional pneumonia (4% for GA versus 5% for DS), or C-reactive protein levels (361±351 nmol/L for GA versus 278±239 nmol/L for DS). Significantly fewer patients with DS needed a postinterventional stay in the intensive care unit (96% for GA versus 19% for DS, P<0.001). Importantly, there was no significant difference between DS and GA regarding intrahospital or 6-month mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

DS for PMVR is safe and feasible. No disadvantages with respect to procedural outcome or complications in comparison to GA were observed. Applying DS may simplify the PMVR procedure.

Deep sedation versus general anesthesia in percutaneous edge-to-edge mitral valve reconstruction using the MitraClip system

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous edge-to-edge mitral valve reconstruction (PMVR) has emerged as a treatment option in patients with severe mitral regurgitation not considered suitable candidates for surgery. The majority of PMVR procedures are performed under general anesthesia (GA), although deep sedation (DS) appears to be an attractive alternative. We thus sought to assess the impact on intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay, efficacy, and safety of DS in comparison to GA in patients undergoing PMVR using the MitraClip(®) system.

METHODS

Sixty consecutive patients underwent PMVR procedures at two centers. The first 30 patients were treated by GA followed by 30 patients undergoing DS under different settings. The primary clinical endpoint was ICU length of stay. The primary efficacy endpoint included procedural success and procedural duration. The safety endpoint was defined as a composite of death, stroke, cardiogenic shock, moderate and severe bleeding as well as pneumonia.

RESULTS

The ICU length of stay was significantly shorter in the DS group in comparison to GA patients (p = 0.001). The hospital length of stay did not differ following DS in comparison to GA (p = 0.96). Procedural success was high in both groups (100 versus 96.7 %, p = 0.34) at similar procedural duration time (p = 0.60). No difference between GA and DS was observed with respect to the occurrence of the combined safety endpoint (p = 0.47).

CONCLUSIONS

In comparison to GA, DS reduces the ICU length of stay in PMVR without negative effects on safety and efficacy. Prospective randomized trials are needed to confirm these findings.