Reversible sinus node injury during circumferential pulmonary vein ablation

Sinus node dysfunction and atrial fibrillation-Relationships, clinical phenotypes, new mechanisms, and treatment approaches

Although the anatomical basis of the pathogenesis of sinus node dysfunction (SND) and atrial fibrillation (AF) is located primarily in the left and right atria, increasing evidence suggests a strong correlation between SND and AF, in terms of both clinical presentation and formation mechanisms. However, the exact mechanisms underlying this association are unclear. The relationship between SND and AF may not be causal, but is likely to involve common factors and mechanisms, including ion channel remodeling, gap junction abnormalities, structural remodeling, genetic mutations, neuromodulation abnormalities, the effects of adenosine on cardiomyocytes, oxidative stress, and viral infections. Ion channel remodeling manifests primarily as alterations in the "funny" current (I_f) and Ca²⁺ clock associated with cardiomyocyte autoregulation, and gap junction abnormalities are manifested primarily as decreased expression of connexins (Cxs) mediating electrical impulse propagation in cardiomyocytes. Structural remodeling refers primarily to fibrosis and cardiac amyloidosis (CA). Some genetic mutations can also cause arrhythmias, such as SCN5A, HCN4, EMD, and PITX2. The intrinsic cardiac autonomic nervous system (ICANS), a regulator of the heart's physiological functions, triggers arrhythmias.In addition, we discuss arrhythmias caused by viral infections, notably Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). Similarly to upstream treatments for atrial cardiomyopathy such as alleviating CA, ganglionated plexus (GP) ablation acts on the common mechanisms between SND and AF, thus achieving a dual therapeutic effect.

A novel method with which to visualize the human sinuatrial node: Application for a better understanding of the gross anatomy of this part of the conduction system

For various clinical/surgical procedures, it is important to accurately understand the location of the sinuatrial node (SAN). Therefore, this study's goal was to develop a new and simple method to visualize the SAN in human hearts. A total of 16 formalin-fixed human hearts were used in the study. After the epicardium was removed, the fat tissue on the myocardium's surface was brushed and removed in a solution of 40°C water with a surfactant to show the SAN's location. Once the structure considered to be the SAN was observed, histological observation was conducted with Masson's trichrome staining to confirm its identity. The working myocardium, SAN branch of the coronary artery, and the structure believed to be the SAN were observed in all specimens. Histological analysis confirmed this structure to be the SAN. We believe that the method described herein might contribute to a better understanding of the SAN's morphologic features and serve as an improved teaching aide. Clin. Anat. 33:232-236, 2020. © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

The incidence, indications and predictors of acute pacemaker implantation after ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation

INTRODUCTION

Patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) may additionally suffer from a concealed sinus node disease. We sought to determine the incidence, indications and predictors of acute pacemaker [PM] implantation within 1 week after the ablation of persistent AF.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We performed a retrospective analysis of patients, who had had an ablation of persistent AF at our center. Between 01/2011 and 08/2016, 1234 patients (mean age 65 ± 10 years, 66.7% male) without prior PM implantation underwent an ablation of persistent AF. Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) was performed in 1158 (93.8%), the additional ablation of complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAE) in 1109 (89.9%) and linear ablation in 524 (42.5%) patients. Temporary cardiac pacing was necessary in 27 (2.2%) patients. The temporary PM was removed in 15 patients (1.2%) because sinus node recovered after a median of 1.0 (minimum 0.1-maximum 2.0) day. The remaining 12 (1.0%) patients required the implantation of a permanent PM. Another 13 (1.1%) patients required permanent PM implantation without prior temporary pacing. In a multivariable regression model, age [OR 1.07 (1.02-1.12), p = 0.006], sinus pauses prior to ablation [OR 7.97 (2.36-26.88), p = 0.001] and atria with low voltage [OR 2.83 (1.31-6.11), p = 0.008] were identified as significant predictors for acute cardiac pacing.

CONCLUSION

Acute cardiac pacing within 1 week after the ablation of persistent AF was necessary in 40 (3.2%) patients. Age, sinus pauses in history prior to ablation and the existence of low-voltage areas in the atria were identified as relevant risk factors.