1
|
Thomopoulos C, Hitij JB, De Backer T, Gkaliagkousi E, Kreutz R, Lopez-Sublet M, Marketou M, Mihailidou AS, Olszanecka A, Pechère-Bertschi A, Pérez MP, Persu A, Piani F, Socrates T, Stolarz-Skrzypek K, Cífková R. Management of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy: a Position Statement of the European Society of Hypertension Working Group 'Hypertension in Women'. J Hypertens 2024; 42:1109-1132. [PMID: 38690949 DOI: 10.1097/hjh.0000000000003739] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/03/2024]
Abstract
Hypertensive disorders in pregnancy (HDP), remain the leading cause of adverse maternal, fetal, and neonatal outcomes. Epidemiological factors, comorbidities, assisted reproduction techniques, placental disorders, and genetic predisposition determine the burden of the disease. The pathophysiological substrate and the clinical presentation of HDP are multifarious. The latter and the lack of well designed clinical trials in the field explain the absence of consensus on disease management among relevant international societies. Thus, the usual clinical management of HDP is largely empirical. The current position statement of the Working Group 'Hypertension in Women' of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) aims to employ the current evidence for the management of HDP, discuss the recommendations made in the 2023 ESH guidelines for the management of hypertension, and shed light on controversial issues in the field to stimulate future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Costas Thomopoulos
- Department of Cardiology, General Hospital of Athens 'Laiko', Athens, Greece
| | - Jana Brguljan Hitij
- Department of Hypertension, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Medical University Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Tine De Backer
- Cardiovascular Center & Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospital Gent, Belgium
| | - Eugenia Gkaliagkousi
- 3rd Department of Internal Medicine, Papageorgiou Hospital Faculty of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Reinhold Kreutz
- Charite-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Institute of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Berlin, Germany
| | - Marilucy Lopez-Sublet
- AP-HP, Hopital Avicenne, Centre d'Excellence Europeen en Hypertension Arterielle, Service de Medecine Interne, INSERM UMR 942 MASCOT, Paris 13-Universite Paris Nord, Bobigny, FCRIN INI-CRCT (Cardiovascular and Renal Clinical Trialists)
| | - Maria Marketou
- School of Medicine, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece
| | - Anastasia S Mihailidou
- Department of Cardiology and Kolling Institute, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Agnieszka Olszanecka
- 1st Department of Cardiology, Interventional Electrocardiology, and Hypertension, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland
| | | | - Mariana Paula Pérez
- Department of Hypertension. Hospital de Agudos J. M. Ramos Mejía, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Alexandre Persu
- Division of Cardiology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc and Pole of Cardiovascular Research, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Federica Piani
- Hypertension and Cardiovascular Risk Research Center, Medical and Surgical Sciences Department, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Thenral Socrates
- Medical Outpatient and Hypertension Clinic, ESH Hypertension Centre of Excellence University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Katarzyna Stolarz-Skrzypek
- 1st Department of Cardiology, Interventional Electrocardiology, and Hypertension, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland
| | - Renata Cífková
- Center for Cardiovascular Prevention, Charles University in Prague, First Faculty of Medicine and Thomayer University Hospital
- Department of Medicine II, Charles University in Prague, First Faculty of Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Fu J, Tomlinson G, Feig DS. Increased risk of major congenital malformations in early pregnancy use of angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin-receptor-blockers: a meta-analysis. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2021; 37:e3453. [PMID: 33779043 DOI: 10.1002/dmrr.3453] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2020] [Revised: 02/04/2021] [Accepted: 02/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
AIMS To evaluate the risk of adverse fetal outcomes after exposure to angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-Is) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) in first trimester of pregnancy, by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS A systematic literature search was conducted using Medline, Embase, Cochrane and PubMed from inception to 25 November 2019. Studies were included if they evaluated pregnancies exposed to ACE-Is or ARBs, reported fetal outcomes, and compared these outcomes with a control group. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) were estimated using inverse variance-weighted random effects model. The protocol was registered with the PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42020160566). RESULTS Studies reporting on 6234 pregnancies exposed to ACE-Is or ARBs, 4104 pregnancies exposed to other oral antihypertensives, and 1,872,733 pregnancies without exposure were included in the meta-analysis. ACE-I or ARB exposed pregnancies, compared to non-exposed controls, had higher risk of major congenital malformations (OR 1.82; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.42-2.34), cardiovascular malformations (OR 2.50; 95% CI: 1.62-3.87) and stillbirths (OR 1.75; 95% CI: 1.21-2.53). There was no difference in congenital malformations observed between pregnancies exposed to other antihypertensives compared to non-exposed controls (OR 0.96; 95% CI: 0.69-1.33). CONCLUSIONS Women exposed to ACE-Is or ARBs during early pregnancy had higher risk of adverse fetal outcomes, including malformations and stillbirths, than non-exposed controls. This increased risk was independent of underlying maternal hypertension, as those exposed to other antihypertensives did not exhibit a higher risk than healthy controls. Women planning for pregnancy using these medications, including those with diabetic nephropathy, should be counselled appropriately.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Fu
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - George Tomlinson
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Denice S Feig
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Leadership Sinai Centre for Diabetes, Mount Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wei Q, Zhang L, Duan MF, Wang YM, Huang N, Song CR. Use of angiotensin II receptor blocker during pregnancy: A case report. Medicine (Baltimore) 2021; 100:e24304. [PMID: 33546057 PMCID: PMC7837885 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000024304] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2020] [Revised: 12/13/2020] [Accepted: 12/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Drugs that affect the renin-angiotensin system, such as angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors are not typically recommended for pregnant women because of their potential fetal toxicity. CASE STUDY A 32-year-old pregnant woman with nephrotic syndrome lasting more than 5 years became pregnant for the first time. She had been taking losartan tablets before and during pregnancy. Ultrasound at 24+2 weeks of pregnancy showed oligohydramnios, and the maximum vertical depth of amniotic fluid volume was 1.4 cm. Follow-up ultrasound examinations every 2 weeks showed persistent oligohydramnios [amniotic fluid volume: 1.1-3.4 cm, amniotic fluid index 1.9-6.9 cm]. B-ultrasound at 30+2 weeks showed slightly enhanced fetal renal cortex echo. The patient was treated at 32+2 weeks of pregnancy at our hospital. DIAGNOSES Nephrotic syndrome and oligohydramnios. INTERVENTIONS Losartan was discontinued and replaced by nifedipine controlled-release tablets to lower blood pressure. The amount of amniotic fluid gradually increased to normal levels within 8 days. The patient was discharged at 33+2 weeks of pregnancy for follow-up. At 34+4 weeks, blood pressure had increased to 177/113 mm Hg and the patient was re-hospitalized with nephrotic syndrome complicated by preeclampsia. Due to progression of severe preeclampsia, elective cesarean section was performed at 35+3 weeks. After delivery, losartan and nifedipine were prescribed to continue lowering blood pressure. The patient was discharged 4 days after surgery. OUTCOMES Losartan use was terminated at 32+2 weeks of pregnancy. Amniotic fluid returned to normal after 8 days and the baby was delivered after 22 days. At last follow-up, the infant was 24 months old and healthy. CONCLUSION Although ARBs are effective for treating hypertension, they should be replaced by other classes of anti-hypertensive drugs in pregnant women. Pregnant women who elect to continue using ARBs should be informed about risks, they should be carefully monitored during pregnancy, and their pregnancy should be allowed to proceed as long as clinically feasible in order to optimize maternal and infant outcomes.
Collapse
|
4
|
Buawangpong N, Teekachunhatean S, Koonrungsesomboon N. Adverse pregnancy outcomes associated with first-trimester exposure to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Pharmacol Res Perspect 2020; 8:e00644. [PMID: 32815286 PMCID: PMC7438312 DOI: 10.1002/prp2.644] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2020] [Revised: 07/21/2020] [Accepted: 07/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
This study aimed to determine the effects of prenatal exposure to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) or angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), particularly when exposure is limited to the first trimester of pregnancy, on adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. A systematic search was performed on four databases, that is, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library, to identify relevant articles published up to December 31, 2019. Included studies were limited to original investigations assessing the association between prenatal exposure to ACEIs/ARBs and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Odds ratios were used as a summary effect measure. Pooled-effect estimates of each outcome were calculated by the random-effects meta-analysis. The main outcomes included overall and specific congenital malformations, low birth weight, miscarriage, elective termination of pregnancy, stillbirth, and preterm delivery. Of 19 included articles involving a total of 4 163 753 pregnant women, 13 studies reported an increased risk of, at least, one adverse pregnancy outcome in pregnant women who were exposed to ACEIs/ARBs. Meta-analysis revealed a significant association between overall congenital malformations and first trimester-only exposure to ACEIs/ARBs (OR = 1.94, 95% CI = 1.71-2.21, P < .0001). Cardiovascular malformations, miscarriage, and stillbirth also provided a significant relation with ACEI/ARB exposure. In conclusion, prenatal exposure to ACEIs/ARBs in the first trimester of pregnancy was found to be associated with an increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. Women of reproductive age should be aware of the potential teratogenic risks of these drugs if they become pregnant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nida Buawangpong
- Department of Family MedicineFaculty of MedicineChiang Mai UniversityChiang MaiThailand
| | | | - Nut Koonrungsesomboon
- Department of PharmacologyFaculty of MedicineChiang Mai UniversityChiang MaiThailand
- Musculoskeletal Science and Translational Research CenterChiang Mai UniversityChiang MaiThailand
| |
Collapse
|