Does rhythm matter in acute heart failure? An insight from the British Society for Heart Failure National Audit

Characteristics and clinical outcomes of patients hospitalized for acute heart failure who develop atrial fibrillation or convert to sinus rhythm

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained arrhythmia in acute heart failure (AHF), with a prevalence of approximately 35%. However, little is known about the clinical characteristics and outcomes of in-hospital conversion from AF to sinus rhythm and vice versa.

METHODS

In a post-hoc secondary analysis of the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled PROTECT trial in patients with AHF, we identified four groups of patients; AF at admission and in-hospital conversion to sinus rhythm (n=44), in-hospital development of AF (n=31), persistent AF (n=278) and continuous sinus rhythm (n=410).

RESULTS

Conversion from AF to sinus rhythm (13.7%) and from sinus rhythm to AF (7.0%) only occurred in a minority of patients. Patients with AF who converted to sinus rhythm more often had New York Heart Association class IV, higher heart rate and higher respiratory rate at hospital admission, whereas patients who developed AF were older, more likely to be female and had the highest ejection fraction, compared to continuous sinus rhythm (all P<0.05). Conversion to sinus rhythm or development of AF occurred mainly within the first 24 hours after hospital admission. Patients with persistent AF and those who developed AF had a longer median length of hospital stay (8 vs. 7 days; P<0.001 and 9 vs. 7 days; P<0.001 respectively), compared to continuous sinus rhythm. In both univariable and multivariable analysis, there was no significant association between the AF groups and the primary clinical outcomes of either 180-day all-cause mortality or 60-day death or readmission for heart failure.

CONCLUSION

In patients hospitalized for AHF, only few converted from AF to sinus rhythm or sinus rhythm to AF. Although development of AF or persistent AF were associated with a longer length of hospitalization, mid-term mortality and readmission rates were similar between the groups.

Timely and individualized heart failure management: need for implementation into the new guidelines

Due to remarkable improvements in heart failure (HF) management over the last 30 years, a significant reduction in mortality and hospitalization rates in HF patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) has been observed. Currently, the optimization of guideline-directed chronic HF therapy remains the mainstay to further improve outcomes for patients with HFrEF to reduce mortality and HF hospitalization. This includes established device therapies, such as implantable defibrillators and cardiac resynchronization therapies, which improved patients' symptoms and prognosis. Over the last 10 years, new HF drugs have merged targeting various pathways, such as those that simultaneously suppress the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system and the breakdown of endogenous natriuretic peptides (e.g., sacubitril/valsartan), and those that inhibit the I_f channel and, thus, reduce heart rate (e.g., ivabradine). Furthermore, the treatment of patient comorbidities (e.g., iron deficiency) has shown to improve functional capacity and to reduce hospitalization rates, when added to standard therapy. More recently, other potential treatment mechanisms have been explored, such as the sodium/glucose co-transporter inhibitors, the guanylate cyclase stimulators and the cardiac myosin activators. In this review, we summarize the novel developments in HFrEF pharmacological and device therapy and discuss their implementation strategies into practice to further improve outcomes.

Heart rate at discharge in patients with acute decompensated heart failure is a predictor of mortality

AIMS

Heart failure is a syndrome with increasing prevalence in concordance with the aging population and better survival rates from myocardial infarction. Morbidity and mortality are high in chronic heart failure patients, particularly in those with hospital admission for acute decompensation. Several risk stratification tools and score systems have been established to predict mortality in chronic heart failure patients. However, identification of patients at risk with easy obtainable clinical factors that can predict mortality in acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) are needed to optimize the care-path.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We retrospectively analyzed electronic medical records of 78 patients with HFrEF and HFmrEF who were hospitalized with ADHF in the Heart Center of the University Hospital Cologne in the year 2011 and discharged from the ward after successful treatment. 37.6 ± 16.4 months after index hospitalization 30 (38.5%) patients had died. This mortality rate correlated well with the calculated predicted survival with the Seattle Heart Failure Model (SHFM) for each individual patient. In our cohort, we identified elevated heart rate at discharge as an independent predictor for mortality (p = 0.016). The mean heart rate at discharge was lower in survived patients compared to patients who died (72.5 ± 11.9 vs. 79.1 ± 11.2 bpm. Heart rate of 77 bpm or higher was associated with an almost doubled mortality risk (p = 0.015). Heart rate elevation of 5 bpm was associated with an increase of mortality of 25% (p = 0.022).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients hospitalized for ADHF seem to have a better prognosis, when heart rate at discharge is < 77 bpm. Heart rate at discharge is an easily obtainable biomarker for risk prediction of mortality in HFrEF and HFmrEF patients treated for acute cardiac decompensation. Taking into account this parameter could be useful for guiding treatment strategies in these high-risk patients. Prospective data for validation of this biomarker and specific intervention are needed.

Atrial inflammation in different atrial fibrillation subtypes and its relation with clinical risk factors

Objective

Inflammation of the atria is an important factor in the pathogenesis of atrial fibrillation (AF). Whether the extent of atrial inflammation relates with clinical risk factors of AF, however, is largely unknown. This we have studied comparing patients with paroxysmal and long-standing persistent/permanent AF.

Methods

Left atrial tissue was obtained from 50 AF patients (paroxysmal = 20, long-standing persistent/permanent = 30) that underwent a left atrial ablation procedure either or not in combination with coronary artery bypass grafting and/or valve surgery. Herein, the numbers of CD45+ and CD3+ inflammatory cells were quantified and correlated with the AF risk factors age, gender, diabetes, and blood CRP levels.

Results

The numbers of CD45+ and CD3+ cells were significantly higher in the adipose tissue of the atria compared with the myocardium in all AF patients but did not differ between AF subtypes. The numbers of CD45+ and CD3+ cells did not relate significantly to gender or diabetes in any of the AF subtypes. However, the inflammatory infiltrates as well as CK-MB and CRP blood levels increased significantly with increasing age in long-standing persistent/permanent AF and a moderate positive correlation was found between the extent of atrial inflammation and the CRP blood levels in both AF subtypes.

Conclusion

The extent of left atrial inflammation in AF patients was not related to the AF risk factors, diabetes and gender, but was associated with increasing age in patients with long-standing persistent/permanent AF. This may be indicative for a role of inflammation in the progression to long-standing persistent/permanent AF with increasing age.

Graphic abstract

Quality of life after catheter and minimally invasive surgical ablation of paroxysmal and early persistent atrial fibrillation: results from the SCALAF trial

AIMS

In the SCALAF trial, catheter-based pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) was as effective in long-term prevention of atrial fibrillation (AF) as minimally invasive thoracoscopic PVI and left atrial appendage ligation (MIPI). Catheter ablation (CA) resulted in significantly less major complications as compare to MIPI. We report quality of life (QOL) outcome in these patients.

METHODS

In this study, 52 patients with symptomatic paroxysmal or early persistent AF were randomized to either MIPI or CA. QOL was assessed at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months follow-up using the SF-36 Health Survey Questionnaire. AF-related symptoms were quantified at each follow-up visit using the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) score.

RESULTS

Median age was 57 years and 78% was male. Paroxysmal AF was present in 74%. At 3 months follow-up, physical role limitations (88.2 ± 29.5; versus 40.9 ± 44.0; P = 0.001, respectively) and bodily pain scores (95.5 ± 8.7; versus 76.0 ± 27.8; P = 0.021, respectively) were significantly higher after CA compared to MIPI, indicating less limitation in daily activity caused by physical problems and less pain after CA than after MIPI. AF symptoms assessed by the EHRA scores improved significantly at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months compared to baseline in both treatment groups (P < 0.001), with no significant differences between treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS

CA and MIPI ablation of AF both resulted in an improvement in several QOL measurements, although CA resulted in significantly less physical problems and bodily pain 3 months after treatment compared to MIPI.

CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00703157.