Differential clinical impact of chronic total occlusion revascularization based on left ventricular systolic function

Long-Term Outcomes in Patients With Chronic Total Occlusion and Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction - A Single-Center Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Analysis

BACKGROUND

The optimal treatment strategy for patients with coronary chronic total occlusion (CTO) and left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) remains unclear. This study investigated the long-term outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), and medical therapy (MT) in this specific patient cohort.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This retrospective cohort study included 987 consecutive patients with CTO and LVSD who met the inclusion criteria and underwent either CTO-PCI (n=277), CTO-CABG (n=222), or CTO-MT (n=488) between 2014 and 2020. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality during follow-up. Secondary endpoints were major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) and their components, including cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, unplanned revascularization, and hospitalization for heart failure. During a median follow-up of 5.3 years, 232 (23.51%) patients died from any cause. In the unadjusted analysis, CTO-MT was associated with worse long-term survival prospects. After inverse probability of treatment weighting and variable adjustment, CTO-PCI and CTO-CABG demonstrated significant reductions in the long-term risks of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. Notably, CTO-CABG was associated with the lowest long-term risks of MACCE, MI, unplanned revascularization, and hospitalization for heart failure.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with CTO and LVSD, successful CTO revascularization significantly improved long-term survival compared with CTO-MT. CTO-CABG can be regarded as the optimal treatment modality for better long-term prognosis.

The efficacy of revascularization in ischemic cardiomyopathy

Ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) is characterized by myocardial dysfunction due to myocardial ischemia, associated with the presence of significant coronary artery disease (CAD). We provide a comprehensive review of the current evidence for coronary revascularization in ICM, including consideration of the different modalities of coronary artery bypass grafting and percutaneous coronary intervention. In addition to a contemporary assessment of the literature, we aim to provide real-world insights and perspectives to guide clinical decision-making in this heterogeneous and complex patient population.

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention versus Optimal Medical Therapy in Patients with Chronic Total Occlusion: A Meta-Analysis

Background/Objectives: Chronic total occlusion (CTO) is a prevalent finding in patients with coronary artery disease and is associated with increased mortality. Prior reports on the efficacy of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) compared to optimal medical therapy (OMT) were controversial. Following the emergence of recently published new evidence, a meta-analysis is warranted. The current meta-analysis assessed the effects of PCI compared to OMT in the treatment of CTO. Methods: A structured literature search was performed. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized controlled studies of interventions were eligible. The primary outcome was an accumulated composite of cardiac mortality, myocardial infarction and target vessel/lesion revascularization events. Results: Thirty-two studies reporting on 11260 patients were included. Of these, 5712 (50.7%) were assigned to the PCI and 5548 (49.3%) were allocated to the OMT group. The primary outcome occurred in 14.6% of the PCI and 20.1% of the OMT group (12 trials, OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.88, p = 0.005, I2 = 67%). Subgrouping demonstrated a consistent reduction in the primary outcome for the PCI group in RCTs (six trials, OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.99, p = 0.05). The primary outcome reduction was irrespective of the study design, and it was replicable in sensitivity and subgroup analyses. Advantages in other outcomes were rather related to statistical pooling effects and dominated by observational data. Conclusions: CTO-PCI was associated with improved patient-oriented primary outcome compared to OMT in a study-level meta-analysis. This composite outcome effect was mainly driven by target vessel treatment, but a significant reduction in mortality and myocardial infarction was observed, irrespectively. These findings have hypothesis-generating implications. Future RCTs with adequate statistical power are eagerly awaited.

Heart Failure-Related Outcomes in Patients with Left Ventricular Dysfunction Undergoing Percutaneous Chronic Total Occlusion Revascularization

Background

The presence of a chronic total occlusion (CTO) and severe left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction are known negative prognostic factors in patients with coronary artery disease. Several studies have examined the effect of CTO revascularization on mortality, symptoms, occurrence of myocardial infarction (MI), and cardiac function in patients with normal or reduced LV function. However, the effect of CTO revascularization on heart failure-related events in patients with LV dysfunction, such as heart failure hospitalization (HFH), the occurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF), and a worsening renal function (WRF), has not yet been evaluated. To assess the success rate and safety of CTO percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) in coronary patients with LV ejection fractions of ≤ 40% and evaluate the impact of successful CTO revascularization on HFH, occurrence of AF, and WRF.

Methods

Prospectively, data were collected from CTO PCIs performed at three referral centers and analyzed. From a total of 1435 CTO PCIs, 132 (9.2%) patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of ≤ 40% were included in this analysis. The median follow-up duration was 23.18 months (interquartile range (IQR): 11.02-46.66 months).

Results

A successful CTO PCI was achieved in 109 of these patients, while the procedure was unsuccessful in 23 patients (82.5% procedural success rate). Overall, the intervention had an acceptable number of peri-procedural (or in-hospital) complications (9.1%). During the follow-up period, the rates of all-cause death, cardiovascular death, and non-fatal MI were not significantly different between the two groups. The rates of HFH were significantly lower in the successful PCI group, while WRF and AF did not differ between successful and unsuccessful PCI groups. Successful PCI and higher estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were independent predictors of a lower risk of HFH, while prior stroke and diabetes were independent predictors of a higher risk of HFH.

Conclusions

In patients with reduced LV systolic function (ejection fraction, EF ≤ 40%), CTO PCI is a safe and effective procedure and successful CTO PCI is independently associated with a lower risk of HFH during follow-up. Further expansion of this cohort is necessary to confirm these results.

Assessing the Clinical Influence of Chronic Total Occlusions (CTOs) Revascularization and the Impact of Vascularization Completeness on Patients with Left Ventricular (LV) Systolic Dysfunction

Objectives

This paper intends to assess the clinical influence of chronic total occlusions (CTOs), revascularization, and the impact of vascularization completeness on patients with left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction.

Background

The roles of CTO vascularization in clinical benefits remain conflicting. In addition, data concerning the different results of CTO vascularization and vascularization completeness according to LV systole function were assessed.

Methods

From an overall 918 consecutive patients with at least one CTO, 281 patients with ejection fraction (EF) ≤40% accepted coronary angiographic analysis between Jan 1, 2012, and Dec 31, 2020, and 29 patients were excluded. Subsequently, 261 patients were grouped into the successful CTO-PCI revascularization group (SCR, n = 135) and the optimal medical therapy group (OMT, n = 126). The prognosis influence of successfully finished CTO-PCI and complete revascularization on survival was evaluated. The primary endpoint was cardiac mortality, and the secondary endpoints were major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE).

Results

After a median follow-up time of 38.02 months, the cardiac mortality (p=0.037) and MACCE (p=0.001) were more remarkable in the OMT group than in the SCR group. Moreover, patients with CTO-PCI had survival benefits from complete revascularization for MACCE (p=0.025) and cardiac mortality (p=0.041). Based on multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, age ≧ 75 years (HR: 3.443, 95% CI 1.719–6.897, p < 0.001) predicted a worse probability of cardiac mortality. Additionally, previous PCI (HR: 1.592, 95% CI 1.034–2.449, p=0.035) and previous MI (HR: 1.971, 95% CI 1.258–3.088, p=0.003) predicted a worse probability of MACCE, and SCR (HR: 0.499, 95% CI 0.320–0.776, p=0.002) was a protection predictor of MACCE.

Conclusion

In patients with LV systole dysfunction (EF ≤ 40%), successfully finished CTO-PCI is related to long-term survival benefits. The benefits were more remarkable in patients with complete coronary revascularization (CCR).