[Typing, grading and staging of osteoarthritis: histopathological assessment of joint degeneration]

Open-Label Placebo Administration Decreases Pain in Elderly Patients With Symptomatic Knee Osteoarthritis - A Randomized Controlled Trial

Background

Recent studies indicate that the administration of open-label placebos (OLP) can improve symptoms in various medical conditions. The primary aim of this 3-week randomized controlled trial was to examine the effects of OLP treatments on pain, functional disability, and mobility in patients with arthritic knee pain.

Methods

Sixty patients (55% females; mean age, 66.9 ± 9.7 SD years) were randomized to one of two OLP treatments (n = 41) or no treatment (NT; n = 19). OLP treatments were accompanied by the verbal suggestion "to decrease pain" (OLP-pain, n = 20) or "to improve mood" (OLP-mood, n = 21). Pain and mood levels were monitored on 11-point Numeric Rating Scales (NRSs) in a patient diary, and global clinical improvement (CGI-I) was assessed at the end of the study. At baseline and after 21 days, patients filled in validated questionnaires to assess symptoms and functional disability of the knee (WOMAC), mental and physical quality of life (SF-36), state anxiety (STAI-state), perceived stress (PSQ-20), and self-efficacy (GSE). In addition, knee mobility (neutral zero-method), heart rate variability (HRV), and diurnal cortisol levels were evaluated before and after treatment.

Results

Evaluation of daily pain ratings indicated significant pain decrease in the OLP groups compared to NT (p = 0.013, d = 0.64), with no difference between the OLP-pain and the OLP-mood groups (p = 0.856, d = 0.05). OLP treatment also improved WOMAC pain (p = 0.036, d = 0.55), again with no difference between the two OLP groups (p = 0.65, d = 0.17). WOMAC function and stiffness, knee mobility, stress, state anxiety, quality of life, and self-efficacy did not change differently between groups.

Conclusion

OLP treatment improved knee pain in elderly patients with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (OA), while functional disability and mobility of the knee did not change. The content of the verbal suggestion was of minor importance. OLP administration may be considered as supportive analgesic treatment in elderly patients with symptomatic knee OA.

Trial Registration

German Clinical Trials Register (https://www.drks.de/), DRKS00015191 (retrospectively registered).

Proposal for a New Histological Scoring System for Cartilage Repair

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to develop a new histological scoring system for use in a partial-thickness cartilage repair animal model. Although previous papers have investigated the regeneration of articular cartilage, the good results achieved in small animals have not been replicated in large animal models or humans, possibly because of the frequent use of models with perforation of the subchondral bone plates. Partial-thickness lesions spare the subchondral bone, and this pattern is the most frequent in humans; therefore, new therapies should be tested using this model. However, no specific histological score exists to evaluate partial-thickness model results.

METHODS

Histological sections from 30 ovine knees were reviewed to develop a new scoring system. The sections were subjected to H&E, Safranin O, and Masson's trichrome staining.

RESULTS

This paper describes a new scoring tool that is divided into sections in detail: repair of tissue inside the lesion, cartilage around the lesion and degenerative changes at the base of the lesion. Scores range from 0 to 21; a higher score indicates better cartilage repair.

DISCUSSION

Unlike existing tools, this new scale does not assign points for the positioning of a tidemark; we propose evaluation of the degenerative changes to the subchondral bone and calcified cartilage layer. It is necessary to remove the whole joint to access and study the evolution of the lesion as well as the surrounding tissue.

CONCLUSION

This article emphasizes the importance of a partial-thickness animal model of cartilage repair and presents a new histological scoring system.

The elusive path to cartilage regeneration

Numerous attempts have been made to develop an efficacious strategy for the repair of articular cartilage. These endeavours have been undaunted, if not spurred, by the challenge of the task and by the largely disappointing outcomes in animal models. Of the strategies that have been lately applied in a clinical setting, the autologous-chondrocyte-transplantation technique is the most notorious example. This methodology, which was prematurely launched on the clinical scene, was greeted with enthusiasm and has been widely adopted. However, a recent prospective and randomized clinical trial has revealed the approach to confer no advantage over conventional microfracturing. Why is the repair of articular cartilage such a seemingly intractable problem? The root of the evil undoubtedly lies in the tissue's poor intrinsic healing capacity. But the failure of investigators to tackle the biological stumbling blocks systematically rather than empirically is hardly a less inauspicious circumstance. Moreover, it is a common misbelief that the formation of hyaline cartilage per se suffices, whereas to be durable and functionally competent, the tissue must be fully mature. An appreciation of this necessity, coupled with a thorough understanding of the postnatal development of articular cartilage, would help to steer investigators clear of biological cul-de-sacs.