Kochrezepte Systemischer Lupus erythematodes

[Systemic lupus erythematosus]

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a highly variable disease driven by the tendency to form very different types of antibody. This sometimes leads to an exaggerated respect for the complexity of the disease symptoms and to uncertainty in dealing with affected patients; however, nowadays the most important measures in the diagnosis and management of the disease can be broken down to a manageable extent. In this respect, the new recommendations of the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) on SLE and the recommendations on lupus nephritis jointly developed by EULAR and the European Renal Association/European Dialysis and Transplant Association (ERA/EDTA) are helpful, as are the new classification criteria from EULAR and the American College of Rheumatology (ACR). In this article the core points of these publications are summarized and contemporary SLE management is presented. As a rule, SLE can be effectively treated when managed in this way.

[Systemic lupus erythematosus]

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a highly variable disease driven by the tendency to form very different types of antibody. This sometimes leads to an exaggerated respect for the complexity of the disease symptoms and to uncertainty in dealing with affected patients; however, nowadays the most important measures in the diagnosis and management of the disease can be broken down to a manageable extent. In this respect, the new recommendations of the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) on SLE and the recommendations on lupus nephritis jointly developed by EULAR and the European Renal Association/European Dialysis and Transplant Association (ERA/EDTA) are helpful, as are the new classification criteria from EULAR and the American College of Rheumatology (ACR). In this article the core points of these publications are summarized and contemporary SLE management is presented. As a rule, SLE can be effectively treated when managed in this way.

Neue Klassifikationskriterien des SLE: was helfen sie für die klinische Diagnose des SLE?

Im September 2019 sind die gemeinsamen Klassifikationskriterien der European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) und des American College of Rheumatology (ACR) für den systemischen Lupus erythematodes (SLE) erschienen. Die EULAR/ACR 2019 Klassifikationskriterien verwenden (jemals) positive antinukleäre Antikörper (ANA) als obligates Eingangskriterium und gewichtete Kriterien mit Werten von 2 bis 10 und einem Cut-off von 10. Die Kriterien sind in 10 Domänen geordnet, innerhalb derer Assoziationen zwischen verschiedenen Manifestationen bestehen, und nur der höchste Wert in einer Domäne wird verwendet. Kriterien werden nur gewertet, wenn es für sie keine andere Erklärung gibt, die wahrscheinlicher ist als der SLE. Die neuen Kriterien sind statistisch den älteren Kriteriensets überlegen. Sie gelten aber nur für die Klassifikation. Für die meisten Rheumatologinnen und Rheumatologen ist das Stellen der Diagnose eines SLE wesentlich relevanter als der Einschluss in SLE-Studien, für den die Klassifikationskriterien gedacht sind. Daher stellt sich die Frage, wie weit die Klassifikationskriterien für die Diagnose helfen können. Direkt dafür verwendet werden dürfen sie wirklich nicht. Erfahrene Ärztinnen und Ärzte sind besser und v. a. sensitiver als die besten Kriterien. Manche Detailinformationen helfen aber dennoch dabei, die individuelle Diagnose für konkret Patientinnen und Patienten zu stellen. Die vorliegende Arbeit erörtert die Neuigkeiten in den EULAR/ACR 2019-Kriterien, stellt den Unterschied zwischen Klassifikation und Diagnose dar und diskutiert, welche Informationen auch im klinischen Alltag Anwendung finden können.

[Management of systemic lupus erythematosus]

In the last few decades a number of small, often largely unrecognized steps have fundamentally changed the management of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The current goal is to stop all disease activity without long-term use of more than 5 mg prednisolone per day. Remission, i.e. absence of activity in the SLE activity score of choice, is the defined target in the treat to target approach. The essential basic measures include life-long hydroxychloroquine as well as protection from sunlight (UV) and vitamin D substitution. Patients suffering from SLE need more vaccinations than the healthy population and control of risk factors for atherosclerosis is critical for long-term survival. Methotrexate is on par with azathioprine. If disease activity cannot be controlled in this way, belimumab is an approved therapeutic option. Cyclophosphamide is still used but only in life-threatening situations, such as lupus nephritis or central nervous system (CNS) vasculitis and in drastically reduced doses. Alternatively, off-label mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) can be used particularly for lupus nephritis and off-label rituximab in refractory disease courses. Numerous novel approaches are being tested in controlled trials and it is hoped that new drugs will be available for SLE patients within a few years.