1
|
Sowińska-Przepiera E, Krzyścin M, Syrenicz I, Ćwiertnia A, Orlińska A, Ćwiek D, Branecka-Woźniak D, Cymbaluk-Płoska A, Bumbulienė Ž, Syrenicz A. Evaluation of Trabecular Bone Microarchitecture and Bone Mineral Density in Young Women, Including Selected Hormonal Parameters. Biomedicines 2024; 12:758. [PMID: 38672114 PMCID: PMC11048270 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12040758] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2024] [Revised: 03/24/2024] [Accepted: 03/25/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
The absence of non-invasive methods for assessing bone material and structural changes is a significant diagnostic challenge. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) bone mineral density (BMD) testing is the gold standard for osteoporosis diagnosis. BMD and the trabecular bone score (TBS) have facilitated targeted osteoporosis prevention and treatment in clinical settings. The findings from this study indicate that BMD modulation in young women is influenced by various hormones, potentially compromising the diagnostic precision of BMD for subclinical bone demineralization. A total of 205 women aged 19 to 37 underwent anthropometric measurements and hormonal tests. BMD was determined using DXA, and TBS values were computed from the lumbar spine L1-L4 segment. The multivariate analysis findings suggest that BMD might not be determined by hormones. The relationship between TBS and TSH was statistically significant in the univariate analysis, which indicates the efficacy of further studies to determine the link between TBS and specific hormones. Analyzing the strength of the correlation between TBS and hormones in the univariate analysis shows which factors are worth considering in further analyses. This makes it possible to create better techniques that will help identify young women who are at a higher risk of developing osteoporosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elżbieta Sowińska-Przepiera
- Pediatric, Adolescent Gynecology Clinic, Department of Gynecology, Endocrinology and Gynecological Oncology, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Unii Lubelskiej 1, 71-252 Szczecin, Poland;
- Department of Endocrinology, Metabolic and Internal Diseases, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Unii Lubelskiej 1, 71-252 Szczecin, Poland; (I.S.); (A.S.)
| | - Mariola Krzyścin
- Pediatric, Adolescent Gynecology Clinic, Department of Gynecology, Endocrinology and Gynecological Oncology, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Unii Lubelskiej 1, 71-252 Szczecin, Poland;
| | - Igor Syrenicz
- Department of Endocrinology, Metabolic and Internal Diseases, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Unii Lubelskiej 1, 71-252 Szczecin, Poland; (I.S.); (A.S.)
| | - Adrianna Ćwiertnia
- Department of Reconstructive Surgery and Gynecological Oncology, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Al. Powstańców Wielkopolskich 72, 70-111 Szczecin, Poland; (A.Ć.); (A.O.); (A.C.-P.)
| | - Adrianna Orlińska
- Department of Reconstructive Surgery and Gynecological Oncology, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Al. Powstańców Wielkopolskich 72, 70-111 Szczecin, Poland; (A.Ć.); (A.O.); (A.C.-P.)
| | - Dorota Ćwiek
- Department of Obstetrics and Pathology of Pregnancy, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, 70-204 Szczecin, Poland;
| | - Dorota Branecka-Woźniak
- Department of Gynecology and Reproductive Health, Pomeranian Medical University of Szczecin, Żołnierska 48, 71-210 Szczecin, Poland;
| | - Aneta Cymbaluk-Płoska
- Department of Reconstructive Surgery and Gynecological Oncology, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Al. Powstańców Wielkopolskich 72, 70-111 Szczecin, Poland; (A.Ć.); (A.O.); (A.C.-P.)
| | - Žana Bumbulienė
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, LT-08661 Vilnius, Lithuania;
| | - Anhelli Syrenicz
- Department of Endocrinology, Metabolic and Internal Diseases, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Unii Lubelskiej 1, 71-252 Szczecin, Poland; (I.S.); (A.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Boyadzhieva Z, Palmowski A, Buttgereit F, Hoff P. [Trabecular bone score in rheumatology : Are there benefits in comparison to bone densitometry alone?]. Z Rheumatol 2023; 82:672-677. [PMID: 37646845 DOI: 10.1007/s00393-023-01407-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/02/2023] [Indexed: 09/01/2023]
Abstract
Patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases have an increased risk of fractures due to the inflammatory potential of the disease and also because of the treatment with glucocorticoids that is often necessary. According to the current guidelines of the Governing Body on Osteology (DVO), the fracture risk can be assessed using dual energy X‑ray absorptiometry and can also be supplemented by measuring the trabecular bone score (TBS). The assessment of the TBS offers additional advantages, for example in glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis and in patients with osteoproliferative changes of the spine (spondylarthritis) and thus optimizes the fracture risk assessment in the rheumatological patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhivana Boyadzhieva
- Med. Klinik mit Schwerpunkt Rheumatologie und klinische Immunologie, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Deutschland.
| | - Andriko Palmowski
- Med. Klinik mit Schwerpunkt Rheumatologie und klinische Immunologie, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Deutschland
- Section for Biostatistics and Evidence-Based Research, The Parker Institute, University of Copenhagen, Kopenhagen, Dänemark
| | - Frank Buttgereit
- Med. Klinik mit Schwerpunkt Rheumatologie und klinische Immunologie, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Paula Hoff
- Med. Klinik mit Schwerpunkt Rheumatologie und klinische Immunologie, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Deutschland
- MVZ Endokrinologikum Berlin am Gendarmenmarkt, Berlin, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Shevroja E, Reginster JY, Lamy O, Al-Daghri N, Chandran M, Demoux-Baiada AL, Kohlmeier L, Lecart MP, Messina D, Camargos BM, Payer J, Tuzun S, Veronese N, Cooper C, McCloskey EV, Harvey NC. Update on the clinical use of trabecular bone score (TBS) in the management of osteoporosis: results of an expert group meeting organized by the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis and Musculoskeletal Diseases (ESCEO), and the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) under the auspices of WHO Collaborating Center for Epidemiology of Musculoskeletal Health and Aging. Osteoporos Int 2023; 34:1501-1529. [PMID: 37393412 PMCID: PMC10427549 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-023-06817-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2023] [Accepted: 05/31/2023] [Indexed: 07/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Trabecular bone score (TBS) is a grey-level textural measurement acquired from dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry lumbar spine images and is a validated index of bone microarchitecture. In 2015, a Working Group of the European Society on Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis and Musculoskeletal Diseases (ESCEO) published a review of the TBS literature, concluding that TBS predicts hip and major osteoporotic fracture, at least partly independent of bone mineral density (BMD) and clinical risk factors. It was also concluded that TBS is potentially amenable to change as a result of pharmacological therapy. Further evidence on the utility of TBS has since accumulated in both primary and secondary osteoporosis, and the introduction of FRAX and BMD T-score adjustment for TBS has accelerated adoption. This position paper therefore presents a review of the updated scientific literature and provides expert consensus statements and corresponding operational guidelines for the use of TBS. METHODS An Expert Working Group was convened by the ESCEO and a systematic review of the evidence undertaken, with defined search strategies for four key topics with respect to the potential use of TBS: (1) fracture prediction in men and women; (2) initiating and monitoring treatment in postmenopausal osteoporosis; (3) fracture prediction in secondary osteoporosis; and (4) treatment monitoring in secondary osteoporosis. Statements to guide the clinical use of TBS were derived from the review and graded by consensus using the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. RESULTS A total of 96 articles were reviewed and included data on the use of TBS for fracture prediction in men and women, from over 20 countries. The updated evidence shows that TBS enhances fracture risk prediction in both primary and secondary osteoporosis, and can, when taken with BMD and clinical risk factors, inform treatment initiation and the choice of antiosteoporosis treatment. Evidence also indicates that TBS provides useful adjunctive information in monitoring treatment with long-term denosumab and anabolic agents. All expert consensus statements were voted as strongly recommended. CONCLUSION The addition of TBS assessment to FRAX and/or BMD enhances fracture risk prediction in primary and secondary osteoporosis, adding useful information for treatment decision-making and monitoring. The expert consensus statements provided in this paper can be used to guide the integration of TBS in clinical practice for the assessment and management of osteoporosis. An example of an operational approach is provided in the appendix. This position paper presents an up-to-date review of the evidence base, synthesised through expert consensus statements, which informs the implementation of Trabecular Bone Score in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enisa Shevroja
- Interdisciplinary Center for Bone Diseases, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Jean-Yves Reginster
- World Health Organization Collaborating Center for Epidemiology of Musculoskeletal Health and Aging, Liège, Belgium
- Department of Public Health, Epidemiology and Health Economics, University of Liège, CHU Sart Tilman B23, 4000 Liège, Belgium
| | - Olivier Lamy
- Interdisciplinary Center for Bone Diseases, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Nasser Al-Daghri
- Biochemistry Department, College of Science, King Saud University, 11451 Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Manju Chandran
- Osteoporosis and Bone Metabolism Unit, Department of Endocrinology, Singapore General Hospital, ACADEMIA, 20, College Road, Singapore, 169856 Singapore
| | | | - Lynn Kohlmeier
- Spokane Strides for Strong Bones, Medical Director, West Coast Bone Health CME TeleECHO, Spokane, WA USA
| | | | - Daniel Messina
- IRO Medical Research Center, Buenos Aires and Rheumatology Section, Cosme Argerich, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Bruno Muzzi Camargos
- Rede Materdei de Saúde - Hospital Santo Agostinho - Densitometry Unit Coordinator, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
| | - Juraj Payer
- 5th Department of Internal Medicine, Comenius University Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital, Bratislava, Slovakia
- Ružinovská 6, 82101 Bratislava, Slovakia
| | - Sansin Tuzun
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Cerrahpaşa School of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Nicola Veronese
- Department of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties “G. D’Alessandro”, University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy
| | - Cyrus Cooper
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO16 6YD UK
- NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
- NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Eugene V. McCloskey
- Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
- MRC Versus Arthritis Centre for Integrated Research in Musculoskeletal Ageing, Mellanby Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Nicholas C. Harvey
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO16 6YD UK
- NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kozyreva MV, Nikitinskaya OA, Toroptsova NV. Trabecular bone score in rheumatic disease. RHEUMATOLOGY SCIENCE AND PRACTICE 2022. [DOI: 10.47360/1995-4484-2022-587-59] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Patients with rheumatic diseases (RD) are at high risk of osteoporosis (OP) and osteoporotic fractures. The Trabecular bone score (TBS) is a relatively novel method of assessing bone quality, which independently predicts fracture risk regardless of bone mineral density (BMD). A lower TBS in patients with RD compared to controls is shown in most studies concerning TBS and RD. The data obtained indicate that TBS predicts fractures better in RD, especially in patients receiving glucocorticoids, than BMD or the FRAX algorithm. TBS degradation has been associated with disease activity in ankylosing spondylitis, systemic sclerosis, and rheumatoid arthritis in a few studies. However, there is little data in the literature on the effect of rheumatic disease therapy and OP treatment in patients with RD on predictive ability of TBS for incident fracture.
Collapse
|
5
|
Richards C, Leslie WD. Trabecular Bone Score in Rheumatic Disease. Curr Rheumatol Rep 2022; 24:81-87. [PMID: 35334058 DOI: 10.1007/s11926-022-01062-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/24/2022] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Patients with rheumatic disease are at high risk of low bone mass and osteoporotic fracture. Trabecular bone score (TBS), derived from lumbar spine dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA), is a novel measure of bone texture that independently predicts fracture risk. This review examines the role of TBS in rheumatic disease including fracture prediction. RECENT FINDINGS Most studies concerning TBS and rheumatic disease are cross-sectional, with consistent evidence of lower TBS in patients with rheumatic disease compared to controls. Recent studies have shown association and predictive ability of TBS for prevalent fracture, and the few longitudinal studies showed predictive ability of TBS for incident fracture. TBS in ankylosing spondylitis is of interest given the high rates of vertebral fracture and technical difficulty with lumbar spine bone mineral density. TBS degradation has been associated with disease activity in ankylosing spondylitis, systemic sclerosis, and rheumatoid arthritis. Glucocorticoid exposure is associated with lower TBS, and predicts prevalent fracture, in patients with rheumatic conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ceri Richards
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada. .,Department of Rheumatology, University of Manitoba, RR149 800 Sherbrook Street, Winnipeg, MB, R3A 1M4, Canada.
| | - William D Leslie
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.,Department of Medicine (C5121), University of Manitoba, 409 Tache Avenue, Winnipeg, R2H 2A6, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Żuchowski P, Dura M, Jeka D, Waszczak-Jeka M. The applicability of trabecular bone score for osteoporosis diagnosis in ankylosing spondylitis. Rheumatol Int 2022; 42:839-846. [PMID: 35314900 DOI: 10.1007/s00296-022-05109-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2022] [Accepted: 03/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients have a high risk of osteoporotic fractures. The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of trabecular bone score (TBS) in assessing fracture risk in patients with AS. 67 patients meeting the ASAS classification criteria were enrolled in the study. Fracture risk for each patient was assessed based on a lumbar spine exam encompassing bone mineral density (BMD), and TBS through a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) exam. In addition, each patient had an X-ray taken of their lumbar and thoracic spine to determine the presence of syndesmophytes and bony bridges, as well as spinous process and vertebral body fractures. Moreover, each patient's medical history was analyzed for other osteoporotic fractures. A major osteoporosis fracture (MOF) was found in 11 (16%) patients in total, of which 7 (10%) were vertebral body fractures. The mean TBS in patients with MOF and no MOF were, respectively, 1.12 and 1.29 (p < 0.001). No significant differences were found in BMD scores between the two groups. Syndesmophytes and bony bridges occurred more frequently in patients with MOF (p = 0.02). Age of 50 or more (RR = 9.86, p = 0.002), TBS score ≤ 1.31 (RR = 2.07, p < 0.0001), and presence of syndesmophytes and bony bridges (RR = 2.14, p = 0.04) were considered a relative risk (RR) increasing factors. TBS is a markedly more sensitive method of identifying patients with a high fracture risk compared to BMD measurement in a DXA exam in patients with AS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paweł Żuchowski
- Clinic of Rheumatology and Connective Tissue Diseases, Jan Biziel University Hospital No 2, Bydgoszcz, Poland.
| | - Marta Dura
- Department of Radiology, Jan Biziel University Hospital No 2, Bydgoszcz, Poland.,Collegium Medicum, Bydgoszcz, Poland
| | - Daniel Jeka
- Nasz Lekarz Przychodnie Medyczne, Toruń, Poland
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
[71/f-Multiple vertebral body fractures and glucocorticoid treatment : Preparation for the medical specialist examination: part 74]. Internist (Berl) 2021; 62:486-491. [PMID: 34196739 DOI: 10.1007/s00108-021-01072-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/21/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
|
8
|
Guañabens N, Olmos JM, Hernández JL, Cerdà D, Hidalgo Calleja C, Martinez López JA, Arboleya L, Aguilar Del Rey FJ, Martinez Pardo S, Ros Vilamajó I, Suris Armangué X, Grados D, Beltrán Audera C, Suero-Rosario E, Gómez Gracia I, Salmoral Chamizo A, Martín-Esteve I, Florez H, Naranjo A, Castañeda S, Ojeda Bruno S, García Carazo S, García Vadillo A, López Vives L, Martínez-Ferrer À, Borrell Paños H, Aguado Acín P, Castellanos-Moreira R, Tebé C, Gómez-Vaquero C. Vertebral fractures are increased in rheumatoid arthritis despite recent therapeutic advances: a case-control study. Osteoporos Int 2021; 32:1333-1342. [PMID: 33459805 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-021-05824-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2020] [Accepted: 01/04/2021] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
UNLABELLED Prevalence and risk factors of vertebral fractures in postmenopausal RA women were assessed in 323 patients and compared with 660 age-matched women. Of patients, 24.15% had at least one vertebral fracture vs.16.06% of controls. Age, glucocorticoids and falls were the main fracture risks. Vertebral fractures were associated with disease severity. INTRODUCTION There is little quality data on the updated prevalence of fractures in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) that may have changed due to advances in the therapeutic strategy in recent years. This study was aimed at analysing the prevalence and risk factors of vertebral fractures in postmenopausal women with RA and comparing it with that of the general population. METHODS We included 323 postmenopausal women diagnosed with RA from 19 Spanish Rheumatology Departments, randomly selected and recruited in 2018. Lateral radiographs of the thoracic and lumbar spine were obtained to evaluate morphometric vertebral fractures and the spinal deformity index. We analysed subject characteristics, factors related to RA, and fracture risk factors. The control group consisted of 660 age-matched Spanish postmenopausal women from the population-based Camargo cohort. RESULTS Seventy-eight (24.15%) RA patients had at least one vertebral fracture. RA patients had increased fracture risk compared with controls (106 of 660, 16.06%) (p = 0.02). Logistic regression analysis showed that age (OR 2.17; 95% CI 1.27-4.00), glucocorticoids (OR 3.83; 95% CI 1.32-14.09) and falls (OR 3.57; 95% CI 1.91-6.86) were the independent predictors of vertebral fractures in RA patients. The subgroup with vertebral fractures had higher disease activity (DAS28: 3.15 vs. 2.78, p = 0.038) and disability (HAQ: 0.96 vs. 0.63, p = 0.049), as compared with those without vertebral fractures. CONCLUSION The risk of vertebral fracture in RA is still high in recent years, when compared with the general population. The key determinants of fracture risk are age, glucocorticoids and falls. Patients with vertebral fractures have a more severe RA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Guañabens
- Department of Rheumatology, Hospital Clínic, CIBERehd, IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - J M Olmos
- Departament of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla-IDIVAL, Universidad de Cantabria, Santander, Spain
| | - J L Hernández
- Departament of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla-IDIVAL, Universidad de Cantabria, Santander, Spain
| | - D Cerdà
- Department of Rheumatology, Hospital Moisès Broggi, Sant Joan Despí, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - C Hidalgo Calleja
- Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
| | - J A Martinez López
- Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain
| | - L Arboleya
- Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain
| | - F J Aguilar Del Rey
- Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital Virgen de la Victoria, Malaga, Spain
| | - S Martinez Pardo
- Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital Mutua Terrassa, Barcelona, Spain
| | - I Ros Vilamajó
- Department of Rheumatology, Hospital Son Llàtzer, Palma de Mallorca, Spain
| | - X Suris Armangué
- Department of Rheumatology, Hospital General de Granollers, Granollers, International University of Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain
| | - D Grados
- Department of Rheumatology, Hospital d'Igualada, Igualada, Barcelona, Spain
| | - C Beltrán Audera
- Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - E Suero-Rosario
- Department of Rheumatology, Hospital General Mateu Orfila, Maó, Spain
| | - I Gómez Gracia
- Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital Reina Sofía, Cordoba, Spain
| | - A Salmoral Chamizo
- Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital Reina Sofía, Cordoba, Spain
| | - I Martín-Esteve
- Department of Rheumatology, Hospital General Mateu Orfila, Maó, Spain
| | - H Florez
- Department of Rheumatology, Hospital Clínic, CIBERehd, IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - A Naranjo
- Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital de Gran Canaria Dr. Negrín, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain
| | - S Castañeda
- Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital La Princesa IIS-IP, Madrid, Spain
| | - S Ojeda Bruno
- Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital de Gran Canaria Dr. Negrín, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain
| | - S García Carazo
- Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital La Paz, Madrid, Spain
| | - A García Vadillo
- Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital La Princesa IIS-IP, Madrid, Spain
| | - L López Vives
- Department of Rheumatology, Hospital Sant Rafael, Barcelona, Spain
| | - À Martínez-Ferrer
- Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital Doctor Peset, Valencia, Spain
| | - H Borrell Paños
- Department of Rheumatology, Hospital Sant Rafael, Barcelona, Spain
| | - P Aguado Acín
- Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital La Paz, Madrid, Spain
| | - R Castellanos-Moreira
- Department of Rheumatology, Hospital Clínic, CIBERehd, IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - C Tebé
- Biostatistics Unit, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL) L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - C Gómez-Vaquero
- Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital de Bellvitge, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Rajan R, Cherian KE, Kapoor N, Paul TV. Trabecular Bone Score-An Emerging Tool in the Management of Osteoporosis. Indian J Endocrinol Metab 2020; 24:237-243. [PMID: 33083262 PMCID: PMC7539023 DOI: 10.4103/ijem.ijem_147_20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2020] [Revised: 04/25/2020] [Accepted: 05/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Areal bone mineral density (aBMD) is currently the gold standard for the diagnosis of osteoporosis, however, it has its own pitfalls. Trabecular bone score (TBS), a novel tool in the evaluation of osteoporosis is an indirect indicator of bone microarchitecture. It is a textural index that evaluates pixel gray-level variations in the lumbar spine DXA (dual energy X-ray absorptiometry) image. Both cross-sectional and longitudinal studies have demonstrated that TBS may independently predict fragility fractures. TBS can also be used to adjust FRAX probabilities of fracture, though data available till date doesn't support any additional benefit. TBS also shows an improving trend with anti-osteoporotic treatment; however, the least significant change (LSC) is high that it takes more than 2 years for the change to manifest. TBS is also used in the evaluation of bone strength in cases of secondary osteoporosis. Though TBS predicts fracture risk independently in both genders, with the currently available data, it cannot be recommended as a standalone tool for decision regarding treatment of osteoporosis. TBS can be used as a tool to complement BMD in assessment of bone health. Additional studies are needed to assess its utility in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Remya Rajan
- Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Kripa E. Cherian
- Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Nitin Kapoor
- Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Thomas V. Paul
- Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
| |
Collapse
|