[Disease-related knowledge acquisition through structured patient information in rheumatoid arthritis (StruPI-RA) : First results of the StruPI-RA study in Germany]

Translation, transcultural adaptation into Brazilian Portuguese and concurrent validity of the rheumatoid arthritis assessment scale (RAKAS-13/Brazil)

BACKGROUND

Knowledge of patients about Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) is a necessary aspect to better approach self-management support in a patient-centered manner. The research instrument known as the Rheumatoid Arthritis Knowledge Assessment Scale (RAKAS), consisting of 13 items, is simple, reliable and reproducible, and can be applied in both clinical practice and research protocols.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to translate and culturally adapt the RAKAS vocabulary into Brazilian Portuguese and to evaluate its concurrent validity.

METHODS

The RAKAS was translated into Brazilian Portuguese and administered to 52 elderly women with RA recruited between May 2021 and May 2022. Concurrent validity was assessed using the Spearman's correlation coefficient between RAKAS and Patient Knowledge Questionnaire (PKQ).

RESULTS

The participants considered RAKAS-13/BRAZIL easy to understand and did not report any doubts in answering the final version. Concurrent validity of the RAKAS-13/BRAZIL was low compared to the PKQ (ρ = 0.283, p = 0.038).

CONCLUSION

The Brazilian Portuguese version of the RAKAS (RAKAS-13/BRASIL) proved to be a questionnaire that was easy and quick to administer to assess patient knowledge about Rheumatoid Arthritis, despite its low correlation with the PKQ in the present study.

The impact of a structured one-day seminar on disease-specific knowledge, lifestyle habits and disease impairment in ANCA-associated vasculitis. Results of a randomized, controlled study

OBJECTIVE

Anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV) is a complex, chronic autoimmune disease, and its diagnosis triggers considerable anxiety and uncertainty for those affected. There are currently no valid data describing the impact of disease-specific patient education on the disease knowledge, subjective impairment, and changes in lifestyle habits related to AAV.

METHOD

We designed a one-day educational programme to serve AAV patients with information about their disease and its treatment. Patients were randomized into an intervention group and a waiting list control group. Increase in knowledge was measured with a multiple-choice test. The intervention group completed the questionnaire before, directly after, and 3 months after the seminar, while the waiting list control group was additionally tested 3 months before the seminar to rule out non-specific learning. Furthermore, we investigated the burden of the disease and the impact of our intervention on this burden.

RESULTS

Compared with the control group, the intervention increased the knowledge (mean ± sd score difference 2.2 ± 1.0, 95% confidence interval 0.1-4.3, p = 0.04). From the patients' point of view, their understanding of the disease had improved and the subjective impairment caused by their rheumatic disease had decreased. There was a tendency to include disease-relevant behaviour, such as nasal care or dietary recommendations, more often in everyday life.

CONCLUSION

A one-day seminar is suitable to increase the disease-specific knowledge of patients with AAV in a sustainable manner. In addition, our measure positively affected the disease-relevant behaviour.

[Development of quality standards for patients with rheumatoid arthritis for use in Germany]

Despite a qualitatively and structurally good care of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in Germany, there are still potentially amendable deficits in the quality of care. For this reason, the German Society for Rheumatology (DGRh) has therefore decided to ask a group of experts including various stakeholders to develop quality standards (QS) for the care of patients with RA in order to improve the quality of care. The QS are used to determine and quantitatively measure the quality of care, subject to relevance and feasibility. The recently published NICE and ASAS standards and a systematic literature search were used as the basis for development. A total of 8 QS, now published for the first time, were approved with the intention to measure and further optimize the quality of care for patients with RA in Germany.

[Rehabilitation in Rheumatoid Arthritis]

Die rheumatoide Arthritis stellt unter den Erkrankungen des Bewegungssystems eine besondere Herausforderung für die Rehabilitationsmedizin dar 1. Eine genaue Kenntnis der Erkrankung, inklusive der medikamentösen und der nicht medikamentösen Behandlungsoptionen, ist die wesentliche Voraussetzung für einen nachhaltigen Rehabilitationserfolg und um den berechtigen Anspruch der Erkrankten auf berufliche und soziale Partizipation umzusetzen.

[Data analysis in rheumatology practices : Possibilities, limitations, and results]

Data analyses in rheumatology practices can be used as a feedback system in quality management. Implementation of a representative patient survey enables evaluation of one's own work and can be used for external presentation of the practice. Patient education and the structured use of specialist rheumatology assistants were evaluated by means of a survey. Systematic screening for depressive symptoms was carried out and enables a better understanding of patients and their "unmet needs". An analysis of the diseases and the patients in terms of physical function, disease activity, medication, and concomitant diseases is possible using structured patient documentation in a specialized documentation system. Within the RHADAR network (RheumaDatenRhePort G.b.R.), the proportion of rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with Janus kinase inhibitors was compared between different centers. Patients suitable for clinical trials can be filtered out of a structured documentation system.

[Regional cooperative rheumatology centers : Networking of rheumatology in Germany for over 25 years]

Over the last 25 years the regional collaborative rheumatology centers have become established throughout Germany as "catalysts" for improving rheumatological care at many different levels. With campaigns and a multitude of activities they have promoted the visibility of rheumatology in Germany together with rheumatological alliance partners and, on the scientific side, together with the German Rheumatism Research Center have contributed to the improvement of rheumatological care research in Germany. The regional cooperative rheumatology centers have become an important partner in the rheumatology network in their association as a working group of the German Society for Rheumatology and they will continue to face new tasks in the future to further improve rheumatological care in Germany.