Prevalence of left ventricular systolic dysfunction in a typical outpatient pacemaker cohort

Efficacy of CRT upgrade in pacemaker-induced cardiomyopathy in an outpatient clinic - Results of a prospective registry

PURPOSE

The aim of this prospective, monocentric registry study was to investigate whether upgrading to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in pacemaker-induced cardiomyopathy (PICM) can improve left ventricular function in typical outpatient clinical patients.

METHODS

We screened for PICM in a pacemaker outpatient clinic between 2017 and 2021. The follow-up period was 6 months. The primary endpoint was decreased left ventricular end systolic volume (LVESV), and the responder criterion was decreased LVESV >15%. Secondary endpoints were LVEF, NYHA class, device-associated complications and death.

RESULTS

66 patients were newly diagnosed with PICM. 55 of them received a CRT upgrade. For the primary endpoint, LVESV decreased from 101.6 ± 48.2 ml to 75.9 ± 35.8 ml (p < 0.001). Secondary endpoints were: a) LVEF increased from 31.5 ± 5.4% to 46.1 ± 7.6% (p < 0.001) and b) NYHA class improved by an average of one class in both groups (p < 0.001). The overall complication rate was 1.8%.

CONCLUSIONS

CRT upgrade in outpatient clinic patients with PICM improves left ventricular function and functional capacity and is associated with an acceptable complication rate.

Management of temporary epicardial pacing wires in the cardiac surgical patient

Temporary epicardial pacing wires are used after cardiothoracic surgery to maintain a stable cardiac rhythm. They must be distinguished from the more commonly encountered transvenous temporary pacing wires, which are often used in coronary care units for the same purpose. Patients with temporary epicardial pacing wires may be transferred to hospital wards where these wires are not usually encountered, such as COVID wards, the general intensive care unit, the coronary care unit or general surgical wards if a laparotomy was required in the early period following cardiac surgery. Serious complications may arise in managing patients with temporary epicardial pacing wires, which are well known in the cardiothoracic unit but not so well known elsewhere in the hospital. This article discusses the dangers associated with the management of temporary epicardial pacing wires in adult patients, some of which are common to temporary transvenous pacing wires and others are unique to temporary epicardial pacing wires.

Therapie mit kardialen implantierbaren elektrischen Devices im Alter

Die Therapie mit Herzschrittmacher, implantierbarem Kardioverter-Defibrillator (ICD) oder kardialer Resynchronisation (CRT) ist bei Patienten im Alter besonders oft indiziert und hilfreich, stellt jedoch besondere Anforderungen an Indikationsstellung, Systemwahl, Implantation und Nachsorge. In der Schrittmachertherapie muss Einfühlungsvermögen angewandt werden, um eine oft unspezifische Symptomatik mit einer Bradykardie zu assoziieren. In der ICD-Therapie muss berücksichtigt werden, ob bei hohem Alter und Komorbidität eine Lebensverlängerung durch den ICD möglich und vom Patienten gewünscht ist. Bevor die Akutsituation nicht arrhythmischen Sterbens eintritt, sollte eine Deaktivierung der Schocktherapie erfolgen. Bei hohem Alter muss eine Implantation sicher und zügig durchgeführt, aber immer das optimale System (z. B. CRT) und eine optimale Elektrodenposition verwendet werden, da gerade alte Patienten sehr empfindlich auf eine suboptimale Hämodynamik reagieren.

[Indications for His bundle and left bundle branch pacing]

His bundle pacing (HBP) allows ventricular excitation through the entire cardiac conduction system, resulting in a better synchronicity and efficacy of contraction compared to myocardial pacing. Due to better, dedicated implantation tools and exact practical implantation recommendations, HBP has developed into a form of stimulation that can be successfully applied with reasonable time and effort in >90% of patients. The rate of lead dislodgement and threshold increase is similar to conventional pacemaker systems. Despite a rather weak data base and a paucity of randomized trials, HBS represents an alternative to conventional right or biventricular pacing in the following conditions: (1) high-degree atrioventricular (AV) block with expected ventricular pacing >20% of the time, (2) AV block 1st degree with long PQ (alone or in combination with intermittent 2nd to 3rd degree AV block or sick sinus syndrome), (3) AV node ablation due to refractory atrial fibrillation, and (4) upgrade in pacing-induced cardiomyopathy. Moreover, HBP may be useful in context with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Left bundle branch block below the level of His represents a limitation of HBP. Therefore, more recently left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) has been introduced to correct left bundle branch block. LBBP seems to be possible in a wider anatomic area and may be easier to implant. However, LBBP requires active screw-in of the lead deep into the ventricular septum. Experience with this new technique is limited, particularly regarding long-term performance.