1
|
Bogossian H, Busch S. [The challenge: specialization meets general medicine]. Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol 2024; 35:175-176. [PMID: 39172218 DOI: 10.1007/s00399-024-01034-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/17/2024] [Indexed: 08/23/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Harilaos Bogossian
- Klinik für Kardiologie und Rhythmologie, Evangelisches Krankenhaus Hagen-Haspe, Brusebrinkstraße 20, 58135, Hagen, Deutschland.
- Universität Witten/Herdecke, Witten, Deutschland.
| | - Sonia Busch
- Abteilung Elektrophysiologie, Herz-Zentrum Bodensee, Luisenstr. 9A, 78464, Konstanz, Deutschland.
- Herz-Neuro-Zentrum Bodensee, Münsterlingen, Schweiz.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zhang Y, Jiang L, Shen J, Zhang L. A shorter R wave peak time in left bundle branch pacing may not be a marker of more physiological ventricular activation: A case report. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2024; 47:551-553. [PMID: 37325978 DOI: 10.1111/pace.14754] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2023] [Revised: 05/06/2023] [Accepted: 05/26/2023] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
Left bundle branch pacing (LBBp) is a promising alternative to conventional biventricular pacing cardiac resynchronization therapy. The left anterior fascicle (LAF) is adjacent to the left ventricular outflow tract, while the left posterior fascicle (LPF) dominates a broader area of the left ventricle. Whether LAF or LPF dominates ventricular activation has not been determined. We present the case of a 76-year-old man who underwent LBBp implantation and propose the left ventricular activation domination in LPF pacing, an alternative when LBBp is unavailable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuelin Zhang
- Department of Cardiology, Ningbo No. 2 Hospital, Ningbo, China
| | - Longfu Jiang
- Department of Cardiology, Ningbo No. 2 Hospital, Ningbo, China
| | - Jiabo Shen
- Department of Cardiology, Ningbo No. 2 Hospital, Ningbo, China
| | - Lu Zhang
- Department of Cardiology, Ningbo No. 2 Hospital, Ningbo, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tang W, He W, Long M, Chang R, Su C, Li J, Liu M, Zhang X, Chen X, Jiang J, Liu D, Wang L. Feasibility and efficacy of dual cathode modality in left bundle branch pacing. Heart Rhythm 2023; 20:1796-1798. [PMID: 37678491 DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2023.08.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2023] [Revised: 08/25/2023] [Accepted: 08/28/2023] [Indexed: 09/09/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Tang
- Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Key Laboratory on Assisted Circulation, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China; Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Wei He
- Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China; Department of Medical Ultrasonics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Ming Long
- Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Key Laboratory on Assisted Circulation, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China; Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Rongxuan Chang
- Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Key Laboratory on Assisted Circulation, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China; Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Chen Su
- Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Key Laboratory on Assisted Circulation, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China; Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Jie Li
- Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China; Department of Medical Ultrasonics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Menghui Liu
- Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Key Laboratory on Assisted Circulation, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China; Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Xiaoyu Zhang
- Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Key Laboratory on Assisted Circulation, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China; Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Xumiao Chen
- Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Key Laboratory on Assisted Circulation, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China; Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Jingzhou Jiang
- Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Key Laboratory on Assisted Circulation, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China; Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Donghong Liu
- Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China; Department of Medical Ultrasonics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Lichun Wang
- Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Key Laboratory on Assisted Circulation, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China; Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ezzeddine FM, Leon IG, Cha YM. Cardiac Resynchronisation with Conduction System Pacing. Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev 2023; 12:e22. [PMID: 37654672 PMCID: PMC10466271 DOI: 10.15420/aer.2023.03] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2023] [Accepted: 04/12/2023] [Indexed: 09/02/2023] Open
Abstract
To date, biventricular pacing (BiVP) has been the standard pacing modality for cardiac resynchronisation therapy. However, it is non-physiological, with the activation spreading between the left ventricular epicardium and right ventricular endocardium. Up to one-third of patients with heart failure who are eligible for cardiac resynchronisation therapy do not derive benefit from BiVP. Conduction system pacing (CSP), which includes His bundle pacing and left bundle branch area pacing, has emerged as an alternative to BiVP for cardiac resynchronisation. There is mounting evidence supporting the benefits of CSP in achieving synchronous ventricular activation and repolarisation. The aim of this review is to summarise the current options and outcomes of CSP when used for cardiac resynchronisation in patients with heart failure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Isaac G Leon
- Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, US
| | - Yong-Mei Cha
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, US
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Approach to Left Bundle Branch Pacing. Cardiol Rev 2023:00045415-990000000-00084. [PMID: 36912509 DOI: 10.1097/crd.0000000000000545] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/14/2023]
Abstract
Cardiac pacing refers to the implantation tool serving as a treatment modality for various indications, the most common of which is symptomatic bradyarrhythmia. Left bundle branch pacing has been noted in the literature to be safer than biventricular pacing or His-bundle pacing in patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB) and heart failure, thereby becoming the focus of further research on cardiac pacing. A review of the literature was conducted using a combination of keywords, including "Left Bundle Branch Block," "Procedural techniques," "Left Bundle Capture," and "Complications." The following factors have been investigated as key criteria for direct capture: paced QRS morphology, peak left ventricular activation time, left bundle potential, nonselective and selective left bundle capture, and programmed deep septal stimulation protocol. In addition, complications of LBBP, inclusive of septal perforation, thromboembolism, right bundle branch injury, septal artery injury, lead dislodgement, lead fracture, and lead extraction, have also been elaborated on. Despite clinical implications based on clinical research comparing the use of LBBP with other forms such as right ventricular apex pacing, His-bundle pacing, biventricular pacing, and left ventricular septal pacing, a paucity in the literature on long-term effects and efficacy has been noted. LBBP can thus be considered to have a promising future in patients requiring cardiac pacing, assuming that additional research on clinical outcomes and the limitation of significant complications such as thromboembolism can be established.
Collapse
|
6
|
Zhong J, Zheng N, Jiang L. Evaluation of the Shortening of the Stimulus to Peak Left Ventricular Activation Time at Continuous Low Output to Confirm Selective Left Bundle Branch Pacing. Heart Rhythm O2 2022; 3:351-357. [PMID: 36097464 PMCID: PMC9463687 DOI: 10.1016/j.hroo.2022.04.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) is a physiological pacing method for treatment of atrioventricular block. However, there is a need for a new convenient and safe method for performing left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) and to confirm left conduction system capture. Objective This study aimed to explore a new convenient and safe method for performing selective LBBP. Methods A total of 28 patients who had indications for pacing therapy and received LBBAP were recruited retrospectively. Demographic and baseline patient characteristics, electrocardiograms, pacing parameters, and intracardiac electrogram pattern were evaluated. Continuous unipolar pacing at low output (2 V / 0.5 ms) was performed during the whole period of LBBP lead implantation. Successful left bundle branch (LBB) capture was defined as the abrupt change of the pacing stimulus to the peak of R wave in lead V5 during continuous pacing at low output (2 V / 0.5 ms). Results The parameters of the 2 shortenings (stimulus-to-peak left ventricular activation time [S-peak LVAT] before shortening, S-peak LVAT after shortening, and the duration of shortening) all showed a significant positive correlation (Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient [PCC] = 0.915, P < .001; PCC = 0.897, P < 0.001; PCCs = 0.765, P < 0.001). Shortening of the S-peak LVAT with continuous low output had a 100% sensitivity and 33.3% specificity for predicting stimulus-ventricular potential interval (S-V interval). Conclusion Abrupt shortening of the S-peak LVAT at continuous low output was associated with abrupt shortening of the S-peak LVAT at low and high output. High rate of selective LBB capture can be achieved with the method of continuous low output, shortening the S-peak LVAT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Longfu Jiang
- Address reprint requests and correspondence: Longfu Jiang, Department of Cardiology, Hwa Mei Hospital, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 41 North West St, Ningbo, Zhejiang, China.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
[His bundle and left bundle branch pacing]. Herz 2021; 46:499-512. [PMID: 34766195 DOI: 10.1007/s00059-021-05080-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/18/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
Cardiac pacemakers are an extremely effective treatment for bradycardia but can, however, cause desynchronization of ventricular contraction leading to cardiomyopathy. Pacing of the conduction system can prevent and even reverse desynchronization, which is impressively visible in echocardiography with speckle tracing. His' bundle and left bundle branch pacing requires a specific implantation technique, sheaths and leads which can achieve successful stimulation of the conduction system in up to 98% of cases. Data on conduction system pacing have been acquired in numerous studies but only a few randomized outcome studies. Therefore, in the current European guidelines His' bundle and left bundle branch pacing only have a low level recommendation. The guidelines recommend His' bundle pacing in patients in whom a coronary sinus lead cannot be implanted and in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation and planned atrioventricular (AV) node ablation for heart rate control. Additionally, conduction system pacing appears to be meaningful in patients with an AV block who require pacing of the ventricle for ≥20% of the time or who already show a slightly or moderately reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (36-50%). Even in patients scheduled for generator replacement who have developed a cardiac pacemaker-induced cardiomyopathy, the opportunity should not be missed to upgrade the system by implantation of a His' bundle electrode.
Collapse
|
8
|
Liu P, Wang Q, Sun H, Qin X, Zheng Q. Left Bundle Branch Pacing: Current Knowledge and Future Prospects. Front Cardiovasc Med 2021; 8:630399. [PMID: 33834042 PMCID: PMC8021709 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.630399] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2020] [Accepted: 02/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Cardiac pacing is an effective therapy for treating patients with bradycardia due to sinus node dysfunction or atrioventricular block. However, traditional right ventricular apical pacing (RVAP) causes electric and mechanical dyssynchrony, which is associated with increased risk for atrial arrhythmias and heart failure. Therefore, there is a need to develop a physiological pacing approach that activates the normal cardiac conduction and provides synchronized contraction of ventricles. Although His bundle pacing (HBP) has been widely used as a physiological pacing modality, it is limited by challenging implantation technique, unsatisfactory success rate in patients with wide QRS wave, high pacing capture threshold, and early battery depletion. Recently, the left bundle branch pacing (LBBP), defined as the capture of left bundle branch (LBB) via transventricular septal approach, has emerged as a newly physiological pacing modality. Results from early clinical studies have demonstrated LBBP's feasibility and safety, with rare complications and high success rate. Overall, this approach has been found to provide physiological pacing that guarantees electrical synchrony of the left ventricle with low pacing threshold. This was previously specifically characterized by narrow paced QRS duration, large R waves, fast synchronized left ventricular activation, and correction of left bundle branch block. Therefore, LBBP may be a potential alternative pacing modality for both RVAP and cardiac resynchronization therapy with HBP or biventricular pacing (BVP). However, the technique's widespread adaptation needs further validation to ascertain its safety and efficacy in randomized clinical trials. In this review, we discuss the current knowledge of LBBP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peng Liu
- Department of Cardiology, The Second Affiliate Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China
| | - Qiaozhu Wang
- Department of Cardiology, The Second Affiliate Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China
| | - Hongke Sun
- Department of Cardiology, The Second Affiliate Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China
| | - Xinghua Qin
- School of Life Sciences, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an, China
| | - Qiangsun Zheng
- Department of Cardiology, The Second Affiliate Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Rav Acha M, Soifer E, Hasin T. Cardiac Implantable Electronic Miniaturized and Micro Devices. MICROMACHINES 2020; 11:E902. [PMID: 33003460 PMCID: PMC7600795 DOI: 10.3390/mi11100902] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2020] [Revised: 09/21/2020] [Accepted: 09/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Advancement in the miniaturization of high-density power sources, electronic circuits, and communication technologies enabled the construction of miniaturized electronic devices, implanted directly in the heart. These include pacing devices to prevent low heart rates or terminate heart rhythm abnormalities ('arrhythmias'), long-term rhythm monitoring devices for arrhythmia detection in unexplained syncope cases, and heart failure (HF) hemodynamic monitoring devices, enabling the real-time monitoring of cardiac pressures to detect and alert for early fluid overload. These devices were shown to prevent HF hospitalizations and improve HF patients' life quality. Pacing devices include permanent pacemakers (PPM) that maintain normal heart rates, defibrillators that are capable of fast detection and the termination of life-threatening arrhythmias, and cardiac re-synchronization devices that improve cardiac function and the survival of HF patients. Traditionally, these devices are implanted via the venous system ('endovascular') using conductors ('endovascular leads/electrodes') that connect the subcutaneous device battery to the appropriate cardiac chamber. These leads are a potential source of multiple problems, including lead-failure and systemic infection resulting from the lifelong exposure of these leads to bacteria within the venous system. One of the important cardiac innovations in the last decade was the development of a leadless PPM functioning without venous leads, thus circumventing most endovascular PPM-related problems. Leadless PPM's consist of a single device, including a miniaturized power source, electronic chips, and fixating mechanism, directly implanted into the cardiac muscle. Only rare device-related problems and almost no systemic infections occur with these devices. Current leadless PPM's sense and pace only the ventricle. However, a novel leadless device that is capable of sensing both atrium and ventricle was recently FDA approved and miniaturized devices that are designed to synchronize right and left ventricles, using novel intra-body inner-device communication technologies, are under final experiments. This review will cover these novel implantable miniaturized cardiac devices and the basic algorithms and technologies that underlie their development. Advancement in the miniaturization of high-density power sources, electronic circuits, and communication technologies enabled the construction of miniaturized electronic devices, implanted directly in the heart. These include pacing devices to prevent low heart rates or terminate heart rhythm abnormalities ('arrhythmias'), long-term rhythm monitoring devices for arrhythmia detection in unexplained syncope cases, and heart failure (HF) hemodynamic monitoring devices, enabling the real-time monitoring of cardiac pressures to detect and alert early fluid overload. These devices were shown to prevent HF hospitalizations and improve HF patients' life quality. Pacing devices include permanent pacemakers (PPM) that maintain normal heart rates, defibrillators that are capable of fast detection and termination of life-threatening arrhythmias, and cardiac re-synchronization devices that improve cardiac function and survival of HF patients. Traditionally, these devices are implanted via the venous system ('endovascular') using conductors ('endovascular leads/electrodes') that connect the subcutaneous device battery to the appropriate cardiac chamber. These leads are a potential source of multiple problems, including lead-failure and systemic infection that result from the lifelong exposure of these leads to bacteria within the venous system. The development of a leadless PPM functioning without venous leads was one of the important cardiac innovations in the last decade, thus circumventing most endovascular PPM-related problems. Leadless PPM's consist of a single device, including a miniaturized power source, electronic chips, and fixating mechanism, implanted directly into the cardiac muscle. Only rare device-related problems and almost no systemic infections occur with these devices. Current leadless PPM's sense and pace only the ventricle. However, a novel leadless device that is capable of sensing both atrium and ventricle was recently FDA approved and miniaturized devices designed to synchronize right and left ventricles, using novel intra-body inner-device communication technologies, are under final experiments. This review will cover these novel implantable miniaturized cardiac devices and the basic algorithms and technologies that underlie their development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Moshe Rav Acha
- Jesselson Integrated Heart Center, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Hebrew University, Jerusalem 910000, Israel;
| | - Elina Soifer
- Vectorious Medical Technologies, Tel Aviv 610000, Israel;
| | - Tal Hasin
- Jesselson Integrated Heart Center, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Hebrew University, Jerusalem 910000, Israel;
| |
Collapse
|