Multinodular leptomeningeal metastases from ETANTR contain both small blue cell and maturing neuropil elements

Embryonal Tumors of the Central Nervous System with Multilayered Rosettes and Atypical Teratoid/Rhabdoid Tumors

The 2016 WHO classification of tumors of the central nervous system affected importantly the group of CNS embryonal tumors. Molecular analysis on methylome, genome, and transcriptome levels allowed better classification, identification of specific molecular hallmarks of the different subtypes of CNS embryonal tumors, and their more precise diagnosis. Routine application of appropriate molecular testing and standardized reporting are of pivotal importance for adequate prognosis and treatment, but also for epidemiology studies and search for efficient targeted therapies. As a result of this approach, the term primitive neuroectodermal tumor-PNET was removed and a new clinic-pathological entity was introduced-Embryonal tumor with multilayered rosettes (ETMR). The group of CNS embryonal tumors include also medulloblastoma, medulloepithelioma, CNS neuroblastoma, CNS ganglioneuroblastoma, atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumor (ATRT) and their subtypes. This chapter will focus mainly on ETMR and ATRT. Embryonal tumors with multilayered rosettes and the atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumors are undifferentiated or poorly differentiated tumors of the nervous system that originate from primitive brain cells, develop exclusively in childhood or adolescence, and are characterized by a high degree of malignancy, aggressive evolution and a tendency to metastasize to the cerebrospinal fluid. Their clinical presentation is similar to other malignant, intracranial, neoplastic lesions and depends mainly on the localization of the tumor, the rise of the intracranial pressure, and eventually the obstruction of the cerebrospinal fluid pathways. The MRI image characteristics of these tumors are largely overlappingintra-axial, hypercellular, heterogeneous tumors, frequently with intratumoral necrosis and/or hemorrhages. Treatment options for ETMR and ATRT are very restricted. Surgery can seldom achieve radical excision. The rarity of the disease hampers the establishment of a chemotherapy protocol and the usual age of the patients limits severely the application of radiotherapy as a therapeutic option. Consequently, the prognosis of these undifferentiated, malignant, aggressive tumors remains dismal with a 5-year survival between 0 and 30%.

CT and Multimodal MR Imaging Features of Embryonal Tumors with Multilayered Rosettes in Children

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Embryonal tumors with multilayered rosettes, C19MC-altered, are brain tumors occurring in young children, which were clearly defined in the 2016 World Health Organization classification of central nervous system neoplasms. Our objective was to describe the multimodal imaging characteristics of this new entity.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective monocentric review of embryonal brain tumors and looked for embryonal tumors with multilayered rosettes with confirmed C19MC alteration. We gathered morphologic imaging data, as well as DWI and PWI data (using arterial spin-labeling and DSC).

RESULTS

We included 16 patients with a median age of 2 years 8 months. Tumors were both supratentorial (56%, 9/16) and infratentorial (44%, 7/16). Tumors were large (median diameter, 59 mm; interquartile range, 48-71 mm), with absent (75%, 12/16) or minimal (25%, 4/16) peritumoral edema. Enhancement was absent (20%, 3/15) or weak (73%, 11/15), whereas intratumoral macrovessels were frequently seen (94%, 15/16) and calcifications were present in 67% (10/15). Diffusion was always restricted, with a minimal ADC of 520 mm²/s (interquartile range, 495-540 mm²/s). Cerebral blood flow using arterial spin-labeling was low, with a maximal CBF of 43 mL/min/100 g (interquartile range, 33-55 mL/min/100 g 5). When available (3 patients), relative cerebral blood volume using DSC was high (range, 3.5-5.8).

CONCLUSIONS

Embryonal tumors with multilayered rosettes, C19MC-altered, have characteristic imaging features that could help in the diagnosis of this rare tumor in young children.

Childhood Medulloblastoma Revisited

Medulloblastoma is the most common malignant solid tumor in childhood and the most common embryonal neuroepithelial tumor of the central nervous system. Several morphological variants are recognized: classic medulloblastoma, large cell/anaplastic medulloblastoma, desmoplastic/nodular medulloblastoma, and medulloblastoma with extensive nodularity. Recent advances in transcriptome and methylome profiling of these tumors led to a molecular classification that includes 4 major genetically defined groups. Accordingly, the 2016 revision of the World Health Organization's Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System recognizes the following medulloblastoma entities: Wingless (WNT)-activated, Sonic hedgehog (SHH)-activated, Group 3, and Group 4. This transcriptionally driven classification constitutes the basis of new risk stratification schemes applied to current therapeutic clinical trials. Because additional layers of molecular tumor heterogeneities are being progressively unveiled, several clinically relevant subgroups within the 4 major groups have already been identified. The purpose of this article is to review the recent basic science and clinical advances in the understanding of "medulloblastomas," and their diagnostic imaging correlates and the implications of those on current neuroimaging practice.

Radiation for ETMR: Literature review and case series of patients treated with proton therapy

Background and purpose

Embryonal tumors with multilayered rosettes (ETMRs) are aggressive tumors that typically occur in young children. Radiation is often deferred or delayed for these patients due to late effects; proton therapy may mitigate some of these concerns. This study reviews the role of radiation in ETMR and describes initial results with proton therapy.

Materials and methods

Records of patients with embryonal tumor with abundant neuropil and true rosettes (ETANTR), medulloepithelioma (MEP), and ependymoblastoma (EPL) treated with proton therapy at our institution were retrospectively reviewed. A literature review of cases of CNS ETANTR, MEP, and EPL published since 1990 was also conducted.

Results

Seven patients were treated with proton therapy. Their median age at diagnosis was 33 months (range 10-57 months) and their median age at radiation start was 42 months (range 17-58 months). Their median overall survival (OS) was 16 months (range 8-64 months), with three patients surviving 36 months or longer. Five patients had disease progression prior to starting radiation; all 5 of these patients failed in the tumor bed. A search of the literature identified 204 cases of ETMR with a median OS of 10 months (range 0.03-161 months). Median OS of 18 long-term survivors (≥36 months) in the literature was 77 months (range 37-184 months). Of these 18 long-term survivors, 17 (94%) received radiotherapy as part of their initial treatment; 14 of them were treated with craniospinal irradiation.

Conclusions

Outcomes of patients with ETMR treated with proton therapy are encouraging compared to historical results. Further study of this rare tumor is warranted to better define the role of radiotherapy.

Embryonal tumor with abundant neuropil and true rosettes: an autopsy case-based update and review of the literature

INTRODUCTION

Embryonal tumor with abundant neuropil and true rosettes (ETANTR) is a rare subtype of primitive neuroectodermal tumors first reported in 2000. It is rare among the group of embryonal central nervous system tumors with approximately 50 reported cases. ETANTR has been suggested to be a separate entity among this group of tumors.

CASE REPORT

Herein, we present only the second autopsy case of ETANTR, which occurred in a 17-month-old boy, and was located in the brainstem. The tumor was inoperable, and despite chemotherapy, the child died 3 months after initial hospitalization. A brain only autopsy was performed.

DISCUSSION

Neuropathological and neuroimaging examinations suggest ETANTR grew by expansion rather than invasion distorting anatomical structures of the posterior fossa. We suggest that the characteristic histopathological picture of the tumor is the result of multifocal and dispersed germinative activity surrounded by mature neuropil-like areas.

CONCLUSION

ETANTR is a pediatric tumor occurring in children under 4 with a significantly poor prognosis with more cases and research required to characterize this rare embryonal tumor.

Diffuse intrinsic pontine tumors: a study of primitive neuroectodermal tumors versus the more common diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas

OBJECT

The diagnosis of diffuse pontine tumors has largely been made on the basis of MRI since the early 1990 s. In cases of tumors considered "typical," as a rule, no biopsy specimen has been obtained, and the tumors have been considered diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas (DIPGs). There have been sporadic reports that primitive neuroectodermal tumors (PNETs) of the pons may not be distinguishable from the DIPGs by radiological imaging. This study presents 2 cases of diffuse pontine PNETs with molecular evidence that these are indeed PNETs, distinct from DIPGs, thus supporting biopsy of diffuse pontine tumors as a standard of care.

METHODS

Biopsy specimens were obtained from 7 diffuse pontine tumors and snap frozen. Two of these 7 tumors were identified on the basis of pathological examination as PNETs. All 7 of the diffuse pontine tumors were analyzed for gene expression using the Affymetrix HG-U133 Plus 2.0 GeneChip microarray. Gene expression was compared with that of supratentorial PNETs, medulloblastomas, and low- and high-grade gliomas outside the brainstem.

RESULTS

Unsupervised hierarchical clustering analysis of gene expression demonstrated that pontine PNETs are most closely related to PNETs of the supratentorial region and not with gliomas. They do not cluster with the 5 DIPGs in the study. Thirty-eight genes, including GATA3, are uniquely differentially expressed in pontine PNETs compared with other types of pediatric brain tumors, including DIPGs and other PNETs at a false discovery rate statistical significance of less than 0.05.

CONCLUSIONS

The cluster and individual gene expression analyses indicate that pontine PNETs are intrinsically different from DIPGs. The 2 pontine PNET cases cluster with supratentorial PNETs, rather than with DIPGs, suggesting that these tumors should be treated with a PNET regimen, not with DIPG therapy. Since diagnosis by imaging is not reliable and the biology of the tumors is disparate, a biopsy should be performed to enable accurate diagnosis and direct potentially more effective treatments.