Intraoperative three-dimensional fluoroscopy assessment of iliosacral screws and lumbopelvic implants stabilizing fractures of the os sacrum

Does 3D-Assisted Operative Treatment of Pelvic Ring Injuries Improve Patient Outcome?-A Systematic Review of the Literature

Background: There has been an exponential growth in the use of advanced technologies for three-dimensional (3D) virtual pre- and intra-operative planning of pelvic ring injury surgery but potential benefits remain unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate differences in intra- and post-operative results between 3D and conventional (2D) surgery. Methods: A systematic review was performed including published studies between 1 January 2010 and 22 May 2020 on all available 3D techniques in pelvic ring injury surgery. Studies were assessed for their methodological quality according to the Modified McMaster Critical Review form. Differences in operation time, blood loss, fluoroscopy time, screw malposition rate, fracture reduction and functional outcome between 3D-assisted and conventional (2D) pelvic injury treatment were evaluated and a best-evidence synthesis was performed. Results: Eighteen studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria, evaluating a total of 988 patients. Overall quality was moderate. Regarding intra-operative results of 3D-assisted versus conventional surgery: The weighted mean operation time per screw was 43 min versus 52 min; for overall operation time 126 min versus 141 min; blood loss 275 ± 197 mL versus 549 ± 404 mL; fluoroscopy time 74 s versus 125 s and fluoroscopy frequency 29 ± 4 versus 63 ± 3. In terms of post-operative outcomes of 3D-assisted versus conventional surgery: weighted mean screw malposition rate was 8% versus 18%; quality of fracture reduction measured by the total excellent/good rate by Matta was 86% versus 82% and Majeed excellent/good rate 88% versus 83%. Conclusion: The 3D-assisted surgery technologies seem to have a positive effect on operation time, blood loss, fluoroscopy dose, time and frequency as well as accuracy of screw placement. No improvement in clinical outcome in terms of fracture reduction and functional outcome has been established so far. Due to a wide range of methodological quality and heterogeneity between the included studies, results should be interpreted with caution.

A new minimally invasive U-shaped lumbopelvic stabilization technique

Lumbopelvic stabilization is a surgical technique used frequently to treat lumbosacral fractures; however, it can also be used in revision cases, infections, or during deformity correction. However, the related soft tissue complication rates associated with open lumbopelvic stabilization are high. Different authors have recently reported minimally invasive surgical techniques. We developed a rigid minimally invasive technique for lumbopelvic stabilization. We present our technique and also present preliminary results from 10 cases. We did not observe soft tissue-related complications in any patient. Implant removal was performed twice, to release healthy disks and because of implant prominence. One patient required revision surgery because of implant loosening due to osteoporosis, and one patient required revision surgery due to screw cap loosening. Postsurgical mobilization was good in all patients without further injuries; however, polytraumatized patients were limited by additional injuries. Thus, minimally invasive U-shaped lumbopelvic stabilization is a useful technique combining the soft tissue-related advantages of minimally invasive surgical techniques as well as a theoretically very rigid construct caused by strong implants.

2D versus 3D fluoroscopy-based navigation in posterior pelvic fixation: review of the literature on current technology

PURPOSE

Percutaneous sacroiliac (SI) fixation of unstable posterior pelvic ring injuries is a widely accepted procedure. The complex sacral anatomy with narrow osseous corridors for SI screw placement makes this procedure technically challenging. Techniques are constantly evolving as a result of better understanding of the posterior pelvic anatomy. Recently developed tools include fluoroscopy-based computer-assisted navigation, which can be two-dimensional (2D) or three-dimensional (3D). Our goal is to determine the relevant technical considerations and clinical outcomes associated with these modalities by reviewing the published research. We hypothesize that 3D fluoroscopy-based navigation is safer and superior to its 2D predecessor with respect to lower radiation dose and more accurate SI screw placement.

METHODS

We searched four medical databases to identify English-language studies of 2D and 3D fluoroscopy-based navigation from January 1990 through August 2015. We included articles reporting imaging techniques and outcomes of closed posterior pelvic ring fixation with percutaneous SI screw fixation. Injuries included in the study were sacral fractures (52 patients), sacroiliac fractures (88 patients), lateral compression fractures (20 patients), and anteroposterior compression type pelvic fractures (8 patients). We excluded articles on open reduction of posterior pelvic ring injuries and solely anatomic studies. We then reviewed these studies for technical considerations and outcomes associated with these technologies.

RESULTS

Six studies were included in our analysis. Results of these studies indicate that 3D fluoroscopy-based navigation is associated with a lower radiation dose and lower rate of screw malpositioning compared with 2D fluoroscopy-based systems.

CONCLUSIONS

It may be advantageous to combine modern imaging modalities such as 3D fluoroscopy with computer-assisted navigation for percutaneous screw fixation in the posterior pelvis.

A comparison of percutaneous reduction and screw fixation versus open reduction and plate fixation of traumatic symphysis pubis diastasis

PURPOSE

Plate fixation, the conventional treatment for traumatic symphysis pubis diastasis, carries the risk of extensive exposure, blood loss and postoperative infections. Percutaneous screw fixation is a minimally invasive treatment. The goal of the present study was to compare the outcome of plate fixation and percutaneous screw technique in the treatment of traumatic pubic symphysis diastasis.

METHODS

Ninety patients with traumatic symphysis pubis diastasis were treated from January 2003 to December 2009 at two level 1 regional trauma centers. The mean time of follow-up was 21 months (18 to 26). Forty-five patients were treated by percutaneous screw fixation. Forty-five patients were treated by plate and screws fixation. The demographic, distribution of fracture patterns, blood loss, incision length, fixation failure, malunion, revision surgery and functional scores were compared.

RESULTS

Seven cases were lost during follow-up. Demographics (age and gender), fracture classification and Injury Severity Score were comparable in the two groups (P > 0.05). Blood loss and extensive exposure were much less in screw group (P < 0.01). Patients in screw group achieved better functional performance (P = 0.01). There were no significant differences favoring plate fixation in reduction quality (P = 0.32), implant failure (P = 0.39), malunion (P = 0.15), revision surgery rates (P = 0.27), percentage of impotence in the male patients (P = 0.2) and implant removal time (P = 0.12) between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that besides lower rate of iatrogenic injuries and better functional outcome, percutaneous screw fixation of the pubic symphysis is as strong as plate fixation.