Crosslinked polyethylene in knee arthroplasty: a simulator study evaluating the positive influence on the tribocontact area in the fixed-bearing knee

Reasons for Revision, Oxidation, and Damage Mechanisms of Retrieved Vitamin E-Stabilized Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene in Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

In order to improve oxidation resistance, antioxidants such as vitamin-E are added to polyethylene used in the bearing surfaces of orthopedic components. Currently, little is known about the efficacy of this treatment in vivo. This study therefore reports on the reasons for revision, surface damage mechanisms, and oxidation of retrieved vitamin E-stabilized highly crosslinked polyethylene (HXLPE) for total knee arthroplasty.

METHODS

We examined 103 retrieved knee inserts fabricated from vitamin E (VE)-stabilized HXLPE and 67 fabricated from remelted HXLPE as a control. The implantation times were 1.2 ± 1.3 and 1.5 ± 1.3 years for the VE and control cohorts, respectively. The inserts were evaluated for 7 surface damage mechanisms using a semiquantitative scoring method and analyzed for oxidation using Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy. Reasons for revision were also assessed using operative notes created at time of retrieval.

RESULTS

Both groups were revised primarily for instability, infection, and loosening. Burnishing, pitting, and scratching were the most common damage mechanisms observed, with the VE cohort demonstrating less surface damage than the control. Measured oxidation for the cohort was low, with a median oxidation index of 0.09 ± .05 for the articulating surface, 0.05 ± 0.06 for the backside, 0.08 ± 0.06 for the anterior/posterior surfaces, and 0.08 ± 0.05 for the stabilizing post. As compared to the control cohort, oxidation tended to be less for the VE group at the articulating (P < .001) and backside (P = .003) surfaces, although the median differences were minimal and may not be clinically significant.

CONCLUSION

The results indicate positive fatigue damage resistance and oxidation resistance for the retrieved VE-stabilized total knee arthroplasty inserts.

Surface Damage Is Not Reduced With Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene Tibial Inserts at Short-term

BACKGROUND

Highly crosslinked ultrahigh-molecular-weight polyethylene (XLPE) has been shown to reduce wear in hip arthroplasty, but the advantages over conventional polyethylene (PE) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), if any, remain unclear.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

Do differences exist in (1) surface damage as measured by damage score and percent area affected; and (2) extent and location of dimensional changes between XLPE and conventional PE observed on retrieved TKA tibial inserts?

METHODS

In this study of components retrieved at the time of revision surgery, we matched 44 XLPE to 44 conventional PE inserts from four manufacturers; the matching approach considered implant design (exact match), insert size (exact match), and length of implantation (matched ± 6 months). Surface damage on the articular surfaces was subjectively graded and digitally mapped to determine the percent damaged area of each damage mode. Three-dimensional changes that had occurred as a result of implantation were determined by comparing laser scans of the retrieved inserts with size-matched pristine inserts.

RESULTS

The differences of damage scores and percent damaged areas between the matched XLPE and conventional PE inserts were not large enough to be clinically significant with low corresponding levels of statistical significance (scores: 42 ± 13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 38-46 versus 45 ± 13; 95% CI, 41-49; p = 0.4; percent areas: 54% ± 38%; 95% CI, 44%-64% versus 54% ± 32%; 95% CI, 42%-65%; p = 0.9). However, XLPE inserts showed greater articular surface dimensional changes with high significance (root mean square of the distance: 0.16 ± 0.06 mm; 95% CI, 0.13-0.18 mm versus 0.14 ± 0.05 mm; 95% CI, 0.11-0.16 mm; p = 0.03). Within the same design, deviation patterns were consistent between the two materials; however, as expected, the location of the dimensional changes differed among designs: the negative deviations on the plateaus were centrally located in Zimmer PS inserts, were located on the perimeter in Smith & Nephew PS inserts, and were across the entire surface in DePuy PS inserts.

CONCLUSIONS

We found no difference in surface damage between matched XLPE and conventional PE inserts of the same designs. However, increased dimensional changes in TKAs with XLPE may reflect larger contact areas and potentially explain improved performance of XLPE in published simulator studies.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The lack of meaningful differences between the two polyethylene materials suggests caution in adopting a new, more expensive bearing material over another material that has a long track record of excellent behavior. A possible advantage is the greater dimensional changes, which could be the result of the lower creep resistance of XLPE, but this advantage awaits long-term results.

Highly crosslinked polyethylene does not reduce the wear in total knee arthroplasty: in vivo study of particles in synovial fluid

The aim was to assess if the reduction in polyethylene wear with highly crosslinked polyethylene suggested by studies with knee simulators is confirmed in patients with a knee arthroplasty. The use of a conventional or a highly crosslinked polyethylene was randomly assigned intraoperatively. Twelve months after surgery a knee arthrocentesis was performed and the synovial fluid of 17 patients in each group was studied analysing the number, size and shape of the polyethylene particles by scanning electron microscope. We found no significant differences in the concentration, size or morphology of polyethylene particles between groups. The great variability in the number of particles between individuals suggests that in vivo polyethylene wear depends on many factors and probably the type of polyethylene is not the most significant.