Comparative study on the efficacy of two-staged (posterior followed by anterior) surgical treatment using spinal instrumentation on pyogenic and tuberculotic spondylitis

The effectiveness of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy combined with external lumbar drainage in the treatment of intervertebral infections

Objective

To analyze the effect of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy in treating lumbar intervertebral infections.

Methods

A total of 13 patients with lumbar intervertebral infections who underwent percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy combined with external drainage between November 2016 and December 2019 were enrolled in the present study. After the operation, sensitive antibiotics were used based on the results of the bacterial culture. If no pathogens were detected in the biopsy culture of the infected tissues, empirical antibiotics were administrated to these patients. The clinical efficacy was evaluated by using a visual analog scale (VAS), Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and standard Macnab's evaluation. Postoperative computed tomography (CT) and MRI were also used to evaluate clinical efficacy.

Results

The follow-up time was 10–18 months, and the average time was (13.69 ± 2.63) months. Causative bacteria were isolated in 7 of 13 infected tissue biopsy cultures. Systemic antibiotics and anti-tuberculous chemotherapy were administered according to sensitivity studies for identified. There were no pathogens isolated from the other six patients. Empiric antibiotics were administrated in these patients. One week after the operation, WBC, a fractional fraction of medium granulocytes, ESR and CRP were significantly lower compared to before the operation (all P < 0.05). At the last follow-up visit, the above-mentioned markers were all within normal range, which differed compared to the pre-operative data (P < 0.05). The VAS and ODI of the patients at 1 week and 3 months after operation were significantly lower compared to preoperative data (all P < 0.05). During the last follow-up visit, seven patients were excellent, five were good, and one was poor according to standard Macnab's evaluation. No serious complications were recorded.

Conclusions

Percutaneous lumbar discectomy combined with external drainage resulted as an effective method for treating lumbar intervertebral infections and was associated with fewer injuries, less pain, low cost, and low recurrence rate.

Diagnosis and management of spinal infections

The number of spinal infections has been increasing due to aging populations and larger numbers of immunocompromised hosts and intravenous drug users. Magnetic resonance imaging is a useful tool for the early diagnosis of spinal infections, and can yield positive findings just 3-5 days after disease onset. Before antibiotic administration, cultures must be initiated from blood and from specimens collected from the locus of infection. Based on the pathogens identified by culture, appropriate antibiotics should be selected with careful consideration of antimicrobial susceptibility and spinal tissue penetration. Antibiotic treatment of spinal infections should be continued for longer than for most other types of infections, although the optimal duration remains unknown. The indications for surgical treatment include progressive neurologic deficits, progressive deformity, spinal instability, persistent or recurrent infection, and unbearable pain. In most patients with spinal infection, the gold standard surgical treatment is anterior radical debridement followed by autologous strut bone grafting. The addition of posterior instrumentation has recently become popular. This procedure may be performed alone as an alternative surgical option in patients in poor condition, and if it dramatically reduces pain, subsequent observation may be reasonable. If progressive deformity is observed or pain relief is inadequate after posterior instrumentation, additional anterior debridement and bone grafting should be scheduled.

Is nonstructural bone graft useful in surgical treatment of lumbar spinal tuberculosis?: A retrospective case-control study

Surgical intervention is an important option for treating spinal tuberculosis. Previous studies have reported different surgical procedures and bone grafts for it. To our knowledge, few studies demonstrated the clinical results of using nonstructural autogenous bone graft in surgical treatment of spinal tuberculosis.The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical outcomes of surgical management lumbar spinal tuberculosis by one-stage posterior debridement with nonstructural autogenous bone grafting and instrumentation versus anterior debridement, strut bone grafting combined with posterior instrumentation.A total of 58 consecutive patients who underwent surgical treatment due to lumbar spinal tuberculosis from January 2011 to December 2013 were included. A total of 22 patients underwent one-stage posterior debridement, nonstructural autogenous bone grafting, and instrumentation (group A), and 36 patients received anterior debridement, strut bone grafting combined with posterior instrumentation (group B). The operative duration, total blood loss, perioperative transfusion, length of hospital stay, hospitalization cost, and complications were recorded. The bony fusion of the graft was assessed by computed tomography scans. American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale was used to evaluate the neurological function of patients in the 2 groups.All the patients were followed up, with a mean follow-up duration of 21.6 ± 5.7 months in group A and 22.3 ± 6.2 months in group B (P = 0.47). The average operative duration was 257.5 ± 91.1 minutes in group A and 335.7 ± 91.0 minutes in group B (P = 0.002). The mean total blood loss was 769.6 ± 150.9 mL in group A and 1048.6 ± 556.9 mL in group B (P = 0.007). Also, significant differences were found between the 2 groups in perioperative transfusion volumes, length of hospital stay, and hospitalization cost (P < 0.05), which were less in group A compared with group B. Patients with ASIA grade C/D in the 2 groups were improved with 1 to 2 grades after the surgery with no statistical difference (P = 1.000). The perioperative complications rate was 9.1% (2/22) in group A and 13.9% (5/36) in group B (P = 0.897).Based on a retrospective study, the procedure of one-stage posterior debridement, nonstructural autogenous bone grafting, and instrumentation has a significant shorter operative duration, lower blood loss and perioperative transfusion, shorter hospital stay, and less hospitalization cost compared with the one of anterior debridement, strut bone grafting combined with posterior instrumentation for treating lumber spinal tuberculosis.

Safety of instrumentation and fusion at the time of surgical debridement for spinal infection

The present study aims to assess the results of single-stage instrumentation and fusion at the time of surgical debridement of spinal infections; vertebral osteomyelitis or epidural abscess. Nine patients with spinal infection were treated with instrumentation and fusion after radical debridement in a single-stage operation. Predisposing factors and comorbidities, pain, American Spinal Injury Association motor scores, primary pathologies, microbiology and perioperative markers were recorded. Seven patients with pyogenic and two with tuberculous spinal infection were encountered; the most common pathogen was Staphylococcus aureus. Five patients were predisposed to infection because of diabetes mellitus. Duration of antibiotic therapy lasted up to 12 months. Six patients had thoracic infection, two lumbar and one cervical. No post-operative complications were encountered. There was a significant reduction in pain scores compared to pre-operatively. All patients with neurological deficits improved post-operatively. Despite introduction of hardware, no patients had a recurrence of their infection in the 12 month follow up period. Single-stage debridement and instrumentation appeared to be a safe and effective method of managing spinal infections. The combination of debridement and fusion has the dual benefit of removing a focus of infection and stabilising the spine. The current series confirms that placing titanium cages into an infected space is safe in a majority of patients. Stabilisation and correction of spinal deformity reduces pain, aids neurologic recovery and improves quality of life. The small patient population and retrospective nature limit the present study.

Efficacy and Safety of Posterior Versus Combined Posterior and Anterior Approach for the Treatment of Spinal Tuberculosis: A Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

Surgical treatment is an important strategy for the treatment of spinal tuberculosis (TB). Several approaches have been reported for the surgery. However, no single study has had a large enough sample population to definitively determine whether the single posterior approach is as effective and safe as the combined posterior and anterior approach for the treatment of spinal TB. A meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of posterior versus combined posterior and anterior approach for the treatment of spinal TB.

METHODS

In this meta-analysis, electronic databases, such as PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Google scholar, and Cochrane library, were searched to select the potentially relevant reports that compared the outcomes of the posterior approach (group A) with the combined posterior and anterior approach (group B) in the treatment of spinal TB. Relevant journals and references were also searched manually. Data extraction and quality assessment were according with Cochrane Collaboration guidelines. Outcome assessments were operation time, blood loss, correction of angle, loss of correction, hospital stay, fusion time of the grafting bone, neurological improvement, and complications after surgery. Results were expressed as odds ratio for dichotomous outcomes and mean difference for continuous outcomes with 95% confidence interval.

RESULTS

Five controlled clinical trials published between 2012 and 2014, involving 253 patients (group A, 129; group B, 124) with spinal TB were retrieved in this study. The overall meta-analysis showed that there were significant differences (P< 0.01) between groups A and B in operation time, blood loss, hospital stay, and complications after surgery. However, no significant differences (P> 0.05) were observed in correction of angle, loss of correction at the final follow-up, fusion time of the grafting bone, and neurological improvement after surgery between groups A and B.

CONCLUSIONS

The posterior approach appeared to have the same clinical efficacy, but with less operation time, blood loss, hospital stay, and complications compared with the combined posterior and anterior approach in the treatment of sinal TB. However, more high-quality, randomized controlled trials are required to compare these approaches and guide clinical decision-making.

Comparison of pyogenic spondylitis and tuberculous spondylitis

Pyogenic spondylitis and tuberculous spondylitis are common causes of spinal infection. It is difficult to differentiate tuberculous spondylitis and pyogenic spondylitis clinically and radiologically. Recently magnetic resonance imaging has been reported to be beneficial for early diagnosis and differential diagnosis of the spondylitis, and is being used extensively for diagnosis. However, the diagnosis must be considered in combination with corresponding changes in clinical manifestations, radiological findings, blood and tissue cultures and histopathological findings. Conservative treatments, including antimicrobial medications, are started initially. Surgical treatments, which include anterior or posterior approach, single-stage or two-stage surgery, with or without instrumentation, may be performed as indicated.

Spinal infection: state of the art and management algorithm

INTRODUCTION

Spinal infection is a rare pathology although a concerning rising incidence has been observed in recent years. This increase might reflect a progressively more susceptible population but also the availability of increased diagnostic accuracy. Yet, even with improved diagnosis tools and procedures, the delay in diagnosis remains an important issue. This review aims to highlight the importance of a methodological attitude towards accurate and prompt diagnosis using an algorithm to aid on spinal infection management.

METHODS

Appropriate literature on spinal infection was selected using databases from the US National Library of Medicine and the National Institutes of Health.

RESULTS

Literature reveals that histopathological analysis of infected tissues is a paramount for diagnosis and must be performed routinely. Antibiotic therapy is transversal to both conservative and surgical approaches and must be initiated after etiological diagnosis. Indications for surgical treatment include neurological deficits or sepsis, spine instability and/or deformity, presence of epidural abscess and upon failure of conservative treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

A methodological assessment could lead to diagnosis effectiveness of spinal infection. Towards this, we present a management algorithm based on literature findings.