Periarticular infiltration in total hip replacement: effect on heterotopic ossification, analgesic requirements and outcome

Intraoperative Infiltration of Liposomal Bupivacaine vs Bupivacaine Hydrochloride for Pain Management in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Prospective Randomized Trial

BACKGROUND

Pain management after total hip arthroplasty is well studied. Nevertheless, there is no consensus regarding the "cocktail" to use in periarticular infiltration (PAI). Liposomal bupivacaine (LB) is a slow release local anesthetic that can be infiltrated during surgery. In this study, we compared LB to bupivacaine hydrochloride (HCL).

METHODS

Between September 2014 and March 2016, 181 patients were screened for this prospective randomized trial. A total of 107 patients were enrolled and studied. Patients were separated into LB and control groups. LB group (50) received PAI with LB and bupivacaine HCL with epinephrine and the control group (57) received PAI with bupivacaine HCL and epinephrine. Patient morphine equivalent consumption, pain score estimated on visual analog scale, time to first ambulation greater than 20 feet, time to discharge, drug-related side effects, and patient falls were documented. Data were collected up to 72 hours postoperation.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in morphine equivalent consumption in any of the 12-hour time blocks, up to 72 hours. No patient falls were documented in either group. Time to first ambulation greater than 20 feet, ambulation same day as surgery, time to discharge, and drug-related side effects were not significantly different between groups.

CONLCUSION

Intraoperative PAI with LB did not result in significant differences in postoperative opioid consumption, pain scores, opioid-related side effects, time to first ambulation, and length of stay up to 72 hours following total hip arthroplasty compared to a control group.

Perioperative local infiltration anesthesia with ropivacaine has no effect on postoperative pain after total hip arthroplasty

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The local infiltration analgesia (LIA) technique has been widely used to reduce opioid requirements and to improve postoperative mobilization following total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, the evidence for the efficacy of LIA in THA is not yet clear. We determined whether single-shot LIA in addition to a multimodal analgesic regimen would reduce acute postoperative pain and opioid requirements after THA.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

116 patients undergoing primary THA under spinal anesthesia were included in this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. All patients received oral opioid-sparing multimodal analgesia: etoricoxib, acetaminophen, and glucocorticoid. The patients were randomized to receive either 150 mL ropivacaine (2 mg/mL) and 0.5 mL epinephrine (1 mg/mL) or 150 mL 0.9% saline. Rescue analgesic consisted of morphine and oxycodone as needed. The primary endpoint was pain during mobilization in the recovery unit. Secondary endpoints were pain during mobilization on the day after surgery and total postoperative opioid requirements on the first postoperative day.

RESULTS

The levels of pain during mobilization-both in the recovery unit and on the day after surgery-and consumption of opioids on the first postoperative day were similar in the 2 groups.

INTERPRETATION

LIA did not provide any extra analgesic effect after THA over and above that from the multimodal analgesic regimen used in this study.

Treatment of postoperative pain after total hip arthroplasty: comparison between metamizol and paracetamol as adjunctive to opioid analgesics-prospective, double-blind, randomised study

INTRODUCTION

Metamizole use has been limited because of its risk of agranulocytosis. However, more recent literature seems to support its safety. This prospective, randomised, double-blind study was conducted to compare the analgesic effects of intravenous metamizole or intravenous paracetamol in combination with morphine PCA during the first 24 h following total hip arthroplasty.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred ten consecutive patients were selected for study. The two study groups were (A) metamizole, (B) paracetamol. Postoperative pain therapy was provided by Morphine PCA pump. In the first treatment group (A group), all patients received intravenous metamizole 1.5 g every 8 h during the first 24 postoperative hours. In the second treatment group (B group), all patients received intravenous paracetamol 1 g every 8 h during the first 24 postoperative hours. Postoperative pain intensity was measured 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 14, 18, 22 h after the end of surgery by a VAS.

RESULTS

Statistically significant differences in VAS pain values favoring metamizole were reported at 6-h (p = 0.038), 8-h (p = 0.036), 14-h (p = 0.011), 18-h (p < 0.001) and 22-h (p = 0.025) post-baseline. Mean cumulative pain values were 17.9 for metamizole and 30.6 for paracetamol.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, we have also shown excellent efficacy of paracetamol and metamizole combined with opioids, but metamizole proved to be a better analgesic than paracetamol. It is also necessary to mention the financial aspect considering that intravenous paracetamol is about ten times more expensive than an equivalent analgesic doses of intravenous metamizole.