Radio-lunate arthrodesis in rheumatoid arthritis: outcome and techniques

A Systematic Review of Radiolunate and Radioscapholunate Arthrodesis

Purpose

The aims of this systematic review were to examine the use of radiolunate (RL) or radioscapholunate (RSL) arthrodesis as surgical management for patients with advanced radiocarpal arthritis that failed conservative management and to assess postoperative outcomes.

Methods

We reviewed articles from PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science from inception through December 2019. We identified complete manuscripts written in English reporting on RL or RSL arthrodesis for treatment of wrist pathology that included the primary outcomes (pain or grip strength) and at least 2 secondary outcomes (range of motion, patient-reported outcomes, or nonunion). Data pooling was used to calculate weighted averages.

Results

We identified 2,252 articles and selected 13 for inclusion. Across all studies, RSL arthrodesis was performed for 180 patients (49% female; 45 years old) and RL for 94 (87% female; 50 years old). Both procedures exhibited improvements in pain score and grip strength. Both cohorts demonstrated postoperative changes in flexion-extension arc, flexion, extension, ulnar deviation, supination, and pronation after data pooling. The nonunion rate for RSL was 15% versus 2% for RL, whereas the rate of progression to total wrist arthrodesis for RSL and RL was 4% and 0%, respectively.

Conclusions

Both RL and RSL arthrodesis can be successfully used to manage debilitating radiocarpal arthritis by affording patients with pain reduction. Each has its own benefits, in which RSL arthrodesis provides a total arc of motion within the functional demands of most activities of daily living, and RL arthrodesis has low rates of nonunion and progression to total wrist arthrodesis. Further research is needed to compare the 2 surgeries directly and prospectively in comparable patient groups.

Type of study/level of evidence

Therapeutic III.

Twenty years' follow-up of radiocarpal arthrodesis for rheumatoid wrists

OBJECTIVES

A pain-free stable wrist is a prerequisite for patients with rheumatoid arthritis to improve their activity of daily life. The present study investigated whether or not radiocarpal arthrodesis yielded good results for more than 20 years.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed on 20 unstable wrists in 17 patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Radiocarpal arthrodesis combined with synovectomy and the Darrach procedure was performed. Wrist pain, grip power, the range of motion, pharmacotherapy, ESR, CRP, and serial radiographs were investigated at the baseline and 20 years after the operation. Patient-reported outcomes using the mHAQ, DASH and patient's satisfaction level were investigated at the final follow-up.

RESULTS

Pain had disappeared completely in all patients at 20 years after the operation. The average grip power increased in 16 wrists (80%) and decreased in 4 wrists (20%). Wrist extension and flexion significantly decreased, and supination and pronation remained within the functional range. Radiographically, ulnar shift and palmar subluxation initially improved and remained unchanged for a long time. Fourteen patients (82.4%) with 17 wrists were satisfied with this operation.

CONCLUSION

Radiocarpal arthrodesis for rheumatoid wrists provided painless stability for a long period for 20 years or more.

Radioscapholunate arthrodesis versus radiolunate arthrodesis in rheumatoid wrist surgery: Clinical and radiographic outcomes

Radiolunate arthrodesis is a validated surgical technique in rheumatoid wrist surgery. When the radioscaphoid joint is involved or when there is radiolunate instability, a radioscapholunate arthrodesis must be preferred. The objective was to compare clinical and radiographic outcomes for both types of arthrodesis. Patients were evaluated retrospectively at a minimal follow-up of 12 months after radiolunate arthrodesis (RL-A group) or radioscapholunate arthrodesis (RSL-A group). Mean follow-up was 10.7 years (1-25 years). One hundred and one patients were included in RL-A group and 26 in RSL-A group. At follow-up, pain level was significantly reduced by 3.7 points and by 2.9 points in RL-A and RSL-A groups, respectively. Mobility in flexion/extension was significantly reduced by 25° in both groups. DASH and PRWE scores were 42.9 and 41.4 in RL-A group, 41.8 and 20.6 in RSL-A group, respectively. Larsen stage for the midcarpal joint increased significantly in both groups (+0.8 in RL-A group; +0.9 in RSL-A group), carpal height index decreased (-0.03 in RL-A group (significant); -0.02 in RSL-A group (non-significant)), carpal ulnar translation index increased (+0.038 in RL-A group; +0.037 in RSL-A group), without significant difference between both groups. Nonunion rate was significantly higher in RSL-A group (62%) than in RL-A group (30%). A pain free and functional wrist can be obtained after radiolunate and radioscapholunate arthrodesis. However, arthritis lesions and carpal deformities increased with follow-up similarly with both surgical techniques. Our results have shown that radiolunate arthrodesis remains a reliable surgical procedure for advanced rheumatoid wrist.

Spontaneous radioscapholunate fusion after septic arthritis of the wrist: a case report

Bacterial septic arthritis rarely occurs in the upper extremities. Yet, early diagnosis and treatment is important, as a delay in diagnosis results in pain, impaired hand function, and degenerative joint disease. Radioscapholunate (RSL) arthrodesis is a well-established procedure for treating inflammatory arthritis and osteoarthritis (primary or posttraumatic), primarily to achieve pain relief. The wrist deformity correction offers an alternative option to total wrist arthrodesis. Indications for a RSL arthrodesis are osteoarthritis of the radiolunate and radioscaphoid joint with a concomitant intact midcarpal joint. We present a case study of spontaneous RSL fusion post wrist infection caused by a dog bite.

Functional and patient-reported outcome of partial wrist denervation versus the Mannerfelt wrist arthrodesis in the rheumatoid wrist

INTRODUCTION

Wrist arthrodesis offers high success rates in patients with rheumatoid arthritis; however, loss of residual mobility may cause unnecessary disability. This makes wrist denervation an appealing alternative. However, there is a distinct lack of patient-reported outcome measure studies comparing these two procedures. The aim of this study was to report any change in function, pain and satisfaction following wrist arthrodesis compared to denervation in a single surgeon series of rheumatoid patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The results of 16 wrist arthrodesis in 15 patients and 14 partial (PIN) wrist denervations in 13 patients were compared with a mean follow-up period of 39 and 22 months, respectively. The primary outcome measures were the same for both groups and included the validated patient-rated wrist evaluation questionnaire and a satisfaction questionnaire.

RESULTS

Wrist arthrodesis significantly improved the mean total pain and functional outcome scores by 54 and 36 %, respectively, at the time of follow-up. Wrist denervation patients also reported significant improvements of 44 and 42 % in total pain and functional outcomes, respectively; 87 % reported being very satisfied with their wrist arthrodesis procedure compared to 78 % in the denervation group. No statistically significant difference in response between the groups was observed in this series of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Both procedures enjoyed favourable results amongst patients with excellent satisfaction outcomes. PIN denervation is a simple procedure with low complication rates and we therefore consider it a valid alternative to more difficult treatment options, such as partial or total wrist arthrodesis.