Corrective osteotomy of the distal radius following failed internal fixation

Functional outcome of 2-D- and 3-D-guided corrective forearm osteotomies: a systematic review

We performed a systematic review to compare conventional (2-D) versus 3-D-guided corrective osteotomies regarding intraoperative results, patient-reported outcome measures, range of motion, incidence of complications and pain score. PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched, and 53 articles were included, reporting 1257 patients undergoing forearm corrective osteotomies between 2010 and 2022. 3-D-guided surgery resulted in a greater improvement in median Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score (28, SD 7 vs. 35, SD 5) and fewer complications (12% vs. 6%). Pain scores and range of motion were similar between 3-D-guided and conventional surgery. 3-D-guided corrective osteotomy surgery appears to improve patient-reported outcomes and reduce complications compared to conventional methods. However, due to the limited number of comparative studies and the heterogeneity of the studies, a large randomized controlled trial is needed to draw definitive conclusions.Level of evidence: III.

Arthroscopic Management of Distal Radius Fractures and Malunions

Articular congruity is the most important prognostic factor when dealing with a distal intra-articular radius fracture or the correction of intra-articular malunion. This article details our approach with tips and tricks for effectively managing these complex injuries with the aid of dry arthroscopy.

Distal radius fractures

The management of distal radius fractures has evolved considerably in the last two decades. Techniques and hardware have improved so much that the surgeon can usually assure good results in these debilitating fractures. Yet no one method can be used for all injuries, as the personality of each fracture demands a customized approach. Furthermore, what works in one age group may not work in another. For this reason, every available treatment has its own space in our options. The need for surgeons to be well versed in all techniques is critical. We offer a concise update of important evolutionary and current treatment guidelines for this common fracture.

Extensor Pollicis Longus Ruptures Following Distal Radius Osteotomy Through a Volar Approach

PURPOSE

To investigate the cause and pathological process of extensor pollicis longus (EPL) ruptures after correction of distal radius malunion through a volar approach.

METHODS

We included patients with EPL ruptures who underwent distal radius osteotomies performed through a volar approach. Data were pooled from members of the International Wrist Investigators Workshop. Patient demographics, initial injury parameters, imaging studies, preoperative and postoperative examination, intraoperative findings, surgical technique, and outcomes were compared and analyzed. Preoperative and postoperative radiographic images were evaluated and compared.

RESULTS

We evaluated 6 cases from 5 surgeons in 4 institutions. Length of follow-up ranged from 1 to 5 years. On initial radiographic evaluation all malunions were healed with dorsal angulation (20° to 60°) and with positive ulnar variance. Deformity correction in the sagittal plane was 25° to 55°. Osteotomies were fixed with volar locking plates with autologous bone graft except for one patient who received calcium phosphate-based bone void filler. Postoperative x-rays suggested prominent osteotomy resection edges, osteophytes, or dorsal bony prominence resulting from healed callus. Average time from osteotomy to EPL rupture was 10 weeks (range, 2-17 weeks). Two patients initially refused to undergo tendon transfers. One was pleased with the outcome despite the ruptured EPL. The other patient ruptured 2 more tendons and chose to have tendon transfers. One patient also ruptured the transferred tendon after 2 months and underwent successful tendon grafting.

CONCLUSIONS

In the absence of screw prominence and technical flaws, it is likely that dorsal callus, prominent osteotomy resection edges, and osteophytes may contribute to attritional rupture of the EPL tendon after a corrective osteotomy through a volar approach. Exposure and debridement of excessive callus, dorsal ridge, or a prominent Lister tubercle performed during the osteotomy may reduce subsequent EPL rupture.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

Corrective osteotomies of the radius: Grafting or not?

AIM: To review the current literature regarding corrective osteotomies to provide the best evidence of the rule of bone grafting.

METHODS: Our MEDLINE literature search included 280 studies using the following key words “Malunited distal radius fracture” and 150 studies using key words “Corrective osteotomy of the distal radius”. Inclusion criteria were: Malunited distal radial, extra articular fracture, volar locking plate, use of iliac bone graft (cancellous or corticocancellous), non-use of bone graft. Twelve studies met the inclusion criteria.

RESULTS: Seven of the 12 studies considered, described the use of a graft; the remaining five studies didn’t use any graft. Type of malunion was dorsal in most of the studies. The healing time was comparable using the graft or not (mean 12.5 wk), ranging from 7.5 to 16 wk. The mean disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand score improvement was 23 points both in the studies that used the graft and in those not using the graft.

CONCLUSION: This review demonstrated that corrective osteotomy of extra-articular malunited fractures of the distal radius treated by volar locking plate does not necessarily require bone graft.

Is Bone Grafting Necessary in the Treatment of Malunited Distal Radius Fractures?

Background Open wedge osteotomy with bone grafting and plate fixation is the standard procedure for the correction of malunited distal radius fractures. Bone grafts are used to increase structural stability and to enhance new bone formation. However, bone grafts are also associated with donor site morbidity, delayed union at bone-graft interfaces, size mismatch between graft and osteotomy defect, and additional operation time. Purpose The goal of this study was to assess bone healing and secondary fracture displacement in the treatment of malunited distal radius fractures without the use of bone grafting. Methods Between January 1993 and December 2013, 132 corrective osteotomies and plate fixations without bone grafting were performed for malunited distal radius fractures. The minimum follow-up time was 12 months. Primary study outcomes were time to complete bone healing and secondary fracture displacement. Preoperative and postoperative radiographs during follow-up were compared with each other, as well as with radiographs of the uninjured side. Results All 132 osteotomies healed. In two cases (1.5%), healing took more than 4 months, but reinterventions were not necessary. No cases of secondary fracture displacement or hardware failure were observed. Significant improvements in all radiographic parameters were shown after corrective osteotomy and plate fixation. Conclusion This study shows that bone grafts are not required for bone healing and prevention of secondary fracture displacement after corrective osteotomy and plate fixation of malunited distal radius fractures. Level of evidence Therapeutic, level IV, case series with no comparison group.

Anatomical fit of seven different palmar distal radius plates

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study was to compare the anatomical fit of different, precontoured palmar distal radius plates.

METHODS

The anatomical fit of seven different types of palmar distal radius plates [Königsee variable fixed-angle radius plate 7/3-hole, Königsee variable fixed-angle radius plate 5/3-hole (Allendorf, Germany), Medartis 2.5 Adaptive TriLock, Medartis 2.5 TriLock, Medartis 2.5 TriLock extraarticular, (Basel, Switzerland), Synthes VA-LCP distal two-column-radius, Synthes LCP extraarticular (Bettlach, Switzerland)] were investigated in 25 embalmed human cadaveric radii. An imprint of the space between the well-positioned plate and the distal radius was attained using a silicone mass and the maximum height of the silicone imprint was digitally measured. The mean maximum imprint height was compared between the seven plates using an analysis of variance with repeated measures and Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons.

RESULTS

The mean maximum distance between the plates and the radial cortex was <2 mm for all plates. The greatest difference was found with the Medartis Adaptive (1.99 ± 0.45 mm) and the least difference with the Synthes two-column (1.56 ± 0.76 mm), this difference being statistically significant (p = 0.005).

CONCLUSION

Although there was no complete congruency between the plates and the radial cortex, all distal palmar radius plates investigated in this study presented a reasonable anatomical shape. The Synthes VA-LCP distal two-column-radius plate palmar showed the best anatomical fit. A low profile and optimized anatomical precontouring minimizes irritation of the surrounding soft tissues and should be considered with plate design and implant choice.

Ulnar shortening osteotomy for malunited distal radius fractures: results of a 7-year follow-up with special regard to the grade of radial displacement and post-operative ulnar variance

INTRODUCTION

The treatment of ulnar-sided wrist pain after malunited distal radius fractures remains controversial. Radial corrective osteotomy can restore congruity in the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) as well as adequate length of the radius. Ulnar shortening osteotomies leave the radius' angular deformities unchanged, risking secondary DRUJ osteoarthritis. We supposed that, even within the widely accepted limit of 20°, a greater angulation of the radius in the sagittal plane correlates with a higher rate of DRUJ osteoarthritis. Furthermore, we suspected worse results from an ulna shortened to a negative rather than a neutral or positive ulnar variance.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

For this retrospective study, we reviewed 23 patients a mean 7.2 (range 5.6-8.5) years after ulnar shortening osteotomy for malunion of distal radius fractures. We compared 14 patients with up to 10° dorsal or palmar displacement from the normal palmar tilt of 10° to 9 patients with more than 10° displacement, and 15 patients whose post-operative ulnar variance was neutral or positive to 8 who had a negative one.

RESULTS

Ulnar-sided wrist pain decreased enough to satisfy 21 of the 23 patients. Clinical results tended to be better when radial displacement was minor and when post-operative ulnar variance was positive or neutral. A shorter ulna significantly increased the rate of DRUJ osteoarthritis, whereas a greater degree of radial displacement only increased the rate slightly.

CONCLUSIONS

Radial corrective osteotomy should be discussed as alternative when displacement of the radius in the sagittal plane exceeds 10°. The ulna should be shortened moderately to reduce the risk of osteoarthritis in the distal radioulnar joint.