Median neuropathy in malunited fractures of the distal radius

Management of Extra-Articular and Intra-Articular Distal Radius Malunion

This article presents a comprehensive overview of managing extra-articular and intra-articular distal radius malunions (DRM), discussing the pathoanatomy, clinical, and radiologic evaluation, conservative treatment, and surgical strategies. Corrective osteotomy remains the primary surgical intervention for symptomatic DRM. Surgical planning should consider factors such as timing, approach, correction technique, implant, graft, and associated injuries. The correction of extra-articular malunion necessitates brachioradialis tenotomy, circumferential periosteum release, and intrafocal elevation with grafting to facilitate distal radius realignment following osteotomy. Computer-assisted planning with 3D-printed patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) could help execute extra-articular osteotomy with high precision. As for the management of intra-articular malunion, it may require wrist arthrotomy, arthroscopy, or PSI assistance for precise articular osteotomy and reduction of the joint surface. This review highlights the importance of early intervention, thorough preoperative planning, and appropriate surgical techniques to optimize outcomes and minimize complications. Future research should focus on large-scale randomized controlled trials to compare different surgical methods, particularly for intra-articular DRM.

Other median neuropathies

Median mononeuropathy is common, with carpal tunnel syndrome the most frequently encountered acquired mononeuropathy in clinical practice. However, other disorders of the median nerve and many known anatomical variants can lead to misdiagnosis and unexpected surgical complications if their presence is not correctly identified. A number of inherited and acquired disorders can affect the median nerve proximal to the wrist, alone or accompanied by other affected peripheral nerves. Recognizing other disorders that can masquerade as median mononeuropathies can avoid misdiagnosis and misguided management. This chapter explores median nerve anatomical variants, disorders, and lesions, emphasizing the need for careful examination and electrodiagnostic study in the localization of median neuropathy.

Radiographic Predictors of Delayed Carpal Tunnel Syndrome After Distal Radius Fracture in the Elderly

BACKGROUND

Delayed-onset carpal tunnel syndrome (DCTS) can develop weeks and months after distal radius fracture (DRFx). A better understanding of the risk factors of DCTS can guide surgeon's decision making regarding the management of DRFx and also provides another discussion point to be had with elderly patients when discussing outcomes of nonoperative management.

METHODS

We reviewed 216 nonoperatively managed DRFx between June 2015 and January 2019 at a single level 1 trauma center and senior author's office. We identified 26 patients who developed DCTS at a minimum of 6 weeks after DRFx, which constituted our case group. The remaining 190 patients served as the control group (non-carpal tunnel syndrome [CTS]). Differences between case and control group were evaluated through univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

The prevalence of DCTS among nonoperatively managed DRFx was 12%. In univariate analysis, volar tilt (VT) and teardrop angle (TDA) were significant independent predictors of development of DCTS. Multivariate logistic regression analysis determined that the odds of developing CTS increased by 12% and 24% for each degree of decrease in VT and TDA, respectively. No other significant risk factors were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Decreasing VT and TDA are the most significant risk factors associated with DCTS in nonoperatively managed DRFx. These are simple and reliable radiographic measurements that provide significant prognostic value. These parameters can be used to guide surgeon decision making regarding management of DRFx in the elderly while aiding patient expectations and outcomes following nonoperative management of DRFx.

Long-term clinical and socio-economic outcomes following wrist fracture: a systematic review and meta-analysis

A comprehensive review of studies shows that patients with wrist fracture, aged over 50 years, experience pain and functional limitation long after fracture. This is associated with increased healthcare costs, and reduced quality of life. Understanding factors that predict poor outcomes is important for future healthcare policy and planning.

PURPOSE

To summarise and appraise evidence on the prognosis and long-term clinical and socio-economic outcomes following wrist fracture among adults aged 50 years and over.

METHODS

Five databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, AMED, CINAHL-P and PsycINFO) were comprehensively searched (supplemented by a grey-literature search) from inception till June 2021 for prospective/retrospective cohort studies of patients (≥ 50 years) with a history of wrist fracture and reporting long-term (≥ 6 months) outcomes. Peer study selection, data extraction and risk of bias assessment were conducted. A random effects meta-analysis was used to summarise estimates of pain and function outcomes.

RESULTS

78 studies (n = 688,041 patients) were included. Patients report persistent moderate to severe pain (range: 7.5%-62%) and functional limitations (range: 5.5-78%) up to 12-months or later after wrist fracture. Mean Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) score for pain and function (9 studies, n = 1759 patients) was 15.23 (95%CI 12.77, 17.69) at 6-months to 13-years follow-up. Mean disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) score (9 studies, n = 1346 patients) was 13.82 (95%CI 12.71, 14.93)( at 6- to 17-months follow-up. A 10-20% increase in healthcare encounters in the first 12-months after fracture was observed. Twelve prognostic factors were associated with poor long-term outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Evidence shows that a high proportion of people aged over 50 years with wrist fracture experience pain and functional limitation > 6 months after fracture. This is associated with increased healthcare costs, and reduced quality of life. Exploratory evidence was found for several candidate prognostic factors. Their predictive performance needs to be investigated further.

PROSPERO

CRD42018116478.

Distal radius malunion in adults

Distal radius malunion (DRMU) consists in a non-anatomical consolidation of a distal radius fracture. The resulting alteration of the articular or extra-articular radial anatomy impairs wrist function to a greater or lesser degree: Restricted ranges of motion, loss of strength, pain. There may also be nerve or tendon involvement. Adaptive carpal malalignment and ulnar-carpal impingement are also possible. Imaging assessment should at least include X-ray and CT; CT-arthrography is essential in intra-articular DRMU, which regularly progresses toward radiocarpal osteoarthritis. Surgical indications are guided by clinical assessment. Restoring distal radial anatomy requires osteotomy, according to type of DRMU: anterior or posterior opening or closing wedge. Bone or bone-substitute graft may need to be associated. Computerisation has improved planning and should be implemented, whenever possible. Ulnar osteotomy may be performed, isolated or associated to distal radial osteotomy. Palliative partial fusion or bone resection is possible in case of joint involvement or in patients with low functional demand.

Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Following Corrective Osteotomy for Distal Radius Malunion: A Rare Case Report and Review of the Literature

BACKGROUND

Although median nerve neuropathy and carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) are known complications of both untreated and acutely treated distal radius fracture, median neuropathy after correction of distal radius malunion is not commonly reported in hand surgery literature. We describe a patient with severe CTS after corrective osteotomy, open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) with a volar locking plate (VLP), and bone grafting for distal radius malunion.

METHODS

We report a case of severe acute CTS as a complication of corrective osteotomy with bone grafting for distal radius malunion.

RESULTS

The patient was treated with surgical exploration of the median nerve and carpal tunnel release.

CONCLUSION

The authors report a case of acute CTS after ORIF with VLP for a distal radius malunion warranting surgical exploration and carpal tunnel release. Treatment teams must be aware of this potential complication so that the threshold for reoperation is low and irreversible damage to the median nerve is prevented.

Ulnar shortening osteotomy for malunited distal radius fractures: results of a 7-year follow-up with special regard to the grade of radial displacement and post-operative ulnar variance

INTRODUCTION

The treatment of ulnar-sided wrist pain after malunited distal radius fractures remains controversial. Radial corrective osteotomy can restore congruity in the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) as well as adequate length of the radius. Ulnar shortening osteotomies leave the radius' angular deformities unchanged, risking secondary DRUJ osteoarthritis. We supposed that, even within the widely accepted limit of 20°, a greater angulation of the radius in the sagittal plane correlates with a higher rate of DRUJ osteoarthritis. Furthermore, we suspected worse results from an ulna shortened to a negative rather than a neutral or positive ulnar variance.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

For this retrospective study, we reviewed 23 patients a mean 7.2 (range 5.6-8.5) years after ulnar shortening osteotomy for malunion of distal radius fractures. We compared 14 patients with up to 10° dorsal or palmar displacement from the normal palmar tilt of 10° to 9 patients with more than 10° displacement, and 15 patients whose post-operative ulnar variance was neutral or positive to 8 who had a negative one.

RESULTS

Ulnar-sided wrist pain decreased enough to satisfy 21 of the 23 patients. Clinical results tended to be better when radial displacement was minor and when post-operative ulnar variance was positive or neutral. A shorter ulna significantly increased the rate of DRUJ osteoarthritis, whereas a greater degree of radial displacement only increased the rate slightly.

CONCLUSIONS

Radial corrective osteotomy should be discussed as alternative when displacement of the radius in the sagittal plane exceeds 10°. The ulna should be shortened moderately to reduce the risk of osteoarthritis in the distal radioulnar joint.

Current concepts in the treatment of distal radial fractures

Distal radial fractures are among the most commonly encountered traumatic fractures of the upper extremity. Initial trauma mechanism, fracture pattern, associated injuries, and patient age influence treatment and outcome. Although stable fractures are commonly treated conservatively, the past decade has seen changes in surgical practice and techniques. Indications for surgery have been extended and refined based on new insight into the pathophysiology of the distal end of the forearm and technological advances in implant design. Despite the frequency of this fracture, only limited higher-level evidence exists to guide practitioners in decision making for this injury. This article highlights key concepts in the treatment of distal radial fractures and summarizes current evidence.