Arthroscopic reduction and acetabuloplasty for the treatment of dislocated hips in children of walking age: a preliminary report

[Arthroscopic reduction of congenital hip dislocations in infants]

OBJECTIVE

Open reduction of congenital hip dislocations currently remains the standard treatment for those hip joints which are irreducible by closed means. The open reduction of the dislocated hip joint represents a relatively invasive surgical method. Thus, the goal was to develop a minimally invasive and safe procedure with a lower complication rate as an alternative to open reduction. This work presents the arthroscopically guided reduction of dislocated hip joints, first described in 2009, as a standardized surgical technique.

INDICATIONS

Failed closed reduction for congenital hip dislocation.

SURGICAL TECHNIQUE

Arthroscopic reduction of the dislocated femoral head using an arthroscopic two-portal technique, a high anterolateral and a medial subadductor portal. The arthroscope is inserted through the subadductor portal. The high anterolateral portal serves as working portal. Step-by-step identification and removal of obstacles to reduction such as the ligament of the femoral head, fat tissue, capsular constriction and psoas tendon. Reduction of the femoral head under arthroscopic control.

POSTOPERATIVE TREATMENT

The hip joint is retained in a hip spica cast with the legs in human position.

RESULTS

Arthroscopic hip reduction of 20 congenital hip dislocations: 13 girls and 3 boys with an average age at the time of operation of 5.8 months (3-9 months). All children had multiple, unsuccessful attempts of closed reduction by use of overhead traction, Pavlik harness or closed reduction and hip spica application. According to the Graf classification, there were 20 type IV hips. According to the radiological classification of Tönnis, there were 9 type 4, 7 type 3, and 4 type II grades. The obstacles to reduction were capsular constriction, hypertrophic ligament of the femoral head, and an extensively large pulvinar in the acetabulum. An inverted labrum was not seen in any of the cases. In contrast, in 2/3 of the cases, there was considerable retraction of the dorsal edge of the socket due to the ligament of the femoral head expanding right over it. In all cases, postreduction transinguinal ultrasound and MRI were used to check the femoral head position in the cast postoperatively. In all cases there was a deep reduction of the femoral head in the acetabulum. There were no intra- or postoperative complications such as bleeding, infections or nerve lesions. There were no cases of redislocation or decentering of the femoral head, which was also confirmed after an average follow-up of 15 months. The mean AC angle at follow-up was 24.5°. There was one coxa magna in the series and one avascular necrosis with a fragmented femoral head according to the Salter classification.

Arthroscopic Treatment of Acute Septic Arthritis of the Hip Joint in Pediatric Patients Aged 10 Years or Younger

PURPOSE

To present the results of arthroscopic treatment of acute septic arthritis of the hip joint in children aged 10 years or younger.

METHODS

Patients with a minimum follow-up period of 2 years who underwent arthroscopic treatment (anterolateral and medial subadductor 2-portal approach) of acute septic arthritis of the hip joint between January 2014 and January 2017 were included in this retrospective case-series study. The exclusion criteria included fungal infection, late presentation (≥5 days after the onset of the symptoms), presence of concomitant osteomyelitis, osseous pathologic conditions on radiography suggesting osteomyelitis, immunocompromised condition, history of surgery or infection surgery from the affected extremity, immobility owing to neuromuscular pathologic conditions, and identification of inflammatory or reactive arthritis during follow-up. The diagnosis of septic arthritis was confirmed according to the Waldvogel criteria. Clinical outcomes were assessed according to the Bennett score and Harris Hip Score.

RESULTS

We evaluated 15 hips in 15 patients (6 female and 9 male patients) with a mean age of 5.2 years (range, 2-10 years) in this study. The mean hospital stay was 4.2 days (range, 3-7 days), and the mean antibiotic-use period was 34 days (range, 26-45 days). The most causative pathogen was Staphylococcus aureus (40%) (including methicillin-sensitive S aureus) and was isolated and cultured in all patients. All patients had full range of motion of the hip joint. All of the Bennett scores were excellent; the mean Harris Hip Score was 96.3 (range, 92.5-100) after a minimum follow-up period of 24 months (mean, 26.1 ± 3.2 months; range, 24-35 months). No patient needed additional surgical intervention. No degenerative changes or avascular necrosis developed.

CONCLUSIONS

According to our results, arthroscopic treatment is an effective choice for the treatment of acute septic arthritis of the hip joint in children aged 10 years or younger.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, retrospective case series.

A Single Approach to Arthroscopic Reduction and Debridement for Developmental Dislocation of the Hip in 12 Infants

Background

Developmental dislocation of the hip (DDH) results in osteoarthritis in infants and children. This study aimed to investigate the effects of a single approach to arthroscopic reduction and debridement on clinical outcome in 12 infants with DDH.

Material/Methods

Twelve infants with irreducible DDH underwent single approach arthroscopic reduction and debridement followed by the use of a frog-leg position plaster cast with fixed flexion and abduction of the hips combined with external fixation for 6–8 weeks. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or plain X-ray images were analyzed. Intra-articular obstructive factors for reduction were evaluated. The safety angle, medialization rate of the femoral head, and the acetabular angle were measured before and after arthroscopic reduction.

Results

Imaging showed that the signs of DDH were significantly improved following arthroscopic reduction. Obstructive factors included hypertrophy of the round ligament, fibrous tissue and fat in the acetabular base, arthrocapsular constriction, and varus deformity of the hip. The safety angle was significantly increased following arthroscopic reduction (53.5°) compared with the safety angle before treatment (18.5°) (p<0.05). Medialization of the femoral head was significantly increased (127%) compared with that before treatment (72%) (p<0.05). Arthroscopic reduction significantly reduced the acetabular angle (25°) compared with that before treatment (37.5°) (p<0.05).

Conclusions

Single approach arthroscopic reduction and debridement was an effective method for treating DDH that significantly improved the medialization rate of the femoral head, acetabular angle, and the outcome of external fixation when a plaster cast was used with fixed flexion and abduction of the hips.

Comparison of arthroscopic and open reduction of conservatively irreducible dislocated hips of children

PURPOSE

Children with sonographic grade IV hip dysplasia according to Graf and with failed conservative treatment usually need surgical reduction afterwards. Surgical reduction of the hip can lead to severe complications, the occurrence of residual acetabular dysplasia, osteonecrosis, redislocation and other postoperative complications. This paper investigates whether arthroscopic reduction is a promising alternative to open reduction.

METHODS

We retrospectively examined 66 patients (78 hips) who were not older than two years at the first time of surgery. Arthroscopic reduction was performed on 17 children (19 hips) and open reduction on 49 children (59 hips). Patient records were used to determine redislocation, postoperative complication and residual dysplasia. Radiographs were used to determine Tönnis classification for osteonecrosis and pathological acetabular (AC) angle for residual dysplasia. We considered data up to a two-year follow-up. Statistical evaluation was performed with binary logistic regression.

RESULTS

After arthroscopic reduction, 6% showed osteonecrosis, compared with 20% with open reduction (p = 0.334). Redislocation was not observed after arthroscopic reduction but for 29% after open reduction (p = 0.005). An improvement of femoral head coverage was achieved with residual dysplasia of 23.5% after arthroscopic reduction, compared with 62% after open reduction (p = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

The arthroscopic procedure represents a meaningful alternative to the open procedure due to a lower complication rate, a safe setting, a lower rate of residual dysplasia, no observed redislocation and occurrence of osteonecrosis only once in the arthroscopic group of developmental dysplasia of the hip. The arthroscopic procedure should be tested in further studies and in other clinics in order to broaden the empirical base.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III (retrospective cohort study).

Arthroscopic versus open, medial approach, surgical reduction for developmental dysplasia of the hip in patients under 18 months of age

Background and purpose - The value of arthroscopic surgical reduction in developmental hip dysplasia is poorly known. We compared the clinical and radiographic efficacy of arthroscopic and medial open surgical reduction in patients less than 18 months of age with developmental hip dysplasia. Patients and methods - 54 patients with a mean age of 11 months who were treated by Ludloff's medial open reduction technique (28 hips, Group L) or arthroscopic surgical reduction technique (26 hips, Group A) were evaluated in this case series. Data on age, sex, preoperative Tönnis grade, operative time, estimated blood loss, residual leg length discrepancy, range of motion (ROM), acetabular index (AI) angle, coverage ratio of the femoral head, continuity of Menard-Shenton line, re-dislocation rate, McKay classification, and Kalamchi-MacEwen avascular necrosis (AVN) classification were collected. Results - Preoperatively, the mean AI angle was 39° in Group L and 37° in Group A. At the latest follow-up, the mean AI was 26° in both groups. The mean femoral head coverage ratio was 79% in Group L and 80% in Group A. The Menard-Shenton line was intact in all patients. Residual leg length discrepancy or limited ROM was not detected in any patients. 4 patients in Group L and 2 in Group A were diagnosed with type 2 AVN. Interpretation - Arthroscopic surgical reduction in patients aged 6-18 months revealed promising clinical and radiographic outcomes similar to medial open reduction using Ludloff's technique.

[Hip dysplasia-new and proven methods]

BACKGROUND

Hip dysplasia is one of the most common disorders in paediatric orthopedics. With the development of ultrasound techniques treatment has changed, and earlier diagnosis and treatment is possible. So, for more than 20 years diagnosis and treatment has been focused on ultrasound. Many papers reporting new diagnostic techniques like MRI have been published. Arthroscopic reduction is a new surgical procedure. However, established surgical procedures continue to play an important role in the treatment.

CURRENT TREATMENT

This paper presents new and established diagnostic techniques, conservative and surgical treatment options. Unfortunately, due to the great number of publications, not all aspects could be taken into account. In particular, we describe the diagnostic and treatment standards in German-speaking countries based on ultrasound hip screening. However, also international aspects of diagnostic and treatment options have been included.

Arthroscopic Treatment of Traumatic Hip Dislocations in Children and Adolescents: A Preliminary Study

INTRODUCTION

Traumatic hip dislocations in children and adolescents require prompt concentric reduction. Incomplete reduction with or without retained osteochondral fragments has traditionally been addressed with open reduction. We report on the use of arthroscopy to remove loose bodies and reduce enfolded soft tissues to obtain concentric reduction in the pediatric and adolescent population. Specific note is made of underlying pathology and arthroscopic intervention.

METHODS

After obtaining Institutional Review Board approval, we performed a retrospective review of patients under the age of 19 who were treated with hip arthroscopy following hip dislocation reduction at a single children's hospital from 2006 to 2013. Clinic notes, operative reports, radiographic images, and arthroscopic photographs were reviewed.

RESULTS

Seven patients were identified (aged 8 to 17) who underwent hip arthroscopy after a posterior hip dislocation. Intra-articular bone fragments were found in 6 of 7 patients and 5 of 7 patients had an incongruent hip joint identified by imaging before surgery. The predominant pathology was avulsion of a small bony fragment attached to the posterior capsular labral soft-tissue complex, which became enfolded and blocked reduction (5 of 7 patients). In all cases, the enfolded soft tissue was reduced without soft tissue or bone repair. Additional loose osteochondral fragments were removed, and in 2 cases an avulsed ligamentum teres was debrided. Average follow-up was 10 months. No avascular necrosis or recurrent instability was identified in any case.

CONCLUSIONS

When incongruent hip joints were arthroscopically evaluated after traumatic dislocation, a consistent pattern of interposition of avulsed posterior bone fragment with attached capsule and labrum was found. Reduction of the capsulolabral complex without repair provided satisfactory short-term outcomes. Arthroscopic treatment of such cases was effective and well tolerated and could lead to considerably less postoperative pain and surgical morbidity than open surgical treatment.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV-case series.

Medium-term results following arthroscopic reduction in walking-age children with developmental hip dysplasia after failed closed reduction

Background

Arthroscopic reduction has become increasingly popular as an alternative to open reduction for the treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). However, patient outcomes beyond one and a half years after surgery remain unclear. The purpose of this study is to report the medium-term outcomes of walking-age patients who received arthroscopic reduction after an unsuccessful closed reduction. This research was conducted as part of a retrospectively registered study.

Methods

We performed arthroscopic reduction in eight children with DDH after failed closed reduction between January 2010 and January 2012 and followed all cases for a minimum of 5 years. Arthroscopic reduction was performed using a two-portal approach without traction. Capsular release and resection of the transverse acetabular ligament were also performed if needed. Patient demographics, clinical variables, anatomical assessment measures, and post-operative complications were extracted from medical records.

Results

We treated five male and three female patients with an average age at operation of 15.6 months (range, 12 to 22 months). All obstacles to reduction were corrected arthroscopically. Concentric reduction of the hip joint was observed in post-operative X-rays in all cases. The average safe zone was increased from 17.5° (8° to 30°) to 42.1° (36° to 50°) after the operation. The average acetabular (AC) index was reduced from 40.3° (33° to 65°) to 21.9° (19° to 26°) at the end of follow-up. No complications occurred and no patients developed necrosis of the femoral head, recurrent dislocation, or residual hip dysplasia.

Conclusions

Arthroscopic reduction is a suitable surgical procedure for the treatment of DDH among walking-age children with failed closed reduction and severe dislocation. This method is quick and safe, and it can be performed without post-operative complications over the medium term.

Effects of arthroscopic-assisted surgery on irreducible developmental dislocation of hip by mid-term follow-up: An observational study

The purpose of this study was to investigate the indications, surgical technique, and the clinical effects of arthroscopic-assisted treatment of irreducible developmental dislocation of the hip by mid-term follow-up. Arthroscopic-assisted surgeries were performed on 40 children (52 hips) between January 2005 and December 2009. Anterior and antero-superior greater trochanter portals were used in these treatments. Spica cast and abduction splint were applied for 3 months postoperatively. The follow-up was conducted on every 3 months postoperatively. During 12-month follow-up, a secondary treatment such as acetabuloplasty and/or femoral osteotomy (shortening, varus, and derotation) was applied if the acetabular angle was greater than 25°. The pelvic acetabular angle, Mckay and Severin score were evaluated every 6 months in all children. With 36 to 96 months (average 71 months) follow-up, 35 children (44 hips) were successfully followed up with complete case data while 5 children unsuccessfully. According to Tönnis classification, there were 5 grade 1 hips, 14 grade 2 hips, 14 grade 3 hips, 11 grade 4 hips, in which 3 children (4 hips) were failed in arthroscopic reduction and femoral head avascular necrosis occurred in 2 children (4 hips). According to Mckay standard, the good rate is 100%. According to Severin standard, the good rate is 84.1%. Arthroscopic assisted treatment is an effective way of reduction of the irreducible hip. Compared with the open reduction, arthroscopic treatment combined with acetabuloplasty and/or femoral osteotomy has advantages of less trauma and better function preservation.

The use of hip arthroscopy in the management of the pediatric hip

Arthroscopy of the pediatric hip began in 1977 with a publication by Gross. Interest was relatively slow to develop in the 1980s and 1990s. Coupled with the success of hip arthroscopy in the adult, interest heightened in applying the procedure to a variety of pediatric hip disorders, given that the alternative was an open surgical hip dislocation. The success of this initial group of pediatric hip arthroscopist's has further expanded the application of hip arthroscopy as the primary or adjunct procedure for the management of intra-articular problems of the pediatric hip.

A Comparison of Supine and Lateral Decubitus Positions for Hip Arthroscopy: A Systematic Review of Outcomes and Complications

PURPOSE

This systematic review examines outcomes and risk profiles of the hip arthroscopy in the supine versus lateral decubitus positions to elucidate any superiority of one approach over the other.

METHODS

Three databases (Embase, PubMed, and Medline) were searched for studies that addressed hip arthroscopy performed in either position, and were subsequently screened by two reviewers with data abstracted in duplicate.

RESULTS

Similar outcomes were observed. Supine studies showed a greater mean postoperative improvement for modified Harris hip score (33.74), visual analog scale (-3.99), nonarthritic hip score (29.61), Harris hip score (35.73), and hip outcome score (31.4). Lateral decubitus studies showed greater improvement using the Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis (14.76) score. Supine studies reported more neuropraxic injuries (2.06% v 0.47%), labral penetration (0.65% v 0%), and heterotopic ossification (0.21% v 0%). Lateral decubitus studies reported more fluid extravasation (0.21% v 0.05%) and missed loose bodies (0.08% v 0.01%). Similar rates of revision (1.8% lateral, 1.4% supine) and conversion to open procedures (2.6% in lateral, 2.0% in supine) were also identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Because of quality of evidence, direct comparisons are currently limited; however, the supine position is associated with more neuropraxic injuries, labral penetration, and heterotopic ossification, whereas lateral decubitus has increased risk of fluid extravasation and missed loose bodies. At this time, no evidence exists to establish superiority of one position.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, systematic review of Level II, III, and IV studies.