Can we use intraoperative femoral tunnel length measurement as a clue for proper femoral tunnel placement on coronal plane during ACL reconstruction?

Biologic Impact of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury and Reconstruction

Surgical intervention after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears is typically required because of the limited healing capacity of the ACL. However, mechanical factors and the inflammatory response triggered by the injury and surgery can impact patient outcomes. This review explores key aspects of ACL injury and reconstruction biology, including the inflammatory response, limited spontaneous healing, secondary inflammation after reconstruction, and graft healing processes. Understanding these biologic mechanisms is crucial for developing new treatment strategies and enhancing patient well-being. By shedding light on these aspects, clinicians and researchers can work toward improving quality of life for individuals affected by ACL tears.

Predicting Autologous Hamstring Graft Diameter in the Pediatric Population Using Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Demographic Data

BACKGROUND

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction before 18 years of age has been linked with an increased risk for failure when the graft diameter is <8 mm.

PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS

The purpose of this study was to determine whether autologous hamstring graft size can be reliably predicted with the use of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measurements. We hypothesized that the average of multiple axial cross-sectional area MRI measurements for the semitendinosus tendon and gracilis tendon would alone accurately predict graft diameter. Additionally, factoring in specific demographic data to the MRI cross-sectional areas would provide a synergistic effect to the accuracy of graft diameter predictions.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 51 pediatric patients undergoing ACL reconstructions (age <18 years) performed using either a quadruple-strand semitendinosus tendon or combined double-bundle semitendinosus tendon-gracilis tendon autograft. Preoperative axial MRI scans at multiple points along the craniocaudal axis-specifically, at the level of the joint line, 3 cm cephalad to the medial tibial plateau, and 5 cm cephalad to the medial tibial plateau-were used to determine the combined cross-sectional area of the semitendinosus and gracilis tendons. The MRI measurements were analyzed using Pearson correlation as well as regression analysis to evaluate strength of correlation between measurements. Binomial linear regression was used to analyze the same predictive variables assessed by multiple regression.

RESULTS

The predicted graft diameter was within 0.5 mm of the intraoperative graft size in 37 of 51 (72.5%) patients and within 1 mm of the intraoperative graft size in 49 of 51 (96.1%). With the addition of demographics, the accuracy of predictions increased to 78.4% within 0.5 mm and 98% within 1 mm of the actual graft size. Additionally, 38 of 42 patients whose true graft diameter was ≥8 mm were correctly classified, giving a sensitivity of 90.4%. For those whose true graft diameter was <8 mm, 8 of 9 patients were correctly classified; therefore, the specificity was 88.9%.

CONCLUSION

The results of our study suggest that taking the average of multiple preoperative MRI measurements can be used to accurately predict autologous hamstring graft size when approaching pediatric patients undergoing ACL reconstruction.

Comparison of femoral tunnel length and obliquity of anatomic versus nonanatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A meta-analysis

Purpose

Theoretical considerations suggest that femoral tunnel length might cause graft mismatch, and femoral tunnel obliquity could be related to the longevity of graft in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. However, controversy still exists regarding these issues in the context of the comparison of anatomic and nonanatomic ACL reconstructions. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to compare the length and obliquity of the femoral tunnel created by drilling through either anatomic or nonanatomic ACL reconstructions.

Materials and method

In this meta-analysis, we reviewed studies that compared femoral tunnel length and femoral tunnel obliquity in the coronal plane with the use of anatomic or nonanatomic ACL reconstruction. The major databases were reviewed for appropriate studies from the earliest available date of indexing through December 31, 2018. No restrictions were placed on the language of publication.

Results

Twenty-seven studies met the criteria for inclusion in this meta-analysis. The femur tunnel length of anatomic ACL reconstruction was significantly shorter compared with that of nonanatomic ACL reconstruction by 8.66 mm (95% CI: 7.10–10.22 mm; P<0.001), while the femur tunnel obliquity in the coronal plane of anatomic ACL reconstruction was significantly more oblique versus that of nonanatomic ACL reconstruction by 15.29° (95% CI: 8.07°–22.52°; P<0.001). Similar results in terms of femoral tunnel length were found for the subgroup with cadaveric (7.15 mm; 95% CI: 2.69–11.61 mm; P = 0.002) and noncadaveric (8.96 mm; 95% CI: 7.24–10.69 mm; P<0.001) studies, whereas different results in terms of femoral tunnel obliquity were noted for the subgroup with cadaveric (10.62°; 95% CI: −6.12° to 27.37°; P = 0.21) and noncadaveric (15.86°; 95% CI: 8.11°–23.60°; P<0.001) studies.

Conclusion

Anatomic ACL reconstruction resulted in the femoral tunnel length and femoral tunnel obliquity in the coronal plane being shorter and more oblique, respectively, as compared with nonanatomic ACL reconstruction.

Level of evidence

Therapeutic study, Level III.

BIOLOGICAL ENHANCEMENTS FOR ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION

The anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is mostly responsible for providing knee stability. ACL injury has a marked effect on daily activities, causing pain, dysfunction, and elevated healthcare costs. ACL reconstruction (ACLR) is the standard treatment for this injury. However, despite good results, ACLR is associated with a significant rate of failure. In this context, the mechanical and biological causes must be considered. From a biological perspective, the ACLR depends on the osseointegration of the graft in the adjacent bone and the process of intra-articular ligamentization for good results. Here, we discuss the mechanisms underlying the normal graft healing process after ACLR and its biological modulation, thus, presenting novel strategies for biological enhancements of the ACL graft. Level of evidence III, Systematic review of level III studies.

No correlation between femoral tunnel orientation and clinical outcome at long-term follow-up after non-anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

PURPOSE

This study aimed to determine the influence of femoral tunnel orientation on long-term clinical outcome and osteoarthritis in patients undergoing ACL reconstruction and to test the reliability of the implemented radiographic measurement methods. It was hypothesized that a more horizontal femoral tunnel would correlate with superior clinical outcome.

METHODS

A cohort of 193 patients who underwent non-anatomic ACL reconstruction was examined. In this specific study, non-anatomic is defined by the surgeons' pursuit of optimal isometry, not to emulate the native ACL anatomy. At follow-up, the Lachman test, the KT-1000, the pivot-shift test, the one-leg-hop test and the IKDC-2000 were evaluated. Osteoarthritis was evaluated radiographically. Posteroanterior and lateral radiographs were used to determine the position of the femoral tunnel in the coronal and sagittal planes and the angle of the tunnel in the coronal plane. A method for determining femoral rotation on the lateral radiographs was developed and its reliability was evaluated. The femoral tunnel orientation was analyzed to examine its influence on clinical outcome and osteoarthritis.

RESULTS

A total of 101 patients were analyzed at a mean of 16.4 (± 1.3) years postoperatively. The reliability of the measurement methods was regarded as good to excellent (ICC 0.57-0.97). The mean coronal femoral tunnel angle was 9.6° (± 9.4°). The coronal femoral tunnel was positioned at a mean of 43% (± 3.5%) of the distance measured from lateral to medial. The mean sagittal femoral tunnel position, measured using the quadrant method, was 40% (± 6.4%) from posterior to anterior. No significant associations were found between tunnel orientation and the clinical outcome variables.

CONCLUSIONS

The orientation of the femoral tunnel did not predict the long-term subjective outcome, functional outcome or the development of osteoarthritis in patients undergoing non-anatomic ACL reconstruction. The method for determining femoral rotation on lateral radiographs was found to be reliable.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Retrospective cohort study, level of evidence IV.

Graft position in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: anteromedial versus transtibial technique

INTRODUCTION

When treating anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries, the position of the ACL graft plays a key role in regaining postoperative knee function and physiologic kinematics. In this study, we aimed to compare graft angle, graft position in tibial tunnel, and tibial and femoral tunnel positions in patients operated with anteromedial (AM) and transtibial (TT) methods to those of contralateral healthy knees.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-eight patients who underwent arthroscopic ACL reconstruction with ipsilateral hamstring tendon autograft were included. Of these, 23 and 25 were treated by AM and TT techniques, respectively. MRI was performed at 18.4 and 19.7 months postoperatively in AM and TT groups. Graft angles, graft positions in the tibial tunnel and alignment of tibial and femoral tunnels were noted and compared in these two groups. The sagittal graft insertion tibia midpoint distance (SGON) has been used for evaluation of graft position in tunnel.

RESULTS

Sagittal ACL graft angles in operated and healthy knees of AM patients were 57.78° and 46.80° (p < 0.01). With respect to TT patients, ACL graft angle was 58.87° and 70.04° on sagittal and frontal planes in operated knees versus 47.38° and 61.82° in healthy knees (p < 0.001). ACL graft angle was significantly different between the groups on both sagittal and frontal planes (p < 0.001). Sagittal graft insertion tibia midpoint distance ratio was 0.51 and 0.48 % in the operated and healthy knees of AM group (p < 0.001) and 0.51 and 0.48 % in TT group (p < 0.001). Sagittal tibial tunnel midpoint distance ratio did not differ from sagittal graft insertion tibia midpoint distance of healthy knees in either group. Femoral tunnel clock position was better in AM [right knee 10:19 o'clock-face position (310° ± 4°); left knee 1:40 (50° ± 3°)] compared with TT group [right knee 10:48 (324° ± 5°); left knee 1:04 (32° ± 4°)]. With respect to the sagittal plane, the anterior-posterior position of femoral tunnel was better in AM patients. Lysholm scores and range of motion of operated knees in the AM and TT groups showed no significant difference (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Precise reconstruction on sagittal plane cannot be obtained with either AM or TT technique. However, AM technique is superior to TT technique in terms of anatomical graft positioning. Posterior-placed grafts in tibial tunnel prevent ACL reconstruction, although tibial tunnel is drilled on sagittal plane.