Kinematic analysis of stair climbing in rotating platform cruciate-retaining and posterior-stabilized mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasties

Comparative analysis and validation of posterior cruciate ligament management in mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty: Meta-analysis and animal study

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is an effective treatment for end-stage knee joint diseases. The debate over preserving or sacrificing the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) in mobile-bearing TKA (MB TKA) still needs to be solved due to the lack of high-quality evidence, particularly meta-analyses comparing these techniques. This study aims to conduct a meta-analysis to compare the outcomes of PCL retention (CR) and PCL sacrifice (PS) in terms of clinical and functional knee scores, range of motion, complication rates, and revision rates and to validate these findings through animal experiments. A comprehensive search was conducted using MEDLINE, Cochrane, and Embase databases. Relevant studies were selected for the meta-analysis using RevMan 5.3. Additionally, an animal experiment using Sprague-Dawley rats simulated MB TKA to compare the effects of PCL retention and sacrifice surgeries. 12 studies were included in the meta-analysis. No significant differences were found between CR and PS techniques regarding HSS, KSS, KSFS, WOMAC, ROM, and medial/lateral instability. However, CR MB showed slight superiority in NKJS, while PS MB had better outcomes in complication and revision rates. In the animal study, CR rats exhibited significant early postoperative inflammation, but both groups' knee structures gradually normalized. The meta-analysis indicates that PCL retention (CR MB) and sacrifice (PS MB) have similar effects on various clinical and functional knee scores. However, PS MB is significantly better at reducing complications and revision rates. The animal experiment confirms PS MB's advantages in reducing inflammation and promoting joint recovery. Despite the strong evidence, long-term follow-up and larger-scale randomized controlled trials are necessary to confirm these findings.

Medial-pivot total knee arthroplasty enhances tibiofemoral axial rotation stability in weight-bearing mid-range flexion compared to posterior-stabilised system

PURPOSE

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) stands as a primary intervention for severe knee ailments, yet concerns remain regarding postoperative patient satisfaction and flexion instability. This study aims to evaluate the in-vivo kinematics of medial-pivot (MP) and posterior-stabilised (PS) designs during step-up activity, in comparison to the kinematics of the nonoperated contralateral knee.

METHODS

Sixteen patients with PS-TKA and 14 with MP-TKA were retrospectively examined. Clinical outcomes were assessed using patient-completed questionnaires. Motion during step-up was captured using a dual fluoroscopic system. Statistical analysis was applied to evaluate the in-vivo tibiofemoral six-degree-of-freedom kinematics and articular contact positions between the two groups.

RESULTS

Despite being older, patients in the MP group reported higher postoperative subjective scores for weight-bearing functional activities. The axial rotation centres of MP-TKA located on the medial tibial plateau exhibited less variance compared to PS-TKA and contralateral knees. Compared to the contralateral knee (contralateral to medial-pivot [C-MP] or contralateral to posterior-stabilised [C-PS]), the MP group exhibited limited range of motion in terms of anteroposterior translation (MP: 3.6 ± 1.3 mm vs. C-MP: 7.4 ± 2.5 mm, p < 0.01) and axial rotation (MP: 6.6 ± 1.9° vs. C-MP: 10.3 ± 4.9°, p = 0.02), as well as in the PS group for anteroposterior translation (PS: 3.9 ± 1.7 mm vs. C-PS: 7.2 ± 3.7 mm, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

The MP group with better postoperative ratings demonstrated a more stable MP axial rotation pattern during step-up activity compared to the PS group, underscoring the pivotal role of prosthetic design in optimising postoperative rehabilitation and functional recovery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Effect of single-radius design on in vivo kinematics during stair activities after total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The single-radius design is one of the major total knee arthroplasty (TKA) designs and widely used all over the world. The objective of this study was to compare in vivo kinematics between the anteroposterior (AP) single-radius design with mediolateral (ML) single-radius (Non Restricted Geometry; NRG) and ML dual-radius (Triathlon) during stair activities.

METHODS

A total of 21 knees in 18 patients (NRG group: 10 knees in 7 patients, Triathlon group: 11 knees in 11 patients) with a clinically successful posterior stabilized TKA were examined. Under fluoroscopic surveillance, each patient performed stair ascending and descending motions. In vivo kinematics were analyzed using 2D/3D registration technique. The knee flexion angle, rotation angle, varus-valgus angle, AP translation of the femorotibial contact point for both the medial and lateral sides of the knee, and post-cam engagement were evaluated.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between the two groups in rotation angle and AP translation at each flexion angle. Examining the varus-valgus angle, the NRG group showed varus position at an early flexion angle during both stair activities.Post-cam engagement was observed in both groups during both stair activities. The mean flexion angle of engagement in the NRG group, the post of which was located anterior to the Triathlon, was larger than that in the Triathlon group during both stair activities.

CONCLUSION

Despite the same AP single-radius TKA, ML single-radius might affect varus motion at an early flexion angle.

No difference in clinical outcomes between functionally aligned cruciate-retaining and posterior-stabilized robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

To compare the clinical outcomes of subjects undergoing primary robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RA-TKA), following functional alignment (FA) principles, with cruciate-retaining (CR) or posterior-stabilized (PS) bearing designs, at a minimum of 24 months of follow-up.

METHODS

This observational, retrospective study included 167 consecutive patients undergoing RA-TKA with cemented PS and cementless CR implants performed with a CT-base robotic-arm assisted system (Mako, Stryker), following FA principles, between 2017 and 2020. Patients were followed up with a clinical and radiographic assessment and were administered the Forgotten Joint Score-12 (FJS-12), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS-JR), and the 5-level Likert scale (5-LLS).

RESULTS

Three TKA revisions were performed (2 PS, 1 CR); therefore, a total of 164 knees with a mean age of 71.7 years (SD 8.9) were considered (80 cemented PS; 84 cementless CR). No statistically significant differences were recorded between study groups relative to FJS-12, KOOS-JR, and 5-LLS at a minimum of two year follow-up (FJS-12 89.3 ± 9.2 vs 87.5 ± 12.8, p-value 0.46; KOOS-JR 88.8 ± 10.0 vs 86.7 ± 14.0, p-value 0.31; 5-LLS 4.5 ± 0.7 vs 4.5 ± 0.8, p-value 0.34).

CONCLUSION

No significant outcome differences were reported between patients undergoing PS and CR RA-TKA at a minimum of two year follow-up. RA-TKA achieves excellent clinical results and high satisfaction scores, regardless of the implant design used.

No Significant Differences in Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes between PCL Retained or Sacrificed Kinematic Aligned Medial Pivot Total Knee Arthroplasty in Varus Knee

In the last decades, several surgical techniques, such as medial pivot (MP) philosophy and kinematic alignment (KA), have been introduced in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) to improve patients’ outcomes. This retrospective study aims to evaluate the clinical, radiographic, and functional results of PCL preservation or sacrifice in KA MP-TKA. A consecutive series of 147 patients older than 60, with a minimum follow-up of two years, were treated with TKA for severe primary knee osteoarthritis (OA) at the Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology between 1 January 2019, and 1 July 2020. After excluding those not meeting the inclusion criteria, 64 patients were included in the study analysis. Regarding radiographic outcomes, no statistically significant difference was observed between patients with preserved or sacrificed PCL (p > 0.05). A slight improvement in Knee Society Score (KSS), knee and function score, and FJS was observed for the PCL-preserved group, although this superiority tendency was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). PCL-preserved MA MP-TKA reported a statistically significant result in only two questions on the FJS questionnaire (p < 0.05). A slight, non-statistically significant improvement in active ROM was found in the PCL-sacrificed group (p > 0.05). No interventions or revisions were reported in this case series for all treated patients at the final follow-up. No significant differences were described in clinical, radiographic, and functional outcomes in preserved or sacrificed PCL KA MP-TKA. Although not significant, a slight trend toward better clinical outcomes was reported in PCL-preserved KA MP-TKA.

Evaluation of the balance function before and after total knee arthroplasty using Berg balance scale

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study was to evaluate balance function before and after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using Berg balance scale (BBS). The study also aimed to identify factors associated with balance impairment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ninety-three knees in 90 patients were prospectively evaluated using their BBS scores, passive knee extension/flexion angles, Visual analogue scale for pain scores, hip-knee-ankle angles, and knee extensor/flexor muscle strengths before and after TKA. A total BBS score of less than 45 indicates an enhanced risk of multiple falls. Multivariate logistic regression models were performed to elucidate factors associated with post-operative BBS score.

RESULTS

A significant difference in mean pre- and post-operative BBS scores were noted (49.3 ± 6.4 vs. 52.2 ± 4.7) (p < 0.05). The percentage of pre- and post-operative BBS scores less than 45 were 20% and 10% (p < 0.05). Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA), lower pre-operative BBS score, and larger post-operative knee flexion contracture were significantly associated with lower post-operative BBS score (p < 0.01). The post-operative knee flexion contracture greater than 10° was significantly associated with substantially high odds of post-operative BBS scores less than 45 (Odds ratio 7.6; 95% confidential interval 1.69-34.17).

CONCLUSIONS

While TKA significantly improved BBS scores, 10% of the patients remained at a risk for multiple falls. RA, lower pre-operative BBS score, and post-operative knee flexion contracture greater than 10° retained balance impairment even after TKA.

Gradual-radius femoral component with s-curve post-cam provides stable kinematics at mid-flexion after total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Mid-flexion instability is the one of the reasons for patient dissatisfaction after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purposes of this study were to evaluate in vivo knee kinematics and clinical outcomes using a novel TKA design with a gradual femoral radius component and s-curve post-cam, which are intended to prevent the instability initiated by sudden reductions in the femoral radius observed with conventional components.

METHODS

We used radiographic-based, image-matching techniques to analyze femorotibial anteroposterior translation, axial rotation, and anterior/posterior cam-post contact during two dynamic movements, squatting and stair climbing, in 20 knees that had undergone posterior-stabilized fixed-bearing TKA with an improved sagittal profiles of the femoral component and post-cam mechanism. We also evaluated patient-reported outcomes assessed by the 2011 Knee Society Score (KSS 2011).

RESULTS

Squatting and stair climbing produced a similar trend in anteroposterior translation and a relatively small standard deviation at mid-flexion. Although the rotation angles varied widely during squatting and stair climbing, the femoral component was consistently externally rotated. Anterior/posterior cam-post contact during squatting and stair climbing were observed in 0/17 knees and 0/0 knees, respectively. The "Symptoms", "Satisfaction", and "Functional activities" subscales of the KSS 2011 were significantly (P < 0.05) improved postoperatively compared to preoperatively ("Symptoms", 10 to 21; "Satisfaction", 15 to 26; "Functional activities", 25 to 71).

CONCLUSION

A gradual femoral radius component with an s-curve post-cam provided stable kinematics and favorable clinical results during squatting and stair climbing at 1 year after surgery.

Differences in the flexion and extension phases during kneeling investigated by kinematic and contact point analyses: a cross-sectional study

Background

Kneeling is necessary for certain religious and ceremonial occasions, crouching work, and gardening, which many people take part in worldwide. However, there have been few reports about kneeling activities. The purpose of this study was to clarify the kinematics of kneeling.

Methods

The subjects were 15 healthy young males. Kneeling activity was analysed within a knee flexion angle from 100° to maximum flexion (maxflex, mean ± SD = 161.3 ± 3.2°). The kinematic and contact point (CP) analyses were performed using a 2D/3D registration method, in which a 3D bone model created from computed tomography images was matched to knee lateral fluoroscopic images and analysed on a personal computer.

Results

In the kinematic analysis, the femur translated 37.5 mm posteriorly and rotated 19.8° externally relative to the tibia during the knee flexion phase. During the knee extension phase, the femur translated 36.4 mm anteriorly, which was almost the same amount as in the knee flexion phase. However, the femur rotated only 7.4° internally during the knee extension phase. In the CP analysis, the amount of anterior translation of the CP in the knee extension phase was greater in the medial CP and smaller in the lateral CP than that of posterior translation in the knee flexion phase.

Conclusions

In kneeling, there was a difference in the rotational kinematics between the flexion phase and the extension phase. The kinematic difference between the flexion and extension phases may have some effect on the meniscus and articular cartilage.

No difference in PROMs between robotic-assisted CR versus PS total knee arthroplasty: a preliminary study

The purpose of this study was to determine if significant clinical differences exist in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) between PS and CR TKAs implanted using robotic-assisted technology. This was an IRB-approved retrospective study from an institutional database evaluating 214 knees in 190 patients. Inclusion criteria included: primary RA-TKA, age 22-89 at the time of surgery, preoperative coronal limb deformity within 15º of neutral alignment, and minimum 1-year follow-up. The PS cohort consisted of 103 patients with 107 RA-TKAs, whereas the CR cohort consisted of 87 patients with 107 RA-TKAs. Cohorts were compared on the basis of demographics and PROMs (KSS knee, KSS function, FJS-12, KOOS-JR, WOMAC, and 5-point satisfaction Likert scale) collected preoperatively and at 1-year follow-up. Statistical analyses comparing measures were conducted via Student's t tests for continuous data and Chi-squared analyses for categorical data. There were no significant differences identified in short-term PROMs at 1-year follow-up between cohorts (all p values > 0.05). 93.1% of patients with CR knees and 94.7% of patients with PS knees reported a satisfaction level of "very satisfied" or "satisfied". Revision arthroplasty occurred in six knees (2.8%, 3 knees in CR cohort, 3 knees in PS cohort) with no differences in overall complications between groups. The use of RA-TKA technology promoted high patient satisfaction scores within this study, independent of CR or PS implant type with no significant differences in PROMs, satisfaction, revisions, or complications between the two groups.

Optimal designs and surgical technique for hip and knee joint replacement: The best is yet to come!

Over the last three decades, there have been significant advancements in knee and hip replacement technology. The implants and the surgical technology we now have to aid in their implantation are advancing and improving functional outcomes and survivorship. Despite these advancements, there are still issues with patient satisfaction, functional limitations, and early revisions due to instability and aseptic loosening. This article reviews the state of current technology in hip and knee replacement implant design and surgical technique, and reviews some of the current implant designs and surgical technologies that may be able to solve some of the most common issues in the knee and hip replacement surgery.

Quadriceps muscle group function and after total knee arthroplasty-asystematic narrative update

BACKGROUND

This article systematically summarizes the present evidences, published in the last 20 years, regarding the pre- and post-operative factors, which may influence recovery of the function of the quadriceps muscle group following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We following the PRISMA methodology, including meta-analyses and high-level evidence studies (prospective trials, and, when unavailable, retrospective studies).

SOURCES OF DATA

Pubmed and Cochrane databases: 582 articles were identified and 54 of them were selected.

AREAS OF AGREEMENT

Tourniquets inflated at high pressure exert a detrimental effect on the quadriceps muscle group. Faster quadriceps recovery takes place using mini-invasive approaches, an eight-week rehabilitation period including balance training and the use of nutraceuticals.

AREAS OF DISAGREEMENT

Pre-habilitation and pre-operative factors, analgesic methods and different TKA implants.

GROWING POINTS AND AREAS TIMELY FOR DEVELOPING RESEARCH

Telerehabilitation seems a cost-effective tool for rehabilitation after TKA. Patients' optimization protocols before TKA should include standardized nutraceuticals intake.

Posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty reproduces natural joint laxity compared to normal in kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty: a matched pair cadaveric study

PURPOSE

As the goal of kinematic aligned (KA) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is to preserve soft tissue tension to the native knee, many KA surgeons recommend cruciate-retaining (CR) prosthesis. However, how a posterior-stabilizing (PS) prosthesis affects the biomechanics of a KA TKA remains unclear. This cadaveric study tested the hypothesis that a PS prosthesis in KA TKA would produce biomechanics similar to CR prosthesis and KA TKA with a PS prosthesis would produce more native knee biomechanics than mechanical aligned (MA) TKA with PA prosthesis.

METHODS

Fourteen cadaver knees (7 pairs) were mounted on a knee-testing system to measure knee motion during flexion. For each pair, 1 knee was assigned to KA TKA and the other to MA TKA. In the KA TKA group, the native knee, CR TKA, and PS TKA were tested sequentially. MA TKA was performed using conventional measured resection techniques with a PS prosthesis. All kinematics were measured and compared with the native knee before and after surgery.

RESULTS

A PS prosthesis restored femoral rollback similar to a CR prosthesis. CR TKA showed less lateral rollback at knee flexion ≤ 60° than the native knee. There were no differences in soft tissue tensions among the native knee, CR, and PS prosthesis, except in varus tension at 30° of flexion. Varus tension of CR TKA was larger than those of PS TKA and the native knee after KA TKA with < 1 degree difference. Meanwhile, KA TKA achieved knee motion that was closer to the native knee than did MA TKA at ≥ 60° of flexion when using a PS prosthesis. There were no differences in soft tissue tension between KA-PS and MA-PS TKA.

CONCLUSIONS

After KA TKA, a PS prosthesis affords similar femoral rollback and soft tissue tension when compared with a CR prosthesis. A PS TKA may be a feasible strategy for patients requiring a PS prosthesis when performing KA TKA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Laboratory study, I.

J-curve design total knee arthroplasty: the posterior stabilized shows wider medial pivot compared to the cruciate retaining during chair raising

PURPOSE

Which total knee arthroplasty (TKA) design represents the better solution to restore a correct knee biomechanics is still debated. The aim of this study was to compare posterior stabilized (PS) and cruciate retaining (CR) version of the same TKA design (femoral component with an anatomic sagittal radius-J-curve design) by the use of dynamic Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis (RSA). The hypothesis was that the two models influence differently in vivo knee kinematic.

METHODS

A cohort of 16 randomly selected patients was evaluated 9 months after surgery: Zimmer PERSONA® was implanted, eight with CR design and eight with PS design. The kinematic evaluations were performed using a Dynamic RSA (BI-STAND DRX 2) developed in our Institute, during the execution of the sit-to-stand motor task. The motion parameters were obtained using the Grood and Suntay decomposition and the low-point kinematics methods.

RESULTS

PS TKA lateral femoral compartment had a wider anterior translation (17 ± 2 mm) than the medial one (11 ± 2 mm), while the two compartments of CR TKA showed a similar anterior translation (medial: 9 ± 2 mm/lateral: 11 ± 2 mm). T test for comparison between CR and PS TKA of antero-posterior translation showed a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) in the flexion range between 15° and 40°. The CR prosthesis did not anteriorly translate during flexion. The PS design translated anteriorly showing a roll-forward mechanism during extension from 80° to 18° of flexion and a posterior translation from 18° to 0°. The same significant differences (p < 0.05) between the PS and CR groups were found comparing the low-point positions of the femoral condyles in the range of flexion between 25° and 40° for the medial compartment and between 15° and 25° for the lateral compartment.

CONCLUSIONS

Dynamic RSA was able to investigate for the first time in vivo the kinematic behaviour of PS and CR version of the same TKA J-curve design. PS type showed a medial pivot during sit-to-stand motion task, while the CR type showed a cylindrical movement. Further studies are needed to evaluate the impact of different TKA designs on clinical results.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

The minimum clinically important difference for the Japanese version of the new Knee Society Score (2011KSS) after total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The new Knee Society Score (2011KSS) has been used to evaluate post-operative outcomes after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, there is no minimum clinically important difference (MCID) for 2011KSS. The purpose of this study is to define MCID of 2011KSS after TKA.

METHODS

Patients who underwent primary TKA for primary knee osteoarthritis between April 2012 and December 2016 were included in the study. The Japanese version of 2011KSS and original Knee Society Score (OKSS) were recorded preoperatively and at one-year postoperatively. With improvement in pain score of OKSS as an anchor, an anchor-based approach was used to identify the MCID of 2011KSS. The improvement in pain of OKSS was classified into 5 categories. The MCID was determined using a linear regression analysis of delta 2011KSS against improvement in the category of pain in OKSS. The MCID for 2011KSS expectation was not calculated because the items of pre- and post-operative questionnaires were different.

RESULTS

Five hundred and twenty-two cases were enrolled (age: 74.8 ± 7.3 years, female: 80.0%). After 1-year follow-up, 344 TKAs were finally included (age: 74.6 ± 7.1 years, female: 77.9%). Linear regression analyses showed that MCID for 2011KSS was 1.9 (95% confidential interval (CI): 1.3-2.5) in symptom, 2.2 (95%CI: 1.4-2.9) in satisfaction, and 4.1 (95%CI: 2.5-5.7) in functional activities.

CONCLUSIONS

MCID for 2011KSS was successfully calculated. These MCID values make the 2011KSS a more efficient tool for evaluating the physical activities of the populations of patients undergoing TKA. These MCID values can also be used to calculate sample size to evaluate the power of a study in designing clinical studies.

What to Know for Selecting Cruciate-Retaining or Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty

There has been continuing debate about the superiority of cruciate-retaining (CR) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) versus posterior-stabilized (PS) TKA for obtaining knee joint stability with functional improvement. Many surgeons tend to select the type of prosthesis on the basis of their own training and experience. However, the selection must be based on a great store of knowledge rather than on the surgeon's preconceptions or preferences. CR TKA may not be feasible in certain settings: posterior cruciate ligament insufficiency, severe deformity, and history of trauma or surgery. The risk of conversion from a CR type prosthesis to a PS type prosthesis might be high in patients with severe flexion contracture, steep posterior slope, and small femoral component size. The above factors should be carefully considered for an appropriate selection of the type of prosthesis. The surgeon should have a clear understanding on the technical differences between CR and PS TKAs. The amount of distal femoral resection, femoral component size, and tibial slope are particularly crucial for successful TKA. Unless they are meticulously determined, stiffness or instability will ensue, which can be difficult to resolve afterwards. There was no notable difference in functional outcome, range of motion, kinematics, and survival rate between CR and PS TKAs in most previous studies. Strict adherence to surgical indications and solid understanding of differences in surgical principles might be more important than the selection of either a CR or PS prosthesis.

Anterior Tibial Post Impingement During Stair Climbing: A Kinematic Analysis and Clinical Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Anterior tibial post impingement during gait and stair ambulation was reported in knees with posterior-stabilized prostheses. However, the link between anterior post impingement and knee kinematics and between anterior post impingement and the clinical outcome has not been well investigated. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to assess the anterior impingement to clarify the relevant kinematics and clinical results including patient-reported outcomes.

METHODS

We analyzed 40 well-functioning knees in 20 patients with a posterior-stabilized prosthesis due to osteoarthritis and who were followed up for 2 years or more. Dynamic lateral radiographs during stair-climbing activity were analyzed using a shape-matching technique, and anterior post impingement and the clinical outcome were assessed.

RESULTS

Anterior impingement of the tibial post was observed in 13 knees (33%) during the latter half of the stance phase and at the beginning of the swing phase with the average implant flexion angle of -2.4°. Implant flexion was significantly smaller, while the femoral component was located more posterior in the impingement knees. The posterior tibial slope was significantly greater in the impingement group (6.7° ± 2.0°, 5.3° ± 1.9°, respectively; P = .041); however, no significant differences were demonstrated in anteroposterior laxity and patient-derived assessments.

CONCLUSION

To avoid anterior post impingement, the posterior tibial slope should be made at 5° or less. Femoral notch-anterior post articulation should be designed to have good congruency in order to act as an anterior stabilizer in the case of impingement at knee extension.

How prosthetic design influences knee kinematics: a narrative review of tibiofemoral kinematics of healthy and joint-replaced knees

INTRODUCTION

To improve the total knee arthroplasty (TKA) prosthesis design, it is essential to study the kinematics of the tibiofemoral joint. Many studies have been conducted in this area; however, conflicting results and incomparable testing methods make it difficult to draw definitive conclusions or compare research from studies. The goal of this article is to introduce what is known about both healthy and prosthetic tibiofemoral joint kinematics.

AREAS COVERED

Healthy tibiofemoral joint kinematics are reviewed in vivo by different activities, and the kinematics of existing knee prosthetic design features are considered separately. These features include but are not limited to cruciate retaining, posterior cruciate substituting, mobile-bearing, and high flexion.

EXPERT COMMENTARY

The type of activity that is being performed has a great influence on the kinematics of healthy knees, and the influences of different TKA prosthetic design features on the kinematics are complex and varied. Moreover, the TKA postoperative functional performance is influenced by many factors, and prosthetic design is among them, but not the only one that defines the performance.

Cruciate-Retaining vs Posterior-Stabilized Primary Total Arthroplasty. Clinical Outcome Comparison With a Minimum Follow-Up of 10 Years

BACKGROUND

Controversy continues regarding whether the posterior cruciate ligament should be retained or removed during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) procedure. The objective was to compare the clinical outcomes with a minimum follow-up of 10 years between patients who received contemporary cruciate-retaining or posterior-stabilized primary TKA.

METHODS

Case-control study of 268 patients who underwent cruciate-retaining TKA vs 211 to posterior-stabilized design, with the same arthroplasty system, and a minimum follow-up of 10 years. Clinical assessment was performed by Knee Society scores, Western Ontario and MacMasters Universities and Short-Form 12 questionnaires, range of motion, and patient satisfaction.

RESULTS

Successful outcomes were found for both designs. No significant differences in functional scores, range of motion, patient-related scores, or patient satisfaction. Between the 5-year and last postoperative follow-up, there were a significant decrease of all clinical scores in both groups. In addition, complication rate and implant survival were similar between groups.

CONCLUSION

The superiority of one design over the other was not found. Both designs can be used expecting long-term successful outcomes and high survival. The choice of the design depended on the status of the posterior cruciate ligament and surgeon preference.

Knee kinematics in bi-cruciate stabilized total knee arthroplasty during squatting and stair-climbing activities

This study aimed to evaluate clinical outcomes and in vivo kinematics of bi-cruciate stabilized (BCS) total knee arthroplasty (TKA), using image-matching techniques. We analyzed tibiofemoral anteroposterior translation, axial rotation, and anterior/posterior cam-post contact for 22 BCS TKAs during squatting and stair-climbing. The functional activities on the 2011 Knee Society Score were significantly improved from 36 to 71. The tibiofemoral translation and axial rotation during squatting/stair-climbing were 16.1 mm/7.1 mm and 2.5° external/1.1° internal, respectively. Anterior/posterior cam-post contacts were observed during squatting (14%/96%) and stair-climbing (27%/96%). In conclusion, BCS TKA produced physiological sagittal plane kinematics during activities with favorable clinical outcomes.

In vivo kinematics of gait in posterior-stabilized and bicruciate-stabilized total knee arthroplasties using image-matching techniques

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate the effects of two types of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) designs: posterior-stabilized (PS) and bicruciate-stabilized (BCS) on in vivo kinematics during gait.

METHODS

Continuous X-ray images of the gait were taken using a flat panel detector for 23 PS and BCS TKAs. We analyzed the tibiofemoral implant flexion angle, anteroposterior (AP) translation, axial rotation, and anterior/posterior cam-post contact using image-matching techniques.

RESULTS

Double knee actions were demonstrated for the PS and BCS design (35 and 61%, respectively, p = 0.08). The tibiofemoral AP positions were significantly more posterior at peak extension (- 1.7 ± 2.2 and 1.0 ± 2.5 mm, respectively, p < 0.01) and anterior at peak flexion (1.3 ± 2.3 and - 0.8 ± 2.8 mm, respectively, p = 0.01) for the PS design than for the BCS design, with a significant difference in AP translation (3.0 ± 3.9 mm anterior and 1.7 ± 2.8 mm posterior, respectively, p < 0.01). Anterior/posterior tibial post contacts were found in 83/4% and 74/30% for the PS and BCS designs, respectively, with a significant difference in posterior contact (p = 0.72/0.04, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The knee flexion pattern, tibiofemoral AP translation, axial rotation, and cam-post contact during gait varied, depending on the type of implant, the PS and BCS designs.

Variable tibiofemoral articular contact stress in fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasties

BACKGROUND

Rotational allowance at the tibiofemoral joint would be required during deep flexion. However, the amount of flexion and rotation has not been investigated in modern total knee arthroplasty (TKA) designs. The present study aimed to determine the contact stress in five posterior-stabilized fixed-bearing TKA designs.

HYPOTHESIS

We hypothesized that the contact area and stresses at the tibiofemoral articular surfaces vary according to the type of implant design and tested condition.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The contact area and mean and peak contact stresses at the tibiofemoral articular surfaces were determined when a compressive load of 1200N was applied to a NexGen LPS Flex, Scorpio NRG, Genesis II, PFC Sigma, and Foundation implant. Measurements were performed at 0° and 45° flexion with 0°, 5°, 10°, and 15° rotation, and at 90° and 135° flexion with 0, 5°, 10°, 15°, and 20° rotation.

RESULTS

The LPS Flex showed that the femoral component could not achieve 20° rotation at 135° flexion. The Scorpio NRG showed less than 20MPa of contact stress at all conditions. The Genesis II showed higher contact stress than 20MPa at 135° flexion with 20° rotation. The PFC Sigma showed that the femoral component could not achieve >10° rotation at any flexion angle. The Foundation showed more than 20MPa of contact stress at 90° flexion with 20° rotation and at 135° flexion with 10°, 15°, and 20° rotation.

DISCUSSION

Surgeons should be more aware of the variable contact conditions of the tibiofemoral articular surfaces in individual TKA designs.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, basic science study.

Second-generation bi-cruciate stabilized total knee system has a lower reoperation and revision rate than its predecessor

INTRODUCTION

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) can provide pain relief and good long-term results. However, nearly 30% of post-surgical patients are unsatisfied due to persistent pain and functional deficits. A second-generation bi-cruciate stabilized TKA device has a post-cam mechanism with an asymmetric femoral component, a polyethylene insert, and a medially concave and laterally convex shape. The device is designed to provide guided motion, and thus improve knee kinematics by more closely approximating a normal knee. The aim of this study was to evaluate early complication and revision rates of the second-generation device and to compare its clinical performance to the first-generation device.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective, longitudinal, non-concurrent cohort study, 140 TKAs were performed using the second-generation device on 131 patients from 2012 to 2016, and 155 TKAs were performed using the first-generation device on 138 patients from 2009 to 2012. Primary outcomes were occurrence of revisions and reoperations.

RESULTS

There were 31 reoperations [3.21 per 100 observed component years (OCY)] in 22 (2.28 per 100 OCY) TKAs in the first-generation device cohort compared to five reoperations (1.92 per 100 OCY) in four TKAs (1.54 per 100 OCY) in the second-generation device cohort. The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) was 3.50 (P = 0.0254). There were 21 revisions (2.17 per 100 OCY) in 16 (1.66 per 100 OCY) TKAs in the first-generation device cohort, compared to only three revisions (1.15 per 100 OCY) in two TKAs (0.77 per 100 OCY) in the second-generation device cohort. The adjusted HR was 4.16 (P = 0.0693).

CONCLUSION

The improved design of the second-generation device appears to be associated with a lower risk of reoperation and revision compared to that of the first-generation device.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.