1
|
Mikova E, Kunutsor SK, Butler M, Murray JR. Focal resurfacing of the knee - A systematic review and meta-analysis. Knee 2024; 48:63-75. [PMID: 38521014 DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2024.02.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2023] [Revised: 02/03/2024] [Accepted: 02/27/2024] [Indexed: 03/25/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE In order to assess the published validity of focal resurfacing of the knee, a systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to (i) evaluate revision rates and implant survival of focal resurfacing of the knee; (ii) explore surgical complications; and (iii) evaluate patient reported clinical outcome measures. METHODS PubMED, Cochrane Library and Medline databases were searched by 2 independent reviewers in February 2022 for prospective and retrospective cohort studies evaluating any of the following implant types: HemiCAP®, UniCAP®, Episealer® or BioBoly®. Data on incidence of revision, complications and various patient reported outcome measures, such as Knee Society Score (KSS) or Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) was sourced. RESULTS A total of 24 published studies were identified with a total of 1465 enrolled patients. A revision rate of 12.97% over a 5.9 year weighted mean follow-up period was observed across all implant types. However, in one series a Kaplan-Meir survival as high as 92.6% at a 10-year follow-up period was noted. A statistically significant improvement was documented across multiple subjective clinical outcomes scores, for example a mean 4.56 point improvement of the VAS (0-10) pain score. The Kellgren-Lawrence score was used to evaluate the radiological progression of osteoarthritis and showed a small significant reduction in all anatomical locations, hence not supporting the hypothesis that focal femoral implants can lead to the progression of osteoarthritis in the affected compartment. There was a low reported incidence of post-operative complications such as aseptic loosening or deep wound infection. CONCLUSIONS Focal femoral resurfacing appears to be a viable treatment option for focal symptomatic chondral lesions in patients beyond biological reconstruction, with low revision rates and high patient satisfaction especially at short and medium length follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ester Mikova
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, 5 Tyndall Avenue, Bristol BS8 1UD, UK.
| | - Setor K Kunutsor
- Musculoskeletal Research Unit, Bristol Medical School, Southmead Hospital, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
| | - Meg Butler
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, 5 Tyndall Avenue, Bristol BS8 1UD, UK
| | - James R Murray
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, 5 Tyndall Avenue, Bristol BS8 1UD, UK; Department of Orthopaedics, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol BS10 5NB, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Becher C, Megaloikonomos PD, Lind M, Eriksson K, Brittberg M, Beckmann J, Verdonk P, Högström M, Konradsen L, Holz J, Franz A, Feucht MJ, Kösters C, van Buul G, Sköldenberg O, Emans PJ, Boutefnouchet T, Nathwani D, McNicholas MJ, O'Donnell T, Spalding T, Stålman A, Ostermeier S, Imhoff AB, Shearman AD, Hirschmann M. High degree of consensus amongst an expert panel regarding focal resurfacing of chondral and osteochondral lesions of the femur with mini-implants. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2023; 31:4027-4034. [PMID: 37173573 DOI: 10.1007/s00167-023-07450-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2022] [Accepted: 05/02/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The rationale for the use of mini-implants for partial resurfacing in the treatment of femoral chondral and osteochondral lesions is still under debate. The evidence supporting best practise guidelines is based on studies with low-level evidence. A consensus group of experts was convened to collaboratively advance towards consensus opinions regarding the best available evidence. The purpose of this article is to report the resulting consensus statements. METHODS Twenty-five experts participated in a process based on the Delphi method of achieving consensus. Questions and statements were drafted via an online survey of two rounds, for initial agreement and comments on the proposed statements. An in-person meeting between the panellists was organised during the 2022 ESSKA congress to further discuss and debate each of the statements. A final agreement was made via a final online survey a few days later. The strength of consensus was characterised as: consensus, 51-74% agreement; strong consensus, 75-99% agreement; unanimous, 100% agreement. RESULTS Statements were developed in the fields of patient assessment and indications, surgical considerations and postoperative care. Between the 25 statements that were discussed by this working group, 18 achieved unanimous, whilst 7 strong consensus. CONCLUSION The consensus statements, derived from experts in the field, represent guidelines to assist clinicians in decision-making for the appropriate use of mini-implants for partial resurfacing in the treatment of femoral chondral and osteochondral lesions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level V.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christoph Becher
- International Centre for Orthopedics, ATOS Clinic Heidelberg, Bismarckstr. 9-15, 69115, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | | | - Martin Lind
- Department of Orthopedics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Karl Eriksson
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stockholm South Hospital, Department of Clinical Science and Education Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Mats Brittberg
- Cartilage Research Unit, Region Halland Orthopaedics, Varberg Hospital, University of Gothenburg, Varberg, Sweden
| | - Johannes Beckmann
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Barmherzige Brüder Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Magnus Högström
- Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Sports Medicine Umeå and Orthopedics, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Lars Konradsen
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Bispebjerg-Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Alois Franz
- Hospital for Orthopedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Siegen, Germany
| | - Matthias J Feucht
- Orthopaedic Clinic Paulinenhilfe, Diakonie-Hospital, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Clemens Kösters
- Department of Traumatology and Orthopedics, Maria-Josef-Hospital Greven, Greven, Germany
| | - Gerben van Buul
- Department of Orthopaedics, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Olof Sköldenberg
- Department of Clinical Sciences at Danderyd Hospital, Division of Orthopaedics, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Pieter J Emans
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Tarek Boutefnouchet
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Trust, Mindelsohn Way, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK
| | | | | | | | - Tim Spalding
- Cleveland Clinic London, University Hospital Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK
| | - Anders Stålman
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Stockholm Sports Trauma Research Center, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - Andreas B Imhoff
- Department of Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Alexander D Shearman
- Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Michael Hirschmann
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Kantonsspital Baselland, Bruderholz, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bernfort L, Granfeldt D, Ryd L. Individualized metal implants for focal cartilage lesions in the knee can be cost-effective: A simulation on 47-year-old in a Swedish setting. J ISAKOS 2023; 8:197-203. [PMID: 36924825 DOI: 10.1016/j.jisako.2023.02.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2022] [Revised: 02/23/2023] [Accepted: 02/24/2023] [Indexed: 03/17/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES In the aging population, the knee is the joint most commonly causing impaired function and incapacity. While definite treatment by prosthetic replacement is often performed late, symptomatic knee cartilage lesions cause much suffering also in younger ages. Early intervention could, therefore, be instituted at an early stage to the benefit of both patients and society. Small, metal surface, resurfacing implants have been tested with promising results. A system that features patient-specific implants and surgical instruments shows good clinical results and favorable survival rates. This study aims to assess the cost utility of this metal device compared with microfracture (MFX), being the standard procedure in Sweden. METHODS We constructed a simulation model in Excel. In the model, a cohort of 47-year-old patients (which is the mean age of patients treated with the metal implant) with symptomatic knee cartilage lesions received either MFX or metal implantation. Outcomes for the cohort were simulated over 40 years, such as in a previously published model based on MFX, and sensitivity analyses (deterministic and probabilistic) of the results were undertaken. Data on transition probabilities, costs, and quality of life were taken from clinical data, published literature, and official price lists. Only direct medical costs were included. RESULTS Results from the analysis showed that the metal device is a cost-effective treatment strategy compared with MFX. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) reached acceptable levels at ∼5 years postoperatively. Over the full-time horizon of 40 years, the metal device was cost saving with concomitant gains in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), translating to a dominant treatment strategy. Results were robust according to sensitivity analysis with the initial success rate of up to three years for both metal and MFX having the largest impact. CONCLUSIONS A metal implant may be a cost-effective treatment alternative for patients in their 40's when compared to MFX in a Swedish setting. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 5 [1].
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lars Bernfort
- Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Division of Health Care Analysis, Linköping University, S-581 83 Linköping, Sweden.
| | | | - Leif Ryd
- Senior Medical Advisor, Episurf Medical, S-114 49 Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Megaloikonomos PD, Becher C, Van der Stok J, O'Donnell T. Femoral condyle resurfacing using an inlay metal implant: low revision rate of 266 patients in a 5-10 years follow-up. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2023; 143:1243-1251. [PMID: 34775523 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-021-04251-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2021] [Accepted: 11/02/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the clinical outcome and survival of an inlay resurfacing prosthesis for focal femoral condyle chondral and osteochondral defects. METHODS Two hundred sixty-six patients (mean age, 38.25 years; range 25-56 years) with symptomatic femoral condyle chondral and osteochondral defects were reviewed. The mean follow-up period was 7.3 years (range 5-10 years). The medial femoral condyle was involved in 229 and the lateral condyle in 37 patients. Previous cartilage surgery was done in 235 patients. All patients were treated with focal femoral condyle resurfacing with the HemiCAP® device. The preoperative and the last follow-up values of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Oxford Knee Score (OKS), 36-item Short Form Survey (SF-36) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) were examined. Complications, reoperation rate and survival were analyzed. RESULTS At the last follow-up, all clinical score values showed significant improvement as compared with the corresponding preoperative values (p < 0.001). Age presented a negative correlation with KOOS (p = 0.03) and SF-36 improvement (p = 0.014). Kellgren-Lawrence grade influenced OKS (p = 0.036). BMI, gender, side, medial or lateral condyle and size did not affect the outcome. Patients who had previous biological cartilage procedures demonstrated better clinical improvement in comparison with those that did not have prior surgery (p < 0.05). Survival was 96.2% at 10 years, using as endpoint implant revision or/and progression of osteoarthritis. The cumulative hazard for any-reason reoperation was 12.0%. CONCLUSIONS Femoral condyle resurfacing using the HemiCAP® device is an effective treatment option to address focal chondral and osteochondral defects. It can be successfully used either as a primary procedure or after prior biological cartilage reconstruction. Subjective clinical outcomes are expected to be good to excellent in mid- to long term, while reoperation and revision rates are low. Progression of osteoarthritis is the most common mode of failure; thus, patient selection is very important. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level IV, retrospective case series.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Christoph Becher
- International Centre for Orthopedics, ATOS Clinic Heidelberg, Bismarckstr. 9-15, 69115, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Next Generation Cartilage Repair and the Pre-arthroplasty Patient. Pre-arthroplasty artificial Implants Part B: Metallic. OPER TECHN SPORT MED 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.otsm.2022.150965] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|
6
|
Wang Z, Le H, Wang Y, Liu H, Li Z, Yang X, Wang C, Ding J, Chen X. Instructive cartilage regeneration modalities with advanced therapeutic implantations under abnormal conditions. Bioact Mater 2022; 11:317-338. [PMID: 34977434 PMCID: PMC8671106 DOI: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2021] [Revised: 09/19/2021] [Accepted: 10/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The development of interdisciplinary biomedical engineering brings significant breakthroughs to the field of cartilage regeneration. However, cartilage defects are considerably more complicated in clinical conditions, especially when injuries occur at specific sites (e.g., osteochondral tissue, growth plate, and weight-bearing area) or under inflammatory microenvironments (e.g., osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis). Therapeutic implantations, including advanced scaffolds, developed growth factors, and various cells alone or in combination currently used to treat cartilage lesions, address cartilage regeneration under abnormal conditions. This review summarizes the strategies for cartilage regeneration at particular sites and pathological microenvironment regulation and discusses the challenges and opportunities for clinical transformation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhonghan Wang
- Department of Plastic and Reconstruct Surgery, The First Hospital of Jilin University, 1 Xinmin Street, Changchun, 130021, PR China
- Department of Orthopedics, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, 218 Ziqiang Street, Changchun, 130041, PR China
| | - Hanxiang Le
- Department of Orthopedics, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, 218 Ziqiang Street, Changchun, 130041, PR China
| | - Yanbing Wang
- Department of Orthopedics, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, 218 Ziqiang Street, Changchun, 130041, PR China
| | - He Liu
- Department of Orthopedics, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, 218 Ziqiang Street, Changchun, 130041, PR China
| | - Zuhao Li
- Department of Orthopedics, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, 218 Ziqiang Street, Changchun, 130041, PR China
| | - Xiaoyu Yang
- Department of Orthopedics, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, 218 Ziqiang Street, Changchun, 130041, PR China
| | - Chenyu Wang
- Department of Plastic and Reconstruct Surgery, The First Hospital of Jilin University, 1 Xinmin Street, Changchun, 130021, PR China
| | - Jianxun Ding
- Key Laboratory of Polymer Ecomaterials, Changchun Institute of Applied Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 5625 Renmin Street, Changchun, 130022, PR China
| | - Xuesi Chen
- Key Laboratory of Polymer Ecomaterials, Changchun Institute of Applied Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 5625 Renmin Street, Changchun, 130022, PR China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
van der Stok J, van Buul GM, Stanclik J, Queally JM, O'Donnell T. Focal articular surface replacement as primary treatment for focal chondral defects of the femoral condyles: A series of 157 cases. Knee 2022; 34:108-117. [PMID: 34890923 DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2021.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2021] [Revised: 09/27/2021] [Accepted: 11/05/2021] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Focal chondral defects (FCDs) of the femoral condyle are common. Treatment has heretofore primarily consisted of non-surgical and biological treatments. Focal articular surface replacement (FASR) is an emerging technique utilizing small implants to essentially fill the FCD. Here we report functional outcome and re-operation rates following FASR as a primary treatment for FCDs of the femoral condyles. METHODS Retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database including 327 FASR procedures was performed to identify patients who underwent FASR of the femoral condyle with a modular cementless metallic implant (HemiCAPTM) as a primary procedure. Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Oxford Knee Score (OKS), SF-36 Health Status Survey (SF-36) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) were collected before and 6 weeks, 6 months, and 4 years after surgery. Implant revision and re-operation rate were recorded. RESULTS 157 patients were included with a mean follow-up of 9.4 ± 1.3 years (range 7.0 to 11.4 years). The average age was 40.2 ± 5.3 years, 85% involved the medial condyle, and the average defect size was 3.6 ± 0.5 cm2. Primary FASR resulted in functional improvement on the KOOS (+52%), OKS (+69%) and SF-36 (+50%) scores and a reduction in VAS scores (-70%) at 4-year follow-up. Revision rate was 0.64% and the re-operation rate was 11%. CONCLUSION This retrospective case-series supports primary FASR with HemiCAPTM implants as an alternative to biological procedures to treat medium-sized FCDs (2.5-4 cm2) of the femoral condyle, although long-term follow-up is necessary to determine if the clinical outcome and low revision rate can be maintained.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johan van der Stok
- The Centre for Orthopaedics, Beacon Hospital, Bracken Road, Sandyford, Dublin D18 AK67, Ireland.
| | - Gerben M van Buul
- The Centre for Orthopaedics, Beacon Hospital, Bracken Road, Sandyford, Dublin D18 AK67, Ireland; Zuyderland Medical Center, Henri Dunantstraat 5, 6419PC Heerlen, the Netherlands
| | - Jaroslaw Stanclik
- The Centre for Orthopaedics, Beacon Hospital, Bracken Road, Sandyford, Dublin D18 AK67, Ireland
| | - Joseph M Queally
- The Centre for Orthopaedics, Beacon Hospital, Bracken Road, Sandyford, Dublin D18 AK67, Ireland
| | - Turlough O'Donnell
- The Centre for Orthopaedics, Beacon Hospital, Bracken Road, Sandyford, Dublin D18 AK67, Ireland; University College Dublin School of Medicine, Health Sciences Centre, Belfield, Donnybrook, Dublin D04 C7X2, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of the study was to investigate the long-term outcomes of the Focal Femoral Condyle Resurfacing Prosthesis (HemiCAP) using clinical and radiographic assessments, and to evaluate the revision and survival rates. METHODS Clinical evaluation was performed in those not revised and was able to participate. This was a prospective single-center cohort study of HemiCAP patients with 7 to 10 years of clinical and radiographic follow-up. The clinical examination included the Knee Society Score (KSS) and visual analogue scale (VAS) score. The radiographic examination included the Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grade. Survival was estimated by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, and potential risk factors for revision was evaluated by a regression analysis. RESULTS Of the 62 patients with 64 HemiCAP prostheses, 37 were HemiCAP condyle, 11 HemiCAP PF, and 16 HemiCAP Wave; 27 (42%) were revised-HemiCAP condyle 17 (42%), HemiCAP PF 4 (36%), HemiCAP Wave 6 (37%), and 1 died. Examinations were performed on 31 patients (86%). When compared with the preoperative data, there were significant increases in the KSS objective (mean = 51.5, standard deviation [SD] = 5.9 vs. mean =94.2, SD = 5.0) and function (mean = 51.0, SD = 6.2 vs. mean = 93.7, SD = 4.8) scores, a decrease in the VAS score (mean = 7.1, SD = 0.7 vs. mean = 2.7, SD = 1.7) and a decrease in the KL lateral score (mean = 1.1, SD = 0.3 vs. mean = 0.6, SD = 0.6). The mean follow-up was 7.3 years (SD 1.4) with minimum 4.2 years and maximum 10.2 years. No failures occurred in the series beyond 5 years. CONCLUSIONS As hypothesized, we found good clinical and radiographic outcomes, and for those patients who did not require revisions, there were long-term improvements in disability and function. This suggests that patient selection is a key element to successfully applying these devices in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jens Ole Laursen
- Department of Emergency Medicine,
Hospital of Southern Jutland, Sydals, Denmark,Department of Orthopedic Surgery,
Hospital of Southern Jutland, Sydals, Denmark,Institute of Regional Health Research,
University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark,Jens Ole Laursen, MD, Department of
Orthopedic Surgery and Emergency Medicine, Hospital of Southern Jutland,
Vimmelskaftet 16, Sydals, 6470, Denmark.
| | - Christian Backer Mogensen
- Department of Emergency Medicine,
Hospital of Southern Jutland, Sydals, Denmark,Institute of Regional Health Research,
University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Helene Skjøt-Arkil
- Department of Emergency Medicine,
Hospital of Southern Jutland, Sydals, Denmark,Institute of Regional Health Research,
University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Jeuken RM, van Hugten PPW, Roth AK, Timur UT, Boymans TAEJ, van Rhijn LW, Bugbee WD, Emans PJ. A Systematic Review of Focal Cartilage Defect Treatments in Middle-Aged Versus Younger Patients. Orthop J Sports Med 2021; 9:23259671211031244. [PMID: 34676269 PMCID: PMC8524698 DOI: 10.1177/23259671211031244] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2021] [Accepted: 03/22/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Focal cartilage defects are often debilitating, possess limited potential for
regeneration, are associated with increased risk of osteoarthritis, and are
predictive for total knee arthroplasty. Cartilage repair studies typically
focus on the outcome in younger patients, but a high proportion of treated
patients are 40 to 60 years of age (ie, middle-aged). The reality of current
clinical practice is that the ideal patient for cartilage repair is not the
typical patient. Specific attention to cartilage repair outcomes in
middle-aged patients is warranted. Purpose: To systematically review available literature on knee cartilage repair in
middle-aged patients and include studies comparing results across different
age groups. Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A systematic search was performed in EMBASE, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane
Library database. Articles were screened for relevance and appraised for
quality. Results: A total of 21 articles (mean Coleman Methodology Score, 64 points) were
included. Two out of 3 bone marrow stimulation (BMS) studies, including 1
using the microfracture technique, revealed inferior clinical outcomes in
middle-aged patients in comparison with younger patients. Nine cell-based
studies were included showing inconsistent comparisons of results across age
groups for autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI). Bone marrow aspirate
concentrate showed age-independent results at up to 8 years of follow-up. A
negative effect of middle age was reported in 1 study for both ACI and BMS.
Four out of 5 studies on bone-based resurfacing therapies (allografting and
focal knee resurfacing implants [FKRIs]) showed age-independent results up
to 5 years. One study in only middle-aged patients reported better clinical
outcomes for FKRIs when compared with biological repairs. Conclusion: Included studies were heterogeneous and had low methodological quality. BMS
in middle-aged patients seems to only result in short-term improvements.
More research is warranted to elucidate the ameliorating effects of
cell-based therapies on the aging joint homeostasis. Bone-based therapies
seem to be relatively insensitive to aging and may potentially result in
effective joint preservation. Age subanalyses in cohort studies, randomized
clinical trials, and international registries should generate more evidence
for the large but underrepresented (in terms of cartilage repair)
middle-aged population in the literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ralph M Jeuken
- Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | | | - Alex K Roth
- Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Ufuk Tan Timur
- Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | | | | | - William D Bugbee
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Scripps Clinic, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Pieter J Emans
- Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Elbardesy H, Nagle M, Simmons L, Harty J. The partial femoral condyle focal resurfacing (HemiCAP-UniCAP) for treatment of full-thickness cartilage defects, systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Orthop Belg 2021. [DOI: 10.52628/87.1.12] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Knee osteochondral defects are a common problem among people, especially young and active patients. So effective joint preserving surgeries is essential to prevent or even delay the onset of osteoarthritis for these group of patients. This study aims to critically appraise and evaluate the evidence for the results and effectiveness of femoral condyle resurfacing (HemiCAP/ UniCAP) in treatment of patients with focal femoral condyle cartilage defect.
Using the search terms : HemiCAP, UniCAP, Episurf, focal, femoral, condyle, inlay and resur-facing, we reviewed the PubMed and EMBASE and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR) to find any articles published up to March 2020.
The short term follow-up of the HemiCAP shows (6.74 %) revision rate. However, 29.13 % loss of follow up let us consider these results with caution especially if the revision rate progressively increased with time to 19.3 % in 5-7 years with no enough evidence for the long term results except the data from the Australian Joint Registry 2018, where the cumulative revision rate was 40.6 % (33.5, 48.4) at ten years. The UniCAP that used for defect more than 4 cm 2 has a high revision rate (53.66 %) which is considered unacceptable revision rate in com-parison to another similar prosthesis such as Uni-Knee Arthroplasty (UKA).
The evidence from published studies and our meta- analysis suggests that partial resurfacing of the femoral condyle (HemiCAP) doesn’t support its usage as a tool to treat the focal cartilage defect in middle- aged patients.
The UniCAP as femoral condyle resurfacing has very high revision rate at 5-7 years (53.66 %) which make us recommend against its usage.
Collapse
|
11
|
Springer B, Boettner F. Treatment of Unicompartmental Cartilage Defects of the Knee with Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty, Patellofemoral Partial Knee Arthroplasty or Focal Resurfacing. Life (Basel) 2021; 11:life11050394. [PMID: 33925287 PMCID: PMC8146542 DOI: 10.3390/life11050394] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2021] [Revised: 04/23/2021] [Accepted: 04/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Focal chondral defects are common lesions of the articular cartilage. They are predominantly found on the medial femoral condyle and often progress to osteoarthritis of the knee. Various conservative treatment options are available. The conservative treatment might reduce pain and delay the progress of degenerative processes. However, restoration of the articular cartilage cannot be accomplished. If the conservative treatment fails unicompartmental arthroplasty, patellofemoral joint replacement or focal resurfacing are reasonable options to postpone total knee arthroplasty. A careful patient selection before surgery is crucial for all three treatment options. The following overview reports indications and outcomes of medial partial knee replacement, patellofemoral partial knee replacement, and focal resurfacing treatment options for focal chondral defects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bernhard Springer
- Department of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18–20, 1090 Vienna, Austria;
| | - Friedrich Boettner
- Adult Reconstruction and Joint Replacement Division, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E 70th Street, New York, NY 10021, USA
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
[Focal femoral resurfacing and unicompartmental knee replacement : Between osteotomy and total knee replacement]. DER ORTHOPADE 2021; 50:387-394. [PMID: 33847791 DOI: 10.1007/s00132-021-04105-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/12/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, especially for both femorotibial compartments of the knee, is an established partly joint-saving treatment option for osteoarthritis of the knee if the disease is limited to one compartment. Even smaller implants or resurfacing of the patellofemoral joint have been shown-in smaller patient collectives-to have the potential to yield good clinical results.
Collapse
|
13
|
Becher C, Imhoff A. [Guidelines for the treatment of unicompartmental cartilage defects of the knee-Cartilage repair, osteotomy, mini-implant or arthroplasty?]. DER ORTHOPADE 2021; 50:88-95. [PMID: 33337504 DOI: 10.1007/s00132-020-04051-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
The treatment of unicompartmental cartilage defects offers a large variety of therapeutic options. With help of an algorithm, decision-making for the most suitable treatment approach is supported. Correction of malalignment is key for successful treatment. Defect size, influencing factors such as "age" and prior treatments play an important role in choosing the most appropriate operative treatment option.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christoph Becher
- IZO - Internationales Zentrum für Orthopädie, ATOS Klinik Heidelberg, Bismarckstr. 9-15, 69115, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
| | - Andreas Imhoff
- Abteilung für Sportorthopädie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München (TUM), München, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Laursen JO, Lind M, Mogensen CB, Skjøt-Arkil H. A longterm prospective follow-up study of resurfacing miniprosthesis suitable for patients above sixtyfive years with localized cartilage lesions or early osteoarthritis in the knee. J Exp Orthop 2020; 7:96. [PMID: 33280068 PMCID: PMC7719589 DOI: 10.1186/s40634-020-00308-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2020] [Accepted: 11/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The aim of the study was to investigate the long-term outcomes of the Focal Femoral Condyle Resurfacing Prosthesis for treatment of localized cartilage lesion in patients > 65 years. Methods This was a prospective case series study. Non-reopererated patients initially treated with resurfacing condylar miniprothesis (HemiCAP/UniCAP) were evaluated clinically and radiographically at 7–10 years follow-up (mean 9 years). The clinical examination included the Knee Society Score (KSS) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain score and EQ5D. The radiographic examination included the Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grade for investigate of OA progression. A comparison analysis of the preoperative and follow-up subjective outcome data and a Kaplan-Meier implant survival analysis were performed. Results Twenty-three patients were included in the study (9 HemiCAP and 14 UniCAP). There were seven revisions (one HemiCap and six UniCap respectively) (30%) and three patients had died. Follow-up examinations were performed on 10 patients. When comparing follow-up with the preoperative state, there were significant increases in the KSS objective (50.0 ± 8.3) vs. 90.0 ± 6.3)) and KSS function (45.0 ± 11.7) vs. 85.0 ± 4.7)) scores, a decrease in the pain VAS score (7.0 ± 0.9) vs. (4.0 ± 1.9)). Radiographic evaluation demonstrated increase in osteoarthritis development with a KL medial score (2.0 ± 0.6) and KL lateral score (1.4 ± 0.6) vs. (2.0 ± 0.9)).The EQ5D-score was 86 ± 8.4 and patients Health-score was 85 ± 18). Conclusions Resurfacing implant treatment for early OA in patients above 65 years can require revision to knee arthroplasty in 30% of patients. But in patients that are not revised long-term improvements in subjective clinical outcome was demonstrated. This suggests that even elderly patients with isolated cartilage lesions or early OA might benefit from the limited invasive resurfacing implant treatment. Level of evidence IV
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jens Ole Laursen
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Hospital of Southern Jutland, Vimmelskaftet 16, 6470, Sydals, Denmark. .,Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital of Southern Jutland, Sydals, Denmark. .,Institute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
| | - Martin Lind
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Christian Backer Mogensen
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Hospital of Southern Jutland, Vimmelskaftet 16, 6470, Sydals, Denmark.,Institute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Helene Skjøt-Arkil
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Hospital of Southern Jutland, Vimmelskaftet 16, 6470, Sydals, Denmark.,Institute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Koh YG, Lee JA, Kim PS, Kim HJ, Kang K, Kang KT. Effects of the material properties of a focal knee articular prosthetic on the human knee joint using computational simulation. Knee 2020; 27:1484-1491. [PMID: 33010765 DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2020.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2019] [Revised: 06/29/2020] [Accepted: 08/03/2020] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Localized cartilage defects are related to joint pain and reduced function to the development of osteoarthritis. The mechanical properties of the implant for treatment do influence its longevity. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the effect of material properties' variations of anatomically shaped focal knee implants in the knee joint using numerical finite element analysis. METHODS Computational simulations were performed for different cases including an intact knee, a knee with a focal cartilage defect, and a knee fitted with a focal articular prosthetic having three distinct mechanical properties: cobalt-chromium, pyrolytic carbon, and polyethylene. Femoral cartilage, tibial cartilage, and menisci contact pressures were evaluated under the load. In addition, bone stress was evaluated to investigate the stress shielding effect. RESULTS Compared with the intact model, the contact stress of the focal implant model was increased; on the femoral lateral cartilage by 14%, on medial and lateral tibial cartilages by nine percent and 10%, on medial and lateral menisci by 23% and 20%. In contrast, the focal implant model had no effect on the menisci but contact stress on the tibial cartilage increased compared with the intact model. The BioPoly model showed the lowest contact stress on femoral and tibial cartilages. Additionally, the cobalt-chromium model showed the lowest bone stress that improved the load-sharing effect. CONCLUSIONS The results suggested that implant material properties are an important parameter in the design of a focal implant. The polyethylene model potentially restored the intact knee contact mechanics and it reduced the risk of physiological damage to the articular cartilage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yong-Gon Koh
- Joint Reconstruction Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yonsei Sarang Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jin-Ah Lee
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Paul Shinil Kim
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Bone Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyo-Jeong Kim
- Department of Sport and Healthy Aging, Korea National Sport University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Kiwon Kang
- Joint Reconstruction Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Gaja Yonsei Orthopaedic Clinic, Incheon, Republic of Korea
| | - Kyoung-Tak Kang
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Nahas S, Monem M, Li L, Patel A, Parmar H. Ten-Year Average Full Follow-up and Evaluation of a Contoured Focal Resurface Prosthesis (HemiCAP) in Patients in the United Kingdom. J Knee Surg 2020; 33:966-970. [PMID: 31127601 DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1688921] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
A significant number of patients are affected by localized articular damage that is appropriate neither for traditional arthroplasty nor for biological repair. A focal resurfacing system using a matched contoured articular prosthetic (HemiCAP) has been introduced for the treatment of such cases. Independent long-term results of these implants are limited. We retrospectively evaluated the use of this resurfacing system in 14 patients (13 males, 1 female), with a mean age of 40.3 years (range: 28-49), with focal femoral condyle defects. The same consultant orthopaedic surgeon performed all procedures. Our primary outcome measure was revision rate. Secondary outcome measures included radiographic evaluation (prosthesis migration signs, radiolucency), patient-reported functional evaluation (knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome scores), and complications. A total of 10 patients were treated on the medial femoral condyle, 2 were treated on the lateral condyle, and 2 received bicondylar implants (14 in total). Average follow-up was 107 months (range: 59-135). Three patients were lost to follow-up at the time of study. One patient was excluded from the study. Of the 10 left, 2 had to be revised, leading the survival rate to be 80% at 9.4 years. In four contactable patients, average Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcomes score at 121 months postsurgery (9.75 years) was 92.9 (as compared with 57.7 preoperatively). There were no complications. This series demonstrates that focal resurfacing is a safe, suitable, and useful temporizing step in knee arthroplasty surgery. The use of the focal resurfacing implant in this way allows the delay in transition to knee arthroplasty. This series shows an excellent functional outcome for remaining implants at average 10 years, with low complication rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sam Nahas
- Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Queen Elizabeth II Hospital, Howlands, Welwyn Garden City, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom
| | - Mohammed Monem
- Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Queen Elizabeth II Hospital, Howlands, Welwyn Garden City, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom
| | - Lily Li
- Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Queen Elizabeth II Hospital, Howlands, Welwyn Garden City, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom
| | - Akash Patel
- Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Queen Elizabeth II Hospital, Howlands, Welwyn Garden City, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom
| | - Harish Parmar
- Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Queen Elizabeth II Hospital, Howlands, Welwyn Garden City, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Cases E, Natera L, Antón C, Consigliere P, Guillén J, Cruz E, Garrucho M. Focal inlay resurfacing for full-thickness chondral defects of the femoral medial condyle may delay the progression to varus deformity. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND TRAUMATOLOGY 2020; 31:57-63. [PMID: 32699948 DOI: 10.1007/s00590-020-02746-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2020] [Accepted: 07/14/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Full-thickness chondral defects at the knee joint predispose to the beginning of a degenerative process which final consequence is the compartment collapse and finally the deviation to varus, because the cartilage of the medial femoral condyle is the most frequently affected area. Likewise, people with these chondral defects are more likely to develop tricompartmental osteoarthritis, reason why early surgical management should be the treatment of choice. The aim of this study was to compare the pre- and post-operative lower limb alignment (mechanical axis), in cases of full-thickness chondral defects of the femoral medial condyle that have been managed by means of a prosthetic focal inlay resurfacing, at a minimum follow-up of five years. METHODS A retrospective study of patients treated for chondral defects in the medial femoral condyle was performed. The inclusion criteria were patients who had undergone a focal inlay resurfacing and minimum follow-up of 5 years. Patients that required a concomitant valguizing tibial osteotomy were finally excluded. The follow-up analysis was performed by means of radiological examinations performed prior to surgery and at the last follow-up visit. The mean limb mechanical axis of the operated knees was calculated both pre- and post-operatively, and comparisons between these two settings were performed. RESULTS Ten patients were included: eight men and two women. The mean age at the time of surgery was 55 (40-65) years. The mean follow-up was 9 years (range 5-15). The mean limb mechanical axis was 1.33 ± 4.16 in the pre-operative setting and 2.40 ± 5.50 in the post-operative setting (p = 0.441). CONCLUSION In the setting of small to moderate size, unique femoral medial condyle full-thickness chondral lesions, filling the defect with an inlay prosthetic resurfacing may protect against the progression to varus deformity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic case series, Level IV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva Cases
- Hospital General de Granollers, Avinguda Francesc Ribas s/n, 08402, Granollers, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Luis Natera
- Hospital General de Granollers, Avinguda Francesc Ribas s/n, 08402, Granollers, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Carlos Antón
- Hospital General de Granollers, Avinguda Francesc Ribas s/n, 08402, Granollers, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Paolo Consigliere
- Royal Berkshire Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London Road, Reading, RG1 5AN, UK
| | - Josep Guillén
- Hospital General de Granollers, Avinguda Francesc Ribas s/n, 08402, Granollers, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Enric Cruz
- Hospital General de Granollers, Avinguda Francesc Ribas s/n, 08402, Granollers, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Manel Garrucho
- Hospital General de Granollers, Avinguda Francesc Ribas s/n, 08402, Granollers, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Focal metallic inlay resurfacing prosthesis in articular cartilage defects: short-term results of 118 patients and 2 different implants. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2020; 140:209-218. [PMID: 31748883 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-019-03305-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2019] [Indexed: 02/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The goal of this study was to share our experience with two different inlay metallic implants in the treatment of knee cartilage defects and to analyze their effects on functional scores. METHODS This retrospective study included 118 patients operated on for focal full-thickness knee cartilage lesions, who were treated with a focal metallic inlay resurfacing prosthesis. A cobalt-chromium (Co-Cr) resurfacing implant was applied to 73 patients with a knee chondral lesion, and a biosynthetic implant was applied to 45. All patients were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively using the KOOS, VAS, and Tegner activity scores. RESULTS The group with the Co-Cr-resurfacing implant showed a significantly greater improvement (p < 0.001) in the Tegner and VAS scores at the 2-year follow-up examination. The KOOS scores were similar in both groups. Median patient age was similar in both groups. All patients had a follow-up of at least 2 years. The preoperative and postoperative scores were compared and significant improvements (p < 0.001) were observed. The biosynthetic implant had a higher revision rate. In the univariate analysis, age and type of implant were significantly associated with revision surgery. In the multivariate Cox-regression analysis model, the type of implant was significantly associated with revision surgery. CONCLUSION All the patients operated with the above-mentioned implants showed significant improvements in pain and activity scores. Despite the overall good clinical results, 17% of patients with a biosynthetic implant and > 6% of patients with Co-Cr-resurfacing implant required revision surgery. Age and implant type were the main risk factors associated with revision.
Collapse
|
19
|
Laursen JO, Mogensen CB, Skjøt-Arkil H. UniCAP offers a long term treatment for middle-aged patients, who are not revised within the first 9 years. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2019; 27:1693-1697. [PMID: 30756129 DOI: 10.1007/s00167-019-05356-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2018] [Accepted: 01/11/2019] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this study was to investigate the long-term outcome of the unicompartmental knee resurfacing prosthesis (UniCAP) using clinical and radiographic assessments, and to evaluate the revision and survival rates. METHODS This was a prospective cohort study of patients with UniCAP prostheses with 6-9 years of follow-up. The clinical examination included the Knee Society Score (KSS) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score. The radiographic examination included the Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grading scale. A comparison analysis of the clinical preoperative and follow-up data and a Kaplan-Meier survival analysis were performed. RESULTS Of the 64 UniCAP patients, 36 (56%) were revised and one died. Examinations were performed on 23 (85%) of them. When compared with the preoperative data, the examinations showed a significant increase in the KSS objective [mean = 47.4, standard deviation (SD) = 5.8 vs. mean = 90.0, SD = 6.9] and function (mean = 46.7, SD = 6.8 vs. mean = 91.1, SD = 6.9) scores, a decrease in the VAS-score (mean = 7.3, SD = 0.5 vs. mean = 3.4, SD = 1.4) and a significant increase in the KL medial score (mean = 1.7, SD = 0.6 vs. mean = 2.1, SD = 0.5). The Kaplan-Meier survival rate after 5 years indicated good long-term outcomes. CONCLUSIONS There was a survival rate of approximately 40% after 9 years of follow-up, but in the group of patients (35-65 years old) not eligible for a final total arthroplasty. These patients were often left with pain and disability. This implant can be a temporary or even long-term treatment because it improved the disability and function over the long-term without a major progression in the osteoarthritis, function or pain. Long term results of this mini-prosthesis have not been previously reported. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jens Ole Laursen
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Hospital of Southern Jutland, Kresten Philipsensvej 15, 6200, Aabenraa, Denmark. .,Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital of Southern Jutland, Soenderborg, Denmark. .,Institute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
| | - Christian Backer Mogensen
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Hospital of Southern Jutland, Kresten Philipsensvej 15, 6200, Aabenraa, Denmark.,Institute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Helene Skjøt-Arkil
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Hospital of Southern Jutland, Kresten Philipsensvej 15, 6200, Aabenraa, Denmark.,Institute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
The cost-effectiveness of osteochondral allograft transplantation in the knee. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2019; 27:1739-1753. [PMID: 30721344 PMCID: PMC6541582 DOI: 10.1007/s00167-019-05392-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2018] [Accepted: 01/30/2019] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Osteochondral allografts (OCA) consist of a layer of hyaline cartilage and a layer of underlying bone. They are used to repair combined defects of articular cartilage and bone. Such defects often occur in people far too young to have knee arthroplasty, for whom the main alternative to OCA is conservative symptomatic care, which will not prevent development of osteoarthritis. The aim of this report was to assess the cost-effectiveness of osteochondral allograft transplantation in the knee. METHODS Systematic review of evidence on clinical effectiveness and economic modelling. RESULTS The evidence on osteochondral allograft transplantation comes from observational studies, but often based on good quality prospective registries of all patients having such surgery. Without controlled trials, it was necessary to use historical cohorts to assess the effect of osteochondral grafts. There is good evidence that OCA are clinically effective with a high graft survival rate over 20 years. If an OCA graft fails, there is some evidence that revision with a second OCA is also effective, though less so than primary OCA. Economic modelling showed that osteochondral allograft transplantation was highly cost-effective, with costs per quality adjusted life year much lower than many other treatments considered cost effective. CONCLUSIONS Osteochondral allograft transplantation appears highly cost-effective though the cost per quality adjusted life year varies according to the widely varying costs of allografts. Based on one small study, revision OCA also appears very cost-effective, but more evidence is needed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II.
Collapse
|
21
|
Focal metallic inlay resurfacing prosthesis for the treatment of localized cartilage defects of the femoral condyles: a systematic review of clinical studies. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2018; 26:2722-2732. [PMID: 28918523 DOI: 10.1007/s00167-017-4714-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2017] [Accepted: 09/08/2017] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To systematically review the results of focal metallic inlay resurfacing prosthesis for the treatment of isolated cartilage defects of the femoral condyles. METHODS A systematic electronic search of the PubMed database and the Cochrane Library was performed in April 2017 to identify studies that reported clinical or radiographic outcome of focal metallic inlay resurfacing prosthesis for the treatment of isolated cartilage defects of the femoral condyles. Included studies were abstracted regarding study characteristics, patient demographics, prosthetic device and location, indications and contraindications, and outcome measures. Outcome of interest included functional outcome scores, radiographic measures, complications, re-operations, and conversion to arthroplasty. The methodologic quality of the included studies was assessed with the Coleman Methodology Score. RESULTS Six studies with a total of 186 patients met the inclusion criteria. Five studies were level IV evidence, and one was level III. The methodologic quality of the included studies was good, with a mean Coleman Methodology Score of 78. Two different implants were used: the HemiCAP® (five studies; 66% of study group) and UniCAP® (one study; 34%) implant. The mean age was 46-54 years, and the mean follow-up was 24 months to 7 years. Pre- and post-operative outcome scores were compared in all six studies, and five studies reported significant improvements at the final follow-up for all scores (objective und functional KSS, KOOS, WOMAC, Tegner, HSS Knee and Function score, SF-36 and SF-12 physical component score) except for the SF-36 and SF-12 mental component score. Progression of osteoarthritis was analysed using the Kellgren-Lawrence grading in three studies (30% of study group), with two studies reporting significant progression. The OARSI grading system was analysed in one study with no significant progression. The overall conversion rate to arthroplasty was 22% with considerable differences between the two implants: 9% for HemiCAP® and 47% for UniCAP®. CONCLUSIONS Focal metallic inlay resurfacing prosthesis seems to be a viable option for a carefully selected group of patients. Significant improvement in knee function and pain was observed in most patients. Uncertainty remains with regard to progression of osteoarthritis because of conflicting results and inconsistent reporting. One out of five patients has to be converted to arthroplasty after an average of 4 years. However, compared to the UniCAP® implant, considerable lower conversion rates were reported for the smaller HemiCAP® implant. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Systematic review of level III and IV studies, Level IV.
Collapse
|